diff --git a/core/tasks/tools/compatibility.mk b/core/tasks/tools/compatibility.mk
index e56e8bad5e..a5f162af63 100644
--- a/core/tasks/tools/compatibility.mk
+++ b/core/tasks/tools/compatibility.mk
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ $(test_suite_jdk): $(shell find $(test_suite_jdk_dir) -type f | sort)
 $(test_suite_jdk): $(SOONG_ZIP)
 	$(SOONG_ZIP) -o $@ -P $(PRIVATE_SUBDIR)/jdk -C $(PRIVATE_JDK_DIR) -D $(PRIVATE_JDK_DIR)
 
-$(call declare-license-metadata,$(test_suite_jdk),SPDX-license-identifier-GPL-2.0-with-classpath-exception,restricted,\
+$(call declare-license-metadata,$(test_suite_jdk),SPDX-license-identifier-GPL-2.0-with-classpath-exception,permissive,\
   $(test_suite_jdk_dir)/legal/java.base/LICENSE,JDK,prebuilts/jdk/$(notdir $(patsubst %/,%,$(dir $(test_suite_jdk_dir)))))
 
 # Copy license metadata
diff --git a/tools/compliance/condition.go b/tools/compliance/condition.go
index cfe6f8247e..31452497d9 100644
--- a/tools/compliance/condition.go
+++ b/tools/compliance/condition.go
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ import (
 type LicenseCondition uint16
 
 // LicenseConditionMask is a bitmask for the recognized license conditions.
-const LicenseConditionMask = LicenseCondition(0x3ff)
+const LicenseConditionMask = LicenseCondition(0x1ff)
 
 const (
 	// UnencumberedCondition identifies public domain or public domain-
@@ -41,21 +41,18 @@ const (
 	// RestrictedCondition identifies a license with requirement to share
 	// all source code linked to the module's source.
 	RestrictedCondition = LicenseCondition(0x0010)
-	// RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition identifies RestrictedCondition
-	// waived for dynamic linking from independent modules.
-	RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition = LicenseCondition(0x0020)
 	// WeaklyRestrictedCondition identifies a RestrictedCondition waived
 	// for dynamic linking.
-	WeaklyRestrictedCondition = LicenseCondition(0x0040)
+	WeaklyRestrictedCondition = LicenseCondition(0x0020)
 	// ProprietaryCondition identifies a license with source privacy
 	// requirements.
-	ProprietaryCondition = LicenseCondition(0x0080)
+	ProprietaryCondition = LicenseCondition(0x0040)
 	// ByExceptionOnly identifies a license where policy requires product
 	// counsel review prior to use.
-	ByExceptionOnlyCondition = LicenseCondition(0x0100)
+	ByExceptionOnlyCondition = LicenseCondition(0x0080)
 	// NotAllowedCondition identifies a license with onerous conditions
 	// where policy prohibits use.
-	NotAllowedCondition = LicenseCondition(0x0200)
+	NotAllowedCondition = LicenseCondition(0x0100)
 )
 
 var (
@@ -66,7 +63,6 @@ var (
 		"notice":                              NoticeCondition,
 		"reciprocal":                          ReciprocalCondition,
 		"restricted":                          RestrictedCondition,
-		"restricted_with_classpath_exception": RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition,
 		"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking":   WeaklyRestrictedCondition,
 		"proprietary":                         ProprietaryCondition,
 		"by_exception_only":                   ByExceptionOnlyCondition,
@@ -87,8 +83,6 @@ func (lc LicenseCondition) Name() string {
 		return "reciprocal"
 	case RestrictedCondition:
 		return "restricted"
-	case RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition:
-		return "restricted_with_classpath_exception"
 	case WeaklyRestrictedCondition:
 		return "restricted_allows_dynamic_linking"
 	case ProprietaryCondition:
@@ -98,5 +92,5 @@ func (lc LicenseCondition) Name() string {
 	case NotAllowedCondition:
 		return "not_allowed"
 	}
-	panic(fmt.Errorf("unrecognized license condition: %04x", lc))
+	panic(fmt.Errorf("unrecognized license condition: %#v", lc))
 }
diff --git a/tools/compliance/condition_test.go b/tools/compliance/condition_test.go
index 778ce4a8dd..16ec72cb56 100644
--- a/tools/compliance/condition_test.go
+++ b/tools/compliance/condition_test.go
@@ -21,22 +21,22 @@ import (
 func TestConditionSetHas(t *testing.T) {
 	impliesShare := ImpliesShared
 
