platform_build_soong/java/sdk_library.go

2809 lines
101 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2018 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package java
import (
"fmt"
"path"
"path/filepath"
"reflect"
"regexp"
Additional fixes for java_sdk_library This change fixes several problems found while re-defining some libs using java_sdk_library module type. 1) A phony module whose name is the same as the java_sdk_library name is defined. It is used to support installing the runtime library via PRODUCT_PACKAGES (even when there is no dependency from other modules). 2) A bug that package names whose depth is >= 2 is ignored in droiddoc.srcs_lib_whitelist_pkgs is fixed. A package name foo.bar.baz is now converted to a path foo/bar/baz following the Java convention. 3) A make variable JAVA_SDK_LIBRARIES that is the list of java_sdk_library module names is exported to make. This can be used to distinguish SDK libraries from ordinary libs. 4) When running doclava, some framework sources in the 'android' package and the same packages as the SDK library are automatically added to the sources list. This is required for the case when API class is extending from the framework class. In that case, doclava needs to know whether the base class is hidde nor not. Since that visibility info is encoded as @hide string in the comment, we need source files for the classes, not the compiled ones. Also there are rare cases where part of SDK library is implemented in the framework (e.g. org.apache.http.legacy). In that case, we need framework source to make API stubs, though the sources are not required to build the runtime library. 5) The stubs libs are disabled for PDK builds as well. Bug: 77575606 Test: m -j Change-Id: I360cf15fe5339e46644fb16d0dabe2548aa315f9
2018-04-23 14:41:26 +02:00
"sort"
"strconv"
"strings"
Additional fixes for java_sdk_library This change fixes several problems found while re-defining some libs using java_sdk_library module type. 1) A phony module whose name is the same as the java_sdk_library name is defined. It is used to support installing the runtime library via PRODUCT_PACKAGES (even when there is no dependency from other modules). 2) A bug that package names whose depth is >= 2 is ignored in droiddoc.srcs_lib_whitelist_pkgs is fixed. A package name foo.bar.baz is now converted to a path foo/bar/baz following the Java convention. 3) A make variable JAVA_SDK_LIBRARIES that is the list of java_sdk_library module names is exported to make. This can be used to distinguish SDK libraries from ordinary libs. 4) When running doclava, some framework sources in the 'android' package and the same packages as the SDK library are automatically added to the sources list. This is required for the case when API class is extending from the framework class. In that case, doclava needs to know whether the base class is hidde nor not. Since that visibility info is encoded as @hide string in the comment, we need source files for the classes, not the compiled ones. Also there are rare cases where part of SDK library is implemented in the framework (e.g. org.apache.http.legacy). In that case, we need framework source to make API stubs, though the sources are not required to build the runtime library. 5) The stubs libs are disabled for PDK builds as well. Bug: 77575606 Test: m -j Change-Id: I360cf15fe5339e46644fb16d0dabe2548aa315f9
2018-04-23 14:41:26 +02:00
"sync"
"github.com/google/blueprint"
"github.com/google/blueprint/proptools"
"android/soong/android"
"android/soong/dexpreopt"
)
const (
sdkXmlFileSuffix = ".xml"
)
// A tag to associated a dependency with a specific api scope.
type scopeDependencyTag struct {
blueprint.BaseDependencyTag
name string
apiScope *apiScope
// Function for extracting appropriate path information from the dependency.
depInfoExtractor func(paths *scopePaths, ctx android.ModuleContext, dep android.Module) error
}
// Extract tag specific information from the dependency.
func (tag scopeDependencyTag) extractDepInfo(ctx android.ModuleContext, dep android.Module, paths *scopePaths) {
err := tag.depInfoExtractor(paths, ctx, dep)
if err != nil {
ctx.ModuleErrorf("has an invalid {scopeDependencyTag: %s} dependency on module %s: %s", tag.name, ctx.OtherModuleName(dep), err.Error())
}
}
var _ android.ReplaceSourceWithPrebuilt = (*scopeDependencyTag)(nil)
func (tag scopeDependencyTag) ReplaceSourceWithPrebuilt() bool {
return false
}
// Provides information about an api scope, e.g. public, system, test.
type apiScope struct {
// The name of the api scope, e.g. public, system, test
name string
// The api scope that this scope extends.
extends *apiScope
// The legacy enabled status for a specific scope can be dependent on other
// properties that have been specified on the library so it is provided by
// a function that can determine the status by examining those properties.
legacyEnabledStatus func(module *SdkLibrary) bool
// The default enabled status for non-legacy behavior, which is triggered by
// explicitly enabling at least one api scope.
defaultEnabledStatus bool
// Gets a pointer to the scope specific properties.
scopeSpecificProperties func(module *SdkLibrary) *ApiScopeProperties
// The name of the field in the dynamically created structure.
fieldName string
// The name of the property in the java_sdk_library_import
propertyName string
// The tag to use to depend on the stubs library module.
stubsTag scopeDependencyTag
// The tag to use to depend on the stubs source module (if separate from the API module).
stubsSourceTag scopeDependencyTag
// The tag to use to depend on the API file generating module (if separate from the stubs source module).
apiFileTag scopeDependencyTag
// The tag to use to depend on the stubs source and API module.
stubsSourceAndApiTag scopeDependencyTag
// The scope specific prefix to add to the api file base of "current.txt" or "removed.txt".
apiFilePrefix string
// The scope specific prefix to add to the sdk library module name to construct a scope specific
// module name.
moduleSuffix string
// SDK version that the stubs library is built against. Note that this is always
// *current. Older stubs library built with a numbered SDK version is created from
// the prebuilt jar.
sdkVersion string
// The annotation that identifies this API level, empty for the public API scope.
annotation string
// Extra arguments to pass to droidstubs for this scope.
//
// This is not used directly but is used to construct the droidstubsArgs.
extraArgs []string
// The args that must be passed to droidstubs to generate the API and stubs source
// for this scope, constructed dynamically by initApiScope().
//
// The API only includes the additional members that this scope adds over the scope
// that it extends.
//
// The stubs source must include the definitions of everything that is in this
// api scope and all the scopes that this one extends.
droidstubsArgs []string
// Whether the api scope can be treated as unstable, and should skip compat checks.
unstable bool
}
// Initialize a scope, creating and adding appropriate dependency tags
func initApiScope(scope *apiScope) *apiScope {
name := scope.name
scopeByName[name] = scope
allScopeNames = append(allScopeNames, name)
scope.propertyName = strings.ReplaceAll(name, "-", "_")
scope.fieldName = proptools.FieldNameForProperty(scope.propertyName)
scope.stubsTag = scopeDependencyTag{
name: name + "-stubs",
apiScope: scope,
depInfoExtractor: (*scopePaths).extractStubsLibraryInfoFromDependency,
}
scope.stubsSourceTag = scopeDependencyTag{
name: name + "-stubs-source",
apiScope: scope,
depInfoExtractor: (*scopePaths).extractStubsSourceInfoFromDep,
}
scope.apiFileTag = scopeDependencyTag{
name: name + "-api",
apiScope: scope,
depInfoExtractor: (*scopePaths).extractApiInfoFromDep,
}
scope.stubsSourceAndApiTag = scopeDependencyTag{
name: name + "-stubs-source-and-api",
apiScope: scope,
depInfoExtractor: (*scopePaths).extractStubsSourceAndApiInfoFromApiStubsProvider,
}
// To get the args needed to generate the stubs source append all the args from
// this scope and all the scopes it extends as each set of args adds additional
// members to the stubs.
var scopeSpecificArgs []string
if scope.annotation != "" {
scopeSpecificArgs = []string{"--show-annotation", scope.annotation}
}
for s := scope; s != nil; s = s.extends {
scopeSpecificArgs = append(scopeSpecificArgs, s.extraArgs...)
// Ensure that the generated stubs includes all the API elements from the API scope
// that this scope extends.
if s != scope && s.annotation != "" {
scopeSpecificArgs = append(scopeSpecificArgs, "--show-for-stub-purposes-annotation", s.annotation)
}
}
// Escape any special characters in the arguments. This is needed because droidstubs
// passes these directly to the shell command.
scope.droidstubsArgs = proptools.ShellEscapeList(scopeSpecificArgs)
return scope
}
func (scope *apiScope) stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix() string {
return ".stubs" + scope.moduleSuffix
}
func (scope *apiScope) stubsLibraryModuleName(baseName string) string {
return baseName + scope.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()
}
func (scope *apiScope) stubsSourceModuleName(baseName string) string {
return baseName + ".stubs.source" + scope.moduleSuffix
}
func (scope *apiScope) apiModuleName(baseName string) string {
return baseName + ".api" + scope.moduleSuffix
}
func (scope *apiScope) String() string {
return scope.name
}
type apiScopes []*apiScope
func (scopes apiScopes) Strings(accessor func(*apiScope) string) []string {
var list []string
for _, scope := range scopes {
list = append(list, accessor(scope))
}
return list
}
var (
scopeByName = make(map[string]*apiScope)
allScopeNames []string
apiScopePublic = initApiScope(&apiScope{
name: "public",
// Public scope is enabled by default for both legacy and non-legacy modes.
legacyEnabledStatus: func(module *SdkLibrary) bool {
return true
},
defaultEnabledStatus: true,
scopeSpecificProperties: func(module *SdkLibrary) *ApiScopeProperties {
return &module.sdkLibraryProperties.Public
},
sdkVersion: "current",
})
apiScopeSystem = initApiScope(&apiScope{
name: "system",
extends: apiScopePublic,
legacyEnabledStatus: (*SdkLibrary).generateTestAndSystemScopesByDefault,
scopeSpecificProperties: func(module *SdkLibrary) *ApiScopeProperties {
return &module.sdkLibraryProperties.System
},
apiFilePrefix: "system-",
moduleSuffix: ".system",
sdkVersion: "system_current",
annotation: "android.annotation.SystemApi(client=android.annotation.SystemApi.Client.PRIVILEGED_APPS)",
})
apiScopeTest = initApiScope(&apiScope{
name: "test",
extends: apiScopeSystem,
legacyEnabledStatus: (*SdkLibrary).generateTestAndSystemScopesByDefault,
scopeSpecificProperties: func(module *SdkLibrary) *ApiScopeProperties {
return &module.sdkLibraryProperties.Test
},
apiFilePrefix: "test-",
moduleSuffix: ".test",
sdkVersion: "test_current",
annotation: "android.annotation.TestApi",
unstable: true,
})
apiScopeModuleLib = initApiScope(&apiScope{
name: "module-lib",
extends: apiScopeSystem,
// The module-lib scope is disabled by default in legacy mode.
//
// Enabling this would break existing usages.
legacyEnabledStatus: func(module *SdkLibrary) bool {
return false
},
scopeSpecificProperties: func(module *SdkLibrary) *ApiScopeProperties {
return &module.sdkLibraryProperties.Module_lib
},
apiFilePrefix: "module-lib-",
moduleSuffix: ".module_lib",
sdkVersion: "module_current",
annotation: "android.annotation.SystemApi(client=android.annotation.SystemApi.Client.MODULE_LIBRARIES)",
})
apiScopeSystemServer = initApiScope(&apiScope{
name: "system-server",
extends: apiScopePublic,
// The system-server scope is disabled by default in legacy mode.
