A __size_mul_overflow utility is used to take advantage of the checked
overflow intrinsics in Clang and GCC (>= 5). The fallback for older
compilers is the optimized but less than ideal overflow checking pattern
used in OpenBSD.
Change-Id: Ibb0d4fd9b5acb67983e6a9f46844c2fd444f7e69
I still don't think we can make stdio's fseeko and ftello work, but we can
have everything else, and very few programs use fseeko/ftello (and they can
just refrain from using _FILE_OFFSET_BITS and be no worse off than they are
today).
Bug: 11865851
Change-Id: Ic3cb409aae6713f4b345de954bcc4241fcd969ec
clang don't support warning attribute. Replacing warning attriubte with
deprecated attribute can achieve the same behavior whether compiled by
gcc or clang.
Bug: 19340053
Change-Id: I064432b81cf55212458edbc749eb72dc15a810fb
If we lose the #ifndef, the compiler will tell us if the definitions
of SEEK_SET and friends ever get out of sync.
Change-Id: I357cabec7c9cd451c604342344f210bba20fb6bc
Various C and C++ standards explicitly say that stdin/stdout/stderr
should be macros, but glibc makes them global variables too. This
means it's possible to write code that uses those names as locals,
but that code (toybox being an example) won't build on bionic.
If we'd done this earlier, we could have hidden __sF for LP64, but
it's too late now.
Change-Id: I90cf8c73f52b66e1760b8fa2e135b9f9f9651230
__open_2() is used by the fortify implementation of open(2) in
fcntl.h, and as such needs an unmangled C name. For some reason
(inlining?), this doesn't cause problems at the default optimization
level, but does for -O0.
The rest of these didn't cause build failures, but they look suspect
and probably will, we just haven't caught them yet.
Bug: 17784968
Change-Id: I7391a7a8999ee204eaf6abd14a3d5373ea419d5b
Fix and use __RENAME (and lose ___RENAME --- two underscores should be
enough for anybody). This was the point of this change, because I want
to use __RENAME to support the two basename variants and the two
strerror_r variants.
Lose a bunch of macros that weren't being used.
Lose three dead files from the DNS code.
Change-Id: I3ef645c566b16a52217bc2e68c7d54b37c7c9522
We don't want GCC's fixincludes to touch our <stdio.h> because we
want to support multiple platform versions with one toolchain. Give
them a nice easy unambiguous string to look for.
Bug: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=73728
Change-Id: I15cb9a2c9eb0a44b0965dc2139f224f2b6e68ea1
These were both removed from POSIX 2004, and we don't define an
implementation for getw(3). Keep the definition of put(3) on LP32 for
binary compatibility.
Bug: 13935372
Change-Id: Iba384b45093ac6d2d7c2d81f7980cd7701dd6f56
Also neuter __isthreaded.
We should come back to try to hide struct FILE's internals for LP64.
Bug: 3453512
Bug: 3453550
Change-Id: I7e115329fb4579246a72fea367b9fc8cb6055d18
Even though code built with clang won't be fully fortified
and won't contain calls to our various helpers, binaries built
with GCC will.
Change-Id: I389b2f1e22a3e89b22aadedc46397bf704f9ca79
This is a better solution than the old __warn_references because it's
a compile-time rather than link-time warning, it doesn't rely on something
that doesn't appear to be supported by gold (which is why you only used
to see these warnings on mips builds), and the errors refer to the exact
call site(s) rather than just telling you which object file contains a
reference to the bad function.
This is primarily so we can build bionic for aarch64; building libc.so
caused these warnings to fire (because link time is the wrong time) and
warnings are errors.
Change-Id: I5df9281b2a9d98b164a9b11807ea9472c6faa9e3
Modern architectures only get the *at(2) system calls. For example,
aarch64 doesn't have open(2), and expects userspace to use openat(2)
instead.
Change-Id: I87b4ed79790cb8a80844f5544ac1a13fda26c7b5
Previously, FORTIFY_SOURCE used single macros to define these standard
functions for use with clang. This can cause conflicts with other macros used
to call these functions, particularly when those macros expand the number of
arguments to the function. This change wraps our macro definitions, so that
expansion properly takes place for programmer arguments first.
Change-Id: I55929b1fd2a643b9d14a17631c4bcab3b0b712cf
Enable FORTIFY_SOURCE protections under clang for the following
functions:
* vsprintf
* vsnprintf
and add unittests.
Change-Id: I90f8a27f7b202c78b5dd8ebf53050bf9e33496f7
In 829c089f83, we disabled all
FORTIFY_SOURCE support when compiling under clang. At the time,
we didn't have proper test cases, and couldn't easily create targeted
clang tests.
This change re-enables FORTIFY_SOURCE support under clang for a
limited set of functions, where we have explicit unittests available.
The functions are:
* memcpy
* memmove
* strcpy
* strncpy
* strcat
* strncat
* memset
* strlen (with modifications)
* strchr (with modifications)
* strrchr (with modifications)
It may be possible, in the future, to enable other functions. However,
I need to write unittests first.
For strlen, strchr, and strrchr, clang unconditionally calls the
fortified version of the relevant function. If it doesn't know the
size of the buffer it's dealing with, it passes in ((size_t) -1),
which is the largest possible size_t.
I added two new clang specific unittest files, primarily copied
from fortify?_test.cpp.
I've also rebuild the entire system with these changes, and didn't
observe any obvious problems.
Change-Id: If12a15089bb0ffe93824b485290d05b14355fcaa
Define __errordecl and replace __attribute__((__error__("foo")))
with __errordecl. Make sure __errordecl is a no-op on clang, as it
generates a compile time warning.
Change-Id: Ifa1a2d3afd6881de9d479fc2adac6737871a2949
Also add a more intention-revealing guard so we don't have loads of
places checking whether our inlining macro is defined.
Change-Id: I168860cedcfc798b07a5145bc48a125700265e47
The near duplicates upset fussier compilers that insist that
typedefs be exactly the same, but the fix isn't to make all
copies identical...
Change-Id: Icfdace41726f36ec33c9ae919dbb5a54d3529cc9
There's a (bad) definition of NULL in <linux/stddef.h>, and this
definition of NULL, and the One True definition in the <stddef.h> provided
by the compiler. This change at least kills one of the bad duplicates.
Killing the <linux/stddef.h> one is harder, because it's in a generated
file.
Change-Id: Iea4ccb12d6758199f312ea9cd753b84322d5c471
Some userspace programs (e.g. perf) need getline.
Changes:
() add getdelim.c, getline.c from NetBSD (http://netbsd.org/) under the
NetBSD Foundation's (TNF) license ("2 clause" Berkeley-style license).
() add stub for reentrant.h header that is needed by getdelim.c
() add tests for getdelim(3) and getline(3).
() update NOTICE file.
Change-Id: I22ed82dd5904b9d7a3695535c04f502be3c27c5d
Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@intel.com>
Clang and _FORTIFY_SOURCE are just plain incompatible with
each other. First of all, clang doesn't understand the
__attribute__((gnu_inline)) header. Second of all,
Clang doesn't have support for __builtin_va_arg_pack()
and __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() (see
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#c_unimpl_gcc)
Until we can resolve these issues, don't even try using
_FORTIFY_SOURCE under clang.
Change-Id: I81c2b8073bb3276fa9a4a6b93c427b641038356a
sprintf FORTIFY_SOURCE protections are not available
on clang.
Also add various __attribute__s to stdio functions.
Change-Id: I936d1f9e55fe53a68885c4524b7b59e68fed218d
Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE support for snprintf, vsnprintf
At this time, we opt out of these protections for clang, as clang
does not implement __builtin_va_arg_pack().
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#c_unimpl_gcc
Change-Id: I73ebe5ec8dad1dca8898a76d6afb693a25f75375
Fix the handle locking in stdio to use flockfile/funlockfile
internally when and where required. Macros in <stdio.h> are updated
to automatically call the underlying functions when the process is
threaded to obtain the necessary locking. A private mutex is added
to protect __sglue, the internal list of FILE handles, and another
to protect the one-time initialization. Some routines in libc that
use getc() change to use getc_unlocked() as they're either protected
by their own lock or aren't thread-safe routines anyway.
Based on OpenBSD change by guenther@openbsd.orghttp://www.mail-archive.com/source-changes@cvs.openbsd.org/msg01015.html
Bug: 3446659
Change-Id: Ie82116e358c541718d6709ec45ca6796be5a007b
This matches recent changes in the NDK header.
We enclose missing functions in #if 0 .. #endif blocks
with a clear "MISSING" in comments in order to locate
them later.
Change-Id: I87b3a62e777897e75c9243360fb0a82bcc53d9fb
Also add missing declarations to misc. functions.
Fix clearerr() implementation (previous was broken).
Handle feature test macros like _POSIX_C_SOURCE properly.
Change-Id: Icdc973a6b9d550a166fc2545f727ea837fe800c4
