From 1bfe5342744cc6f3f487627fb28b273eea7f4b27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 12:56:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] riscv64: don't use jalr when we can just say call.

We don't actually care about the length of this jump, and lld will relax
it to a jal when possible anyway. Better to have people copy & paste
call and tail than jal and j.

Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I889044b95fbb5567189a0d6ef31f81df0e0383cd
---
 linker/arch/riscv64/begin.S | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/linker/arch/riscv64/begin.S b/linker/arch/riscv64/begin.S
index f7509c6dd..21665cbe9 100644
--- a/linker/arch/riscv64/begin.S
+++ b/linker/arch/riscv64/begin.S
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ ENTRY(_start)
   .cfi_undefined ra
 
   mv a0, sp
-  jal __linker_init
+  call __linker_init
 
   // __linker_init returns the address of the entry point in the main image.
   jr a0