BSD doesn't invalidate the fd stored in struct FILE, which can make
it possible (via fileno(3), for example), to perform operations on
an fd you didn't intend to (rather than just failing with EBADF).
Fixing this makes the code slightly simpler anyway, and might help
catch bad code before it ships.
Bug: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10816837/fclose-works-differently-on-android-and-linux
Change-Id: I9db74584038229499197a2695c70b58ed0372a87
It is reported by tsan that funlockfile() can unlock an unlocked mutex.
It happens when printf() is called before fopen() or other stdio stuff.
As FLOCKFILE(fp) is called before __sinit(), _stdio_handles_locking is false,
and _FLOCK(fp) will not be locked. But then cantwrite(fp) in __vfprintf()
calls__sinit(), which makes _stdio_handles_locking become true, and
FUNLOCKFILE(fp) unlocks _FLOCK(fp).
Change _stdio_handles_locking into _caller_handles_locking,
so __sinit() won't change its value. Add test due to my previous fault.
Bug: 25392375
Change-Id: I483e3c3cdb28da65e62f1fd9615bf58c5403b4dd
The old __isthreaded hack was never very useful on Android because all user
code runs in a VM where there are lots of threads running. But __fsetlocking
lets a caller say "I'll worry about the locking for this FILE*", which is
useful for the normal case where you don't share a FILE* between threads
so you don't need any locking.
Bug: 17154740
Bug: 18593728
Change-Id: I2a8dddc29d3edff39a3d7d793387f2253608a68d
