releasetools: Add support for --override_timestamp. am: 9f884e6c55
am: 9ee7071553
Change-Id: I58f6108d8d620d39d673e2be9489cb13b50fbbb0
This commit is contained in:
commit
d5de271e01
1 changed files with 30 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -75,7 +75,19 @@ Usage: ota_from_target_files [flags] input_target_files output_ota_package
|
|||
will be replaced by "ota-downgrade=yes" in the metadata file. A data
|
||||
wipe will always be enforced, so "ota-wipe=yes" will also be included in
|
||||
the metadata file. The update-binary in the source build will be used in
|
||||
the OTA package, unless --binary flag is specified.
|
||||
the OTA package, unless --binary flag is specified. Please also check the
|
||||
doc for --override_timestamp below.
|
||||
|
||||
--override_timestamp
|
||||
Intentionally generate an incremental OTA that updates from a newer
|
||||
build to an older one (based on timestamp comparison), by overriding the
|
||||
timestamp in package metadata. This differs from --downgrade flag: we
|
||||
know for sure this is NOT an actual downgrade case, but two builds are
|
||||
cut in a reverse order. A legit use case is that we cut a new build C
|
||||
(after having A and B), but want to enfore an update path of A -> C -> B.
|
||||
Specifying --downgrade may not help since that would enforce a data wipe
|
||||
for C -> B update. The value of "post-timestamp" will be set to the newer
|
||||
timestamp plus one, so that the package can be pushed and applied.
|
||||
|
||||
-e (--extra_script) <file>
|
||||
Insert the contents of file at the end of the update script.
|
||||
|
@ -153,6 +165,7 @@ OPTIONS.patch_threshold = 0.95
|
|||
OPTIONS.wipe_user_data = False
|
||||
OPTIONS.omit_prereq = False
|
||||
OPTIONS.downgrade = False
|
||||
OPTIONS.timestamp = False
|
||||
OPTIONS.extra_script = None
|
||||
OPTIONS.aslr_mode = True
|
||||
OPTIONS.worker_threads = multiprocessing.cpu_count() // 2
|
||||
|
@ -832,20 +845,21 @@ def HandleDowngradeMetadata(metadata):
|
|||
is_downgrade = long(post_timestamp) < long(pre_timestamp)
|
||||
|
||||
if OPTIONS.downgrade:
|
||||
metadata["ota-downgrade"] = "yes"
|
||||
if not is_downgrade:
|
||||
raise RuntimeError("--downgrade specified but no downgrade detected: "
|
||||
"pre: %s, post: %s" % (pre_timestamp, post_timestamp))
|
||||
metadata["ota-downgrade"] = "yes"
|
||||
elif OPTIONS.timestamp:
|
||||
if not is_downgrade:
|
||||
raise RuntimeError("--timestamp specified but no timestamp hack needed: "
|
||||
"pre: %s, post: %s" % (pre_timestamp, post_timestamp))
|
||||
metadata["post-timestamp"] = str(long(pre_timestamp) + 1)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if is_downgrade:
|
||||
# Non-fatal here to allow generating such a package which may require
|
||||
# manual work to adjust the post-timestamp. A legit use case is that we
|
||||
# cut a new build C (after having A and B), but want to enfore the
|
||||
# update path of A -> C -> B. Specifying --downgrade may not help since
|
||||
# that would enforce a data wipe for C -> B update.
|
||||
print("\nWARNING: downgrade detected: pre: %s, post: %s.\n"
|
||||
"The package may not be deployed properly. "
|
||||
"Try --downgrade?\n" % (pre_timestamp, post_timestamp))
|
||||
raise RuntimeError("Downgrade detected based on timestamp check: "
|
||||
"pre: %s, post: %s. Need to specify --timestamp OR "
|
||||
"--downgrade to allow building the incremental." % (
|
||||
pre_timestamp, post_timestamp))
|
||||
metadata["post-timestamp"] = post_timestamp
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1963,6 +1977,8 @@ def main(argv):
|
|||
elif o == "--downgrade":
|
||||
OPTIONS.downgrade = True
|
||||
OPTIONS.wipe_user_data = True
|
||||
elif o == "--override_timestamp":
|
||||
OPTIONS.timestamp = True
|
||||
elif o in ("-o", "--oem_settings"):
|
||||
OPTIONS.oem_source = a
|
||||
elif o == "--oem_no_mount":
|
||||
|
@ -2021,6 +2037,7 @@ def main(argv):
|
|||
"wipe_user_data",
|
||||
"no_prereq",
|
||||
"downgrade",
|
||||
"override_timestamp",
|
||||
"extra_script=",
|
||||
"worker_threads=",
|
||||
"aslr_mode=",
|
||||
|
@ -2055,6 +2072,9 @@ def main(argv):
|
|||
raise ValueError("Cannot generate downgradable full OTAs - consider"
|
||||
"using --omit_prereq?")
|
||||
|
||||
assert not (OPTIONS.downgrade and OPTIONS.timestamp), \
|
||||
"Cannot have --downgrade AND --override_timestamp both"
|
||||
|
||||
# Load the dict file from the zip directly to have a peek at the OTA type.
|
||||
# For packages using A/B update, unzipping is not needed.
|
||||
input_zip = zipfile.ZipFile(args[0], "r")
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue