pthread_exit(): reduce duplication.

Strictly, this is more of "swap one form of duplication for another", but
I found the existing code non-obvious in part because people have added new
code under existing comments (which don't apply), in two places. At this
point, duplicating the _condition_ (which is much less likely to change at
all, let alone grow more complex) clarifies the code and makes the comments
match the code they're adjacent to again.

Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Ic8f01dc5b4fd14e942bf8dd7c72cab7df06d99d5
This commit is contained in:
Elliott Hughes 2024-05-24 14:47:40 -04:00
parent 7c22b4c372
commit 118d5da898

View file

@ -133,20 +133,17 @@ void pthread_exit(void* return_value) {
// pthread_internal_t is freed below with stack, not here.
__pthread_internal_remove(thread);
if (thread->mmap_size != 0) {
// We need to free mapped space for detached threads when they exit.
// That's not something we can do in C.
__notify_thread_exit_callbacks();
__hwasan_thread_exit();
_exit_with_stack_teardown(thread->mmap_base, thread->mmap_size);
}
}
// No need to free mapped space. Either there was no space mapped, or it is left for
// the pthread_join caller to clean up.
__notify_thread_exit_callbacks();
__hwasan_thread_exit();
if (old_state == THREAD_DETACHED && thread->mmap_size != 0) {
// We need to free mapped space for detached threads when they exit.
// That's not something we can do in C.
_exit_with_stack_teardown(thread->mmap_base, thread->mmap_size);
}
// No need to free mapped space. Either there was no space mapped,
// or it is left for the pthread_join caller to clean up.
__exit(0);
}