Paul Lawrence 65b47c9fe0 Fix problem that we don't block syscalls below min value ... The check that we are not below the lowest permitted syscall was off by one, so we always allowed them, rather than always denying them Test: Check arm64 boots, chrome and maps work mips and mips64 emulators boot Note that arm, x86 and x86_64 already allow syscall 0 so there will be no functional change there Change-Id: I85873f1d04124e634e648bd47c027f280f1d6dbd		2017-03-22 09:48:17 -07:00
..
include	Generate both static and shared libseccomp_policy.	2017-03-02 18:57:44 -08:00
Android.bp	Support all architectures in seccomp	2017-03-13 18:26:50 +00:00
arm64_policy.cpp	Fix problem that we don't block syscalls below min value	2017-03-22 09:48:17 -07:00
arm_policy.cpp	Fix problem that we don't block syscalls below min value	2017-03-22 09:48:17 -07:00
mips64_policy.cpp	Fix problem that we don't block syscalls below min value	2017-03-22 09:48:17 -07:00
mips_policy.cpp	Fix problem that we don't block syscalls below min value	2017-03-22 09:48:17 -07:00
seccomp_bpfs.h	Support all architectures in seccomp	2017-03-13 18:26:50 +00:00
seccomp_policy.cpp	Support all architectures in seccomp	2017-03-13 18:26:50 +00:00
x86_64_policy.cpp	Fix problem that we don't block syscalls below min value	2017-03-22 09:48:17 -07:00
x86_policy.cpp	Fix problem that we don't block syscalls below min value	2017-03-22 09:48:17 -07:00