-	t.Logf("testing with imliesShare=%04x", impliesShare)
+	t.Logf("testing with imliesShare=%#v", impliesShare)
 
 	if impliesShare.HasAny(NoticeCondition) {
-		t.Errorf("impliesShare.HasAny(\"notice\"=%04x) got true, want false", NoticeCondition)
+		t.Errorf("impliesShare.HasAny(\"notice\"=%#v) got true, want false", NoticeCondition)
 	}
 
 	if !impliesShare.HasAny(RestrictedCondition) {
-		t.Errorf("impliesShare.HasAny(\"restricted\"=%04x) got false, want true", RestrictedCondition)
+		t.Errorf("impliesShare.HasAny(\"restricted\"=%#v) got false, want true", RestrictedCondition)
 	}
 
 	if !impliesShare.HasAny(ReciprocalCondition) {
-		t.Errorf("impliesShare.HasAny(\"reciprocal\"=%04x) got false, want true", ReciprocalCondition)
+		t.Errorf("impliesShare.HasAny(\"reciprocal\"=%#v) got false, want true", ReciprocalCondition)
 	}
 
 	if impliesShare.HasAny(LicenseCondition(0x0000)) {
-		t.Errorf("impliesShare.HasAny(nil=%04x) got true, want false", LicenseCondition(0x0000))
+		t.Errorf("impliesShare.HasAny(nil=%#v) got true, want false", LicenseCondition(0x0000))
 	}
 }
 
