The NDK doesn't support anything older than API level 16, so remove some
more clutter.
Test: builds
Change-Id: If257a27841396af001b089b7ae0fbd8c3e0128e4
The NDK only supports >= 16, so remove anything older than that to avoid
giving the misleading impression that such old targets are still
supported.
(This change doesn't touch <unistd.h>. I'll follow up with that once the
outstanding FORTIFY changes to that file are in.)
Test: builds
Change-Id: I6cc6ecdb99fe228a4afa71f78e5fd45309ba9786
When building the bionic tests, we use -fno-builtins, which turns off
clang's recognition of vfork as a magical function that can return
twice. Explicitly annotate our returns_twice functions to ensure that
we generate correct code even in -fno-builtins (and while we're at it,
annotate the no_return functions as well, so we generate faster code).
Bug: http://b/131856005
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I465f8042a965f0c7c03caa5f17af67deea8f5d9d
In particular, document the fact that they only affect the calling thread
on Android.
Bug: http://b/13134174
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: Ica6af451400d47e24358f59495ded63b2110eb8b
Now that we have a clang that supports transparent overloads, we can
kill all of this cruft, and restore our upstream sources to their
untouched glory. Woohoo!
Bug: 12231437
Test: Built aosp_marlin; no obvious patch-related aosp_mips issues.
Change-Id: I520a19d014f12137f80e43f973dccd6711c571cd
We're still seeing lots of confusion. People do seem to look as far as
the headers, but stop there. So let's try a bit harder to point them in
the right direction.
Also explicitly state that removing _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is the
behavior-preserving fix for compilation problems when upgrading to NDK
r15 or later.
Bug: N/A
Test: N/A
Change-Id: I2d5c65b2fb5cccb9977901e51fea1ad2ccc0fd95
I'm skeptical about the usefulness of this, but it's in POSIX, it's
in glibc (but not iOS), and it is used in some internal source (test
runners and container code).
Bug: N/A
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: I92c5398f2a679b21a33fba92bc8e67e3ae2eb76f
Surprisingly to me, there are actual uses of `swab` in the codebases
I have available to search, including one with a #ifndef __ANDROID__
around it.
Bug: N/A
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: Ic91b78ae22bb65c346cb46dd38916f48d979abe0
Spotted while adding syncfs(2). I'd previously seen that this file already
had names, but apparently not inspected them. A couple were missing, a
couple (pipe/pipe2) could usefully have a more specific type, and many
hadruntogethercstylenames.
Bug: http://b/64613623
Test: builds
Change-Id: I6b4a131bf51bf04825317ec481bc55e87c88c2b3
GMM calls this system call directly at the moment. That's silly.
Bug: http://b/36405699
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: I1e14c0e5ce0bc2aa888d884845ac30dc20f13cd5
This patch cleans up our standard headers by moving most of the FORTIFY
cruft out in to its own sandbox. In order to include the *_chk and
*_real declarations, you can either enable FORTIFY, or `#define
__BIONIC_DECLARE_FORTIFY_HELPERS`.
Both sys/select.h and strings.h are explicitly ignored by this patch.
Both of these files have very small __BIONIC_FORTIFY blocks, and don't
define any actual FORTIFY'ed functions (just macros, and 3 *_chk
functions).
This patch also makes the versioner ignore the FORTIFY implementation
headers, since we're guaranteed to pick the FORTIFY'ed headers up when
looking at the regular headers. (...Not to mention that making the
FORTIFY'ed headers freestanding would be annoying to do and maintain for
~no benefit).
We bake the knowledge of where FORTIFY headers live directly into the
versioner. We could go with a more general approach (e.g. adding an -X
IGNORED_FILE flag that tells the versioner to ignore
$HEADER_PATH/$IGNORED_FILE), but we'd then have to repeat that for every
test, every manual invocation of the versioner, etc. for no benefit
that's obvious to me.
Bug: 12231437
Test: m checkbuild on bullhead internal master + CtsBionicTestCases. no
new errors.
Change-Id: Iffc0cc609009b33d989cdaddde0a809282131a5b
We had several bugs filed saying "if I set _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 when
targeting an API < L, various functions are missing". Instead of
saying "yes, they are", we quietly just modified the header files to
expose the non-64-bit variants. This makes no sense. We can't just say
"oh, yeah, we don't have a version of this function that agrees with
your calling code about how large off_t is, but here's a version that
doesn't: I'm sure it'll be fine".
