We had these symbols incorrectly versioned as LIBC_PRIVATE
in M release. This change moves __aeabi* symbols from LIBC
to LIBC_N and adds __gnu_Unwind_Find_exidx to the list
Bug: https://github.com/android-ndk/ndk/issues/1
Change-Id: I0b353012adeacb00ae29ea10c63b9d1cf1cadbe7
The mremap definition was incorrect (unsigned long instead of int) and
it was missing the optional new_address parameter.
Change-Id: Ib9d0675aaa098c21617cedc9b2b8cf267be3aec4
This moves the generic arm/arm64/x86 settings into the main makefiles
and makes the rest of them derivatives. This better aligns with how
soong handles arch/cpu variants.
Also updates the Android.bp to make it consistent with the make
versions.
Change-Id: I5a0275d992bc657459eb6fe1697ad2336731d122
ARM deprecates using the SP register in the register lists for ldm
and stm, which LLVM emits a warning for.
Bug: http://b/25017080
Change-Id: Ib427e3dfd5740e251f1ad91ebb66534e0d7b72a9
For the __release and __release_rt functions, the previous macros
would add a dwarf cfi entry for the function with no values. This works
with libunwind since it always tries the arm unwind information first.
This change removes those entries by creating a no dwarf version of the
assembler macro.
Change-Id: Ib93e42fff5a79b8d770eab0071fdee7d2afa988d
This bug will happen when these circumstances are met:
- Destination address & 0x7 == 1, strlen of src is 11, 12, 13.
- Destination address & 0x7 == 2, strlen of src is 10, 11, 12.
- Destination address & 0x7 == 3, strlen of src is 9, 10, 11.
- Destination address & 0x7 == 4, strlen of src is 8, 9, 10.
In these cases, the dest alignment code does a ldr which reads 4 bytes,
and it will read past the end of the source. In most cases, this is
probably benign, but if this crosses into a new page it could cause a
crash.
Fix the labels in the cortex-a9 strcat.
Modify the overread test to vary the dst alignment to expost this bug.
Also, shrink the strcat/strlcat overread cases since the dst alignment
variation increases the runtime too much.
Bug: 24345899
Change-Id: Ib34a559bfcebd89861985b29cae6c1e47b5b5855
The routines optimized for cortex-a7 and cortex-a53 cause performance
drops on cortex-a57. Instead create a target that is the middle ground
that works relatively well on either core.
Change-Id: Ie2b6cc9a59a01c7b30602ee368b2b90f5e886289
Reuse the top bits of _JB_SIGFLAG field previously used to store a
boolean to store a cookie that's validated by [sig]longjmp to make it
harder to use as a ROP gadget. Additionally, encrypt saved registers
with the cookie so that an attacker can't modify a register's value to
a specific value without knowing the cookie.
Bug: http://b/23942752
Change-Id: Id0eb8d06916e89d5d776bfcaa9458f8826717ba3
Add an optimized memset that is ~20% faster for cortex-a7 and
cortex-a53.
Add a 32 bit optimized cortex-a53 memcpy that is about ~20% faster
on cached data.
Fix the cortex-a15 __str{cat,cpy}_chk.S, memcpy_base.S to remove
the phony functions, since they aren't needed any more. Then add
a direct include of these for cortex-a53.
Verified the new functions by stepping through all of the major
paths and verifying the backtrace is still correct.
Bug: 22696180
Change-Id: Iec92a3f82d51243cca76c9aff9f35d920ff865ae
On the path that only uses r0 in both the krait and cortex-a9
memset, remove the push and use r3 instead.
In addition, for cortex-a9, remove the artificial function since
it's not needed since dwarf unwinding is now supported on arm.
Change-Id: Ia4ed1cc435b03627a7193215e76c8ea3335f949a
When there is arm assembler of this format:
ldmxx sp!, {..., lr} or pop {..., lr}
bx lr
It can be replaced with:
ldmxx sp!, {..., pc} or pop {..., pc}
Change-Id: Ic27048c52f90ac4360ad525daf0361a830dc22a3
A continuation of commit 2825f10b7f.
Add O_PATH compatibility support for flistxattr(). This allows
a process to list out all the extended attributes associated with
O_PATH file descriptors.
Change-Id: Ie2285ac7ad2e4eac427ddba6c2d182d41b130f75
Support O_PATH file descriptors when handling fgetxattr and fsetxattr.
This avoids requiring file read access to pull extended attributes.
This is needed to support O_PATH file descriptors when calling
SELinux's fgetfilecon() call. In particular, this allows the querying
and setting of SELinux file context by using something like the following
code:
int dirfd = open("/path/to/dir", O_DIRECTORY);
int fd = openat(dirfd, "file", O_PATH | O_NOFOLLOW);
char *context;
fgetfilecon(fd, &context);
This change was motivated by a comment in
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/152680/1/toys/posix/ls.c
Change-Id: Ic0cdf9f9dd0e35a63b44a4c4a08400020041eddf
There's no reason to have multiple years in our own copyright headers,
and given the stupidity of our NOTICE file generation, it just creates
more junk.
Change-Id: I065a3811c2e2584e3b649a18ad9460286bc72b92
All arch-arm and arch-arm64 .S files were compiled
by gcc with and without this patch. The output object files
were identical. When compiled with llvm and this patch,
the output files were also identical to gcc's output.
BUG: 18061004
Change-Id: I458914d512ddf5496e4eb3d288bf032cd526d32b
With a different memcpy, __memcpy_base_aligned ceased to exist.
Instead, point to the name defined by whatever includes memcpy_base.S
Change-Id: I242cf49cbada35337ba155d7f170e86a905ff55f
This doesn't affect code like Chrome that correctly ignores EINTR on
close, makes code that tries TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY work (where before it might
have closed a different fd and appeared to succeed, or had a bogus EBADF),
and makes "goto fail" code work (instead of mistakenly assuming that EINTR
means that the close failed).
Who loses? Anyone actively trying to detect that they caught a signal while
in close(2). I don't think those people exist, and I think they have better
alternatives available.
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=269623
Bug: http://b/20501816
Change-Id: I11e2f66532fe5d1b0082b2433212e24bdda8219b
This makes unwind symbols 'protected',
which should prevent them from relocating
against libc++.so/libcutls.so.
This is temporary file and it is going
to be removed once libc.so stops exporting
them.
Bug: http://b/19958712
Change-Id: I96a765afe47e68d2e2ceb288870e63a25ca52081
The kernel system call faccessat() does not have any flags arguments,
so passing flags to the kernel is currently ignored.
Fix the kernel system call so that no flags argument is passed in.
Ensure that we don't support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW. This non-POSIX
(http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/access.html)
flag is a glibc extension, and has non-intuitive, error prone behavior.
For example, consider the following code:
symlink("foo.is.dangling", "foo");
if (faccessat(AT_FDCWD, "foo", R_OK, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) == 0) {
int fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "foo", O_RDONLY | O_NOFOLLOW);
}
The faccessat() call in glibc will return true, but an attempt to
open the dangling symlink will end up failing. GLIBC documents this
as returning the access mode of the symlink itself, which will
always return true for any symlink on Linux.
Some further discussions of this are at:
* http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/toybox-landley.net/2014-September/003617.html
* http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6952
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW seems broken by design. I suspect this is why this
function was never added to POSIX. (note that "access" is pretty much
broken by design too, since it introduces a race condition between
check and action). We shouldn't support this until it's clearly
documented by POSIX or we can have it produce intuitive results.
Don't support AT_EACCESS for now. Implementing it is complicated, and
pretty much useless on Android, since we don't have setuid binaries.
See http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=0a05eace163cee9b08571d2ff9d90f5e82d9c228
for how an implementation might look.
Bug: 18867827
Change-Id: I25b86c5020f3152ffa3ac3047f6c4152908d0e04
The overflow's actually in the generic C implementation of memchr.
While I'm here, let's switch our generic memrchr to the OpenBSD version too.
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=147048
Change-Id: I296ae06a1ee196d2c77c95a22f11ee4d658962da
* changes:
Use LOCAL_LDFLAGS_64 instead of enumerating 64-bit architectures
Fix typo in cpu variant makefile depenendency for arm64
Remove libc_static_common_src_files
Share LP32 makefile settings between arches
Add <var>_32 to patch-up-arch-specific-flags, and move the LP32
cruft varaibles from the 32-bit arch specific makefiles into the
top level Android.mk.
Change-Id: Id3fcf6805d4af048c2524c94b1295416ebe7d057
In https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/127908/5/libc/SYSCALLS.TXT@116
Elliott said:
for LP64 these will be hidden. for LP32 we were cowards and left
them all public for compatibility (though i don't think we ever
dremeled to see whether it was needed). we don't have an easy
way to recognize additions, though, so we can't prevent adding
new turds.
Add a mechanism to prevent the adding of new turds, and use that
mechanism on the fchmod/fchmodat system calls.
Bug: 19233951
Change-Id: I98f98345970b631a379f348df57858f9fc3d57c0
Many libc functions have an option to not follow symbolic
links. This is useful to avoid security sensitive code
from inadvertantly following attacker supplied symlinks
and taking inappropriate action on files it shouldn't.
For example, open() has O_NOFOLLOW, chown() has
lchown(), stat() has lstat(), etc.
There is no such equivalent function for chmod(), such as lchmod().
To address this, POSIX introduced fchmodat(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW),
which is intended to provide a way to perform a chmod operation
which doesn't follow symlinks.
Currently, the Linux kernel doesn't implement AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW.
In GLIBC, attempting to use the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag causes
fchmodat to return ENOTSUP. Details are in "man fchmodat".
Bionic currently differs from GLIBC in that AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW
is silently ignored and treated as if the flag wasn't present.
This patch provides a userspace implementation of
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW for bionic. Using open(O_PATH | O_NOFOLLOW),
we can provide a way to atomically change the permissions on
files without worrying about race conditions.
As part of this change, we add support for fchmod on O_PATH
file descriptors, because it's relatively straight forward
and could be useful in the future.
The basic idea behind this implementation comes from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14578 , specifically
comment #10.
Change-Id: I1eba0cdb2c509d9193ceecf28f13118188a3cfa7
Interestingly, this mostly involves cleaning up our implementation of
various <string.h> functions.
Change-Id: Ifaef49b5cb997134f7bc0cc31bdac844bdb9e089