//
// Enabling this would break existing usages.
legacyEnabledStatus: func(module *SdkLibrary) bool {
return false
},
scopeSpecificProperties: func(module *SdkLibrary) *ApiScopeProperties {
return &module.sdkLibraryProperties.System_server
},
apiFilePrefix: "system-server-",
moduleSuffix: ".system_server",
sdkVersion: "system_server_current",
annotation: "android.annotation.SystemApi(client=android.annotation.SystemApi.Client.SYSTEM_SERVER)",
extraArgs: []string{
"--hide-annotation", "android.annotation.Hide",
// com.android.* classes are okay in this interface"
"--hide", "InternalClasses",
},
})
allApiScopes = apiScopes{
apiScopePublic,
apiScopeSystem,
apiScopeTest,
apiScopeModuleLib,
apiScopeSystemServer,
}
)
Additional fixes for java_sdk_library This change fixes several problems found while re-defining some libs using java_sdk_library module type. 1) A phony module whose name is the same as the java_sdk_library name is defined. It is used to support installing the runtime library via PRODUCT_PACKAGES (even when there is no dependency from other modules). 2) A bug that package names whose depth is >= 2 is ignored in droiddoc.srcs_lib_whitelist_pkgs is fixed. A package name foo.bar.baz is now converted to a path foo/bar/baz following the Java convention. 3) A make variable JAVA_SDK_LIBRARIES that is the list of java_sdk_library module names is exported to make. This can be used to distinguish SDK libraries from ordinary libs. 4) When running doclava, some framework sources in the 'android' package and the same packages as the SDK library are automatically added to the sources list. This is required for the case when API class is extending from the framework class. In that case, doclava needs to know whether the base class is hidde nor not. Since that visibility info is encoded as @hide string in the comment, we need source files for the classes, not the compiled ones. Also there are rare cases where part of SDK library is implemented in the framework (e.g. org.apache.http.legacy). In that case, we need framework source to make API stubs, though the sources are not required to build the runtime library. 5) The stubs libs are disabled for PDK builds as well. Bug: 77575606 Test: m -j Change-Id: I360cf15fe5339e46644fb16d0dabe2548aa315f9
2018-04-23 14:41:26 +02:00
var (
javaSdkLibrariesLock sync.Mutex
)
// TODO: these are big features that are currently missing
// 1) disallowing linking to the runtime shared lib
// 2) HTML generation
func init() {
RegisterSdkLibraryBuildComponents(android.InitRegistrationContext)
Additional fixes for java_sdk_library This change fixes several problems found while re-defining some libs using java_sdk_library module type. 1) A phony module whose name is the same as the java_sdk_library name is defined. It is used to support installing the runtime library via PRODUCT_PACKAGES (even when there is no dependency from other modules). 2) A bug that package names whose depth is >= 2 is ignored in droiddoc.srcs_lib_whitelist_pkgs is fixed. A package name foo.bar.baz is now converted to a path foo/bar/baz following the Java convention. 3) A make variable JAVA_SDK_LIBRARIES that is the list of java_sdk_library module names is exported to make. This can be used to distinguish SDK libraries from ordinary libs. 4) When running doclava, some framework sources in the 'android' package and the same packages as the SDK library are automatically added to the sources list. This is required for the case when API class is extending from the framework class. In that case, doclava needs to know whether the base class is hidde nor not. Since that visibility info is encoded as @hide string in the comment, we need source files for the classes, not the compiled ones. Also there are rare cases where part of SDK library is implemented in the framework (e.g. org.apache.http.legacy). In that case, we need framework source to make API stubs, though the sources are not required to build the runtime library. 5) The stubs libs are disabled for PDK builds as well. Bug: 77575606 Test: m -j Change-Id: I360cf15fe5339e46644fb16d0dabe2548aa315f9
2018-04-23 14:41:26 +02:00
android.RegisterMakeVarsProvider(pctx, func(ctx android.MakeVarsContext) {
javaSdkLibraries := javaSdkLibraries(ctx.Config())
sort.Strings(*javaSdkLibraries)
ctx.Strict("JAVA_SDK_LIBRARIES", strings.Join(*javaSdkLibraries, " "))
})
// Register sdk member types.
android.RegisterSdkMemberType(javaSdkLibrarySdkMemberType)
}
func RegisterSdkLibraryBuildComponents(ctx android.RegistrationContext) {
ctx.RegisterModuleType("java_sdk_library", SdkLibraryFactory)
ctx.RegisterModuleType("java_sdk_library_import", sdkLibraryImportFactory)
}
// Properties associated with each api scope.
type ApiScopeProperties struct {
// Indicates whether the api surface is generated.
//
// If this is set for any scope then all scopes must explicitly specify if they
// are enabled. This is to prevent new usages from depending on legacy behavior.
//
// Otherwise, if this is not set for any scope then the default behavior is
// scope specific so please refer to the scope specific property documentation.
Enabled *bool
// The sdk_version to use for building the stubs.
//
// If not specified then it will use an sdk_version determined as follows:
//
// 1) If the sdk_version specified on the java_sdk_library is none then this
// will be none. This is used for java_sdk_library instances that are used
// to create stubs that contribute to the core_current sdk version.
// 2) Otherwise, it is assumed that this library extends but does not
// contribute directly to a specific sdk_version and so this uses the
// sdk_version appropriate for the api scope. e.g. public will use
// sdk_version: current, system will use sdk_version: system_current, etc.
//
// This does not affect the sdk_version used for either generating the stubs source
// or the API file. They both have to use the same sdk_version as is used for
// compiling the implementation library.
Sdk_version *string
}
type sdkLibraryProperties struct {
// List of source files that are needed to compile the API, but are not part of runtime library.
Api_srcs []string `android:"arch_variant"`
java_sdk_library: Create separate impl library Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl, stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars. Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as that is created the JSL itself. Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe. That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated together so compatibility is not an issue. This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate module. It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse. Bug: 156618935 Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
2020-05-16 16:52:12 +02:00
// Visibility for impl library module. If not specified then defaults to the
// visibility property.
Impl_library_visibility []string
// Visibility for stubs library modules. If not specified then defaults to the
// visibility property.
Stubs_library_visibility []string
// Visibility for stubs source modules. If not specified then defaults to the
// visibility property.
Stubs_source_visibility []string
// List of Java libraries that will be in the classpath when building the implementation lib
Impl_only_libs []string `android:"arch_variant"`
// List of Java libraries that will be in the classpath when building stubs
Stub_only_libs []string `android:"arch_variant"`
// List of Java libraries that will included in stub libraries
Stub_only_static_libs []string `android:"arch_variant"`
// list of package names that will be documented and publicized as API.
// This allows the API to be restricted to a subset of the source files provided.
// If this is unspecified then all the source files will be treated as being part
// of the API.
Api_packages []string
// list of package names that must be hidden from the API
Hidden_api_packages []string
// the relative path to the directory containing the api specification files.
// Defaults to "api".
Api_dir *string
// Determines whether a runtime implementation library is built; defaults to false.
//
// If true then it also prevents the module from being used as a shared module, i.e.
// it is as is shared_library: false, was set.
Api_only *bool
// local files that are used within user customized droiddoc options.
Droiddoc_option_files []string
// additional droiddoc options.
// Available variables for substitution:
//
// $(location <label>): the path to the droiddoc_option_files with name <label>
Droiddoc_options []string
// is set to true, Metalava will allow framework SDK to contain annotations.
Annotations_enabled *bool
// a list of top-level directories containing files to merge qualifier annotations
// (i.e. those intended to be included in the stubs written) from.
Merge_annotations_dirs []string
// a list of top-level directories containing Java stub files to merge show/hide annotations from.
Merge_inclusion_annotations_dirs []string
// If set to true then don't create dist rules.
No_dist *bool
// The stem for the artifacts that are copied to the dist, if not specified
// then defaults to the base module name.
//
// For each scope the following artifacts are copied to the apistubs/<scope>
// directory in the dist.
// * stubs impl jar -> <dist-stem>.jar
// * API specification file -> api/<dist-stem>.txt
// * Removed API specification file -> api/<dist-stem>-removed.txt
//
// Also used to construct the name of the filegroup (created by prebuilt_apis)
// that references the latest released API and remove API specification files.
// * API specification filegroup -> <dist-stem>.api.<scope>.latest
// * Removed API specification filegroup -> <dist-stem>-removed.api.<scope>.latest
// * API incompatibilities baseline filegroup -> <dist-stem>-incompatibilities.api.<scope>.latest
Dist_stem *string
// The subdirectory for the artifacts that are copied to the dist directory. If not specified
// then defaults to "unknown". Should be set to "android" for anything that should be published
// in the public Android SDK.
Dist_group *string
// A compatibility mode that allows historical API-tracking files to not exist.
// Do not use.
Unsafe_ignore_missing_latest_api bool
// indicates whether system and test apis should be generated.
Generate_system_and_test_apis bool `blueprint:"mutated"`
// The properties specific to the public api scope
//
// Unless explicitly specified by using public.enabled the public api scope is
// enabled by default in both legacy and non-legacy mode.
Public ApiScopeProperties
// The properties specific to the system api scope
//
// In legacy mode the system api scope is enabled by default when sdk_version
// is set to something other than "none".
//
// In non-legacy mode the system api scope is disabled by default.
System ApiScopeProperties
// The properties specific to the test api scope
//
// In legacy mode the test api scope is enabled by default when sdk_version
// is set to something other than "none".
//
// In non-legacy mode the test api scope is disabled by default.
Test ApiScopeProperties
// The properties specific to the module-lib api scope
//
// Unless explicitly specified by using test.enabled the module-lib api scope is
// disabled by default.
Module_lib ApiScopeProperties
// The properties specific to the system-server api scope
//
// Unless explicitly specified by using test.enabled the module-lib api scope is
// disabled by default.
System_server ApiScopeProperties
// Determines if the stubs are preferred over the implementation library
// for linking, even when the client doesn't specify sdk_version. When this
// is set to true, such clients are provided with the widest API surface that
// this lib provides. Note however that this option doesn't affect the clients
// that are in the same APEX as this library. In that case, the clients are
// always linked with the implementation library. Default is false.
Default_to_stubs *bool
// Properties related to api linting.
Api_lint struct {
// Enable api linting.
Enabled *bool
}
// TODO: determines whether to create HTML doc or not
//Html_doc *bool
}
// Paths to outputs from java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import.
//
// Fields that are android.Paths are always set (during GenerateAndroidBuildActions).
// OptionalPaths are always set by java_sdk_library but may not be set by
// java_sdk_library_import as not all instances provide that information.
type scopePaths struct {
// The path (represented as Paths for convenience when returning) to the stubs header jar.
//
// That is the jar that is created by turbine.
stubsHeaderPath android.Paths
// The path (represented as Paths for convenience when returning) to the stubs implementation jar.
//
// This is not the implementation jar, it still only contains stubs.
stubsImplPath android.Paths
// The dex jar for the stubs.
//
// This is not the implementation jar, it still only contains stubs.
stubsDexJarPath OptionalDexJarPath
// The API specification file, e.g. system_current.txt.
currentApiFilePath android.OptionalPath
// The specification of API elements removed since the last release.
removedApiFilePath android.OptionalPath
// The stubs source jar.
stubsSrcJar android.OptionalPath
// Extracted annotations.
annotationsZip android.OptionalPath
}
func (paths *scopePaths) extractStubsLibraryInfoFromDependency(ctx android.ModuleContext, dep android.Module) error {
if ctx.OtherModuleHasProvider(dep, JavaInfoProvider) {
lib := ctx.OtherModuleProvider(dep, JavaInfoProvider).(JavaInfo)
paths.stubsHeaderPath = lib.HeaderJars
paths.stubsImplPath = lib.ImplementationJars
libDep := dep.(UsesLibraryDependency)
paths.stubsDexJarPath = libDep.DexJarBuildPath()
return nil
} else {
return fmt.Errorf("expected module that has JavaInfoProvider, e.g. java_library")
}
}
func (paths *scopePaths) treatDepAsApiStubsProvider(dep android.Module, action func(provider ApiStubsProvider)) error {
if apiStubsProvider, ok := dep.(ApiStubsProvider); ok {
action(apiStubsProvider)
return nil
} else {
return fmt.Errorf("expected module that implements ApiStubsProvider, e.g. droidstubs")
}
}
func (paths *scopePaths) treatDepAsApiStubsSrcProvider(dep android.Module, action func(provider ApiStubsSrcProvider)) error {
if apiStubsProvider, ok := dep.(ApiStubsSrcProvider); ok {
action(apiStubsProvider)
return nil
} else {
return fmt.Errorf("expected module that implements ApiStubsSrcProvider, e.g. droidstubs")
}
}
func (paths *scopePaths) extractApiInfoFromApiStubsProvider(provider ApiStubsProvider) {
paths.annotationsZip = android.OptionalPathForPath(provider.AnnotationsZip())
paths.currentApiFilePath = android.OptionalPathForPath(provider.ApiFilePath())
paths.removedApiFilePath = android.OptionalPathForPath(provider.RemovedApiFilePath())
}
func (paths *scopePaths) extractApiInfoFromDep(ctx android.ModuleContext, dep android.Module) error {
return paths.treatDepAsApiStubsProvider(dep, func(provider ApiStubsProvider) {
paths.extractApiInfoFromApiStubsProvider(provider)
})
}
func (paths *scopePaths) extractStubsSourceInfoFromApiStubsProviders(provider ApiStubsSrcProvider) {
paths.stubsSrcJar = android.OptionalPathForPath(provider.StubsSrcJar())
}
func (paths *scopePaths) extractStubsSourceInfoFromDep(ctx android.ModuleContext, dep android.Module) error {
return paths.treatDepAsApiStubsSrcProvider(dep, func(provider ApiStubsSrcProvider) {
paths.extractStubsSourceInfoFromApiStubsProviders(provider)
})
}
func (paths *scopePaths) extractStubsSourceAndApiInfoFromApiStubsProvider(ctx android.ModuleContext, dep android.Module) error {
return paths.treatDepAsApiStubsProvider(dep, func(provider ApiStubsProvider) {
paths.extractApiInfoFromApiStubsProvider(provider)
paths.extractStubsSourceInfoFromApiStubsProviders(provider)
})
}
type commonToSdkLibraryAndImportProperties struct {
// The naming scheme to use for the components that this module creates.
