The build was working on AOSP, but fails downstream when using
Jack because the javalib.jar file needed by CTS is not being
built by default there.
Change-Id: I8dd836b33a4e1bae5af623db3822de99e9b05cf0
Add vboot properties to the dictionary file, which will be packed into
the target_files zip. Add support in packaging and OTA scripts to
sign the generated bootable images (boot.img and recovery.img) when
vboot is enabled.
Change-Id: I08758ced03d173219415bca762bbdb66c464a9f5
(cherry picked from commit 5d5a3bd9e8d8b14b71d1b2105417a2958d13d3d2)
As suggested in the comments on
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/141560/
drop BOARD_SEPOLICY_UNION and simplify the build_policy logic.
Union all files found under BOARD_SEPOLICY_DIRS.
Change-Id: I4214893c999c23631f5456cb1b8edd59771ef13b
Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Previously we were bundling this into libc++ and having each binary
resolve its symbols from there. This means that the unwinder that gets
used for a given binary is sensitive to the order in which its
libraries are linked. Making this a static library dependency of each
binary means the right unwinder will always be used.
Bug: 18471342
Bug: 19958712
Change-Id: I782d212784dbf85355b5d9146d7460d675259a0e
With commit 33360dd569 we moved Java
resource packaging forward to creation of the jar file. But the Java
resource packaging will be skipped if a module has no Java code at all.
(The build system does support building an apk without Java code.)
In this change we add back the Java resources directly to the built apk
when the apk has no Java code.
(cherry-picked from commit 8b27d1879c)
Bug: 19947218
Change-Id: I0e1a65a9cbe656974f8ef3923b2f15e9efa5feb9
Added support to build system.img that combines contents of /system and
the ramdisk, and can be mounted at the root of the file system.
To enable this feature, define BoardConfig.mk variable:
BOARD_BUILD_SYSTEM_ROOT_IMAGE := true
Ideally we would just change TARGET_OUT (the path of the staging system
directory) to under TARGET_ROOT_OUT. But at this point many places in
the build system assume TARGET_OUT is independent of TARGET_ROOT_OUT and
we can't make it easily configurable.
Instead this implementation takes the least intrusive approach:
We don't change TARGET_OUT or TARGET_ROOT_OUT. We just assemble a
temporary staging directory that contains contents of both TARGET_OUT
and TARGET_ROOT_OUT, in build_image.BuildImage() of
tools/releasetools/build_image.py.
When build_image.py is directly called from the makefile, we pass in the
parameters from the global dictionary; when build_image.BuildImage() is
called from add_img_to_target_files.py, we need to override values to
point to files extracted from the target_files zip file.
We need to combine the fs_config files of both /system and ramdisk,
when fs_config is enabled.
Also this change refactored build_image.BuildImage() by moving the extra
parameters to the image property dictionary.
(cherry-picked from commit 0eabd4f2c5)
Bug:19868522
Change-Id: Iafc467a0e3427b0d6ad3b575abcc98ddcc9ea0f1
Fix the bug that build is still success when boot jars contain
non-whitelisted classes. Now, check-boot-jars.py correctly
finishes with exit code 1 when non-whitelisted classes are found.
Change-Id: Id5c80ef9fdb70213d878d569f6033be2c9eb90d3
Clang 3.6 (including the snapshot present in AOSP) added support for
-mcpu=cortex-a15 -- there's no need to fall back to generic armv7-a
anymore.
Change-Id: I8a582261ac35e32f8f1def1d244cf83f2096520d
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <Bernhard.Rosenkranzer@linaro.org>
The change follows the patten found in "Package OTA" and other places
to allow for overriding the mkbootimg command.
Now pass MKBOOTIMG variable to get make_recovery_patch and add_image_to_target
to use the tool set in BOARD_CUSTOM_MKBOOTIMG for boot/recovery image
generation.
Change-Id: I78533c25e87c2750eb24ac1bf39e4b7ca321a441
This caught a few bugs/syntax errors (a few character classes were not
escaped properly in regex patterns, some indentation was illegal,
etc).
Change-Id: I50637607524e68c4fb9cad7167f58a46b8d26b2c
We need to patch zipfile during close() too, because it refers to the
ZIP64 file size threshold when writing out the central directory
Bug: 18015246
Bug: 19888174
Change-Id: I1b49d653d0831fcc2106808f86c929d7a2b22ff3
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
