At the time I added <stdio_ext.h>, I just added what was on the man
page (which matched glibc), not realizing that musl and glibc had
slightly different functionality in their headers.
The toybox maintainer came up with a legitimate use case for this, for
which there is no portable workaround, so I'm adding it here. I'm not
adding the other functions that are in musl but not glibc for lack of a
motivating use case.
Bug: http://lists.landley.net/htdig.cgi/toybox-landley.net/2022-April/020864.html
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I073baa86ff0271064d4e2f20a584d38787ead6b0
Coming to C23 via WG14 N2630.
This one is a little interesting, because it actually changes existing
behavior. Previously "0b101" would be parsed as "0", "b", "101" by these
functions. I'm led to believe that glibc plans to actually have separate
versions of these functions for C23 and pre-C23, so callers can have the
behavior they (implicitly) specify by virtue of which -std= they compile
with. Android has never really done anything like that, and I'm pretty
sure app developers have more than enough to worry about with API levels
without having to deal with the cartesian product of API level and C
standard.
Therefore, my plan A is "if you're running on Android >= U, you get C23
behavior". My plan B in the (I think unlikely) event that that actually
causes trouble for anyone is "if you're _targeting_ Android >= U, you
get C23 behavior". I don't think we'd actually want to have two versions
of each of these functions under any circumstances --- that seems by far
the most confusing option.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I0bbb30315d3fabd306905ad1484361f5d8745935
Coming to C23 via WG14 N2630, and already in glibc.
We're still missing clang support for %b and %B in format string checking,
but it's probably easier to fix this first. (Apparently GCC already has
support because of glibc.)
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Ie8bfe4630d00c50e1d047d6756a7f799205356db
The FILE::_read function pointer takes an int rather than a size_t, so
we need to be careful to break large reads up for it.
fwrite() hasn't (yet) been optimized in this way, so it's immune for
now, but add the corresponding write test anyway.
Seeking already uses a off64_t function pointer where possible, so I
don't think there's anything more to be done there.
No other function pointers in FILE are relevant.
Bug: https://issuetracker.google.com/240139009
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Ife2537e10f178bb0d980719592539f4b00b67031
This came up with POSIX recently. Doesn't seem like it matters since
everyone's had this wrong for 40 years, but "meh" --- it's a trivial
fix, and it's strictly correct even if nobody needs this, so let's just
do it...
(Geoff Clare pointed out that my app compat concern "what if someone's
relying on this bug to pass flags to the shell?" isn't relevant because
while you can indeed do that, you then can't pass a command!)
Bug: https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1440
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I64f6440da55e2dc29d0136ee62007197d2f00d46
On LP32, just abort if we're asked to handle an fd that's too big for
the `short` field in `struct FILE`. This is unreachable anyway because
the ulimit is 32Ki, and this will make issues far more noticeable if we
ever do increase that limit (which seems unlikely for LP32 devices).
Also rename __finit() to __FILE_init() to match __FILE_close().
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I5db4d6c4529a1f558aff135b4dea071d73666be5
This has been in the standard since C99, but we've never supported it
before. It's apparently used by SPIRV-Tools.
I tried implementing this the other way (with fcntl(2)) first, but
eventually realized that that's more complicated and gives worse
results. This implementation assumes that /proc is mounted, but so much
of libc relies on that at this point that I don't think there's any
realistic case where the fcntl(2) implementation would be preferable,
and there are many where it's not.
The fact that no-one's mentioned this until now suggests that it's not a
heavily used feature anyway.
I've also replaced AssertCloseOnExec() with a CloseOnExec()
boolean-valued function instead, because it's really annoying getting
assertion failures that don't point you at the test line in question,
and instead point to some common helper code.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Ia2e53bf2664a4f782581042054ecd492830e2aed
Mostly from extra test cases, but also:
* Move the fgets size < 0 assertion into fgets.
* Use ELF aliases for strtoq/strtouq rather than duplicating code.
* Don't check uname() succeeded, since it can't fail.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I2e6b3b88b0a3eb16bd68be68b9bc9f40d8043291
Plain __ for generated syscalls didn't mean it was a hidden symbol, it
just meant "please don't use this". We added ___ to signify that a
hidden symbol should be generated, but then we added the map files
anyway so you now have to explicitly export symbols. Given that, this
convention serves no particular purpose so we may as well just use the
nicer names have everything look the same.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: If424e17a49c36f4be545f5d283c4561a6ea9c7ea
The locking can fail in a couple of ways:
- A concurrent fread from an unbuffered or line-buffered file flushes
the output of other line-buffered files, and if _fwalk locks every
file, then the fread blocks until other file reads have completed.
- __sfp can initialize a file lock while _fwalk is locking/unlocking it.
For now, revert to the behavior Bionic had in previous releases. This
commit reverts the file locking parts of commit
468efc80da.
Bug: http://b/131251441
Bug: http://b/130189834
Test: bionic unit tests
Change-Id: I9e20b9cd8ccd14e7962f7308e174f08af72b56c6
We regressed on this recently: code under the upstream-* directories has
_PATH_BSHELL defined as a call to __bionic_get_shell_path(). In our own
code, we may as well just call it directly.
