Upgrade libm.
This brings us up to date with FreeBSD HEAD, fixes various bugs, unifies
the set of functions we support on ARM, MIPS, and x86, fixes "long double",
adds ISO C99 support, and adds basic unit tests.
It turns out that our "long double" functions have always been broken
for non-normal numbers. This patch fixes that by not using the upstream
implementations and just forwarding to the regular "double" implementation
instead (since "long double" on Android is just "double" anyway, which is
what BSD doesn't support).
All the tests pass on ARM, MIPS, and x86, plus glibc on x86-64.
Bug: 3169850
Bug: 8012787
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=6697
Change-Id: If0c343030959c24bfc50d4d21c9530052c581837
2013-01-31 04:06:37 +01:00
|
|
|
/*-
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2001-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
|
|
|
|
* All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
|
|
|
|
* are met:
|
|
|
|
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
|
|
|
|
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
|
|
|
|
* ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
|
|
|
|
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
|
|
|
|
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
|
|
|
|
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
|
|
|
|
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
|
|
|
|
* OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
|
|
|
|
* HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
|
|
|
|
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
|
|
|
|
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
|
|
|
|
* SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* $FreeBSD$
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef _COMPLEX_H
|
|
|
|
#define _COMPLEX_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __GNUC__
|
|
|
|
#define _Complex_I ((float _Complex)1.0i)
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __generic
|
|
|
|
_Static_assert(__generic(_Complex_I, float _Complex, 1, 0),
|
|
|
|
"_Complex_I must be of type float _Complex");
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define complex _Complex
|
|
|
|
#define I _Complex_I
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-09 03:11:23 +02:00
|
|
|
#if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L
|
2014-11-06 20:16:55 +01:00
|
|
|
#ifdef __clang__
|
|
|
|
#define CMPLX(x, y) ((double complex){ x, y })
|
|
|
|
#define CMPLXF(x, y) ((float complex){ x, y })
|
|
|
|
#define CMPLXL(x, y) ((long double complex){ x, y })
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
#else
|
2014-11-06 20:16:55 +01:00
|
|
|
#define CMPLX(x, y) __builtin_complex((double)(x), (double)(y))
|
|
|
|
#define CMPLXF(x, y) __builtin_complex((float)(x), (float)(y))
|
|
|
|
#define CMPLXL(x, y) __builtin_complex((long double)(x), (long double)(y))
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2016-06-09 03:11:23 +02:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2014-11-06 20:16:55 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Upgrade libm.
This brings us up to date with FreeBSD HEAD, fixes various bugs, unifies
the set of functions we support on ARM, MIPS, and x86, fixes "long double",
adds ISO C99 support, and adds basic unit tests.
It turns out that our "long double" functions have always been broken
for non-normal numbers. This patch fixes that by not using the upstream
implementations and just forwarding to the regular "double" implementation
instead (since "long double" on Android is just "double" anyway, which is
what BSD doesn't support).
All the tests pass on ARM, MIPS, and x86, plus glibc on x86-64.
Bug: 3169850
Bug: 8012787
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=6697
Change-Id: If0c343030959c24bfc50d4d21c9530052c581837
2013-01-31 04:06:37 +01:00
|
|
|
__BEGIN_DECLS
|
|
|
|
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.5 Trigonometric functions */
|
|
|
|
/* 7.3.5.1 The cacos functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex cacos(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex cacosf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex cacosl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.5.2 The casin functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex casin(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex casinf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex casinl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.5.1 The catan functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex catan(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex catanf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex catanl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.5.1 The ccos functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex ccos(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex ccosf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex ccosl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.5.1 The csin functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex csin(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex csinf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex csinl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.5.1 The ctan functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex ctan(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex ctanf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex ctanl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* 7.3.6 Hyperbolic functions */
|
|
|
|
/* 7.3.6.1 The cacosh functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex cacosh(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex cacoshf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex cacoshl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.6.2 The casinh functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex casinh(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex casinhf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex casinhl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.6.3 The catanh functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex catanh(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex catanhf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex catanhl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.6.4 The ccosh functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex ccosh(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex ccoshf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex ccoshl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.6.5 The csinh functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex csinh(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex csinhf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex csinhl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.6.6 The ctanh functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex ctanh(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex ctanhf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex ctanhl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* 7.3.7 Exponential and logarithmic functions */
|
|
|
|
/* 7.3.7.1 The cexp functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex cexp(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex cexpf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
long double complex cexpl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.7.2 The clog functions */
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex clog(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
|
|
|
float complex clogf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
|
|
|
long double complex clogl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* 7.3.8 Power and absolute-value functions */
|
|
|
|
/* 7.3.8.1 The cabs functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double cabs(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float cabsf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
long double cabsl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_32(21) __INTRODUCED_IN_64(23);
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.8.2 The cpow functions */
|
2016-04-29 22:45:25 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex cpow(double complex, double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
|
|
|
float complex cpowf(float complex, float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
|
|
|
long double complex cpowl(long double complex, long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_FUTURE;
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.8.3 The csqrt functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex csqrt(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex csqrtf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
long double complex csqrtl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_32(21) __INTRODUCED_IN_64(23);
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* 7.3.9 Manipulation functions */
|
|
|
|
/* 7.3.9.1 The carg functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double carg(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float cargf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
long double cargl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.9.2 The cimag functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double cimag(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float cimagf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
long double cimagl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.9.3 The conj functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex conj(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex conjf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
long double complex conjl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.9.4 The cproj functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double complex cproj(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float complex cprojf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
long double complex cprojl(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN_32(21) __INTRODUCED_IN_64(23);
|
Add missing <complex.h> functions.
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
2016-03-11 23:49:13 +01:00
|
|
|
/* 7.3.9.5 The creal functions */
|
2016-04-29 21:00:55 +02:00
|
|
|
double creal(double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
float crealf(float complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
|
|
|
long double creall(long double complex) __INTRODUCED_IN(23);
|
Upgrade libm.
This brings us up to date with FreeBSD HEAD, fixes various bugs, unifies
the set of functions we support on ARM, MIPS, and x86, fixes "long double",
adds ISO C99 support, and adds basic unit tests.
It turns out that our "long double" functions have always been broken
for non-normal numbers. This patch fixes that by not using the upstream
implementations and just forwarding to the regular "double" implementation
instead (since "long double" on Android is just "double" anyway, which is
what BSD doesn't support).
All the tests pass on ARM, MIPS, and x86, plus glibc on x86-64.
Bug: 3169850
Bug: 8012787
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=6697
Change-Id: If0c343030959c24bfc50d4d21c9530052c581837
2013-01-31 04:06:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__END_DECLS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif /* _COMPLEX_H */
|