Merge "aconfig: require exactly one bug field" into main
This commit is contained in:
commit
9997fdbacf
3 changed files with 52 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -92,8 +92,7 @@ pub mod flag_declaration {
|
|||
ensure!(codegen::is_valid_name_ident(pdf.name()), "bad flag declaration: bad name");
|
||||
ensure!(codegen::is_valid_name_ident(pdf.namespace()), "bad flag declaration: bad name");
|
||||
ensure!(!pdf.description().is_empty(), "bad flag declaration: empty description");
|
||||
|
||||
// ProtoFlagDeclaration.bug: Vec<String>: may be empty, no checks needed
|
||||
ensure!(pdf.bug.len() == 1, "bad flag declaration: exactly one bug required");
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -195,8 +194,7 @@ pub mod parsed_flag {
|
|||
for tp in pf.trace.iter() {
|
||||
super::tracepoint::verify_fields(tp)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ProtoParsedFlag.bug: Vec<String>: may be empty, no checks needed
|
||||
ensure!(pf.bug.len() == 1, "bad flag declaration: exactly one bug required");
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -279,12 +277,12 @@ flag {
|
|||
namespace: "first_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the first flag."
|
||||
bug: "123"
|
||||
bug: "abc"
|
||||
}
|
||||
flag {
|
||||
name: "second"
|
||||
namespace: "second_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the second flag."
|
||||
bug: "abc"
|
||||
}
|
||||
"#,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
@ -294,14 +292,12 @@ flag {
|
|||
assert_eq!(first.name(), "first");
|
||||
assert_eq!(first.namespace(), "first_ns");
|
||||
assert_eq!(first.description(), "This is the description of the first flag.");
|
||||
assert_eq!(first.bug.len(), 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(first.bug[0], "123");
|
||||
assert_eq!(first.bug[1], "abc");
|
||||
assert_eq!(first.bug, vec!["123"]);
|
||||
let second = flag_declarations.flag.iter().find(|pf| pf.name() == "second").unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.name(), "second");
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.namespace(), "second_ns");
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.description(), "This is the description of the second flag.");
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.bug.len(), 0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.bug, vec!["abc"]);
|
||||
|
||||
// bad input: missing package in flag declarations
|
||||
let error = flag_declarations::try_from_text_proto(
|
||||
|
@ -376,6 +372,36 @@ flag {
|
|||
)
|
||||
.unwrap_err();
|
||||
assert!(format!("{:?}", error).contains("bad flag declaration: bad name"));
|
||||
|
||||
// bad input: no bug entries in flag declaration
|
||||
let error = flag_declarations::try_from_text_proto(
|
||||
r#"
|
||||
package: "com.foo.bar"
|
||||
flag {
|
||||
name: "first"
|
||||
namespace: "first_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the first flag."
|
||||
}
|
||||
"#,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.unwrap_err();
|
||||
assert!(format!("{:?}", error).contains("bad flag declaration: exactly one bug required"));
|
||||
|
||||
// bad input: multiple bug entries in flag declaration
|
||||
let error = flag_declarations::try_from_text_proto(
|
||||
r#"
|
||||
package: "com.foo.bar"
|
||||
flag {
|
||||
name: "first"
|
||||
namespace: "first_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the first flag."
|
||||
bug: "123"
|
||||
bug: "abc"
|
||||
}
|
||||
"#,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.unwrap_err();
|
||||
assert!(format!("{:?}", error).contains("bad flag declaration: exactly one bug required"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
@ -482,6 +508,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "first"
|
||||
namespace: "first_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the first flag."
|
||||
bug: "SOME_BUG"
|
||||
state: DISABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_ONLY
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -495,6 +522,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "second"
|
||||
namespace: "second_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the second flag."
|
||||
bug: "SOME_BUG"
|
||||
state: ENABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_WRITE
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -516,6 +544,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
assert_eq!(second.name(), "second");
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.namespace(), "second_ns");
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.description(), "This is the description of the second flag.");
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.bug, vec!["SOME_BUG"]);
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.state(), ProtoFlagState::ENABLED);
|
||||
assert_eq!(second.permission(), ProtoFlagPermission::READ_WRITE);
|
||||
assert_eq!(2, second.trace.len());
|
||||
|
@ -569,6 +598,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "first"
|
||||
namespace: "first_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the first flag."
|
||||
bug: ""
|
||||
state: DISABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_ONLY
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -582,6 +612,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "second"
|
||||
namespace: "second_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the second flag."
|
||||
bug: ""
|
||||
state: ENABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_WRITE
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -604,6 +635,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "bbb"
|
||||
namespace: "first_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the first flag."
|
||||
bug: ""
|
||||
state: DISABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_ONLY
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -617,6 +649,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "aaa"
|
||||
namespace: "second_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the second flag."
|
||||
bug: ""
|
||||
state: ENABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_WRITE
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -639,6 +672,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "bar"
|
||||
namespace: "first_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the first flag."
|
||||
bug: ""
|
||||
state: DISABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_ONLY
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -652,6 +686,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "bar"
|
||||
namespace: "second_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the second flag."
|
||||
bug: ""
|
||||
state: ENABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_WRITE
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -673,6 +708,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "bar"
|
||||
namespace: "first_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the first flag."
|
||||
bug: "b/12345678"
|
||||
state: DISABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_ONLY
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -703,6 +739,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "first"
|
||||
namespace: "first_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the first flag."
|
||||
bug: "a"
|
||||
state: DISABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_ONLY
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -716,6 +753,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "second"
|
||||
namespace: "second_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the second flag."
|
||||
bug: "b"
|
||||
state: ENABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_WRITE
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -733,6 +771,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "first"
|
||||
namespace: "first_ns"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the first flag."
|
||||
bug: "a"
|
||||
state: DISABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_ONLY
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
@ -749,6 +788,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
package: "com.second"
|
||||
name: "second"
|
||||
namespace: "second_ns"
|
||||
bug: "b"
|
||||
description: "This is the description of the second flag."
|
||||
state: ENABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_WRITE
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "enabled_ro"
|
||||
namespace: "aconfig_test"
|
||||
description: "This flag is ENABLED + READ_ONLY"
|
||||
bug: "789"
|
||||
bug: "abc"
|
||||
state: ENABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_ONLY
|
||||
|
@ -86,6 +85,7 @@ parsed_flag {
|
|||
name: "enabled_rw"
|
||||
namespace: "aconfig_test"
|
||||
description: "This flag is ENABLED + READ_WRITE"
|
||||
bug: ""
|
||||
state: ENABLED
|
||||
permission: READ_WRITE
|
||||
trace {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ flag {
|
|||
name: "enabled_ro"
|
||||
namespace: "aconfig_test"
|
||||
description: "This flag is ENABLED + READ_ONLY"
|
||||
bug: "789"
|
||||
bug: "abc"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -19,7 +18,8 @@ flag {
|
|||
name: "enabled_rw"
|
||||
namespace: "aconfig_test"
|
||||
description: "This flag is ENABLED + READ_WRITE"
|
||||
# no bug field: bug is not mandatory
|
||||
# for bug fields, the empty string is a discouraged but valid value
|
||||
bug: ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# This flag's final value is calculated from:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue