3391a9ff13
This doesn't affect code like Chrome that correctly ignores EINTR on close, makes code that tries TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY work (where before it might have closed a different fd and appeared to succeed, or had a bogus EBADF), and makes "goto fail" code work (instead of mistakenly assuming that EINTR means that the close failed). Who loses? Anyone actively trying to detect that they caught a signal while in close(2). I don't think those people exist, and I think they have better alternatives available. Bug: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=269623 Bug: http://b/20501816 Change-Id: I11e2f66532fe5d1b0082b2433212e24bdda8219b |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
bionic | ||
include/machine | ||
string | ||
syscalls | ||
x86_64.mk |