The avb_pubkey may not be present, if the apex was initially
unsigned or generated from a bundle. In this case, running
sign_apex to generate a signed apex binary would result in an error.
This fix checks for presense of avbpubkey before attempting the
deletion
BUG: 139994107
Change-Id: I3cb2e88a11ad8797e38ba5fb98c96a4ec4135fc8
This allows sharing the same signing config on different target_files
zips. Nonexistent APEX will be ignored with a warning.
Bug: 137249701
Test: Run sign_target_files_apks with APEX overrides.
Change-Id: I2bad0f5c00753ed36ec5ae3431c7dc2ff1fc3e9c
When using Verified Boot 2.0, releasetools specifies a salt value based
on build fingerprint, so that to give idempotent images.
However, the change that removed static `ro.build.fingerprint` [1] broke
the behavior, as common.LoadInfoDict still relies on fingerprints.
Without a fixed salt, the first call to make_recovery_patch.py and the
second one (which writes IMAGES/{boot,recovery}.img) will see different
images, which leads to install-recovery.sh failure.
Note that currently there's a dependency that requires getting bootable
images through two separate calls. make_recovery_patch.py has to happen
first to get (placeholder) files in the system image. We then generate
canned fs_config files, and finally use add_img_to_target_files.py to
write the images.
This CL adds a quick workaround to force rebuilding the
recovery-from-boot patch while calling add_img_to_target_files.py.
[1] https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/build/+/892933
Bug: 134123803
Bug: 134525174
Test: TreeHugger
Test: Build a non-A/B target that uses AVB. Run validate_target_files.py
on the generated target_files.zip.
Change-Id: I5859e30be63bfd54398cf41fd2d907f15285f560
Merged-In: I5859e30be63bfd54398cf41fd2d907f15285f560
(cherry picked from commit 4978fa99d1)
In device root directory, we have the following symlinks:
- /odm/app -> /vendor/odm/app
- /odm/bin -> /vendor/odm/bin
- /odm/etc -> /vendor/odm/etc
...
This allows the Generic System Image (GSI) to be used on both devices:
1) Has a physical odm partition, where those symlink will be hidden
when /odm is used as the mount point
2) Has no physical odm partition and fallback to /vendor/odm/.
We can't just have the symlink /odm -> /vendor/odm, because the former
devices won't have /vendor/odm directory, which leads to mount failure
when the mount point /odm is resolved to /vendor/odm.
The existing /vendor/odm/build.prop won't be loaded in the latter
devices, because there is no symlink:
- /odm/build.prop -> /vendor/odm/build.prop.
Note that init blocks reading through direct symlinks (O_NOFOLLOW) so
the above symlink won't work either. This CL moves the odm build.prop
to /odm/etc/build.prop for init to load it (symlinks in earlier
components of the path will still be followed by O_NOFOLLOW).
Bug: 132128501
Test: boot a device and checks /odm/etc/build.prop is loaded
Test: make dist with an odm.img, checks $OUT/odm/etc/build.prop is loaded
Change-Id: I6f88763db755c9ec6068bfdd9cee81c19d72e9d7
Merged-In: I6f88763db755c9ec6068bfdd9cee81c19d72e9d7
(cherry picked from commit 6c62884000)
Bug: 132687993, 131687150
This CL moves SignApex() from sign_target_files_apks into apex_utils,
and adds sign_apex that allows signing a standalone APEX file directly.
Test: Run the following command and check the output file.
$ build/make/tools/releasetools/sign_apex.py \
-v \
--container_key \
build/make/target/product/security/testkey.x509.pem \
--payload_key external/avb/test/data/testkey_rsa4096.pem \
--payload_extra_args \
"--signing_helper_with_files ./signing-helper.sh" \
foo.apex \
signed-foo.apex
Test: Run sign_target_files_apks.py on crosshatch target_files.zip.
Change-Id: I4b2422fd5cb1c60a3aa94511475e2a0e5b1666ca
Commit 7df64c3e starts to call common.LoadInfoDict() when generating
image archive, which reads additional files under BOOT/, RECOVERY/ and
ROOT/. Unzip everything from the target_files.zip.