//
// If not specified then it defaults to "default".
//
// This is a temporary mechanism to simplify conversion from separate modules for each
// component that follow a different naming pattern to the default one.
//
// TODO(b/155480189) - Remove once naming inconsistencies have been resolved.
Naming_scheme *string
// Specifies whether this module can be used as an Android shared library; defaults
// to true.
//
// An Android shared library is one that can be referenced in a <uses-library> element
// in an AndroidManifest.xml.
Shared_library *bool
// Files containing information about supported java doc tags.
Doctag_files []string `android:"path"`
// Signals that this shared library is part of the bootclasspath starting
// on the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// This will make platforms at this level and above to ignore
// <uses-library> tags with this library name because the library is already
// available
On_bootclasspath_since *string
// Signals that this shared library was part of the bootclasspath before
// (but not including) the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// The system will automatically add a <uses-library> tag with this library to
// apps that target any SDK less than the version indicated in this attribute.
On_bootclasspath_before *string
// Indicates that PackageManager should ignore this shared library if the
// platform is below the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// This means that the device won't recognise this library as installed.
Min_device_sdk *string
// Indicates that PackageManager should ignore this shared library if the
// platform is above the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// This means that the device won't recognise this library as installed.
Max_device_sdk *string
}
// commonSdkLibraryAndImportModule defines the interface that must be provided by a module that
// embeds the commonToSdkLibraryAndImport struct.
type commonSdkLibraryAndImportModule interface {
2021-04-29 22:50:40 +02:00
android.SdkAware
BaseModuleName() string
}
// Common code between sdk library and sdk library import
type commonToSdkLibraryAndImport struct {
module commonSdkLibraryAndImportModule
scopePaths map[*apiScope]*scopePaths
namingScheme sdkLibraryComponentNamingScheme
commonSdkLibraryProperties commonToSdkLibraryAndImportProperties
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
// Paths to commonSdkLibraryProperties.Doctag_files
doctagPaths android.Paths
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
// Functionality related to this being used as a component of a java_sdk_library.
EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent
}
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) initCommon(module commonSdkLibraryAndImportModule) {
c.module = module
module.AddProperties(&c.commonSdkLibraryProperties)
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
// Initialize this as an sdk library component.
c.initSdkLibraryComponent(module)
}
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) initCommonAfterDefaultsApplied(ctx android.DefaultableHookContext) bool {
schemeProperty := proptools.StringDefault(c.commonSdkLibraryProperties.Naming_scheme, "default")
switch schemeProperty {
case "default":
c.namingScheme = &defaultNamingScheme{}
default:
ctx.PropertyErrorf("naming_scheme", "expected 'default' but was %q", schemeProperty)
return false
}
namePtr := proptools.StringPtr(c.module.BaseModuleName())
c.sdkLibraryComponentProperties.SdkLibraryName = namePtr
// Only track this sdk library if this can be used as a shared library.
if c.sharedLibrary() {
// Use the name specified in the module definition as the owner.
c.sdkLibraryComponentProperties.SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack = namePtr
}
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
return true
}
// uniqueApexVariations provides common implementation of the ApexModule.UniqueApexVariations
// method.
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) uniqueApexVariations() bool {
// A java_sdk_library that is a shared library produces an XML file that makes the shared library
// usable from an AndroidManifest.xml's <uses-library> entry. That XML file contains the name of
// the APEX and so it needs a unique variation per APEX.
return c.sharedLibrary()
}
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) generateCommonBuildActions(ctx android.ModuleContext) {
c.doctagPaths = android.PathsForModuleSrc(ctx, c.commonSdkLibraryProperties.Doctag_files)
}
// Module name of the runtime implementation library
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) implLibraryModuleName() string {
return c.module.BaseModuleName() + ".impl"
}
// Module name of the XML file for the lib
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) xmlPermissionsModuleName() string {
return c.module.BaseModuleName() + sdkXmlFileSuffix
}
// Name of the java_library module that compiles the stubs source.
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) stubsLibraryModuleName(apiScope *apiScope) string {
2021-04-29 22:50:40 +02:00
baseName := c.module.BaseModuleName()
return c.module.SdkMemberComponentName(baseName, func(name string) string {
return c.namingScheme.stubsLibraryModuleName(apiScope, name)
})
}
// Name of the droidstubs module that generates the stubs source and may also
// generate/check the API.
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) stubsSourceModuleName(apiScope *apiScope) string {
2021-04-29 22:50:40 +02:00
baseName := c.module.BaseModuleName()
return c.module.SdkMemberComponentName(baseName, func(name string) string {
return c.namingScheme.stubsSourceModuleName(apiScope, name)
})
}
// The component names for different outputs of the java_sdk_library.
//
// They are similar to the names used for the child modules it creates
const (
stubsSourceComponentName = "stubs.source"
apiTxtComponentName = "api.txt"
removedApiTxtComponentName = "removed-api.txt"
annotationsComponentName = "annotations.zip"
)
// A regular expression to match tags that reference a specific stubs component.
//
// It will only match if given a valid scope and a valid component. It is verfy strict
// to ensure it does not accidentally match a similar looking tag that should be processed
// by the embedded Library.
var tagSplitter = func() *regexp.Regexp {
// Given a list of literal string items returns a regular expression that will
// match any one of the items.
choice := func(items ...string) string {
return `\Q` + strings.Join(items, `\E|\Q`) + `\E`
}
// Regular expression to match one of the scopes.
scopesRegexp := choice(allScopeNames...)
// Regular expression to match one of the components.
componentsRegexp := choice(stubsSourceComponentName, apiTxtComponentName, removedApiTxtComponentName, annotationsComponentName)
// Regular expression to match any combination of one scope and one component.
return regexp.MustCompile(fmt.Sprintf(`^\.(%s)\.(%s)$`, scopesRegexp, componentsRegexp))
}()
// For OutputFileProducer interface
//
// .<scope>.<component name>, for all ComponentNames (for example: .public.removed-api.txt)
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) commonOutputFiles(tag string) (android.Paths, error) {
if groups := tagSplitter.FindStringSubmatch(tag); groups != nil {
scopeName := groups[1]
component := groups[2]
if scope, ok := scopeByName[scopeName]; ok {
paths := c.findScopePaths(scope)
if paths == nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%q does not provide api scope %s", c.module.BaseModuleName(), scopeName)
}
switch component {
case stubsSourceComponentName:
if paths.stubsSrcJar.Valid() {
return android.Paths{paths.stubsSrcJar.Path()}, nil
}
case apiTxtComponentName:
if paths.currentApiFilePath.Valid() {
return android.Paths{paths.currentApiFilePath.Path()}, nil
}
case removedApiTxtComponentName:
if paths.removedApiFilePath.Valid() {
return android.Paths{paths.removedApiFilePath.Path()}, nil
}
case annotationsComponentName:
if paths.annotationsZip.Valid() {
return android.Paths{paths.annotationsZip.Path()}, nil
}
}
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%s not available for api scope %s", component, scopeName)
} else {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("unknown scope %s in %s", scope, tag)
}
} else {
switch tag {
case ".doctags":
if c.doctagPaths != nil {
return c.doctagPaths, nil
} else {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("no doctag_files specified on %s", c.module.BaseModuleName())
}
}
return nil, nil
}
}
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) getScopePathsCreateIfNeeded(scope *apiScope) *scopePaths {
if c.scopePaths == nil {
c.scopePaths = make(map[*apiScope]*scopePaths)
}
paths := c.scopePaths[scope]
if paths == nil {
paths = &scopePaths{}
c.scopePaths[scope] = paths
}
return paths
}
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) findScopePaths(scope *apiScope) *scopePaths {
if c.scopePaths == nil {
return nil
}
return c.scopePaths[scope]
}
// If this does not support the requested api scope then find the closest available
// scope it does support. Returns nil if no such scope is available.
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) findClosestScopePath(scope *apiScope) *scopePaths {
for s := scope; s != nil; s = s.extends {
if paths := c.findScopePaths(s); paths != nil {
return paths
}
}
// This should never happen outside tests as public should be the base scope for every
// scope and is enabled by default.
return nil
}
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) selectHeaderJarsForSdkVersion(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, sdkVersion android.SdkSpec) android.Paths {
// If a specific numeric version has been requested then use prebuilt versions of the sdk.
if !sdkVersion.ApiLevel.IsPreview() {
return PrebuiltJars(ctx, c.module.BaseModuleName(), sdkVersion)
}
paths := c.selectScopePaths(ctx, sdkVersion.Kind)
if paths == nil {
return nil
}
return paths.stubsHeaderPath
}
// selectScopePaths returns the *scopePaths appropriate for the specific kind.
//
// If the module does not support the specific kind then it will return the *scopePaths for the
// closest kind which is a subset of the requested kind. e.g. if requesting android.SdkModule then
// it will return *scopePaths for android.SdkSystem if available or android.SdkPublic of not.
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) selectScopePaths(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, kind android.SdkKind) *scopePaths {
apiScope := sdkKindToApiScope(kind)
paths := c.findClosestScopePath(apiScope)
if paths == nil {
var scopes []string
for _, s := range allApiScopes {
if c.findScopePaths(s) != nil {
scopes = append(scopes, s.name)
}
}
ctx.ModuleErrorf("requires api scope %s from %s but it only has %q available", apiScope.name, c.module.BaseModuleName(), scopes)
return nil
}
return paths
}
// sdkKindToApiScope maps from android.SdkKind to apiScope.
func sdkKindToApiScope(kind android.SdkKind) *apiScope {
var apiScope *apiScope
switch kind {
case android.SdkSystem:
apiScope = apiScopeSystem
case android.SdkModule:
apiScope = apiScopeModuleLib
case android.SdkTest:
apiScope = apiScopeTest
case android.SdkSystemServer:
apiScope = apiScopeSystemServer
default:
apiScope = apiScopePublic
}
return apiScope
}
// to satisfy SdkLibraryDependency interface
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) SdkApiStubDexJar(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, kind android.SdkKind) OptionalDexJarPath {
paths := c.selectScopePaths(ctx, kind)
if paths == nil {
return makeUnsetDexJarPath()
}
return paths.stubsDexJarPath
}
// to satisfy SdkLibraryDependency interface
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) SdkRemovedTxtFile(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, kind android.SdkKind) android.OptionalPath {
apiScope := sdkKindToApiScope(kind)
paths := c.findScopePaths(apiScope)
if paths == nil {
return android.OptionalPath{}
}
return paths.removedApiFilePath
}
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) sdkComponentPropertiesForChildLibrary() interface{} {
componentProps := &struct {
SdkLibraryName *string
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack *string
}{}
namePtr := proptools.StringPtr(c.module.BaseModuleName())
componentProps.SdkLibraryName = namePtr
if c.sharedLibrary() {
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
// Mark the stubs library as being components of this java_sdk_library so that
// any app that includes code which depends (directly or indirectly) on the stubs
// library will have the appropriate <uses-library> invocation inserted into its
// manifest if necessary.
componentProps.SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack = namePtr
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
}
return componentProps
}
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) sharedLibrary() bool {
return proptools.BoolDefault(c.commonSdkLibraryProperties.Shared_library, true)
}
// Check if the stub libraries should be compiled for dex
func (c *commonToSdkLibraryAndImport) stubLibrariesCompiledForDex() bool {
// Always compile the dex file files for the stub libraries if they will be used on the
// bootclasspath.
return !c.sharedLibrary()
}
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
// Properties related to the use of a module as an component of a java_sdk_library.
type SdkLibraryComponentProperties struct {
// The name of the java_sdk_library/_import module.
SdkLibraryName *string `blueprint:"mutated"`
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
// The name of the java_sdk_library/_import to add to a <uses-library> entry
// in the AndroidManifest.xml of any Android app that includes code that references
// this module. If not set then no java_sdk_library/_import is tracked.
SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack *string `blueprint:"mutated"`
}
// Structure to be embedded in a module struct that needs to support the
// SdkLibraryComponentDependency interface.
type EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent struct {
sdkLibraryComponentProperties SdkLibraryComponentProperties
}
func (e *EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent) initSdkLibraryComponent(module android.Module) {
module.AddProperties(&e.sdkLibraryComponentProperties)
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
}
// to satisfy SdkLibraryComponentDependency
func (e *EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent) SdkLibraryName() *string {
return e.sdkLibraryComponentProperties.SdkLibraryName
}
// to satisfy SdkLibraryComponentDependency
func (e *EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent) OptionalSdkLibraryImplementation() *string {
// For shared libraries, this is the same as the SDK library name. If a Java library or app
// depends on a component library (e.g. a stub library) it still needs to know the name of the
// run-time library and the corresponding module that provides the implementation. This name is
// passed to manifest_fixer (to be added to AndroidManifest.xml) and added to CLC (to be used
// in dexpreopt).
