Elliott Hughes 41398d03b7 Call __fortify_fatal if printf sees %n. ... We've ignored %n for a long time, but that's dangerous too because it makes it unclear whether the corresponding pointer argument should be supplied or not. Remove the ambiguity by just rejecting %n outright. Bug: http://b/31832608 Test: ran tests Change-Id: Ic046ad3436a30c6f8f580ea738bdcaeb01c858f8		2018-03-07 13:32:58 -08:00
..
fmemopen.cpp	Replace fmemopen.	2017-07-24 10:48:42 -07:00
glue.h	Rename LIBC64_HIDDEN to LIBC32_LEGACY_PUBLIC.	2015-10-23 12:32:52 -07:00
local.h	Call __fortify_fatal if printf sees %n.	2018-03-07 13:32:58 -08:00
parsefloat.c	Start de-duplicating the regular and wide printf implementations.	2017-11-01 18:13:36 -07:00
printf_common.h	Call __fortify_fatal if printf sees %n.	2018-03-07 13:32:58 -08:00
refill.c	More missing _unlocked <stdio.h> functions.	2017-10-31 13:23:41 -07:00
stdio.cpp	Remove __overloadable/__RENAME_CLANG	2018-02-06 13:35:56 -08:00
stdio_ext.cpp	Add __fseterr.	2018-02-14 15:25:21 -08:00
vfprintf.cpp	Call __fortify_fatal if printf sees %n.	2018-03-07 13:32:58 -08:00
vfscanf.cpp	Simplify CT_CCL and CT_STRING inner loop.	2018-01-19 17:58:07 -08:00
vfwprintf.cpp	Call __fortify_fatal if printf sees %n.	2018-03-07 13:32:58 -08:00
vfwscanf.c	More scanf cleanup.	2017-12-12 17:10:51 -08:00