Bug: 132456827
Test: Run img_from_target_files.py on previously failing
target_files.zip.
Change-Id: I22ee57c4f765bee9494478bf115b1581877401f4
Bug: 131710801
Test: Run sign_target_files_apks.py on a target that uses vbmeta_system.
Change-Id: I3bc526af3ec9f2680ca17ee5535607cff3ae9523
Merged-In: I3bc526af3ec9f2680ca17ee5535607cff3ae9523
(cherry picked from commit d6085d6834)
Some properties had 'test-keys' still set
after signing the target files zip for release.
These properties are now added to the RewriteProps
method.
Bug: 131810966
Test: manual
Test: `atest releasetools_test`
Change-Id: Ifb352ed28f5100f1e9f686d77e935723f7f6d3ae
Merged-In: Ifb352ed28f5100f1e9f686d77e935723f7f6d3ae
(cherry picked from commit 234f4b418f)
When set, product-img-tag.zip contains super.img instead of individual
user images from target files. For virtual devices, super.img is needed
to boot the device, but individual user images aren't needed.
Test: on A/B DAP, with flag set:
- m updatepackage and look at img.zip
- img_from_target_files
both have super.img and not system / vendor / system_other
Test: on non-A/B DAP, with the flag set:
- m updatepackage and look at img.zip
- img_from_target_files
both have super.img and not system / vendor
Test: on A/B retrofit, with the flag set:
- m updatepackage and look at img.zip
- img_from_target_files
both have super_*.img and system_other.img, but not system / vendor
Bug: 113175337
Change-Id: I94e33091d0c837cae40776176b4dcfdd338aba90
(cherry picked from commit 0e97dbb8ca)
Merged-In: I94e33091d0c837cae40776176b4dcfdd338aba90
For an PRESIGNED APEX, it has the following format, which should be
considered as a valid input.
name="foo.apex" public_key="PRESIGNED" private_key="PRESIGNED" container_certificate="PRESIGNED" container_private_key="PRESIGNED"
Bug: 131153746
Test: Run sign_target_files_apks.py on a target_files.zip with PRESIGNED
APEXes.
Test: python -m unittest sign_target_files_apks
Change-Id: I51076b0c6eddfb75637d37659a08009f0a88e931
(cherry picked from commit f454c3a0b4)
When odm is changed, device manifest/matrices should be included.
When product is changed, framework manifest/matrices should be included.
Bug: 130714844
Bug: 126770403
Test: build with odm and product VINTF metadata
Change-Id: I49c8083e0e7185ae7b96047d68f1f624b1113dfc
Merged-In: I49c8083e0e7185ae7b96047d68f1f624b1113dfc
The boot-debug.img should NOT be release signed and can only be used
if the device is unlocked. Adding a check to prevent the tool from
signing this debuggable boot.img.
See the following for more details about boot-debug.img:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/build/+/947857
Bug: 126493225
Test: put a file /force_debuggable into boot.img, checks the following
command fails:
./build/tools/releasetools/sign_target_files_apks \
out/dist/*-target_files-*.zip signed-target_files.zip
Change-Id: Ia5232949cb9582d2b4eaa171d9e9f3fe7317d418
Merged-In: Ia5232949cb9582d2b4eaa171d9e9f3fe7317d418
(cherry picked from commit 78369ebbc1)
Bug: 130787336
Test: m oemaids_header_gen oemaids_headers passwd group
Test: Set TARGET_FS_CONFIG_GEN to a list of paths
Change-Id: I5186b378fea8865f46cfd891420ba576f36e2565
Merged-In: I5186b378fea8865f46cfd891420ba576f36e2565
(cherry picked from commit 7f25f2aed9)
FileImage needs to be thread-safe because multiple
threads gets data from it when an incremental OTA
package is created.