//
// For non-shared SDK (component or not) libraries this returns `nil`, as they are not
// <uses-library> and should not be added to the manifest or to CLC.
return e.sdkLibraryComponentProperties.SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack
}
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
// Implemented by modules that are (or possibly could be) a component of a java_sdk_library
// (including the java_sdk_library) itself.
type SdkLibraryComponentDependency interface {
UsesLibraryDependency
// SdkLibraryName returns the name of the java_sdk_library/_import module.
SdkLibraryName() *string
// The name of the implementation library for the optional SDK library or nil, if there isn't one.
OptionalSdkLibraryImplementation() *string
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
}
// Make sure that all the module types that are components of java_sdk_library/_import
// and which can be referenced (directly or indirectly) from an android app implement
// the SdkLibraryComponentDependency interface.
var _ SdkLibraryComponentDependency = (*Library)(nil)
var _ SdkLibraryComponentDependency = (*Import)(nil)
var _ SdkLibraryComponentDependency = (*SdkLibrary)(nil)
var _ SdkLibraryComponentDependency = (*SdkLibraryImport)(nil)
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
// Provides access to sdk_version related files, e.g. header and implementation jars.
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
type SdkLibraryDependency interface {
SdkLibraryComponentDependency
// Get the header jars appropriate for the supplied sdk_version.
//
// These are turbine generated jars so they only change if the externals of the
// class changes but it does not contain and implementation or JavaDoc.
SdkHeaderJars(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, sdkVersion android.SdkSpec) android.Paths
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
// Get the implementation jars appropriate for the supplied sdk version.
//
// These are either the implementation jar for the whole sdk library or the implementation
// jars for the stubs. The latter should only be needed when generating JavaDoc as otherwise
// they are identical to the corresponding header jars.
SdkImplementationJars(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, sdkVersion android.SdkSpec) android.Paths
// SdkApiStubDexJar returns the dex jar for the stubs. It is needed by the hiddenapi processing
// tool which processes dex files.
SdkApiStubDexJar(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, kind android.SdkKind) OptionalDexJarPath
// SdkRemovedTxtFile returns the optional path to the removed.txt file for the specified sdk kind.
SdkRemovedTxtFile(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, kind android.SdkKind) android.OptionalPath
// sharedLibrary returns true if this can be used as a shared library.
sharedLibrary() bool
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
}
type SdkLibrary struct {
Library
sdkLibraryProperties sdkLibraryProperties
// Map from api scope to the scope specific property structure.
scopeToProperties map[*apiScope]*ApiScopeProperties
commonToSdkLibraryAndImport
}
var _ SdkLibraryDependency = (*SdkLibrary)(nil)
func (module *SdkLibrary) generateTestAndSystemScopesByDefault() bool {
return module.sdkLibraryProperties.Generate_system_and_test_apis
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) getGeneratedApiScopes(ctx android.EarlyModuleContext) apiScopes {
// Check to see if any scopes have been explicitly enabled. If any have then all
// must be.
anyScopesExplicitlyEnabled := false
for _, scope := range allApiScopes {
scopeProperties := module.scopeToProperties[scope]
if scopeProperties.Enabled != nil {
anyScopesExplicitlyEnabled = true
break
}
}
var generatedScopes apiScopes
enabledScopes := make(map[*apiScope]struct{})
for _, scope := range allApiScopes {
scopeProperties := module.scopeToProperties[scope]
// If any scopes are explicitly enabled then ignore the legacy enabled status.
// This is to ensure that any new usages of this module type do not rely on legacy
// behaviour.
defaultEnabledStatus := false
if anyScopesExplicitlyEnabled {
defaultEnabledStatus = scope.defaultEnabledStatus
} else {
defaultEnabledStatus = scope.legacyEnabledStatus(module)
}
enabled := proptools.BoolDefault(scopeProperties.Enabled, defaultEnabledStatus)
if enabled {
enabledScopes[scope] = struct{}{}
generatedScopes = append(generatedScopes, scope)
}
}
// Now check to make sure that any scope that is extended by an enabled scope is also
// enabled.
for _, scope := range allApiScopes {
if _, ok := enabledScopes[scope]; ok {
extends := scope.extends
if extends != nil {
if _, ok := enabledScopes[extends]; !ok {
ctx.ModuleErrorf("enabled api scope %q depends on disabled scope %q", scope, extends)
}
}
}
}
return generatedScopes
}
type sdkLibraryComponentTag struct {
blueprint.BaseDependencyTag
name string
}
// Mark this tag so dependencies that use it are excluded from visibility enforcement.
func (t sdkLibraryComponentTag) ExcludeFromVisibilityEnforcement() {}
var xmlPermissionsFileTag = sdkLibraryComponentTag{name: "xml-permissions-file"}
java_sdk_library - Allow it to be replaced by prebuilt Previously, a java_sdk_library called "SDKLIB" would create a prebuilt_etc module called "SDKLIB.xml" which installs the generated XML permission file to /etc/permissions/SDKLIB.xml. That module depended on the java_sdk_library "SDKLIB" to generate the XML file as one of its outputs by specifying srcs: [":SDKLIB{.xml}"]. If the java_sdk_library is replaced by a prebuilt then the SDKLIB.xml module expects the prebuilt to provide the XML permissions file which it doesn't because that is an implementation detail and so the build breaks. A couple of alternative approaches were looked at to fix this. One was to have the logic that replaced the source module with the prebuilt to inform the source module that it was being replaced so it could disable its created module. That lead to a dependency cycle where SDKLIB -> SDKLIB.xml -> SDKLIB{.xml} Another solution was to mark dependency tags in such a way that the prebuilt could automatically identify and disable the SDKLIB.xml module. Similar to how the visibility code will ignore dependencies that are tagged with ExcludeFromVisibilityEnforcementTag. That became very convoluted. Instead the java_sdk_library was changed so that it was not responsible for creating the XML permissions file. Instead it created a genrule called "gen-SDKLIB.xml" to create it and then "SDKLIB.xml" depended on that. The java_sdk_library also depended on the genrule to make the XML permissions file available for APEX and testing. Some refactoring of the APEX code and tests was necessary because they had knowledge of the internal implementation of java_sdk_library. The refactoring insulates them a little better from those details. Bug: 148080325 Test: m droid && TARGET_BUILD_APPS=Camera2 m Change-Id: I597bccbb177b6b6320c3a3edeff467243230d384
2020-02-06 14:51:46 +01:00
func IsXmlPermissionsFileDepTag(depTag blueprint.DependencyTag) bool {
if dt, ok := depTag.(sdkLibraryComponentTag); ok {
return dt == xmlPermissionsFileTag
}
return false
}
var implLibraryTag = sdkLibraryComponentTag{name: "impl-library"}
java_sdk_library: Create separate impl library Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl, stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars. Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as that is created the JSL itself. Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe. That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated together so compatibility is not an issue. This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate module. It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse. Bug: 156618935 Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
2020-05-16 16:52:12 +02:00
// Add the dependencies on the child modules in the component deps mutator.
func (module *SdkLibrary) ComponentDepsMutator(ctx android.BottomUpMutatorContext) {
for _, apiScope := range module.getGeneratedApiScopes(ctx) {
// Add dependencies to the stubs library
ctx.AddVariationDependencies(nil, apiScope.stubsTag, module.stubsLibraryModuleName(apiScope))
// Add a dependency on the stubs source in order to access both stubs source and api information.
ctx.AddVariationDependencies(nil, apiScope.stubsSourceAndApiTag, module.stubsSourceModuleName(apiScope))
}
if module.requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() {
java_sdk_library: Create separate impl library Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl, stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars. Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as that is created the JSL itself. Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe. That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated together so compatibility is not an issue. This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate module. It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse. Bug: 156618935 Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
2020-05-16 16:52:12 +02:00
// Add dependency to the rule for generating the implementation library.
ctx.AddDependency(module, implLibraryTag, module.implLibraryModuleName())
if module.sharedLibrary() {
// Add dependency to the rule for generating the xml permissions file
ctx.AddDependency(module, xmlPermissionsFileTag, module.xmlPermissionsModuleName())
}
}
}
java_sdk_library - Allow it to be replaced by prebuilt Previously, a java_sdk_library called "SDKLIB" would create a prebuilt_etc module called "SDKLIB.xml" which installs the generated XML permission file to /etc/permissions/SDKLIB.xml. That module depended on the java_sdk_library "SDKLIB" to generate the XML file as one of its outputs by specifying srcs: [":SDKLIB{.xml}"]. If the java_sdk_library is replaced by a prebuilt then the SDKLIB.xml module expects the prebuilt to provide the XML permissions file which it doesn't because that is an implementation detail and so the build breaks. A couple of alternative approaches were looked at to fix this. One was to have the logic that replaced the source module with the prebuilt to inform the source module that it was being replaced so it could disable its created module. That lead to a dependency cycle where SDKLIB -> SDKLIB.xml -> SDKLIB{.xml} Another solution was to mark dependency tags in such a way that the prebuilt could automatically identify and disable the SDKLIB.xml module. Similar to how the visibility code will ignore dependencies that are tagged with ExcludeFromVisibilityEnforcementTag. That became very convoluted. Instead the java_sdk_library was changed so that it was not responsible for creating the XML permissions file. Instead it created a genrule called "gen-SDKLIB.xml" to create it and then "SDKLIB.xml" depended on that. The java_sdk_library also depended on the genrule to make the XML permissions file available for APEX and testing. Some refactoring of the APEX code and tests was necessary because they had knowledge of the internal implementation of java_sdk_library. The refactoring insulates them a little better from those details. Bug: 148080325 Test: m droid && TARGET_BUILD_APPS=Camera2 m Change-Id: I597bccbb177b6b6320c3a3edeff467243230d384
2020-02-06 14:51:46 +01:00
// Add other dependencies as normal.
func (module *SdkLibrary) DepsMutator(ctx android.BottomUpMutatorContext) {
var missingApiModules []string
for _, apiScope := range module.getGeneratedApiScopes(ctx) {
if apiScope.unstable {
continue
}
if m := android.SrcIsModule(module.latestApiFilegroupName(apiScope)); !ctx.OtherModuleExists(m) {
missingApiModules = append(missingApiModules, m)
}
if m := android.SrcIsModule(module.latestRemovedApiFilegroupName(apiScope)); !ctx.OtherModuleExists(m) {
missingApiModules = append(missingApiModules, m)
}
if m := android.SrcIsModule(module.latestIncompatibilitiesFilegroupName(apiScope)); !ctx.OtherModuleExists(m) {
missingApiModules = append(missingApiModules, m)
}
}
if len(missingApiModules) != 0 && !module.sdkLibraryProperties.Unsafe_ignore_missing_latest_api {
m := module.Name() + " is missing tracking files for previously released library versions.\n"
m += "You need to do one of the following:\n"
m += "- Add `unsafe_ignore_missing_latest_api: true` to your blueprint (to disable compat tracking)\n"
m += "- Add a set of prebuilt txt files representing the last released version of this library for compat checking.\n"
m += " (the current set of API files can be used as a seed for this compatibility tracking\n"
m += "\n"
m += "The following filegroup modules are missing:\n "
m += strings.Join(missingApiModules, "\n ") + "\n"
m += "Please see the documentation of the prebuilt_apis module type (and a usage example in prebuilts/sdk) for a convenient way to generate these."
ctx.ModuleErrorf(m)
}
if module.requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() {
// Only add the deps for the library if it is actually going to be built.
module.Library.deps(ctx)
}
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) OutputFiles(tag string) (android.Paths, error) {
paths, err := module.commonOutputFiles(tag)
if paths == nil && err == nil {
return module.Library.OutputFiles(tag)
} else {
return paths, err
}
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) GenerateAndroidBuildActions(ctx android.ModuleContext) {
module.generateCommonBuildActions(ctx)
// Only build an implementation library if required.
if module.requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() {
module.Library.GenerateAndroidBuildActions(ctx)
}
2021-04-29 22:50:40 +02:00
// Collate the components exported by this module. All scope specific modules are exported but
// the impl and xml component modules are not.
exportedComponents := map[string]struct{}{}
// Record the paths to the header jars of the library (stubs and impl).
