Bug: 200082547
Test: Manual builds:
1. Set BOARD_USES_SYSTEM_DLKM_PARTITION
2. Set BOARD_PREBUILT_SYSTEM_DLKM_IMAGE to external image
- Check that "m dist" put the system_dlkm image in
out/dist/aosp_cf_x86_64_phone-img-eng.ramjiyani.zip
Signed-off-by: Ramji Jiyani <ramjiyani@google.com>
Change-Id: I8b7dd40e178db7fe542253bff19040095847fa57
This new init_boot.img contains the ramdisk that used to reside in the
boot.img file.
Test: set BOARD_PREBUILT_INIT_BOOT_IMAGE to an external init_boot.img
- Check that "m" pulls in the init_boot.img to
out/target/product/vsoc_x86_64/
- Check that "m dist" adds the init_boot.img to
aosp_cf_x86_64_phone-img-eng.devinmoore.zip
Test: atest --host releasetools_test
Bug: 203698939
Change-Id: If7ef2cf093e5e525529c7c44333c0f40f6ba0764
Commit Ia982eb2ee3d1eb64db72c1836e433bcc53e71e3f removes boot-5.4.img
and leaves only a boot-5.10.img file, which makes 'boot_container'
become false. This leads to the failure in AddVbmetaDigest() as it will
search a 'boot.img' based on the 'boot' descriptor from the vbmeta.img.
Add a condition that if boot_images[0] is not 'boot.img' then the
build is also a boot container.
Bug: 199807830
Test: build aosp_x86_64-user
Change-Id: I4a9487b075186f0abf2ba74d3a1cf78072352a05
When computing the data offset of an entry in zip file, we used length
of extra field from central directory. That is correct most of the time
but wrong if the extra field in central directory has different length
than the one in local file directory. Since python's zipfile doesn't
provide an API to access local file header, we need to parse local file
header ourselves and extract length of extra field.
An incorrect offset will cause magic mismatch error from update_engine,
as update_engine expects to find uncompressed payload at the recorded
offset.
Test: th, partner verification
Bug: 191443484
Change-Id: Id670cd79b0bd65adffaaa5224ae4f8065d66b358
During signing, we write the entry directly to the output zip, intead
of a temp directory. Add the logic to write vbmeta_digest.txt to output
zipfile too. So the digest file will show up in the signed target files.
Bug: 189926233
Test: add_img_to_target_files -a <target-files.zip>
Change-Id: Ibf28a8f97512bda8c8c695e06190e1fb6573c53e
We have already logged the compressed apexes in the target-files.
Because we want to support the apex metrics during OTA update, also
include the uncompressed apexes in the META/apex_info.pb.
For incremental OTA packages, include the source apex version for
each apex package as well.
Bug: 190244686
Test: unit test
Change-Id: I5cf2647c56c4feb5517f9a81aa1e9abc52515bf1
If the build prop ro.build.id isn't set at build time, init will
set it at runtime. The logic is appending the vbmeta digest to
the ro.build.legacy.id.
Make the same change in ota scripts, so the correct build fingerprint
will be saved in the ota metadata.
Bug: 186786987
Test: generate an OTA, check the metadata
Change-Id: I278f59c41c1f98d4cbea749e5d9e4eaf7a6b9565
Calculate the vbmeta digest if the device builds vbmeta image. The
digest will used later to determine the build fingerprint in new
format.
One sample usage is the ota package generation, where we put the
build fingerprint in the ota metadata. But we don't have the runtime
vbmeta digest provided the bootloader.
Bug: 186786987
Test: unit tests
Change-Id: If572e2b973e295a6c95a9e23a65bb20b3afbf1b0
Uses apex_utils.GetApexInfoFromTargetFiles to find and parse APEX files
in the target files partition dirs. Raises an error on failure to parse
or duplicate package names.
Bug: 177225446
Test: releasetools_test
Test: Create a merged build that provides the VNDK APEX on both vendor
and system. Observe failure.
Change-Id: I1356e263b7b32d6063129e079f3ba7ab4ff132a7
This reverts commit ccfea17fb7.