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ func TestConditionName(t *testing.T) {
 	for expected, condition := range RecognizedConditionNames {
 		actual := condition.Name()
 		if expected != actual {
-			t.Errorf("unexpected name for condition %04x: got %s, want %s", condition, actual, expected)
+			t.Errorf("unexpected name for condition %#v: got %s, want %s", condition, actual, expected)
 		}
 	}
 }
@@ -62,6 +62,6 @@ func TestConditionName_InvalidCondition(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Errorf("invalid condition unexpected name: got %s, wanted panic", name)
 	}()
 	if !panicked {
-		t.Errorf("no expected panic for %04x.Name(): got no panic, wanted panic", lc)
+		t.Errorf("no expected panic for %#v.Name(): got no panic, wanted panic", lc)
 	}
 }
diff --git a/tools/compliance/conditionset_test.go b/tools/compliance/conditionset_test.go
index c91912f19f..020cc0cdef 100644
--- a/tools/compliance/conditionset_test.go
+++ b/tools/compliance/conditionset_test.go
@@ -96,14 +96,13 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 		{
 			name:       "everything",
 			conditions: []string{"unencumbered", "permissive", "notice", "reciprocal", "restricted", "proprietary"},
-			plus:       &[]string{"restricted_with_classpath_exception", "restricted_allows_dynamic_linking", "by_exception_only", "not_allowed"},
+			plus:       &[]string{"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking", "by_exception_only", "not_allowed"},
 			matchingAny: map[string][]string{
 				"unencumbered":                        []string{"unencumbered"},
 				"permissive":                          []string{"permissive"},
 				"notice":                              []string{"notice"},
 				"reciprocal":                          []string{"reciprocal"},
 				"restricted":                          []string{"restricted"},
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception": []string{"restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
 				"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking":   []string{"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking"},
 				"proprietary":                         []string{"proprietary"},
 				"by_exception_only":                   []string{"by_exception_only"},
@@ -116,7 +115,6 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				"notice",
 				"reciprocal",
 				"restricted",
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception",
 				"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking",
 				"proprietary",
 				"by_exception_only",
@@ -131,7 +129,6 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				"notice",
 				"reciprocal",
 				"restricted",
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception",
 				"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking",
 				"proprietary",
 				"by_exception_only",
@@ -151,7 +148,6 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				"notice",
 				"reciprocal",
 				"restricted",
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception",
 				"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking",
 				"proprietary",
 				"by_exception_only",
@@ -168,7 +164,6 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				"notice":                              []string{"notice"},
 				"reciprocal":                          []string{"reciprocal"},
 				"restricted":                          []string{"restricted"},
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception": []string{},
 				"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking":   []string{"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking"},
 				"proprietary":                         []string{"proprietary"},
 				"by_exception_only":                   []string{"by_exception_only"},
@@ -195,7 +190,6 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				"notice",
 				"reciprocal",
 				"restricted",
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception",
 				"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking",
 				"proprietary",
 				"by_exception_only",
@@ -208,7 +202,6 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				"notice":                              []string{"notice"},
 				"reciprocal":                          []string{"reciprocal"},
 				"restricted":                          []string{"restricted"},
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception": []string{"restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
 				"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking":   []string{},
 				"proprietary":                         []string{"proprietary"},
 				"by_exception_only":                   []string{"by_exception_only"},
@@ -221,7 +214,6 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				"notice",
 				"reciprocal",
 				"restricted",
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception",
 				"proprietary",
 				"by_exception_only",
 				"not_allowed",
@@ -235,7 +227,6 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				"notice",
 				"reciprocal",
 				"restricted",
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception",
 				"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking",
 				"proprietary",
 				"by_exception_only",
@@ -247,7 +238,6 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				"notice",
 				"reciprocal",
 				"restricted",
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception",
 				"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking",
 				"proprietary",
 				"by_exception_only",
@@ -259,7 +249,6 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				"notice":                              []string{},
 				"reciprocal":                          []string{},
 				"restricted":                          []string{},
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception": []string{},
 				"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking":   []string{},
 				"proprietary":                         []string{},
 				"by_exception_only":                   []string{},
@@ -270,21 +259,20 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 		},
 		{
 			name:       "restrictedplus",
-			conditions: []string{"restricted", "restricted_with_classpath_exception", "restricted_allows_dynamic_linking"},
+			conditions: []string{"restricted", "restricted_allows_dynamic_linking"},
 			plus:       &[]string{"permissive", "notice", "restricted", "proprietary"},
 			matchingAny: map[string][]string{
 				"unencumbered":                        []string{},
 				"permissive":                          []string{"permissive"},
 				"notice":                              []string{"notice"},
 				"restricted":                          []string{"restricted"},
-				"restricted_with_classpath_exception": []string{"restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
 				"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking":   []string{"restricted_allows_dynamic_linking"},
 				"proprietary":                         []string{"proprietary"},
 				"restricted|proprietary":              []string{"restricted", "proprietary"},
 				"by_exception_only":                   []string{},
 				"proprietary|by_exception_only":       []string{"proprietary"},
 			},
-			expected: []string{"permissive", "notice", "restricted", "restricted_with_classpath_exception", "restricted_allows_dynamic_linking", "proprietary"},
+			expected: []string{"permissive", "notice", "restricted", "restricted_allows_dynamic_linking", "proprietary"},
 		},
 	}
 	for _, tt := range tests {
@@ -342,11 +330,11 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				actual := cs.MatchingAny(toConditions(strings.Split(data, "|"))...)
 				actualNames := actual.Names()
 
-				t.Logf("MatchingAny(%s): actual set %04x %s", data, actual, actual.String())
-				t.Logf("MatchingAny(%s): expected set %04x %s", data, expected, expected.String())
+				t.Logf("MatchingAny(%s): actual set %#v %s", data, actual, actual.String())
+				t.Logf("MatchingAny(%s): expected set %#v %s", data, expected, expected.String())
 
 				if actual != expected {
-					t.Errorf("MatchingAny(%s): got %04x, want %04x", data, actual, expected)
+					t.Errorf("MatchingAny(%s): got %#v, want %#v", data, actual, expected)
 					continue
 				}
 				if len(actualNames) != len(expectedNames) {
@@ -382,11 +370,11 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				actual := cs.MatchingAnySet(NewLicenseConditionSet(toConditions(strings.Split(data, "|"))...))
 				actualNames := actual.Names()
 
