The close_range() test in particular has been confusing a lot of
partners. I think the sys_epoll_test.cpp idiom is the clearest of the
ones in use, so let's use that everywhere. (I haven't actually touched
the SysV IPC tests, because if we do touch them, _deleting_ them --
since all those syscalls are not allowed on Android -- is probably the
change to be made!)
I'm on the fence about factoring this idiom out into a macro. There
should never be too many of these, and we should probably be removing
them? Is anyone still running the current bionic tests on 4.3 kernels
without membarrier(2), and if they are --- why?!
For now though, I haven't removed any of our existing tests; I've just
moved them over to the sys_epoll_test.cpp style.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Ie69a0bb8f416c79957188e187610ff8a3c4d1e8f
We've talked about this many times in the past, but partners struggle to
understand "expected 38, got 22" in these contexts, and I always have to
go and check the header files just to be sure I'm sure.
I actually think the glibc geterrorname_np() function (which would
return "ENOSYS" rather than "Function not implemented") would be more
helpful, but I'll have to go and implement that first, and then come
back.
Being forced to go through all our errno assertions did also make me
want to use a more consistent style for our ENOSYS assertions in
particular --- there's a particularly readable idiom, and I'll also come
back and move more of those checks to the most readable idiom.
I've added a few missing `errno = 0`s before tests, and removed a few
stray `errno = 0`s from tests that don't actually make assertions about
errno, since I had to look at every single reference to errno anyway.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Iba7c56f2adc30288c3e00ade106635e515e88179
Also delete some fdsan code that attempts to check for the post-fork
state, but never will, because we update the cached pid upon fork.
Bug: http://b/174542867
Test: /data/nativetest64/bionic-unit-tests/bionic-unit-tests
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I9b748dac9de9b4c741897d93e64d31737e52bf8e
I'm assuming this was useful while debugging, but isn't needed now.
Bug: http://b/180605583
Test: check logs
Change-Id: I9d5bb8db60e7709a9a52e29469f7fd1d5a9cb085
accept creates an additional socket behind the scenes to communicate
with netd. Filter out events for temporarily created, but then closed
fds to allow for this.
Bug: https://issuetracker.google.com/154450436
Test: bionic-unit-tests
Change-Id: I2168ddc60f307278e3257ffcdf591272d61d45bb
Add tests for all of our existing wrappers (with one commented out,
because it's unexpectedly generating multiple events).
Bug: https://issuetracker.google.com/154450436
Test: bionic-unit-tests
Change-Id: I552692aef952237c2eee0dabec61b7ea7fd230e3
Add a hook that's called upon file descriptor creation to libc, and a
library that uses it to capture backtraces for file descriptor creation,
to make it easier to hunt down file descriptor leaks.
Currently, this doesn't capture all of the ways of creating a file
descriptor, but completeness isn't required for this to be useful as
long as leaked file descriptors are created with a function that is
tracked. The primary unhandled case is binder, which receives file
descriptors as a payload in a not-trivially-parsable byte blob, but
there's a chance that the leak we're currently trying to track down
isn't of a file descriptor received over binder, so leave that for
later.
Bug: http://b/140703823
Test: manual
Change-Id: I308a14c2e234cdba4207157b634ab6b8bc539dd9
(cherry picked from commit b7eccd4b15)