Reason for revert: Original bug was resolved by updating branch config
Change-Id: I2327092261a2147fa8f2be3d878db04228e65511
This change doesn't change the condition for building super_empty.img,
it just add a toggle PRODUCT_BUILD_SUPER_EMPTY_IMAGE that product
makefiles can use to skip building super_empty.img.
Products that don't use super_empty at all, for example GSI, can set
this option to ensure the super_empty.img is not built.
Bug: 183068624
Test: "m dist" on GSI and check the build artifacts under OUT and DIST
directories, and check the contents of *-img-*.zip
Change-Id: I54943952873d2d297fd9d18cbe14742bc12ae9c6
The pvmfw is included in an `m` build but not in the distribution files.
Apply the same treatment as the dtbo partition to copy the pvmfw
partition to dist/ since, similar to the dtbo image, the pvmfw image is
generally provided as a prebuilt image.
Test: make dist
Bug: 174457787
Change-Id: I6f42517ba42db92e90048d1236d7255ccbd73f73
This is needed for partial builds that do not have the apex directory in
their target files package.
Test: build target files for a partial vendor-only build.
Change-Id: I076bfbd1a81cccddcef795f5edeaf2b51538cdec
Currently we support skip building vbmeta.img when
PRODUCT_BUILD_VBMETA_IMAGE is set to false, which is used
when generating a system-only or vendor-only build artifacts.
However, when using `make dist` to build target files,
vbmeta.img is still generated. This change fixes this by
passing the related info to misc_info.txt for the release
tool to skip building vbmeta.img when necessary.
To make this happen, a device config should:
1. Set PRODUCT_BUILD_VBMETA_IMAGE := false
2. Remove 'vbmeta' from AB_OTA_PARTITIONS:
AB_OTA_PARTITIONS += \
boot \
system \
- vbmeta \
dtbo \
product \
system_ext \
vbmeta_system
Bug: 161659370
Test: `make dist` and checks the target file does not include vbmeta.img
Change-Id: Iddca9fe0b171a50a80e5a88aa462e118f18a7e6f
- Remove vendor_dlkm and odm_dlkm from the default list of items that
need to be merged
- Allow a prebuilt system.img to be used when adding images to the
target files archive
Test: Built Pixel 3a and inspected the output
Change-Id: If5291fff559ed9517133f6b476d8dee2500c5b4c
Modules partition is a dynamic read-write partition.
- AVB is not enabled on the partition
- OTA is file-based; see follow up CL for details
- No build prop files; in particular, no build fingerprint
- No fs_config
- No notice files; notice files are included in individual APEXes
Test: build on CF
Bug: 163543381
Change-Id: Ie397b9ec61dfd1c158450d050196024604854d4d
Multiple boot images can be generated based on BOARD_KERNEL_BINARIES
but vbmeta would capture the image descriptor of only the first boot
image specified in BUILT_BOOTIMAGE_TARGET.
Bug : 158213759
Test: Compile multiple boot images and check if vbmeta.img
includes image descriptor of only the first boot image
specified in BUILT_BOOTIMAGE_TARGET
Change-Id: Ib70f65d98546a436da82656bc5c911d437618bb5
Modify add_img_to_target_files.py to use the BUILDING_*_IMAGE flags when
deciding whether to create and add a given image to a target files
archive.
To do this, the BUILDING_*_IMAGE flags are now dumped to misc_info.txt.
The origin of this change was to use the BUILDING_USERDATA_IMAGE and
BUILDING_CACHE_IMAGE flags in add_img_to_target_files.py so that we
could reliably turn off the generation of the userdata and cache images.
The other image flags were added for symmetry.
Bug: 130307439
Test: m -j out/target/product/bonito/misc_info.txt
Test: m -j droid dist
Change-Id: I32d5a8d6c9ebb5f329d856030084d698ee8d271d
The custom images are any images owned by OEMs and SoCs, oem images
mounted on /oem is an example. The oem images can be used to customize
devices for different carriers, like wallpaper, ringtones, and
carrier-specific apks. OEMs can generate multiple oem images, like
oem.img, oem-carrier1.img and oem-carrier2.img and flash different oem
images for different carriers. The oem images are only one case, OEMs
and SoCs can add more custom images and mount them to custom partitions.