Bug: https://issuetracker.google.com/129030706
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: Ic2423f521272be95e67f94771772fe8072636ef0
We don't need this now that popen always uses O_CLOEXEC, and it's unsafe
because _fwalk takes a lock. (In <= P, the equivalent code walked the
list without a lock in the child.)
Bug: http://b/129156634
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: Ic9cee7eb59cfc9397f370d1dc47ea3d3326179ca
I failed to convince the compiler/linker to just refrain (via factoring out,
attribute `noinline`, or meddling with `--icf=none`), but luckily I noticed
that we should have CHECK_FP in each function for a better error message,
and the distinct error messages keep the two functions apart.
(Also add a missing CHECK_FP to `clearerr_unlocked`.)
Bug: http://b/116969207
Test: manual with a modified `crasher`
Change-Id: Ic122e90e94f7e22f486be57d3dac7137a225d682
There's TLS space used for unknown errno values, and a call to printf
shouldn't clobber that. No-one will ever hit this in real life, but
since it's easily fixed...
Bug: http://b/112776560
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: I8c2437f2e5214e652119791d4e162a197b049d5b
libc had some -Wimplicit-fallthrough warnings. They all seem to be
benign. We're trying to enable this flag globally, so we need to
annotate these breaks here.
Bug: 112564944
Test: Builds
Change-Id: I5afae694cc4cf26ad1a61e2c8ae91f00cda7c733
POSIX says "The popen() function shall ensure that any streams from
previous popen() calls that remain open in the parent process are closed
in the new child process". It doesn't appear to disallow all popen(3) file
descriptors from being O_CLOEXEC, and it's not obvious why anyone would want
them inherited. Let's see if we can make the stricter guarantee...
Bug: N/A
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: I2c85170d730b211637afb8ba10df150ca3237262
Add two functions to allow objects that own a file descriptor to
enforce that only they can close their file descriptor.
Use them in FILE* and DIR*.
Bug: http://b/110100358
Test: bionic_unit_tests
Test: aosp/master boots without errors
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Iecd6e8b26c62217271e0822dc3d2d7888b091a45
pclose(3) is now an alias for fclose(3). We could add a FORTIFY check
that you use pclose(3) if and only if you used popen(3), but there seems
little value to that when we can just do the right thing.
This patch also adds the missing locking to _fwalk --- we need to lock
both the global list of FILE*s and also each FILE* we touch. POSIX says
that "The popen() function shall ensure that any streams from previous
popen() calls that remain open in the parent process are closed in the
new child process", which we implement via _fwalk(fclose) in the child,
but we might want to just make *all* popen(3) file descriptors O_CLOEXEC
in all cases.
Ignore fewer errors in popen(3) failure cases.
Improve popen(3) test coverage.
Bug: http://b/72470344
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: Ic937594bf28ec88b375f7e5825b9c05f500af438
We've ignored %n for a long time, but that's dangerous too because it
makes it unclear whether the corresponding pointer argument should be
supplied or not.
Remove the ambiguity by just rejecting %n outright.
Bug: http://b/31832608
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: Ic046ad3436a30c6f8f580ea738bdcaeb01c858f8
Trivial, obvious counterpart to the standard ferror(3) and clearerr(3),
and lets us build bison out of the box.
Bug: http://b/64273806
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: I20affabddb71210051165c41e86adfe5ae04f77f
We've been using #pragma once for new internal files, but let's be more bold.
Bug: N/A
Test: builds
Change-Id: I7e2ee2730043bd884f9571cdbd8b524043030c07
Now that we have a clang that supports transparent overloads, we can
kill all of this cruft, and restore our upstream sources to their
untouched glory. Woohoo!
Bug: 12231437
Test: Built aosp_marlin; no obvious patch-related aosp_mips issues.
Change-Id: I520a19d014f12137f80e43f973dccd6711c571cd
Makes no difference to the benchmarks, but does make the code a bit
more readable.
Bug: http://b/68672236
Test: ran tests, benchmarks
Change-Id: I63fa5f78d077c86e4f4f194f2c76ab5510c29109
Merge CT_CCL and CT_STRING handling before we add %m.
Also fix an accidental scanf/wscanf difference.
Add currently-disabled tests for questionable behavior noticed during
code review that isn't a regression, but should be fixed later.
Bug: http://b/68672236
Bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202240
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: I3eec9b7dfce84f63c68426406224822c52551d64
Strictly, POSIX says "If a '-' is in the scanlist and is not the first
wide character, nor the second where the first wide character is a '^',
nor the last wide character, the behavior is implementation-defined",
but it seems unreasonable for swscanf to interpret `a-c` differently
from sscanf. Make ours behave the same as each other by making swscanf
work the same as sscanf.
Bug: http://b/68672236
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: Ia84805897628d7128e901b468e02504373730e61
Just trivial use of macros.
The %s/%ls case in __find_arguments was backwards in the wide copy of
the code, but not problematically so because all pointers are the same
size anyway.
Bug: http://b/67371539
Test: ran tests
Change-Id: I8d34915d75ae5425c56c59510a16c328fc481d20