// When this java_sdk_library is depended upon from others via "libs" property,
// the recorded paths will be returned depending on the link type of the caller.
ctx.VisitDirectDeps(func(to android.Module) {
tag := ctx.OtherModuleDependencyTag(to)
// Extract information from any of the scope specific dependencies.
if scopeTag, ok := tag.(scopeDependencyTag); ok {
apiScope := scopeTag.apiScope
scopePaths := module.getScopePathsCreateIfNeeded(apiScope)
// Extract information from the dependency. The exact information extracted
// is determined by the nature of the dependency which is determined by the tag.
scopeTag.extractDepInfo(ctx, to, scopePaths)
2021-04-29 22:50:40 +02:00
exportedComponents[ctx.OtherModuleName(to)] = struct{}{}
}
})
2021-04-29 22:50:40 +02:00
// Make the set of components exported by this module available for use elsewhere.
exportedComponentInfo := android.ExportedComponentsInfo{Components: android.SortedStringKeys(exportedComponents)}
ctx.SetProvider(android.ExportedComponentsInfoProvider, exportedComponentInfo)
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) AndroidMkEntries() []android.AndroidMkEntries {
if !module.requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() {
return nil
}
entriesList := module.Library.AndroidMkEntries()
if module.sharedLibrary() {
entries := &entriesList[0]
entries.Required = append(entries.Required, module.xmlPermissionsModuleName())
}
return entriesList
Additional fixes for java_sdk_library This change fixes several problems found while re-defining some libs using java_sdk_library module type. 1) A phony module whose name is the same as the java_sdk_library name is defined. It is used to support installing the runtime library via PRODUCT_PACKAGES (even when there is no dependency from other modules). 2) A bug that package names whose depth is >= 2 is ignored in droiddoc.srcs_lib_whitelist_pkgs is fixed. A package name foo.bar.baz is now converted to a path foo/bar/baz following the Java convention. 3) A make variable JAVA_SDK_LIBRARIES that is the list of java_sdk_library module names is exported to make. This can be used to distinguish SDK libraries from ordinary libs. 4) When running doclava, some framework sources in the 'android' package and the same packages as the SDK library are automatically added to the sources list. This is required for the case when API class is extending from the framework class. In that case, doclava needs to know whether the base class is hidde nor not. Since that visibility info is encoded as @hide string in the comment, we need source files for the classes, not the compiled ones. Also there are rare cases where part of SDK library is implemented in the framework (e.g. org.apache.http.legacy). In that case, we need framework source to make API stubs, though the sources are not required to build the runtime library. 5) The stubs libs are disabled for PDK builds as well. Bug: 77575606 Test: m -j Change-Id: I360cf15fe5339e46644fb16d0dabe2548aa315f9
2018-04-23 14:41:26 +02:00
}
// The dist path of the stub artifacts
func (module *SdkLibrary) apiDistPath(apiScope *apiScope) string {
return path.Join("apistubs", module.distGroup(), apiScope.name)
}
// Get the sdk version for use when compiling the stubs library.
func (module *SdkLibrary) sdkVersionForStubsLibrary(mctx android.EarlyModuleContext, apiScope *apiScope) string {
scopeProperties := module.scopeToProperties[apiScope]
if scopeProperties.Sdk_version != nil {
return proptools.String(scopeProperties.Sdk_version)
}
sdkDep := decodeSdkDep(mctx, android.SdkContext(&module.Library))
if sdkDep.hasStandardLibs() {
// If building against a standard sdk then use the sdk version appropriate for the scope.
return apiScope.sdkVersion
} else {
// Otherwise, use no system module.
return "none"
}
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) distStem() string {
return proptools.StringDefault(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Dist_stem, module.BaseModuleName())
}
// distGroup returns the subdirectory of the dist path of the stub artifacts.
func (module *SdkLibrary) distGroup() string {
return proptools.StringDefault(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Dist_group, "unknown")
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) latestApiFilegroupName(apiScope *apiScope) string {
return ":" + module.distStem() + ".api." + apiScope.name + ".latest"
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) latestRemovedApiFilegroupName(apiScope *apiScope) string {
return ":" + module.distStem() + "-removed.api." + apiScope.name + ".latest"
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) latestIncompatibilitiesFilegroupName(apiScope *apiScope) string {
return ":" + module.distStem() + "-incompatibilities.api." + apiScope.name + ".latest"
}
func childModuleVisibility(childVisibility []string) []string {
if childVisibility == nil {
// No child visibility set. The child will use the visibility of the sdk_library.
return nil
}
// Prepend an override to ignore the sdk_library's visibility, and rely on the child visibility.
var visibility []string
visibility = append(visibility, "//visibility:override")
visibility = append(visibility, childVisibility...)
return visibility
}
java_sdk_library: Create separate impl library Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl, stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars. Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as that is created the JSL itself. Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe. That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated together so compatibility is not an issue. This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate module. It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse. Bug: 156618935 Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
2020-05-16 16:52:12 +02:00
// Creates the implementation java library
func (module *SdkLibrary) createImplLibrary(mctx android.DefaultableHookContext) {
visibility := childModuleVisibility(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Impl_library_visibility)
java_sdk_library: Create separate impl library Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl, stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars. Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as that is created the JSL itself. Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe. That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated together so compatibility is not an issue. This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate module. It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse. Bug: 156618935 Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
2020-05-16 16:52:12 +02:00
props := struct {
Name *string
Visibility []string
Instrument bool
Libs []string
java_sdk_library: Create separate impl library Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl, stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars. Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as that is created the JSL itself. Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe. That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated together so compatibility is not an issue. This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate module. It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse. Bug: 156618935 Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
2020-05-16 16:52:12 +02:00
}{
Name: proptools.StringPtr(module.implLibraryModuleName()),
Visibility: visibility,
// Set the instrument property to ensure it is instrumented when instrumentation is required.
Instrument: true,
// Set the impl_only libs. Note that the module's "Libs" get appended as well, via the
// addition of &module.properties below.
Libs: module.sdkLibraryProperties.Impl_only_libs,
java_sdk_library: Create separate impl library Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl, stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars. Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as that is created the JSL itself. Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe. That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated together so compatibility is not an issue. This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate module. It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse. Bug: 156618935 Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
2020-05-16 16:52:12 +02:00
}
properties := []interface{}{
&module.properties,
&module.protoProperties,
&module.deviceProperties,
&module.dexProperties,
java_sdk_library: Create separate impl library Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl, stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars. Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as that is created the JSL itself. Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe. That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated together so compatibility is not an issue. This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate module. It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse. Bug: 156618935 Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
2020-05-16 16:52:12 +02:00
&module.dexpreoptProperties,
&module.linter.properties,
java_sdk_library: Create separate impl library Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl, stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars. Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as that is created the JSL itself. Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe. That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated together so compatibility is not an issue. This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate module. It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse. Bug: 156618935 Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
2020-05-16 16:52:12 +02:00
&props,
module.sdkComponentPropertiesForChildLibrary(),
}
mctx.CreateModule(LibraryFactory, properties...)
}
// Creates a static java library that has API stubs
func (module *SdkLibrary) createStubsLibrary(mctx android.DefaultableHookContext, apiScope *apiScope) {
props := struct {
Name *string
Visibility []string
Srcs []string
Installable *bool
Sdk_version *string
System_modules *string
Patch_module *string
Libs []string
Static_libs []string
Compile_dex *bool
Java_version *string
Openjdk9 struct {
Srcs []string
Javacflags []string
}
Dist struct {
Targets []string
Dest *string
Dir *string
Tag *string
}
}{}
props.Name = proptools.StringPtr(module.stubsLibraryModuleName(apiScope))
props.Visibility = childModuleVisibility(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Stubs_library_visibility)
// sources are generated from the droiddoc
props.Srcs = []string{":" + module.stubsSourceModuleName(apiScope)}
sdkVersion := module.sdkVersionForStubsLibrary(mctx, apiScope)
props.Sdk_version = proptools.StringPtr(sdkVersion)
props.System_modules = module.deviceProperties.System_modules
props.Patch_module = module.properties.Patch_module
props.Installable = proptools.BoolPtr(false)
props.Libs = module.sdkLibraryProperties.Stub_only_libs
props.Static_libs = module.sdkLibraryProperties.Stub_only_static_libs
// The stub-annotations library contains special versions of the annotations
// with CLASS retention policy, so that they're kept.
if proptools.Bool(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Annotations_enabled) {
props.Libs = append(props.Libs, "stub-annotations")
}
props.Openjdk9.Srcs = module.properties.Openjdk9.Srcs
props.Openjdk9.Javacflags = module.properties.Openjdk9.Javacflags
// We compile the stubs for 1.8 in line with the main android.jar stubs, and potential
// interop with older developer tools that don't support 1.9.
props.Java_version = proptools.StringPtr("1.8")
// The imports need to be compiled to dex if the java_sdk_library requests it.
compileDex := module.dexProperties.Compile_dex
if module.stubLibrariesCompiledForDex() {
compileDex = proptools.BoolPtr(true)
}
props.Compile_dex = compileDex
// Dist the class jar artifact for sdk builds.
if !Bool(module.sdkLibraryProperties.No_dist) {
props.Dist.Targets = []string{"sdk", "win_sdk"}
props.Dist.Dest = proptools.StringPtr(fmt.Sprintf("%v.jar", module.distStem()))
props.Dist.Dir = proptools.StringPtr(module.apiDistPath(apiScope))
props.Dist.Tag = proptools.StringPtr(".jar")
}
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
mctx.CreateModule(LibraryFactory, &props, module.sdkComponentPropertiesForChildLibrary())
}
// Creates a droidstubs module that creates stubs source files from the given full source
// files and also updates and checks the API specification files.
func (module *SdkLibrary) createStubsSourcesAndApi(mctx android.DefaultableHookContext, apiScope *apiScope, name string, scopeSpecificDroidstubsArgs []string) {
props := struct {
Name *string
Visibility []string
Srcs []string
Installable *bool
Sdk_version *string
System_modules *string
Libs []string
Output_javadoc_comments *bool
Arg_files []string
Args *string
Java_version *string
Annotations_enabled *bool
Merge_annotations_dirs []string
Merge_inclusion_annotations_dirs []string
Generate_stubs *bool
Previous_api *string
Check_api struct {
Current ApiToCheck
Last_released ApiToCheck
Api_lint struct {
Enabled *bool
New_since *string
Baseline_file *string
}
}
Aidl struct {
Include_dirs []string
Local_include_dirs []string
}
Dists []android.Dist
}{}
// The stubs source processing uses the same compile time classpath when extracting the
// API from the implementation library as it does when compiling it. i.e. the same
// * sdk version
// * system_modules
// * libs (static_libs/libs)
Make sdkDep/decodeSdkDep the source of truth about the sdk Previously, different parts of the build used different sources of information about the SDK (i.e. the default libraries) against which a Java module aimed at the device was built. Some used the sdk_version property, others used the no_standard_libs or no_framework_libs, some used a combination of all three. That lead to inconsistent handling in the code, e.g. some parts treated no_standard_libs: true as implying no_framework_libs: true and others did not, and also in the build files, e.g. some modules specified no_framework_libs: true and sdk_version: "system_current" which makes no sense, or no_standard_libs: true and sdk_version: "core_current" which are inconsistent. This is the first step in a refactoring to simplify the sdk selection process by replacing the no_standard_libs/no_framework_libs properties with some extra options for the sdk_version property. This change consists of: 1) Extra functions sdkContext to access the no_standard_libs and no_framework_libs properties. 2) Extra field/functions in sdkDep to store and access the value of no_standard_libs/no_framework_libs. 3) Changes to decodeSdkDep(...) to pass the values of the no_... properties through to the returned sdkDep. 4) Change all code that accesses the no_... properties directly to call decodeSdkDep(...) to get an sdkDep object and then accessing the values of the no_... properties from there. The accessor functions on sdkDep are called has...() rather than no...() as most callers of the methods invert the value anyway and !no...() is harder to reason about than has...(). The hasFrameworkLibs() function returns true if and only if no_standard_libs and no_framework_libs are false. That is consistent with all but one usage of the no_framework_libs property and that is not affected by it. Bug: 134566750 Test: m droid Change-Id: I196e3304e8bd802fb154e897397b0dd337f868e2 Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: Colin has already given +2 modulo some minor nits and this blocking other changes.