-				t.Logf("MatchingAnySet(%s): actual set %04x %s", data, actual, actual.String())
-				t.Logf("MatchingAnySet(%s): expected set %04x %s", data, expected, expected.String())
+				t.Logf("MatchingAnySet(%s): actual set %#v %s", data, actual, actual.String())
+				t.Logf("MatchingAnySet(%s): expected set %#v %s", data, expected, expected.String())
 
 				if actual != expected {
-					t.Errorf("MatchingAnySet(%s): got %04x, want %04x", data, actual, expected)
+					t.Errorf("MatchingAnySet(%s): got %#v, want %#v", data, actual, expected)
 					continue
 				}
 				if len(actualNames) != len(expectedNames) {
@@ -426,11 +414,11 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 
 			actualNames := actual.Names()
 
-			t.Logf("actual license condition set: %04x %s", actual, actual.String())
-			t.Logf("expected license condition set: %04x %s", expected, expected.String())
+			t.Logf("actual license condition set: %#v %s", actual, actual.String())
+			t.Logf("expected license condition set: %#v %s", expected, expected.String())
 
 			if actual != expected {
-				t.Errorf("checkExpected: got %04x, want %04x", actual, expected)
+				t.Errorf("checkExpected: got %#v, want %#v", actual, expected)
 				return false
 			}
 
@@ -487,7 +475,7 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 
 			notExpected := (AllLicenseConditions &^ expected)
 			notExpectedList := notExpected.AsList()
-			t.Logf("not expected license condition set: %04x %s", notExpected, notExpected.String())
+			t.Logf("not expected license condition set: %#v %s", notExpected, notExpected.String())
 
 			if len(tt.expected) == 0 {
 				if actual.HasAny(append(expectedConditions, notExpectedList...)...) {
@@ -526,11 +514,11 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 
 			actualNames := actual.Names()
 
-			t.Logf("actual license condition set: %04x %s", actual, actual.String())
-			t.Logf("expected license condition set: %04x %s", expected, expected.String())
+			t.Logf("actual license condition set: %#v %s", actual, actual.String())
+			t.Logf("expected license condition set: %#v %s", expected, expected.String())
 
 			if actual != expected {
-				t.Errorf("checkExpectedSet: got %04x, want %04x", actual, expected)
+				t.Errorf("checkExpectedSet: got %#v, want %#v", actual, expected)
 				return false
 			}
 
@@ -581,7 +569,7 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 			}
 
 			notExpected := (AllLicenseConditions &^ expected)
-			t.Logf("not expected license condition set: %04x %s", notExpected, notExpected.String())
+			t.Logf("not expected license condition set: %#v %s", notExpected, notExpected.String())
 
 			if len(tt.expected) == 0 {
 				if actual.MatchesAnySet(expected, notExpected) {
@@ -606,10 +594,10 @@ func TestConditionSet(t *testing.T) {
 				t.Errorf("actual.Difference({expected}).IsEmpty(): want true, got false")
 			}
 			if expected != actual.Intersection(expected) {
-				t.Errorf("expected == actual.Intersection({expected}): want true, got false (%04x != %04x)", expected, actual.Intersection(expected))
+				t.Errorf("expected == actual.Intersection({expected}): want true, got false (%#v != %#v)", expected, actual.Intersection(expected))
 			}
 			if actual != actual.Intersection(expected) {
-				t.Errorf("actual == actual.Intersection({expected}): want true, got false (%04x != %04x)", actual, actual.Intersection(expected))
+				t.Errorf("actual == actual.Intersection({expected}): want true, got false (%#v != %#v)", actual, actual.Intersection(expected))
 			}
 			return true
 		}
diff --git a/tools/compliance/policy_policy.go b/tools/compliance/policy_policy.go
index 60bdf48e22..63da73114d 100644
--- a/tools/compliance/policy_policy.go
+++ b/tools/compliance/policy_policy.go
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ package compliance
 
 import (
 	"regexp"
-	"strings"
 )
 
 var (
@@ -62,14 +61,13 @@ var (
 
 	// ImpliesNotice lists the condition names implying a notice or attribution policy.
 	ImpliesNotice = LicenseConditionSet(UnencumberedCondition | PermissiveCondition | NoticeCondition | ReciprocalCondition |
-		RestrictedCondition | RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition | WeaklyRestrictedCondition |
-		ProprietaryCondition | ByExceptionOnlyCondition)
+		RestrictedCondition | WeaklyRestrictedCondition | ProprietaryCondition | ByExceptionOnlyCondition)
 