Test: apply incremental OTA on cuttlefish
Bug: 113175337
Change-Id: I31637fce0fbd66f3fa6c5c478da09bae65a52229
Merged-In: I31637fce0fbd66f3fa6c5c478da09bae65a52229
It returns a list of one generator object, not a list
of strings.
Test: test_blockimgdiff
Bug: 113175337
Change-Id: I8962c539c2ce3fae90d428b38c4b0e52c5a2cdad
Merged-In: I8962c539c2ce3fae90d428b38c4b0e52c5a2cdad
The function used to be serving system and vendor partitions only (as
they were the only partitions using sparse image at the point). The code
itself doesn't rely on anything specific to system/vendor.
Test: python -m unittest test_common
Bug: 113175337
Change-Id: Ia4ecdeedb262f3d9db082128eaf9bab299983333
Merged-In: Ia4ecdeedb262f3d9db082128eaf9bab299983333
The signature size will be 512 bytes when signing the payload
with 4096 bits key. This cl determines the key size with
"openssl rsa -modulus"
The new key in testdata is generated by
"openssl genrsa -out testkey 4096"
Bug: 129163830
Test: generate and verify an OTA package
Change-Id: I6662b0a0c553dc0fd84711312a1256b887e332fd
(cherry picked from commit 376cc7c452)
assert-max-image-size doesn't make sense for
dynamic partitions, as build_image.py always find the
right size for the output image. Hence:
- build_image.py no longer need to write generated_*_info.txt
(which contains the size of the image).
- assert-max-image-size on the static BOARD_*IMAGE_PARTITION_SIZE. If
a partition is dynamic, that variable isn't set, and
assert-max-image-size becomes a no-op. If the partition is static,
assert-max-image-size checks the static partition size as it used
to be.
- Fix read-size-of-partitions to use the size of the partition by
reading the image directly (instead of using generated_*_info.txt).
For devices without AVB, with DAP enabled, and does not have
RESERVED_SIZE for partitions, because of right sizing, the original
code always warns about approaching size limits. Since such checks
doesn't make sense for dynamic partitions, remove them.
Test: builds on device with dynamic partitions
Test: builds on cuttlefish with DAP enabled (without AVB), no
more size limit warnings:
WARNING: out/target/product/vsoc_x86/vendor.img approaching size limit (X now; limit X)
This reverts commit 6e099095d1.
Reason for revert: reland the CL
Bug: 122377935
Test: build blueline_mainline
Change-Id: Iee594b64e687decff186c0fa60f82b88608febe9
Merged-In: Iee594b64e687decff186c0fa60f82b88608febe9
Also, move code from build_super_image.py to sparse_img.py.
Test: sparse_img.py on sparse and non-sparse images
Bug: 122377935
Change-Id: Ie91fdfdbb54298ea27eb20d1b5363aeb1470356e
Merged-In: Ie91fdfdbb54298ea27eb20d1b5363aeb1470356e
If TARGET_USERIMAGES_SPARSE_EXT_DISABLED is set, don't provide
--sparse to lpmake, so that a non-sparse super image is built.
Test: build with the flag set.
Bug: 120041578
Change-Id: I5a26e4c793b0e2ddc89e9c38c8828ac21044e78a
Merged-In: I5a26e4c793b0e2ddc89e9c38c8828ac21044e78a
For non-A/B, you must supply the --system-item-list, --other-item-list, and
--system-misc-info-keys parameters approrpriate for merging two partial target
files. Additionally, you must supply the --rebuild-recovery option to correctly
generate the filesystem config and file contexts. With all of these parameters,
the script will generate a merged target files containing the correct recovery
files.
Also fix the --keep-tmp option to be consistent with the other options.
Bug: 122813742
Test: verify that merged target image boots and can perform OTA.
Change-Id: I5a942ac0cd9924fec419a686794a2340304594c8
This reverts commit 9788b4ed31. All the
blocking issues have been addressed.
Fixes: 120517892
Test: Run validate_target_files.py on crosshatch signed
target_files.zip.
Change-Id: I95de241e159998e002dedddafea65953b1a1b263