_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 on Android LP32 has always been a game of chance,
but that game should be "are all the functions my code needs available
at compile time?", not "will my code actually work at run time?".
Bug: https://github.com/android-ndk/ndk/issues/449
Bug: https://github.com/android-ndk/ndk/issues/442
Bug: https://github.com/android-ndk/ndk/issues/333
Bug: https://github.com/android-ndk/ndk/issues/332
Bug: https://github.com/android-ndk/ndk/issues/324
Test: builds
Change-Id: Ib095251d3e21e77ed50cc3575388107fecec4ecd
pass_object_size(N) forwards the result of __builtin_object_size(param,
N) to a function. So, a function that looks like:
size_t foo(void *const p __pass_object_size) { return __bos0(p); }
int bar = foo(baz);
would effectively be turned into
size_t foo(void *const p, size_t sz) { return sz; }
int bar = foo(baz, __bos(baz)); // note that this is not __bos0
This is bad, since if we're using __bos0, we want more relaxed
objectsize checks.
__bos0 should be more permissive than __bos in all cases, so this
change Should Be Fine™.
This change also makes GCC and clang share another function's
implementation (recv). I just realized we need to add special
diagnostic-related overloads bits for clang to it, but I can do that in
another patch.
Bug: None
Test: Bullhead builds and boots; CtsBionicTestCases passes.
Change-Id: I6818d0041328ab5fd0946a1e57321a977c1e1250
This patch adds clang-style FORTIFY to Bionic. For more information on
FORTIFY, please see https://goo.gl/8HS2dW . This implementation works
for versions of clang that don't support diagnose_if, so please see the
"without diagnose_if" sections. We plan to swap to a diagnose_if-based
FORTIFY later this year (since it doesn't really add any features; it
just simplifies the implementation a lot, and it gives us much prettier
diagnostics)
Bug: 32073964
Test: Builds on angler, bullhead, marlin, sailfish. Bionic CTS tests
pass on Angler and Bullhead.
Change-Id: I607aecbeee81529709b1eee7bef5b0836151eb2b
These names were pretty misleading (aka "backwards"), so switch to the
same obvious names glibc uses.
Test: build.
Change-Id: Ia98c9dbbccd0820386116562347654e84669034a
Give a compile time diagnostic when the nullptr sentinel is missing
from an execl family call, instead of just pulling arbitrary values.
Bug: http://b/30793878
Change-Id: I1c49005c58b7ad4a5b04f0435b722d4c744e8f0e
Test: Built bullhead
Future API levels aren't known (e.g. 25 could be a maintenance release
of N that doesn't contain any bionic updates), so use a placeholder
macro that we can find and replace with the actual API level before each
release.
Bug: http://b/28178111
Change-Id: I667fe53ea1ac49b64135170fc30d5dbe9df94e29
{get,set}domainname aren't in POSIX but are widely-implemented
extensions.
The Linux kernel provides a setdomainname syscall but not a symmetric
getdomainname syscall, since it expects userspace to get the domain name
from uname(2).
Change-Id: I96726c242f4bb646c130b361688328b0b97269a0
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
This has been requested a few times over the years. This is basically
a very late rebase of https://android-review.googlesource.com/45470
which was abandoned years ago. One addition is that this version has
_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 support.
POSIX puts this in <unistd.h>. glibc also has it in <fcntl.h>.
Bug: http://b/13077650
Change-Id: I5862b1dc326e326c01ad92438ecc1578d19ba739
Make unistd.h usable from all platform versions.
Also name all function parameters for Android Studio.
Bug: http://b/21952040
Change-Id: Ia1777fd4a6d4e37f25cc402c28fb78c003e481e3
These are just based on the read/pread{,64} implementations with the
function calls and error messages adjusted as appropriate. The only
difference is that the buffer parameters are const.
Change-Id: Ida1597a903807f583f230d74bcedffdb7b24fcf6
I still don't think we can make stdio's fseeko and ftello work, but we can
have everything else, and very few programs use fseeko/ftello (and they can
just refrain from using _FILE_OFFSET_BITS and be no worse off than they are
today).
Bug: 11865851
Change-Id: Ic3cb409aae6713f4b345de954bcc4241fcd969ec