This change enables custom images to be vbmeta.img chained partitions.
The following configuration in BoardConfig.mk is an exmaple. It has two
custom partitions: oem and test. They will be signed by different keys.
And they will be chained by vbmeta.img. The custom images here are
prebuilts, which can be built by `make custom_images` separately.
BOARD_AVB_<CUSTOM_PARTITION>_IMAGE_LIST should include all custom images
to apply AVB signing. And to every custom partition, one image whose
name is partition name must be added in its
BOARD_AVB_<CUSTOM_PARTITION>_IMAGE_LIST.
BOARD_CUSTOMIMAGES_PARTITION_LIST := oem test
BOARD_AVB_OEM_KEY_PATH := external/avb/test/data/testkey_rsa4096.pem
BOARD_AVB_OEM_ALGORITHM := SHA256_RSA4096
BOARD_AVB_OEM_ADD_HASHTREE_FOOTER_ARGS :=
BOARD_AVB_OEM_ROLLBACK_INDEX_LOCATION := 1
BOARD_AVB_OEM_PARTITION_SIZE := 5242880
BOARD_AVB_OEM_IMAGE_LIST := \
device/xxxx/yyyy/oem/oem.img \
device/xxxx/yyyy/oem/oem1.img
BOARD_AVB_TEST_KEY_PATH := external/avb/test/data/testkey_rsa2048.pem
BOARD_AVB_TEST_ALGORITHM := SHA256_RSA2048
BOARD_AVB_TEST_ADD_HASHTREE_FOOTER_ARGS :=
BOARD_AVB_TEST_ROLLBACK_INDEX_LOCATION := 2
BOARD_AVB_TEST_PARTITION_SIZE := 10485760
BOARD_AVB_TEST_IMAGE_LIST := \
device/xxxx/yyyy/test/test.img \
device/xxxx/yyyy/test/test1.img
To resign the custom images in the target zip file, the
avb_extra_custom_image_key, avb_extra_custom_image_algorithms and
avb_extra_custom_image_extra_args options are added to the
sign_target_files_apks tool too. The following test cases list some
examples about how to use them.
BUG: 154171021
Test: 1) "atest --host releasetools_test releasetools_py3_test -c"
2) Build images by 'make dist', sign and validate target files.
a) Test on dist w/ chained vbmeta_system and ome custom images
sign_target_files_apks -d certs \
--avb_extra_custom_image_key oem=oem_rsa4096.pem \
--avb_extra_custom_image_algorithm oem=SHA256_RSA4096 \
xxx-target_xxx.zip signed.zip
validate_target_files.py signed.zip
Flash image and boot up.
Verify the oem images and vbmeta images in OUT and target zips by
avbtool.
b) Test on dist w/ chained vbmeta_system and oem and test custom images
sign_target_files_apks -d certs \
--avb_extra_custom_image_key oem=oem_rsa4096.pem \
--avb_extra_custom_image_algorithm oem=SHA256_RSA4096 \
--avb_extra_custom_image_extra_args oem=--do_not_generate_fec \
--avb_extra_custom_image_key test=test_rsa4096.pem \
--avb_extra_custom_image_algorithm test=SHA256_RSA4096 \
xxx-target_xxx.zip signed.zip
validate_target_files.py signed.zip
Verify the oem, test images and vbmeta images in OUT and target zips
by avbtool.
c) Test on dist w/o chained partition.
sign_target_files_apks -d certs xxx-target_xxx.zip signed.zip
validate_target_files.py signed.zip
Flash image and boot up.
Verify the vbmeta images in OUT and target zips by avbtool.
Change-Id: Ifccfee5e8909697eef6ccda0cc352fa16a9f6db6
This reverts commit 6022545272.
The build prop for a partition used to be a simple key:value
dictionary. But we need more fields to hold the alternative build
props overriden by the 'import' statement. Therefore, add a new
class as a wrapper for these props first.
Bug: 152167826
Change-Id: I5c952cd2a976ba1a09ddc66d56c2b8b55a61986b
Test: unittests pass
The build prop for a partition used to be a simple key:value
dictionary. But we need more fields to hold the alternative build
props overriden by the 'import' statement. Therefore, add a new
class as a wrapper for these props first.
