Hopefully this is totally unambiguous and non-confusing output:
```
Expected equality of these values:
Errno(22)
Which is: EINVAL
Errno((*__errno()))
Which is: ENOSYS
```
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Iefe6a8a6447e76681c18256d2713e2c527081c75
We've talked about this many times in the past, but partners struggle to
understand "expected 38, got 22" in these contexts, and I always have to
go and check the header files just to be sure I'm sure.
I actually think the glibc geterrorname_np() function (which would
return "ENOSYS" rather than "Function not implemented") would be more
helpful, but I'll have to go and implement that first, and then come
back.
Being forced to go through all our errno assertions did also make me
want to use a more consistent style for our ENOSYS assertions in
particular --- there's a particularly readable idiom, and I'll also come
back and move more of those checks to the most readable idiom.
I've added a few missing `errno = 0`s before tests, and removed a few
stray `errno = 0`s from tests that don't actually make assertions about
errno, since I had to look at every single reference to errno anyway.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Iba7c56f2adc30288c3e00ade106635e515e88179
If this is a low ram device, then do not run these tests. Otherwise,
verify that memory returned from the allocator is zero.
Bug: 171429763
Bug: 264539505
Bug: 265431478
Test: New unit tests pass on scudo.
Test: New unit tests fail on original jemalloc.
Test: New unit tests pass on jemalloc that always zeroes memory.
Test: New unit tests are skipped on low ram device.
Test: Ran unit tests atest CtsBionicTestCases in above scenarios.
Change-Id: Id62ab74f649c0f7c14a951235fe79972926ecec0
Adds persistent sysprops for test infra usage, and adds the tests for
the sysprops.
The test does some fancy flocking in order to restore any existing
GWP-ASan sysprop usage in the test cleanup.
Bug: 236738714
Test: atest bionic-unit-tests
Change-Id: I8956296d39c98ce8c7dd0a703b240530d8ad48db
