sincos and sincosf are being tested more thoroughly with a table of data,
but there's nothing equivalent for sincosl.
Test: ran the tests, obviously.
Change-Id: I5b4b22b73cad9b0030549de2e2ed2a0e38648806
Future API levels aren't known (e.g. 25 could be a maintenance release
of N that doesn't contain any bionic updates), so use a placeholder
macro that we can find and replace with the actual API level before each
release.
Bug: http://b/28178111
Change-Id: I667fe53ea1ac49b64135170fc30d5dbe9df94e29
Some symbols appeared at different times between 32 and 64 bit. Add a
macro to represent this.
Bug: http://b/28178111
Change-Id: I0aa46d9da3c7301b60df0416bce252f0f37b7b36
complex_test.cpp is compiled with both bionic and glibc, so when
__INTRODUCED_IN starts being used in <complex.h>, we'll need this to
keep it building.
Bug: http://b/28178111
Change-Id: I6431111be35288cad72e9c23ca8599f548b6d906
FreeBSD doesn't seem interested in having low-quality implementations of
these functions:
cacoshl, cacosl, casinhl, casinl, catanhl, catanl, ccoshl, ccosl, cexpl,
clog, clogf, clogl, cpow, cpowf, cpowl, csinhl, csinl, ctanhl, ctanl.
And they still haven't got round to writing good implementations, so for
now let's just take the NetBSD ones so we have the full set.
Bug: http://b/27555792
Change-Id: I6b72003cf749b1043f006377a01fffe5e1d659bc
We build libm with -fvisibility=hidden, so we weren't exporting any
of the <complex.h> functions.
We also weren't building many of the functions anyway.
We were also missing the complex inverse trigonometric functions.
And because we didn't even have perfunctory "call each function once"
tests, we didn't notice that we weren't exporting any symbols, so this
patch adds at least that level of testing.
Change-Id: Ibcf2843f507126c51d134cc5fc8d67747e033a0d