2019-06-07 11:44:37 +02:00
props.Name = proptools.StringPtr(name)
props.Visibility = childModuleVisibility(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Stubs_source_visibility)
props.Srcs = append(props.Srcs, module.properties.Srcs...)
props.Srcs = append(props.Srcs, module.sdkLibraryProperties.Api_srcs...)
props.Sdk_version = module.deviceProperties.Sdk_version
props.System_modules = module.deviceProperties.System_modules
props.Installable = proptools.BoolPtr(false)
// A droiddoc module has only one Libs property and doesn't distinguish between
// shared libs and static libs. So we need to add both of these libs to Libs property.
props.Libs = module.properties.Libs
props.Libs = append(props.Libs, module.properties.Static_libs...)
props.Aidl.Include_dirs = module.deviceProperties.Aidl.Include_dirs
props.Aidl.Local_include_dirs = module.deviceProperties.Aidl.Local_include_dirs
props.Java_version = module.properties.Java_version
props.Annotations_enabled = module.sdkLibraryProperties.Annotations_enabled
props.Merge_annotations_dirs = module.sdkLibraryProperties.Merge_annotations_dirs
props.Merge_inclusion_annotations_dirs = module.sdkLibraryProperties.Merge_inclusion_annotations_dirs
droidstubsArgs := []string{}
if len(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Api_packages) != 0 {
droidstubsArgs = append(droidstubsArgs, "--stub-packages "+strings.Join(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Api_packages, ":"))
}
if len(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Hidden_api_packages) != 0 {
droidstubsArgs = append(droidstubsArgs,
android.JoinWithPrefix(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Hidden_api_packages, " --hide-package "))
}
droidstubsArgs = append(droidstubsArgs, module.sdkLibraryProperties.Droiddoc_options...)
disabledWarnings := []string{
"MissingPermission",
"BroadcastBehavior",
"HiddenSuperclass",
"DeprecationMismatch",
"UnavailableSymbol",
"SdkConstant",
"HiddenTypeParameter",
"Todo",
"Typo",
}
droidstubsArgs = append(droidstubsArgs, android.JoinWithPrefix(disabledWarnings, "--hide "))
// Output Javadoc comments for public scope.
if apiScope == apiScopePublic {
props.Output_javadoc_comments = proptools.BoolPtr(true)
}
// Add in scope specific arguments.
droidstubsArgs = append(droidstubsArgs, scopeSpecificDroidstubsArgs...)
props.Arg_files = module.sdkLibraryProperties.Droiddoc_option_files
props.Args = proptools.StringPtr(strings.Join(droidstubsArgs, " "))
// List of APIs identified from the provided source files are created. They are later
// compared against to the not-yet-released (a.k.a current) list of APIs and to the
// last-released (a.k.a numbered) list of API.
currentApiFileName := apiScope.apiFilePrefix + "current.txt"
removedApiFileName := apiScope.apiFilePrefix + "removed.txt"
apiDir := module.getApiDir()
currentApiFileName = path.Join(apiDir, currentApiFileName)
removedApiFileName = path.Join(apiDir, removedApiFileName)
// check against the not-yet-release API
props.Check_api.Current.Api_file = proptools.StringPtr(currentApiFileName)
props.Check_api.Current.Removed_api_file = proptools.StringPtr(removedApiFileName)
if !(apiScope.unstable || module.sdkLibraryProperties.Unsafe_ignore_missing_latest_api) {
// check against the latest released API
latestApiFilegroupName := proptools.StringPtr(module.latestApiFilegroupName(apiScope))
props.Previous_api = latestApiFilegroupName
props.Check_api.Last_released.Api_file = latestApiFilegroupName
props.Check_api.Last_released.Removed_api_file = proptools.StringPtr(
module.latestRemovedApiFilegroupName(apiScope))
props.Check_api.Last_released.Baseline_file = proptools.StringPtr(
module.latestIncompatibilitiesFilegroupName(apiScope))
if proptools.Bool(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Api_lint.Enabled) {
// Enable api lint.
props.Check_api.Api_lint.Enabled = proptools.BoolPtr(true)
props.Check_api.Api_lint.New_since = latestApiFilegroupName
// If it exists then pass a lint-baseline.txt through to droidstubs.
baselinePath := path.Join(apiDir, apiScope.apiFilePrefix+"lint-baseline.txt")
baselinePathRelativeToRoot := path.Join(mctx.ModuleDir(), baselinePath)
paths, err := mctx.GlobWithDeps(baselinePathRelativeToRoot, nil)
if err != nil {
mctx.ModuleErrorf("error checking for presence of %s: %s", baselinePathRelativeToRoot, err)
}
if len(paths) == 1 {
props.Check_api.Api_lint.Baseline_file = proptools.StringPtr(baselinePath)
} else if len(paths) != 0 {
mctx.ModuleErrorf("error checking for presence of %s: expected one path, found: %v", baselinePathRelativeToRoot, paths)
}
}
}
if !Bool(module.sdkLibraryProperties.No_dist) {
// Dist the api txt and removed api txt artifacts for sdk builds.
distDir := proptools.StringPtr(path.Join(module.apiDistPath(apiScope), "api"))
for _, p := range []struct {
tag string
pattern string
}{
{tag: ".api.txt", pattern: "%s.txt"},
{tag: ".removed-api.txt", pattern: "%s-removed.txt"},
} {
props.Dists = append(props.Dists, android.Dist{
Targets: []string{"sdk", "win_sdk"},
Dir: distDir,
Dest: proptools.StringPtr(fmt.Sprintf(p.pattern, module.distStem())),
Tag: proptools.StringPtr(p.tag),
})
}
}
mctx.CreateModule(DroidstubsFactory, &props)
}
// Implements android.ApexModule
func (module *SdkLibrary) DepIsInSameApex(mctx android.BaseModuleContext, dep android.Module) bool {
depTag := mctx.OtherModuleDependencyTag(dep)
if depTag == xmlPermissionsFileTag {
return true
}
return module.Library.DepIsInSameApex(mctx, dep)
}
// Implements android.ApexModule
func (module *SdkLibrary) UniqueApexVariations() bool {
return module.uniqueApexVariations()
}
// Creates the xml file that publicizes the runtime library
func (module *SdkLibrary) createXmlFile(mctx android.DefaultableHookContext) {
props := struct {
Name *string
Lib_name *string
Apex_available []string
On_bootclasspath_since *string
On_bootclasspath_before *string
Min_device_sdk *string
Max_device_sdk *string
}{
Name: proptools.StringPtr(module.xmlPermissionsModuleName()),
Lib_name: proptools.StringPtr(module.BaseModuleName()),
Apex_available: module.ApexProperties.Apex_available,
On_bootclasspath_since: module.commonSdkLibraryProperties.On_bootclasspath_since,
On_bootclasspath_before: module.commonSdkLibraryProperties.On_bootclasspath_before,
Min_device_sdk: module.commonSdkLibraryProperties.Min_device_sdk,
Max_device_sdk: module.commonSdkLibraryProperties.Max_device_sdk,
}
mctx.CreateModule(sdkLibraryXmlFactory, &props)
}
func PrebuiltJars(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, baseName string, s android.SdkSpec) android.Paths {
var ver android.ApiLevel
var kind android.SdkKind
if s.UsePrebuilt(ctx) {
ver = s.ApiLevel
kind = s.Kind
} else {
// We don't have prebuilt SDK for the specific sdkVersion.
// Instead of breaking the build, fallback to use "system_current"
ver = android.FutureApiLevel
kind = android.SdkSystem
}
dir := filepath.Join("prebuilts", "sdk", ver.String(), kind.String())
jar := filepath.Join(dir, baseName+".jar")
jarPath := android.ExistentPathForSource(ctx, jar)
if !jarPath.Valid() {
if ctx.Config().AllowMissingDependencies() {
return android.Paths{android.PathForSource(ctx, jar)}
} else {
ctx.PropertyErrorf("sdk_library", "invalid sdk version %q, %q does not exist", s.Raw, jar)
}
return nil
}
return android.Paths{jarPath.Path()}
}
Reland: Deduplicate APEX variants that would build identically APEX variants that share the same SDK version and updatability almost always use identical command line arguments to build but with different intermediates directories. This causes unnecessary build time and disk space for duplicated work. Deduplicate APEX variants that would build identically. Create aliases from the per-APEX variations to the new shared variations so that the APEX modules can continue to depend on them via the APEX name as the variation. This has one significant change in behavior. Before this change, if an APEX had two libraries in its direct dependencies and one of those libraries depended on the other, and the second library had stubs, then the first library would depend on the implementation of the second library and not the stubs. After this change, if the first library is also present in a second APEX but the second library is not, then the common variant shared between the two APEXes would use the stubs, not the implementation. In a correctly configured set of build rules this change will be irrelevant, because if the compilation worked for the second APEX using stubs then it will work for the common variant using stubs. However, if an incorrect change to the build rules is made this could lead to confusing errors, as a previously-working common variant could suddenly stop building when a module is added to a new APEX without its dependencies that require implementation APIs to compile. This change reduces the number of modules in an AOSP arm64-userdebug build by 3% (52242 to 50586), reduces the number of variants of the libcutils module from 74 to 53, and reduces the number of variants of the massive libart[d] modules from 44 to 32. This relands I0529837476a253c32b3dfb98dcccf107427c742c with a fix to always mark permissions XML files of java_sdk_library modules as unique per apex since they contain the APEX filename, and a fix to UpdateUniqueApexVariationsForDeps to check ApexInfo.InApexes instead of DepIsInSameApex to check if two modules are in the same apex to account for a module that depends on another in a way that doesn't normally include the dependency in the APEX (e.g. a libs property), but the dependency is directly included in the APEX. Bug: 164216768 Test: go test ./build/soong/apex/... Change-Id: I2ae170601f764e5b88d0be2e0e6adc84e3a4d9cc
2020-08-11 21:17:01 +02:00
// Check to see if the other module is within the same set of named APEXes as this module.
//
// If either this or the other module are on the platform then this will return
// false.
func withinSameApexesAs(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, other android.Module) bool {
apexInfo := ctx.Provider(android.ApexInfoProvider).(android.ApexInfo)
otherApexInfo := ctx.OtherModuleProvider(other, android.ApexInfoProvider).(android.ApexInfo)
return len(otherApexInfo.InApexVariants) > 0 && reflect.DeepEqual(apexInfo.InApexVariants, otherApexInfo.InApexVariants)
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) sdkJars(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, sdkVersion android.SdkSpec, headerJars bool) android.Paths {
// If the client doesn't set sdk_version, but if this library prefers stubs over
// the impl library, let's provide the widest API surface possible. To do so,
// force override sdk_version to module_current so that the closest possible API
// surface could be found in selectHeaderJarsForSdkVersion
if module.defaultsToStubs() && !sdkVersion.Specified() {
sdkVersion = android.SdkSpecFrom(ctx, "module_current")
}
// Only provide access to the implementation library if it is actually built.
if module.requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() {
// Check any special cases for java_sdk_library.
//
// Only allow access to the implementation library in the following condition:
// * No sdk_version specified on the referencing module.
// * The referencing module is in the same apex as this.