 	// ImpliesReciprocal lists the condition names implying a local source-sharing policy.
 	ImpliesReciprocal = LicenseConditionSet(ReciprocalCondition)
 
 	// Restricted lists the condition names implying an infectious source-sharing policy.
-	ImpliesRestricted = LicenseConditionSet(RestrictedCondition | RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition | WeaklyRestrictedCondition)
+	ImpliesRestricted = LicenseConditionSet(RestrictedCondition | WeaklyRestrictedCondition)
 
 	// ImpliesProprietary lists the condition names implying a confidentiality policy.
 	ImpliesProprietary = LicenseConditionSet(ProprietaryCondition)
@@ -81,7 +79,7 @@ var (
 	ImpliesPrivate = LicenseConditionSet(ProprietaryCondition)
 
 	// ImpliesShared lists the condition names implying a source-code sharing policy.
-	ImpliesShared = LicenseConditionSet(ReciprocalCondition | RestrictedCondition | RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition | WeaklyRestrictedCondition)
+	ImpliesShared = LicenseConditionSet(ReciprocalCondition | RestrictedCondition | WeaklyRestrictedCondition)
 )
 
 var (
@@ -112,13 +110,9 @@ func LicenseConditionSetFromNames(tn *TargetNode, names ...string) LicenseCondit
 				continue
 			}
 			hasLgpl := false
-			hasClasspath := false
 			hasGeneric := false
 			for _, kind := range tn.LicenseKinds() {
-				if strings.HasSuffix(kind, "-with-classpath-exception") {
-					cs = cs.Plus(RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition)
-					hasClasspath = true
-				} else if anyLgpl.MatchString(kind) {
+				if anyLgpl.MatchString(kind) {
 					cs = cs.Plus(WeaklyRestrictedCondition)
 					hasLgpl = true
 				} else if versionedGpl.MatchString(kind) {
@@ -131,7 +125,7 @@ func LicenseConditionSetFromNames(tn *TargetNode, names ...string) LicenseCondit
 					cs = cs.Plus(RestrictedCondition)
 				}
 			}
-			if hasGeneric && !hasLgpl && !hasClasspath {
+			if hasGeneric && !hasLgpl {
 				cs = cs.Plus(RestrictedCondition)
 			}
 			continue
@@ -202,9 +196,6 @@ func depConditionsPropagatingToTarget(lg *LicenseGraph, e *TargetEdge, depCondit
 	}
 
 	result |= depConditions & LicenseConditionSet(RestrictedCondition)
-	if 0 != (depConditions&LicenseConditionSet(RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition)) && !edgeNodesAreIndependentModules(e) {
-		result |= LicenseConditionSet(RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition)
-	}
 	return result
 }
 
@@ -241,9 +232,6 @@ func targetConditionsPropagatingToDep(lg *LicenseGraph, e *TargetEdge, targetCon
 		return result
 	}
 	result = result.Minus(WeaklyRestrictedCondition)
-	if edgeNodesAreIndependentModules(e) {
-		result = result.Minus(RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition)
-	}
 	return result
 }
 
@@ -261,10 +249,7 @@ func conditionsAttachingAcrossEdge(lg *LicenseGraph, e *TargetEdge, universe Lic
 		return NewLicenseConditionSet()
 	}
 
-	result &= LicenseConditionSet(RestrictedCondition | RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition)
-	if 0 != (result&LicenseConditionSet(RestrictedClasspathExceptionCondition)) && edgeNodesAreIndependentModules(e) {
-		result &= LicenseConditionSet(RestrictedCondition)
-	}
+	result &= LicenseConditionSet(RestrictedCondition)
 	return result
 }
 
