These directories all have Android.bp files that are always used now,
delete the Android.mk files.
Change-Id: Ib0ba2d28bff88483b505426ba61606da314e03ab
It turns out that at least the Nexus 9 kernel is built without CONFIG_QUOTA.
If we decide we're going to mandate quota functionality, I'm happy for us to
be a part of CTS that ensures that happens, but I don't want to be first, so
there's not much to test here other than "will it compile?". The strace
output looks right though.
Bug: http://b/27948821
Bug: http://b/27952303
Change-Id: If667195eee849ed17c8fa9110f6b02907fc8fc04
Previously, the implementation of setjmp on x86_64 claimed that
sigprocmask would write to two longs' worth of bytes.
Bug: http://b/27856501
Change-Id: I9f32b40ac773a0cd91a976aace5bfba6e67fb0f8
{get,set}domainname aren't in POSIX but are widely-implemented
extensions.
The Linux kernel provides a setdomainname syscall but not a symmetric
getdomainname syscall, since it expects userspace to get the domain name
from uname(2).
Change-Id: I96726c242f4bb646c130b361688328b0b97269a0
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
I can only assume I was testing the 32-bit implementation when I claimed
this worked. While improving the 32-bit code I realized that I'd used
signed comparisons instead of unsigned, and came back to find that the
64-bit code didn't work.
By way of apology, make x86-64 the first architecture where __memset_chk
falls through to memset.
Change-Id: I54d9eee5349b6a2abb2ce81e161fdcde09556561
Exactly which functions get a stack protector is up to the compiler, so
let's separate the code that sets up the environment stack protection
requires and explicitly build it with -fno-stack-protector.
Bug: http://b/26276517
Change-Id: I8719e23ead1f1e81715c32c1335da868f68369b5
The mremap definition was incorrect (unsigned long instead of int) and
it was missing the optional new_address parameter.
Change-Id: Ib9d0675aaa098c21617cedc9b2b8cf267be3aec4
This moves the generic arm/arm64/x86 settings into the main makefiles
and makes the rest of them derivatives. This better aligns with how
soong handles arch/cpu variants.
Also updates the Android.bp to make it consistent with the make
versions.
Change-Id: I5a0275d992bc657459eb6fe1697ad2336731d122
A continuation of commit 2825f10b7f.
Add O_PATH compatibility support for flistxattr(). This allows
a process to list out all the extended attributes associated with
O_PATH file descriptors.
Change-Id: Ie2285ac7ad2e4eac427ddba6c2d182d41b130f75
Support O_PATH file descriptors when handling fgetxattr and fsetxattr.
This avoids requiring file read access to pull extended attributes.
This is needed to support O_PATH file descriptors when calling
SELinux's fgetfilecon() call. In particular, this allows the querying
and setting of SELinux file context by using something like the following
code:
int dirfd = open("/path/to/dir", O_DIRECTORY);
int fd = openat(dirfd, "file", O_PATH | O_NOFOLLOW);
char *context;
fgetfilecon(fd, &context);
This change was motivated by a comment in
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/152680/1/toys/posix/ls.c
Change-Id: Ic0cdf9f9dd0e35a63b44a4c4a08400020041eddf
This doesn't affect code like Chrome that correctly ignores EINTR on
close, makes code that tries TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY work (where before it might
have closed a different fd and appeared to succeed, or had a bogus EBADF),
and makes "goto fail" code work (instead of mistakenly assuming that EINTR
means that the close failed).
Who loses? Anyone actively trying to detect that they caught a signal while
in close(2). I don't think those people exist, and I think they have better
alternatives available.
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=269623
Bug: http://b/20501816
Change-Id: I11e2f66532fe5d1b0082b2433212e24bdda8219b
The kernel system call faccessat() does not have any flags arguments,
so passing flags to the kernel is currently ignored.
Fix the kernel system call so that no flags argument is passed in.
Ensure that we don't support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW. This non-POSIX
(http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/access.html)
flag is a glibc extension, and has non-intuitive, error prone behavior.
For example, consider the following code:
symlink("foo.is.dangling", "foo");
if (faccessat(AT_FDCWD, "foo", R_OK, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) == 0) {
int fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "foo", O_RDONLY | O_NOFOLLOW);
}
The faccessat() call in glibc will return true, but an attempt to
open the dangling symlink will end up failing. GLIBC documents this
as returning the access mode of the symlink itself, which will
always return true for any symlink on Linux.
Some further discussions of this are at:
* http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/toybox-landley.net/2014-September/003617.html
* http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6952
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW seems broken by design. I suspect this is why this
function was never added to POSIX. (note that "access" is pretty much
broken by design too, since it introduces a race condition between
check and action). We shouldn't support this until it's clearly
documented by POSIX or we can have it produce intuitive results.
Don't support AT_EACCESS for now. Implementing it is complicated, and
pretty much useless on Android, since we don't have setuid binaries.
See http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=0a05eace163cee9b08571d2ff9d90f5e82d9c228
for how an implementation might look.
Bug: 18867827
Change-Id: I25b86c5020f3152ffa3ac3047f6c4152908d0e04
The overflow's actually in the generic C implementation of memchr.
While I'm here, let's switch our generic memrchr to the OpenBSD version too.
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=147048
Change-Id: I296ae06a1ee196d2c77c95a22f11ee4d658962da
In https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/127908/5/libc/SYSCALLS.TXT@116
Elliott said:
for LP64 these will be hidden. for LP32 we were cowards and left
them all public for compatibility (though i don't think we ever
dremeled to see whether it was needed). we don't have an easy
way to recognize additions, though, so we can't prevent adding
new turds.
Add a mechanism to prevent the adding of new turds, and use that
mechanism on the fchmod/fchmodat system calls.
Bug: 19233951
Change-Id: I98f98345970b631a379f348df57858f9fc3d57c0
Many libc functions have an option to not follow symbolic
links. This is useful to avoid security sensitive code
from inadvertantly following attacker supplied symlinks
and taking inappropriate action on files it shouldn't.
For example, open() has O_NOFOLLOW, chown() has
lchown(), stat() has lstat(), etc.
There is no such equivalent function for chmod(), such as lchmod().
To address this, POSIX introduced fchmodat(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW),
which is intended to provide a way to perform a chmod operation
which doesn't follow symlinks.
Currently, the Linux kernel doesn't implement AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW.
In GLIBC, attempting to use the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag causes
fchmodat to return ENOTSUP. Details are in "man fchmodat".
Bionic currently differs from GLIBC in that AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW
is silently ignored and treated as if the flag wasn't present.
This patch provides a userspace implementation of
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW for bionic. Using open(O_PATH | O_NOFOLLOW),
we can provide a way to atomically change the permissions on
files without worrying about race conditions.
As part of this change, we add support for fchmod on O_PATH
file descriptors, because it's relatively straight forward
and could be useful in the future.
The basic idea behind this implementation comes from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14578 , specifically
comment #10.
Change-Id: I1eba0cdb2c509d9193ceecf28f13118188a3cfa7
They'd drifted slightly which led to a compilation error in toybox,
which was assuming pid_t was defined. arm and arm64 were picking it
up via <endian.h> but x86 wasn't.
Change-Id: I58401e6c0066959dfc3b305b020876aaf7074bbf
This change provides __restore/__restore_rt on x86 and __restore_rt on
x86_64 with unwinding information to be able to unwind through signal
frame via libgcc provided unwinding interface. See comments inlined for
more details.
Also remove the test that had a dependency on
__attribute__((cleanup(foo_cleanup))). It doesn't provide us with any
better test coverage than we have from the newer tests, and it doesn't
work well across a variety architectures (presumably because no one uses
this attribute in the real world).
Tested this on host via bionic-unit-tests-run-on-host on both x86 and
x86-64.
Bug: 17436734
Change-Id: I2f06814e82c8faa732cb4f5648868dc0fd2e5fe4
Signed-off-by: Pavel Chupin <pavel.v.chupin@intel.com>
Add the missing prototypes, fix the existing prototypes to use clockid_t
rather than int, fix clock_nanosleep's failure behavior, and add simple
tests.
Bug: 17644443
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=77372
Change-Id: I03fba369939403918abcabae9551a7123953d780
Signed-off-by: Haruki Hasegawa <h6a.h4i.0@gmail.com>