Bug: 152167826
Test: unittests pass
Change-Id: I2fe7e93a2f4de8e55f5f8051b000b96b5efdc85a
Support for generating multiple boot.img files is required in the
release tools to enable GKI distribution/signing.
Bug: 151094943
Change-Id: I536a286d3123f35918106a52c49b1148d746370f
This causes the output image files of a merged build to be identical
to the image files of the input partial builds, for each images in
PARTITIONS_WITH_CARE_MAP.
Test: python -m unittest test_common
Test: `m dist`; `unzip out/dist/target_files.zip IMAGES/\*`;
`zip -d out/dist/target_files.zip IMAGES/\*`
`add_img_to_target_files -a out/dist/target_files.zip`.
Verify that the rebuilt images are identical to the deleted ones.
Test: Build a merged target (using merge_target_files.py). Verify that
the partial target-files.zip IMAGES are identical to the merged
target-files.zip IMAGES for PARTITIONS_WITH_CARE_MAP images.
Bug: 150405807
Change-Id: I5fdf5783c1aff9c14cf5408090389b1f65b69ca6
We used to support getting idempotent images when given the same inputs,
by specifying UUID and AVB salt to the image builders. The support was
broken by Q changes that moved away from build-time fingerprints [1].
This CL addresses the issue by updating the logic in computing UUID and
AVB salt to be based on BuildInfo.fingerprint, as opposed to the
deprecated static build fingerprint.
[1] https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/build/+/892933
Bug: 134525174
Test: TreeHugger
Test: lunch a target; `atest --host releasetools_test releasetools_py3_test`
Test: `m dist`; `unzip out/dist/target_files.zip IMAGES/\*`;
`zip -d out/dist/target_files.zip IMAGES/\*`
Test: `add_img_to_target_files -a out/dist/target_files.zip`. Verify that
the rebuilt images are identical to the ones deleted.
Change-Id: I8844fc7f044e9abfcd96a00e8958fa0583c70eaf
First, remove the use of info_dict['fstab'] in add_img_to_target_files.
- info_dict['fstab'] corresponds to recovery fstab
(`/etc/recovery.fstab`), which may differ from the one used for
normal boot.
- When calling build_image.ImagePropFromGlobalDict, we already have the
desired info from global dict (`META/info_dict.txt`).
Second, common.LoadInfoDict now loads recovery fstab only for non-A/B
devices. Because the info is only meaningful for installing non-A/B OTAs
(under recovery mode).
Fixes: 132458722
Test: TreeHugger
Test: Build non-A/B incremental OTAs.
Change-Id: Id23e7b17264c123319fe00b1663d52bfd9b4a5e2
This change is part of a topic that moves the recovery resources from the
system partition to the vendor partition, if it exists, or the vendor directory
on the system partition otherwise. The recovery resources are moving from the
system image to the vendor partition so that a single system image may be used
with either an A/B or a non-A/B vendor image. The topic removes a delta in the
system image that prevented such reuse in the past.
The recovery resources that are moving are involved with updating the recovery
partition after an update. In a non-A/B configuration, the system boots from
the recovery partition, updates the other partitions (system, vendor, etc.)
Then, the next time the system boots normally, a script updates the recovery
partition (if necessary). This script, the executables it invokes, and the data
files that it uses were previously on the system partition. The resources that
are moving include the following.
* install-recovery.sh
* applypatch
* recovery-resource.dat (if present)
* recovery-from-boot.p (if present)
This change includes the platform build system and release tools changes to
move the recovery resources from system to vendor (or /system/vendor). The
release tools need to know where to generate the recovery patch, and they
discover this from misc_info.txt variable board_uses_vendorimage, which the
platform build system generates.
We remove applypatch from PRODUCT_PACKAGES, but it is added back as a required
module in target/product/base_vendor.mk.
Several release tools rely on the misc_info.txt board_uses_vendorimage variable
to know how to generate and detect the recovery patch.
This change partially removes the --rebuild_recovery flag from the
merge_target_files.py script. The flag will be fully removed in a follow-on
change.
