The bionic benchmarks set the decay time in various ways, but
don't necessarily restore it properly. Add a new method for
getting the current decay time and then a way to restore it.
Right now the assumption is that the decay time defaults to zero,
but in the near future that assumption might be incorrect. Therefore
using this method will future proof the code.
Bug: 302212507
Test: Unit tests pass for both static and dynamic executables.
Test: Ran bionic benchmarks that were modified.
Change-Id: Ia77ff9ffee3081c5c1c02cb4309880f33b284e82
Create a second set of system properties, that can be overlaid over the
real ones if necessary, for appcompat purposes.
Bug: 291814949
Ignore-AOSP-First: Aosp -> internal merge conflict
Test: manual, treehugger, system_properties_test
Change-Id: I884a78b67679c1f0b90a6c0159b17ab007f8cc60
Adds support for the dynamic entries to specify MTE enablement. This is
now the preferred way for dynamically linked executables to specify to
the loader what mode MTE should be in, and whether stack MTE should be
enabled. In future, this is also needed for MTE globals support.
Leave the existing ELF note parsing as a backup option because dynamic
entries are not supported for fully static executables, and there's
still a bunch of glue sitting around in the build system and tests that
explicitly include the note. When -fsanitize=memtag* is specified, lld
will create the note implicitly (along with the new dynamic entries),
but at some point once we've cleaned up all the old references to the
note, we can remove the notegen from lld.
Bug: N/A
Test: atest bionic-unit-tests CtsBionicTestCases --test-filter=*Memtag*
Test: Build/boot the device under _fullmte.
Change-Id: I954b7e78afa5ff4274a3948b968cfad8eba94d88
The first app developer (we know of) that hit this didn't understand
what it was trying to tell them.
Before:
FORTIFY: fcntl(F_SETFD) passed non-FD_CLOEXEC flag: 0x801
After:
FORTIFY: fcntl(F_SETFD) only supports FD_CLOEXEC but was passed 0x801
Bug: https://issuetracker.google.com/304348746
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I8522e851d8f74c91152ebae68b083b5272d49255
The NDK only supports API 21 and later, so we don't need to worry
about older API levels any more.
All the functions in this file are trivial, being but a single
instruction on most architectures. For that reason, we inline them by
default. (We continue to also provide actual symbols for any caller
that needs them --- in particular existing binaries!)
Also inline all the _l() variants too. No-one should be using them,
but since we're already using trickery to only implement the non-_l()
variants once, we may as well use the same trick for both.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I17637c49dd14be9e5ecb8246e72e8acc662739f1
strerrordesc_np() isn't very useful (being just another name for
strerror()), but strerrorname_np() lets you get "ENOSYS" for ENOSYS,
which will make some of our test assertion messages clearer when we
switch over from strerror().
This also adds `%#m` formatting to all the relevant functions.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Icfe07a39a307d591c3f4f2a09d008dc021643062
Currently, we use sentinels (starting with -1 and ending with 0) in
preinit_array/init_array/fini_array in executables. But after using LTO,
the sentinels can be reordered by LLD and no longer work. So make below
changes to not rely on them:
1. In crtbegin.c, use symbols (like __init_array_start) inserted by the
linker.
2. Add array_count fields in structors_array_t.
3. In static libc, use array_count fields to decide array lengths.
4. To make new dynamic executables work with old libc.so, create a fake
fini_array with sentinels, and pass it to __libc_init. The fake
fini_array contains a function to call functions in real fini_array.
5. To make old dynamic executables work with new libc.so, libc.so
still uses sentinels to decide the length of fini_array.
Bug: 295944813
Bug: https://github.com/android/ndk/issues/1461
Test: run bionic-unit-tests-static
Test: test static executables manually
Test: boot cf_gwear_x86-trunk_staging-userdebug
Change-Id: I1ce31f07bcfe0e99b4237984898a8fc9e98ff426
When used in an ifunc resolver, errno@plt won't be available. This is
the API the rivos folks contributing to glibc are leaning towards, for
the same reason. Hit by the berberis folks because they don't implement
the syscall so they were trying to set errno to ENOSYS.
Tested by looking at the generated assembler, and also disabling the
vdso (since on actual systems, this will go via the vdso).
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Ie2779110f141f20efe97cb892fbdefd808b5339b
musl already added tcgetwinsize() and tcsetwinsize(), but I didn't
notice.
Trivial single-line inlines added to a header that's already written
that way.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Iac95ea6a89f3872025c512f7e61987b81d0aafa7
This is a bit disappointing. I'd not implemented this in the past
because it wasn't available on all platforms, and -- although the
riscv64 implementation was just a cool optimization -- I thought that
the /sys stuff was actually portable, until I ran it on arm64 hardware.
So here we have getauxval() for riscv64, /sys for x86-64, and our best
guess based on ctr_el0 for arm64.
Bug: http://b/294034962
Test: ran tests on the host, an arm64 device, and riscv64 host and qemu
Change-Id: I420b69b976d30668d4d2ac548c4229e2a4eafb20
I've also added doc comments for everything in <sys/epoll.h>.
I've also broken up the old "smoke" test (which was taking 2s on my
riscv64 qemu) to keep the total runtime for all the tests down to 200ms.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Icd939af51886fdf21432653a07373c1a0f26e422
Android V will support page size agnostic targets. The bionic macro
PAGE_SIZE won't be defined for the agnostic targets.
The PAGE_SIZE macro will be replaced by max_page_size() instead.
- For not agnostic builds, max_page_size() will be replaced by 4096.
- For agnostic builds, it will be replaced by 16384
Bug: 296907948
Test: source build/envsetup.sh
lunch aosp_cf_arm64_phone_pgagnostic
m
source build/envsetup.sh
aosp_cf_x86_64_phone-userdebug
m
Change-Id: I81731a2ec59decd19ab9fd714d4f2ac20df873b7
Use the real page size from getauxval() for memtag stack
MTE protection.
Bug: 296275298
Test: atest -c bionic-unit-tests
Change-Id: I1711291b918b09e5464f1d15358dd1ff7fa2f371
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Talking futher to the person doing the glibc risc-v ifunc work, they
clarified that glibc _is_ passing hwcap as the first argument, and the
null pointer is actually the second argument.
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-August/150967.html
So since our whole purpose here was source compatibility, let's do what
they're actually doing, and let's add some tests. I've also added a test
that __riscv_hwprobe() works from an ifunc resolver because that's one
place where it might well be used. That said, one other thing that came
out of the discussion is that I actually went away and looked at a
sample of top apps to see how many are using ifuncs currently. The
result? Zero. So although this _might_ be interesting long term
(especially if clang gets riscv64 FMV), I think we've done more than we
need to with riscv64 ifuncs for now!
Test: ran locally, both dynamic and static tests
Change-Id: Ie2044d9f4e47c32c00ad381f045c537f4df38b08
Under some circumstances, it's possible to fail the enable allocation
limit android_mallopt call. Increase the total allowed time for the
function to complete.
In addition, if the enable fails, allow another limit call to succeed
in the future.
Finally, change the limit test to use _exit instead of exit.
Bug: 291672185
Test: Ran limit test thousands of times.
Test: Forced the limit to fail and verified the second call passes.
Change-Id: I0948e6fd97231a7538b9b82b76f0a207386681b1