@@ -281,9 +266,3 @@ func edgeIsDerivation(e *TargetEdge) bool {
 	isToolchain := e.annotations.HasAnnotation("toolchain")
 	return !isDynamic && !isToolchain
 }
-
-// edgeNodesAreIndependentModules returns true for edges where the target and
-// dependency are independent modules.
-func edgeNodesAreIndependentModules(e *TargetEdge) bool {
-	return e.target.PackageName() != e.dependency.PackageName()
-}
diff --git a/tools/compliance/policy_policy_test.go b/tools/compliance/policy_policy_test.go
index 27ce16c54a..94d0be332c 100644
--- a/tools/compliance/policy_policy_test.go
+++ b/tools/compliance/policy_policy_test.go
@@ -85,19 +85,13 @@ func TestPolicy_edgeConditions(t *testing.T) {
 		{
 			name: "independentmodulestatic",
 			edge: annotated{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
-			expectedDepActions: []string{
-				"apacheBin.meta_lic:gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic:restricted_with_classpath_exception",
-				"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic:gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic:restricted_with_classpath_exception",
-			},
+			expectedDepActions: []string{},
 			expectedTargetConditions: []string{},
 		},
 		{
 			name: "dependentmodule",
 			edge: annotated{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
-			expectedDepActions: []string{
-				"dependentModule.meta_lic:gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic:restricted_with_classpath_exception",
-				"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic:gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic:restricted_with_classpath_exception",
-			},
+			expectedDepActions: []string{},
 			expectedTargetConditions: []string{},
 		},
 
@@ -166,13 +160,13 @@ func TestPolicy_edgeConditions(t *testing.T) {
 			name:                     "independentmodulereversestatic",
 			edge:                     annotated{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			expectedDepActions:       []string{},
-			expectedTargetConditions: []string{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic:restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
+			expectedTargetConditions: []string{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:                     "dependentmodulereverse",
 			edge:                     annotated{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			expectedDepActions:       []string{},
-			expectedTargetConditions: []string{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic:restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
+			expectedTargetConditions: []string{},
 		},
 		{
 			name: "ponr",
@@ -257,9 +251,9 @@ func TestPolicy_edgeConditions(t *testing.T) {
 						otherCs := otn.LicenseConditions()
 						depConditions |= otherCs
 					}
-					t.Logf("calculate target actions for edge=%s, dep conditions=%04x, treatAsAggregate=%v", edge.String(), depConditions, tt.treatAsAggregate)
+					t.Logf("calculate target actions for edge=%s, dep conditions=%#v %s, treatAsAggregate=%v", edge.String(), depConditions, depConditions, tt.treatAsAggregate)
 					csActual := depConditionsPropagatingToTarget(lg, edge, depConditions, tt.treatAsAggregate)
-					t.Logf("calculated target conditions as %04x{%s}", csActual, strings.Join(csActual.Names(), ", "))
+					t.Logf("calculated target conditions as %#v %s", csActual, csActual)
 					csExpected := NewLicenseConditionSet()
 					for _, triple := range tt.expectedDepActions {
 						fields := strings.Split(triple, ":")
@@ -269,9 +263,9 @@ func TestPolicy_edgeConditions(t *testing.T) {
 						}
 						csExpected |= expectedConditions
 					}
-					t.Logf("expected target conditions as %04x{%s}", csExpected, strings.Join(csExpected.Names(), ", "))
+					t.Logf("expected target conditions as %#v %s", csExpected, csExpected)
 					if csActual != csExpected {
-						t.Errorf("unexpected license conditions: got %04x, want %04x", csActual, csExpected)
+						t.Errorf("unexpected license conditions: got %#v, want %#v", csActual, csExpected)
 					}
 				})
 			}
diff --git a/tools/compliance/policy_resolve_test.go b/tools/compliance/policy_resolve_test.go
index f98e4cc23a..d6731feb21 100644
--- a/tools/compliance/policy_resolve_test.go
+++ b/tools/compliance/policy_resolve_test.go
@@ -289,8 +289,8 @@ func TestResolveBottomUpConditions(t *testing.T) {
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
 			expectedActions: []tcond{
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice|restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
+				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -300,8 +300,8 @@ func TestResolveBottomUpConditions(t *testing.T) {
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
 			expectedActions: []tcond{
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice|restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
+				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ func TestResolveBottomUpConditions(t *testing.T) {
 			},
 			expectedActions: []tcond{
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -322,8 +322,8 @@ func TestResolveBottomUpConditions(t *testing.T) {
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
 			expectedActions: []tcond{
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice|restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
+				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 	}
@@ -593,9 +593,9 @@ func TestResolveTopDownConditions(t *testing.T) {
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
 			expectedActions: []tcond{
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice|restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
-				{"mitLib.meta_lic", "notice|restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
+				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
+				{"mitLib.meta_lic", "notice"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -606,9 +606,9 @@ func TestResolveTopDownConditions(t *testing.T) {
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
 			expectedActions: []tcond{
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice|restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
-				{"mitLib.meta_lic", "notice|restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
+				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
+				{"mitLib.meta_lic", "notice"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ func TestResolveTopDownConditions(t *testing.T) {
 			},
 			expectedActions: []tcond{
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 				{"mitLib.meta_lic", "notice"},
 			},
 		},
@@ -632,9 +632,9 @@ func TestResolveTopDownConditions(t *testing.T) {
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
 			expectedActions: []tcond{
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice|restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
-				{"mitLib.meta_lic", "notice|restricted_with_classpath_exception"},
+				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
+				{"mitLib.meta_lic", "notice"},
 			},
 		},
 	}
diff --git a/tools/compliance/policy_resolvenotices_test.go b/tools/compliance/policy_resolvenotices_test.go
index cd9dd71bdc..ee5e3b8b9e 100644
--- a/tools/compliance/policy_resolvenotices_test.go
+++ b/tools/compliance/policy_resolvenotices_test.go
@@ -375,10 +375,8 @@ func TestResolveNotices(t *testing.T) {
 			},
 			expectedResolutions: []res{
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -390,10 +388,8 @@ func TestResolveNotices(t *testing.T) {
 			},
 			expectedResolutions: []res{
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -418,7 +414,7 @@ func TestResolveNotices(t *testing.T) {
 			expectedResolutions: []res{
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice"},
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -430,9 +426,7 @@ func TestResolveNotices(t *testing.T) {
 			},
 			expectedResolutions: []res{
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -444,11 +438,8 @@ func TestResolveNotices(t *testing.T) {
 			},
 			expectedResolutions: []res{
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "mitLib.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 	}
diff --git a/tools/compliance/policy_resolveshare_test.go b/tools/compliance/policy_resolveshare_test.go
index c451b86040..d49dfa8b3d 100644
--- a/tools/compliance/policy_resolveshare_test.go
+++ b/tools/compliance/policy_resolveshare_test.go
@@ -40,9 +40,7 @@ func TestResolveSourceSharing(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:  "independentmodulestaticrestricted",
@@ -50,10 +48,7 @@ func TestResolveSourceSharing(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:  "dependentmodulerestricted",
@@ -61,9 +56,7 @@ func TestResolveSourceSharing(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:  "dependentmodulerestrictedshipclasspath",
@@ -71,11 +64,7 @@ func TestResolveSourceSharing(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:  "lgplonfprestricted",
@@ -185,9 +174,7 @@ func TestResolveSourceSharing(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:  "independentmodulereversestaticrestricted",
@@ -195,10 +182,7 @@ func TestResolveSourceSharing(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:  "dependentmodulereverserestricted",
@@ -206,9 +190,7 @@ func TestResolveSourceSharing(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:  "dependentmodulereverserestrictedshipdependent",
@@ -216,11 +198,7 @@ func TestResolveSourceSharing(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:  "ponrrestricted",
diff --git a/tools/compliance/policy_walk_test.go b/tools/compliance/policy_walk_test.go
index 92867f9535..c55e2f88ae 100644
--- a/tools/compliance/policy_walk_test.go
+++ b/tools/compliance/policy_walk_test.go
@@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			},
 			expectedResolutions: []res{
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -115,10 +114,7 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "dependentmodulenotice",
@@ -129,7 +125,6 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			},
 			expectedResolutions: []res{
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -139,9 +134,7 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "lgplonfpnotice",
@@ -347,7 +340,7 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
 			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -357,9 +350,7 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "independentmodulereverserestrictedshipped",
@@ -368,9 +359,7 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "independentmodulereversestaticnotice",
@@ -380,9 +369,8 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
 			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -392,10 +380,7 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "dependentmodulereversenotice",
@@ -405,7 +390,7 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
 			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -415,9 +400,7 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "dependentmodulereverserestrictedshipped",
@@ -426,11 +409,7 @@ func TestWalkResolutionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedResolutions: []res{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedResolutions: []res{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "ponrnotice",
@@ -716,8 +695,7 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			},
 			expectedActions: []act{
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -727,10 +705,7 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
-			expectedActions: []act{
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedActions: []act{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "dependentmodulenotice",
@@ -741,7 +716,6 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			},
 			expectedActions: []act{
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -751,9 +725,7 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedActions: []act{
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedActions: []act{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "lgplonfpnotice",
@@ -956,7 +928,7 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
 			expectedActions: []act{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -966,9 +938,7 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedActions: []act{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedActions: []act{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "independentmodulereverserestrictedshipped",
@@ -977,9 +947,7 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedActions: []act{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedActions: []act{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "independentmodulereversestaticnotice",
@@ -989,9 +957,8 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
 			expectedActions: []act{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", "notice"},
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -1001,10 +968,7 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "apacheBin.meta_lic", []string{"static"}},
 			},
-			expectedActions: []act{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"apacheBin.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedActions: []act{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "dependentmodulereversenotice",
@@ -1014,7 +978,7 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
 			expectedActions: []act{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
+				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "permissive"},
 			},
 		},
 		{
@@ -1024,9 +988,7 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedActions: []act{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedActions: []act{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "dependentmodulereverserestrictedshipped",
@@ -1035,10 +997,7 @@ func TestWalkActionsForCondition(t *testing.T) {
 			edges: []annotated{
 				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "dependentModule.meta_lic", []string{"dynamic"}},
 			},
-			expectedActions: []act{
-				{"gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-				{"dependentModule.meta_lic", "gplWithClasspathException.meta_lic", "restricted"},
-			},
+			expectedActions: []act{},
 		},
 		{
 			name:      "ponrnotice",
diff --git a/tools/compliance/test_util.go b/tools/compliance/test_util.go
index 26d7461b8b..c9d6fe29ec 100644
--- a/tools/compliance/test_util.go
+++ b/tools/compliance/test_util.go
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ license_conditions: "restricted"
 	Classpath = `` +
 		`package_name: "Free Software"
 license_kinds: "SPDX-license-identifier-GPL-2.0-with-classpath-exception"
-license_conditions: "restricted"
+license_conditions: "permissive"
 `
 