Bug: 68319577
Test: Ensure that recovery partition is updated correctly.
Change-Id: Ia4045bd67ffb3d899efa8d20dab4c4299b87ee5f
The vendor_boot partition is generated by mkbootimg and contains all the
device-specific information that used to reside in the boot partition.
Bug: 137297791
Change-Id: I5b005097b73f59857c3a2f92d693b3e67ee8424e
Bug: 137853921
Bug: 138671115
Test: python -m unittest test_common
Test: python -m unittest test_add_img_to_target_files
Test: Ran 'merge_builds --build_vbmeta' for two devices, one with the
vbmeta struct on system.img and another with vbmeta_system.img. Flashed
the regenerated vbmeta.img files on devices, devices boot.
Change-Id: I8d7585c7af468be3d242d8aceeed6d27e6fc6d96
It used to be packed at IMAGES/recovery-two-step.img, but to serve OTA
purpose only.
Test: `m dist` with a non-A/B target. Check the file in the generated
target_files.zip.
Test: Create two-step package. Check that recovery-two-step.img is used.
Change-Id: Iec6a73c682e0f844cd8c0b758c9470fa35dd15d8
This CL changes the condition for building super_empty.img from
PRODUCT_BUILD_SUPER_PARTITION to PRODUCT_USE_DYNAMIC_PARTITIONS, as a
follow-up to the change in [1].
With the CL in [1], it skips building super.img and super_empty.img both
when turning off PRODUCT_BUILD_SUPER_PARTITION. However, the latter
should be mandatory whenever dynamic partitions is enabled. Because
fastboot relies on this file to properly flash dynamic partitions. Plus,
the cost for building super_empty.img is much lower than the one for
super.img.
As part of the change, it'll write group info into target_files when
building with PRODUCT_BUILD_SUPER_PARTITION == false. It's the work for
target_files merging script to determine the values to be picked up. The
current logic in merge_target_files.py always uses the one from vendor
target_files. This CL adds a testcase to ensure the behavior.
[1] https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/build/+/928756
Bug: 135752763
Test: `m dist` with a target that sets PRODUCT_BUILD_SUPER_PARTITION to
false. Check the built artifacts contain super_empty.img. Verify
that the build can be flashed properly.
Change-Id: I277f087eab45663a6c3b33333d16e9e576c1c25c
common.AVB_VBMETA_PARTITIONS was recently added (commit
08c190fc89) for the same purpose.
Test: TreeHugger
Change-Id: I65572d54c22a753fdef80677377fcc9b684ee16f
When using Verified Boot 2.0, releasetools specifies a salt value based
on build fingerprint, so that to give idempotent images.
However, the change that removed static `ro.build.fingerprint` [1] broke
the behavior, as common.LoadInfoDict still relies on fingerprints.
Without a fixed salt, the first call to make_recovery_patch.py and the
second one (which writes IMAGES/{boot,recovery}.img) will see different
images, which leads to install-recovery.sh failure.
Note that currently there's a dependency that requires getting bootable
images through two separate calls. make_recovery_patch.py has to happen
first to get (placeholder) files in the system image. We then generate
canned fs_config files, and finally use add_img_to_target_files.py to
write the images.
This CL adds a quick workaround to force rebuilding the
recovery-from-boot patch while calling add_img_to_target_files.py.
[1] https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/build/+/892933
Bug: 134123803
Bug: 134525174
Test: TreeHugger
Test: Build a non-A/B target that uses AVB. Run validate_target_files.py
on the generated target_files.zip.
Change-Id: I5859e30be63bfd54398cf41fd2d907f15285f560
Bug: 123428770
Test: Built system-only image and checked that no boot.img or
recovery.img files where created. Booted the resulting merged build on
device.
Change-Id: I760476502775e68125907c39e66b8665e789a798
common.GetCareMap() may return an empty list on unavailable care_map
since the change in commit 8bdfb990ea.
Caller needs to handle such a case accordingly. This CL fixes the caller
in add_img_to_target_files.py, and changes the return value to None to
break legacy callers loudly.
Fixes: 131794385
Test: `atest releasetools_test`
Change-Id: I7c94f456064199237e84ef75732bdd10ebe31736