if sdkVersion.Kind == android.SdkPrivate || withinSameApexesAs(ctx, module) {
if headerJars {
return module.HeaderJars()
} else {
return module.ImplementationJars()
}
}
}
return module.selectHeaderJarsForSdkVersion(ctx, sdkVersion)
}
// to satisfy SdkLibraryDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibrary) SdkHeaderJars(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, sdkVersion android.SdkSpec) android.Paths {
return module.sdkJars(ctx, sdkVersion, true /*headerJars*/)
}
// to satisfy SdkLibraryDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibrary) SdkImplementationJars(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, sdkVersion android.SdkSpec) android.Paths {
return module.sdkJars(ctx, sdkVersion, false /*headerJars*/)
}
var javaSdkLibrariesKey = android.NewOnceKey("javaSdkLibraries")
Additional fixes for java_sdk_library This change fixes several problems found while re-defining some libs using java_sdk_library module type. 1) A phony module whose name is the same as the java_sdk_library name is defined. It is used to support installing the runtime library via PRODUCT_PACKAGES (even when there is no dependency from other modules). 2) A bug that package names whose depth is >= 2 is ignored in droiddoc.srcs_lib_whitelist_pkgs is fixed. A package name foo.bar.baz is now converted to a path foo/bar/baz following the Java convention. 3) A make variable JAVA_SDK_LIBRARIES that is the list of java_sdk_library module names is exported to make. This can be used to distinguish SDK libraries from ordinary libs. 4) When running doclava, some framework sources in the 'android' package and the same packages as the SDK library are automatically added to the sources list. This is required for the case when API class is extending from the framework class. In that case, doclava needs to know whether the base class is hidde nor not. Since that visibility info is encoded as @hide string in the comment, we need source files for the classes, not the compiled ones. Also there are rare cases where part of SDK library is implemented in the framework (e.g. org.apache.http.legacy). In that case, we need framework source to make API stubs, though the sources are not required to build the runtime library. 5) The stubs libs are disabled for PDK builds as well. Bug: 77575606 Test: m -j Change-Id: I360cf15fe5339e46644fb16d0dabe2548aa315f9
2018-04-23 14:41:26 +02:00
func javaSdkLibraries(config android.Config) *[]string {
return config.Once(javaSdkLibrariesKey, func() interface{} {
Additional fixes for java_sdk_library This change fixes several problems found while re-defining some libs using java_sdk_library module type. 1) A phony module whose name is the same as the java_sdk_library name is defined. It is used to support installing the runtime library via PRODUCT_PACKAGES (even when there is no dependency from other modules). 2) A bug that package names whose depth is >= 2 is ignored in droiddoc.srcs_lib_whitelist_pkgs is fixed. A package name foo.bar.baz is now converted to a path foo/bar/baz following the Java convention. 3) A make variable JAVA_SDK_LIBRARIES that is the list of java_sdk_library module names is exported to make. This can be used to distinguish SDK libraries from ordinary libs. 4) When running doclava, some framework sources in the 'android' package and the same packages as the SDK library are automatically added to the sources list. This is required for the case when API class is extending from the framework class. In that case, doclava needs to know whether the base class is hidde nor not. Since that visibility info is encoded as @hide string in the comment, we need source files for the classes, not the compiled ones. Also there are rare cases where part of SDK library is implemented in the framework (e.g. org.apache.http.legacy). In that case, we need framework source to make API stubs, though the sources are not required to build the runtime library. 5) The stubs libs are disabled for PDK builds as well. Bug: 77575606 Test: m -j Change-Id: I360cf15fe5339e46644fb16d0dabe2548aa315f9
2018-04-23 14:41:26 +02:00
return &[]string{}
}).(*[]string)
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) getApiDir() string {
return proptools.StringDefault(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Api_dir, "api")
}
// For a java_sdk_library module, create internal modules for stubs, docs,
// runtime libs and xml file. If requested, the stubs and docs are created twice
// once for public API level and once for system API level
func (module *SdkLibrary) CreateInternalModules(mctx android.DefaultableHookContext) {
// If the module has been disabled then don't create any child modules.
if !module.Enabled() {
return
}
if len(module.properties.Srcs) == 0 {
mctx.PropertyErrorf("srcs", "java_sdk_library must specify srcs")
return
}
// If this builds against standard libraries (i.e. is not part of the core libraries)
// then assume it provides both system and test apis.
sdkDep := decodeSdkDep(mctx, android.SdkContext(&module.Library))
hasSystemAndTestApis := sdkDep.hasStandardLibs()
module.sdkLibraryProperties.Generate_system_and_test_apis = hasSystemAndTestApis
missingCurrentApi := false
generatedScopes := module.getGeneratedApiScopes(mctx)
apiDir := module.getApiDir()
for _, scope := range generatedScopes {
for _, api := range []string{"current.txt", "removed.txt"} {
path := path.Join(mctx.ModuleDir(), apiDir, scope.apiFilePrefix+api)
p := android.ExistentPathForSource(mctx, path)
if !p.Valid() {
if mctx.Config().AllowMissingDependencies() {
mctx.AddMissingDependencies([]string{path})
} else {
mctx.ModuleErrorf("Current api file %#v doesn't exist", path)
missingCurrentApi = true
}
}
}
}
if missingCurrentApi {
script := "build/soong/scripts/gen-java-current-api-files.sh"
p := android.ExistentPathForSource(mctx, script)
if !p.Valid() {
panic(fmt.Sprintf("script file %s doesn't exist", script))
}
mctx.ModuleErrorf("One or more current api files are missing. "+
"You can update them by:\n"+
"%s %q %s && m update-api",
script, filepath.Join(mctx.ModuleDir(), apiDir),
strings.Join(generatedScopes.Strings(func(s *apiScope) string { return s.apiFilePrefix }), " "))
return
}
for _, scope := range generatedScopes {
// Use the stubs source name for legacy reasons.
module.createStubsSourcesAndApi(mctx, scope, module.stubsSourceModuleName(scope), scope.droidstubsArgs)
module.createStubsLibrary(mctx, scope)
}
Additional fixes for java_sdk_library This change fixes several problems found while re-defining some libs using java_sdk_library module type. 1) A phony module whose name is the same as the java_sdk_library name is defined. It is used to support installing the runtime library via PRODUCT_PACKAGES (even when there is no dependency from other modules). 2) A bug that package names whose depth is >= 2 is ignored in droiddoc.srcs_lib_whitelist_pkgs is fixed. A package name foo.bar.baz is now converted to a path foo/bar/baz following the Java convention. 3) A make variable JAVA_SDK_LIBRARIES that is the list of java_sdk_library module names is exported to make. This can be used to distinguish SDK libraries from ordinary libs. 4) When running doclava, some framework sources in the 'android' package and the same packages as the SDK library are automatically added to the sources list. This is required for the case when API class is extending from the framework class. In that case, doclava needs to know whether the base class is hidde nor not. Since that visibility info is encoded as @hide string in the comment, we need source files for the classes, not the compiled ones. Also there are rare cases where part of SDK library is implemented in the framework (e.g. org.apache.http.legacy). In that case, we need framework source to make API stubs, though the sources are not required to build the runtime library. 5) The stubs libs are disabled for PDK builds as well. Bug: 77575606 Test: m -j Change-Id: I360cf15fe5339e46644fb16d0dabe2548aa315f9
2018-04-23 14:41:26 +02:00
if module.requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() {
java_sdk_library: Create separate impl library Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl, stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars. Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as that is created the JSL itself. Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe. That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated together so compatibility is not an issue. This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate module. It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse. Bug: 156618935 Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
2020-05-16 16:52:12 +02:00
// Create child module to create an implementation library.
//
// This temporarily creates a second implementation library that can be explicitly
// referenced.
//
// TODO(b/156618935) - update comment once only one implementation library is created.
module.createImplLibrary(mctx)
// Only create an XML permissions file that declares the library as being usable
// as a shared library if required.
if module.sharedLibrary() {
module.createXmlFile(mctx)
}
// record java_sdk_library modules so that they are exported to make
javaSdkLibraries := javaSdkLibraries(mctx.Config())
javaSdkLibrariesLock.Lock()
defer javaSdkLibrariesLock.Unlock()
*javaSdkLibraries = append(*javaSdkLibraries, module.BaseModuleName())
}
// Add the impl_only_libs *after* we're done using the Libs prop in submodules.
module.properties.Libs = append(module.properties.Libs, module.sdkLibraryProperties.Impl_only_libs...)
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) InitSdkLibraryProperties() {
module.addHostAndDeviceProperties()
module.AddProperties(&module.sdkLibraryProperties)
module.initSdkLibraryComponent(module)
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
module.properties.Installable = proptools.BoolPtr(true)
module.deviceProperties.IsSDKLibrary = true
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() bool {
return !proptools.Bool(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Api_only)
}
func (module *SdkLibrary) defaultsToStubs() bool {
return proptools.Bool(module.sdkLibraryProperties.Default_to_stubs)
}
// Defines how to name the individual component modules the sdk library creates.
type sdkLibraryComponentNamingScheme interface {
stubsLibraryModuleName(scope *apiScope, baseName string) string
stubsSourceModuleName(scope *apiScope, baseName string) string
}
type defaultNamingScheme struct {
}
func (s *defaultNamingScheme) stubsLibraryModuleName(scope *apiScope, baseName string) string {
return scope.stubsLibraryModuleName(baseName)
}
func (s *defaultNamingScheme) stubsSourceModuleName(scope *apiScope, baseName string) string {
return scope.stubsSourceModuleName(baseName)
}
var _ sdkLibraryComponentNamingScheme = (*defaultNamingScheme)(nil)
func moduleStubLinkType(name string) (stub bool, ret sdkLinkType) {
// This suffix-based approach is fragile and could potentially mis-trigger.
// TODO(b/155164730): Clean this up when modules no longer reference sdk_lib stubs directly.
if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopePublic.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) {
if name == "hwbinder.stubs" || name == "libcore_private.stubs" {
// Due to a previous bug, these modules were not considered stubs, so we retain that.
return false, javaPlatform
}
return true, javaSdk
}
if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopeSystem.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) {
return true, javaSystem
}
if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopeModuleLib.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) {
return true, javaModule
}
if strings.HasSuffix(name, apiScopeTest.stubsLibraryModuleNameSuffix()) {
return true, javaSystem
}
return false, javaPlatform
}
// java_sdk_library is a special Java library that provides optional platform APIs to apps.
// In practice, it can be viewed as a combination of several modules: 1) stubs library that clients
// are linked against to, 2) droiddoc module that internally generates API stubs source files,
// 3) the real runtime shared library that implements the APIs, and 4) XML file for adding
// the runtime lib to the classpath at runtime if requested via <uses-library>.
func SdkLibraryFactory() android.Module {
module := &SdkLibrary{}
// Initialize information common between source and prebuilt.
module.initCommon(module)
module.InitSdkLibraryProperties()
android.InitApexModule(module)
android.InitSdkAwareModule(module)
InitJavaModule(module, android.HostAndDeviceSupported)
// Initialize the map from scope to scope specific properties.
scopeToProperties := make(map[*apiScope]*ApiScopeProperties)
for _, scope := range allApiScopes {
scopeToProperties[scope] = scope.scopeSpecificProperties(module)
}
module.scopeToProperties = scopeToProperties
// Add the properties containing visibility rules so that they are checked.
java_sdk_library: Create separate impl library Most dependencies on java_sdk_library instances (JSL) simply reference them by name and rely on the build to pick the correct part, impl, stubs for a specific scope, headers or implementation jars or dex jars. Generally, the build gets that decision right. If it does not the for most of the components of the JSL there is a way to reference them directly. However, that is not true for the implementation library as that is created the JSL itself. Access to the implementation library should be avoided as it opens up the possibility that use will be made of an API that is not tracked and maintained which could lead to compatibility issues. However, there is a case where use of the implementation library is required and safe. That is when it is being used from other libraries within the same APEX as the JSL. In that case the JSL and its dependencies will be updated together so compatibility is not an issue. This change adds a new <module>.impl java_library that compiles the implementation library in the same way as the JSL itself does. This will allow the modules that are blocked from converting to JSL because of this limitation to progress. Initially the library is only for use for compiling but follow up changes will switch the rest of the build from using the implementation library created by JSL to the separate module. It also adds the ability to give the separate .impl library a more restrictive visibility than the JSL further limiting misuse. Bug: 156618935 Test: m droid, flash, atest CtsProviderTestCases - sniff test tested that it fixes compilation issues with mainline module Change-Id: Ifc4799feb4ada9dec8021efc13fe6a953bf2edd3
2020-05-16 16:52:12 +02:00
android.AddVisibilityProperty(module, "impl_library_visibility", &module.sdkLibraryProperties.Impl_library_visibility)
android.AddVisibilityProperty(module, "stubs_library_visibility", &module.sdkLibraryProperties.Stubs_library_visibility)
android.AddVisibilityProperty(module, "stubs_source_visibility", &module.sdkLibraryProperties.Stubs_source_visibility)
module.SetDefaultableHook(func(ctx android.DefaultableHookContext) {
// If no implementation is required then it cannot be used as a shared library
// either.
if !module.requiresRuntimeImplementationLibrary() {
// If shared_library has been explicitly set to true then it is incompatible
// with api_only: true.
if proptools.Bool(module.commonSdkLibraryProperties.Shared_library) {
ctx.PropertyErrorf("api_only/shared_library", "inconsistent settings, shared_library and api_only cannot both be true")
}
// Set shared_library: false.
module.commonSdkLibraryProperties.Shared_library = proptools.BoolPtr(false)
}
if module.initCommonAfterDefaultsApplied(ctx) {
module.CreateInternalModules(ctx)
}
})
return module
}
//
// SDK library prebuilts
//
// Properties associated with each api scope.
type sdkLibraryScopeProperties struct {
Jars []string `android:"path"`
Sdk_version *string
// List of shared java libs that this module has dependencies to
Libs []string
// The stubs source.
Stub_srcs []string `android:"path"`
// The current.txt
Current_api *string `android:"path"`
// The removed.txt
Removed_api *string `android:"path"`
// Annotation zip
Annotations *string `android:"path"`
}
type sdkLibraryImportProperties struct {
// List of shared java libs, common to all scopes, that this module has
// dependencies to
Libs []string
// If set to true, compile dex files for the stubs. Defaults to false.
Compile_dex *bool
// If not empty, classes are restricted to the specified packages and their sub-packages.