 	// DependentModule starts a test metadata file for a module in the same package as `Classpath`.
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ func checkSame(rsActual, rsExpected ResolutionSet, t *testing.T) {
 			expectedConditions := expectedRl[i].Resolves()
 			actualConditions := actualRl[i].Resolves()
 			if expectedConditions != actualConditions {
-				t.Errorf("unexpected conditions apply to %q acting on %q: got %04x with names %s, want %04x with names %s",
+				t.Errorf("unexpected conditions apply to %q acting on %q: got %#v with names %s, want %#v with names %s",
 					target.name, expectedRl[i].actsOn.name,
 					actualConditions, actualConditions.Names(),
 					expectedConditions, expectedConditions.Names())
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ func checkResolves(rsActual, rsExpected ResolutionSet, t *testing.T) {
 			expectedConditions := expectedRl[i].Resolves()
 			actualConditions := actualRl[i].Resolves()
 			if expectedConditions != (expectedConditions & actualConditions) {
-				t.Errorf("expected conditions missing from %q acting on %q: got %04x with names %s, want %04x with names %s",
+				t.Errorf("expected conditions missing from %q acting on %q: got %#v with names %s, want %#v with names %s",
 					target.name, expectedRl[i].actsOn.name,
 					actualConditions, actualConditions.Names(),
 					expectedConditions, expectedConditions.Names())