Permitted_packages []string
}
type SdkLibraryImport struct {
android.ModuleBase
android.DefaultableModuleBase
prebuilt android.Prebuilt
android.ApexModuleBase
android.SdkBase
hiddenAPI
dexpreopter
properties sdkLibraryImportProperties
// Map from api scope to the scope specific property structure.
scopeProperties map[*apiScope]*sdkLibraryScopeProperties
commonToSdkLibraryAndImport
// The reference to the implementation library created by the source module.
// Is nil if the source module does not exist.
implLibraryModule *Library
// The reference to the xml permissions module created by the source module.
// Is nil if the source module does not exist.
xmlPermissionsFileModule *sdkLibraryXml
// Build path to the dex implementation jar obtained from the prebuilt_apex, if any.
dexJarFile OptionalDexJarPath
// Expected install file path of the source module(sdk_library)
// or dex implementation jar obtained from the prebuilt_apex, if any.
installFile android.Path
}
var _ SdkLibraryDependency = (*SdkLibraryImport)(nil)
// The type of a structure that contains a field of type sdkLibraryScopeProperties
// for each apiscope in allApiScopes, e.g. something like:
// struct {
// Public sdkLibraryScopeProperties
// System sdkLibraryScopeProperties
// ...
// }
var allScopeStructType = createAllScopePropertiesStructType()
// Dynamically create a structure type for each apiscope in allApiScopes.
func createAllScopePropertiesStructType() reflect.Type {
var fields []reflect.StructField
for _, apiScope := range allApiScopes {
field := reflect.StructField{
Name: apiScope.fieldName,
Type: reflect.TypeOf(sdkLibraryScopeProperties{}),
}
fields = append(fields, field)
}
return reflect.StructOf(fields)
}
// Create an instance of the scope specific structure type and return a map
// from apiscope to a pointer to each scope specific field.
func createPropertiesInstance() (interface{}, map[*apiScope]*sdkLibraryScopeProperties) {
allScopePropertiesPtr := reflect.New(allScopeStructType)
allScopePropertiesStruct := allScopePropertiesPtr.Elem()
scopeProperties := make(map[*apiScope]*sdkLibraryScopeProperties)
for _, apiScope := range allApiScopes {
field := allScopePropertiesStruct.FieldByName(apiScope.fieldName)
scopeProperties[apiScope] = field.Addr().Interface().(*sdkLibraryScopeProperties)
}
return allScopePropertiesPtr.Interface(), scopeProperties
}
// java_sdk_library_import imports a prebuilt java_sdk_library.
func sdkLibraryImportFactory() android.Module {
module := &SdkLibraryImport{}
allScopeProperties, scopeToProperties := createPropertiesInstance()
module.scopeProperties = scopeToProperties
module.AddProperties(&module.properties, allScopeProperties)
// Initialize information common between source and prebuilt.
module.initCommon(module)
android.InitPrebuiltModule(module, &[]string{""})
android.InitApexModule(module)
android.InitSdkAwareModule(module)
InitJavaModule(module, android.HostAndDeviceSupported)
module.SetDefaultableHook(func(mctx android.DefaultableHookContext) {
if module.initCommonAfterDefaultsApplied(mctx) {
module.createInternalModules(mctx)
}
})
return module
}
var _ PermittedPackagesForUpdatableBootJars = (*SdkLibraryImport)(nil)
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) PermittedPackagesForUpdatableBootJars() []string {
return module.properties.Permitted_packages
}
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) Prebuilt() *android.Prebuilt {
return &module.prebuilt
}
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) Name() string {
return module.prebuilt.Name(module.ModuleBase.Name())
}
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) createInternalModules(mctx android.DefaultableHookContext) {
// If the build is configured to use prebuilts then force this to be preferred.
if mctx.Config().AlwaysUsePrebuiltSdks() {
module.prebuilt.ForcePrefer()
}
for apiScope, scopeProperties := range module.scopeProperties {
if len(scopeProperties.Jars) == 0 {
continue
}
module.createJavaImportForStubs(mctx, apiScope, scopeProperties)
if len(scopeProperties.Stub_srcs) > 0 {
module.createPrebuiltStubsSources(mctx, apiScope, scopeProperties)
}
}
javaSdkLibraries := javaSdkLibraries(mctx.Config())
javaSdkLibrariesLock.Lock()
defer javaSdkLibrariesLock.Unlock()
*javaSdkLibraries = append(*javaSdkLibraries, module.BaseModuleName())
}
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) createJavaImportForStubs(mctx android.DefaultableHookContext, apiScope *apiScope, scopeProperties *sdkLibraryScopeProperties) {
// Creates a java import for the jar with ".stubs" suffix
props := struct {
Name *string
Sdk_version *string
Libs []string
Jars []string
Prefer *bool
Compile_dex *bool
}{}
props.Name = proptools.StringPtr(module.stubsLibraryModuleName(apiScope))
props.Sdk_version = scopeProperties.Sdk_version
// Prepend any of the libs from the legacy public properties to the libs for each of the
// scopes to avoid having to duplicate them in each scope.
props.Libs = append(module.properties.Libs, scopeProperties.Libs...)
props.Jars = scopeProperties.Jars
// The imports are preferred if the java_sdk_library_import is preferred.
props.Prefer = proptools.BoolPtr(module.prebuilt.Prefer())
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
// The imports need to be compiled to dex if the java_sdk_library_import requests it.
compileDex := module.properties.Compile_dex
if module.stubLibrariesCompiledForDex() {
compileDex = proptools.BoolPtr(true)
}
props.Compile_dex = compileDex
Improve tracking of exported sdk libraries The build tracks the java_sdk_library/_import modules that are referenced by libraries so that it can ensure that any Android app that includes code that depends on one of those modules has the appropriate <uses-library> entry in their manifest. Unfortunately, there were a couple of issues with that: 1) It only tracks direct references to the java_sdk_library module itself, e.g. android.test.mock. Direct references to the stubs module, e.g. android.test.mock.stubs were not tracked. Making it possible for Android apps to reference libraries which would not be available at runtime. 2) The logic for determining whether something was a java_sdk_library was repeated in a number of places making it difficult to allow java_sdk_library/_import instances to determine whether they should be treated as an Android shared library. 3) It tracks (and could use) even those java_sdk_library instances which do not represent a shared library, e.g. the ones that set api_only: true. While this change will simplifty fixing that the actual issue will be fixed in a follow up change. Changes: * Added EmbeddableSdkLibraryComponent and embedded it into java_sdk_library/_import, java_library and java_import. It provides the common code to minimize duplication. It contains an SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field that if set will cause any references to the containing module to add the SdkLibraryParent to the list of implicit sdk libraries being tracked. * Changed code that assumed that anything that implemented SdkLibraryDependency required tracking to use the OptionalImplicitSdkLibrary() method to get the optional name of the sdk library to track. That will allow a follow up change to return nil from that method to exclude an sdk library from being tracked. * Moved SdkLibraryDependency from java.go to sdk_library.go as that is a better place for it to be. * Changed the stubs java_library/java_import creation code to initialize the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field with the name of the creating module. * Initialized the SdkLibraryToImplicitlyTrack field in the java_sdk_library/_import so that direct references to them will be tracked too. * Added tests to verify that direct access to the .stubs child of both java_sdk_library and java_sdk_library_import are tracked properly. Test: atest CtsProviderTestCases - which relies on android.test.mock being implicitly tracked to verify that I had not broken anything. Used aapt2 dump badging to read the manifest. m nothing - to run the new tests which failed before fixing the code. Bug: 156723295 Change-Id: Ia99def91e9b74d2ed0a777de04b476c00ea0393d
2020-05-15 11:20:31 +02:00
mctx.CreateModule(ImportFactory, &props, module.sdkComponentPropertiesForChildLibrary())
}
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) createPrebuiltStubsSources(mctx android.DefaultableHookContext, apiScope *apiScope, scopeProperties *sdkLibraryScopeProperties) {
props := struct {
Name *string
Srcs []string
Prefer *bool
}{}
props.Name = proptools.StringPtr(module.stubsSourceModuleName(apiScope))
props.Srcs = scopeProperties.Stub_srcs
mctx.CreateModule(PrebuiltStubsSourcesFactory, &props)
// The stubs source is preferred if the java_sdk_library_import is preferred.
props.Prefer = proptools.BoolPtr(module.prebuilt.Prefer())
}
// Add the dependencies on the child module in the component deps mutator so that it
// creates references to the prebuilt and not the source modules.
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) ComponentDepsMutator(ctx android.BottomUpMutatorContext) {
for apiScope, scopeProperties := range module.scopeProperties {
if len(scopeProperties.Jars) == 0 {
continue
}
// Add dependencies to the prebuilt stubs library
ctx.AddVariationDependencies(nil, apiScope.stubsTag, android.PrebuiltNameFromSource(module.stubsLibraryModuleName(apiScope)))
if len(scopeProperties.Stub_srcs) > 0 {
// Add dependencies to the prebuilt stubs source library
ctx.AddVariationDependencies(nil, apiScope.stubsSourceTag, android.PrebuiltNameFromSource(module.stubsSourceModuleName(apiScope)))
}
}
}
// Add other dependencies as normal.
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) DepsMutator(ctx android.BottomUpMutatorContext) {
implName := module.implLibraryModuleName()
if ctx.OtherModuleExists(implName) {
ctx.AddVariationDependencies(nil, implLibraryTag, implName)
xmlPermissionsModuleName := module.xmlPermissionsModuleName()
if module.sharedLibrary() && ctx.OtherModuleExists(xmlPermissionsModuleName) {
// Add dependency to the rule for generating the xml permissions file
ctx.AddDependency(module, xmlPermissionsFileTag, xmlPermissionsModuleName)
}
}
}
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) AndroidMkEntries() []android.AndroidMkEntries {
// For an SDK library imported from a prebuilt APEX, we don't need a Make module for itself, as we
// don't need to install it. However, we need to add its dexpreopt outputs as sub-modules, if it
// is preopted.
dexpreoptEntries := module.dexpreopter.AndroidMkEntriesForApex()
return append(dexpreoptEntries, android.AndroidMkEntries{Disabled: true})
}
var _ android.ApexModule = (*SdkLibraryImport)(nil)
// Implements android.ApexModule
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) DepIsInSameApex(mctx android.BaseModuleContext, dep android.Module) bool {
depTag := mctx.OtherModuleDependencyTag(dep)
if depTag == xmlPermissionsFileTag {
return true
}
// None of the other dependencies of the java_sdk_library_import are in the same apex
// as the one that references this module.
return false
}
// Implements android.ApexModule
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) ShouldSupportSdkVersion(ctx android.BaseModuleContext,
sdkVersion android.ApiLevel) error {
// we don't check prebuilt modules for sdk_version
return nil
}
// Implements android.ApexModule
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) UniqueApexVariations() bool {
return module.uniqueApexVariations()
}
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) OutputFiles(tag string) (android.Paths, error) {
return module.commonOutputFiles(tag)
}
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) GenerateAndroidBuildActions(ctx android.ModuleContext) {
module.generateCommonBuildActions(ctx)
// Assume that source module(sdk_library) is installed in /<sdk_library partition>/framework
module.installFile = android.PathForModuleInstall(ctx, "framework", module.Stem()+".jar")
// Record the paths to the prebuilt stubs library and stubs source.
ctx.VisitDirectDeps(func(to android.Module) {
tag := ctx.OtherModuleDependencyTag(to)
// Extract information from any of the scope specific dependencies.
if scopeTag, ok := tag.(scopeDependencyTag); ok {
apiScope := scopeTag.apiScope
scopePaths := module.getScopePathsCreateIfNeeded(apiScope)
// Extract information from the dependency. The exact information extracted
// is determined by the nature of the dependency which is determined by the tag.
scopeTag.extractDepInfo(ctx, to, scopePaths)
} else if tag == implLibraryTag {
if implLibrary, ok := to.(*Library); ok {
module.implLibraryModule = implLibrary
} else {
ctx.ModuleErrorf("implementation library must be of type *java.Library but was %T", to)
}
} else if tag == xmlPermissionsFileTag {
if xmlPermissionsFileModule, ok := to.(*sdkLibraryXml); ok {
module.xmlPermissionsFileModule = xmlPermissionsFileModule
} else {
ctx.ModuleErrorf("xml permissions file module must be of type *sdkLibraryXml but was %T", to)
}
}
})
// Populate the scope paths with information from the properties.
for apiScope, scopeProperties := range module.scopeProperties {
if len(scopeProperties.Jars) == 0 {
continue
}
paths := module.getScopePathsCreateIfNeeded(apiScope)
paths.annotationsZip = android.OptionalPathForModuleSrc(ctx, scopeProperties.Annotations)
paths.currentApiFilePath = android.OptionalPathForModuleSrc(ctx, scopeProperties.Current_api)
paths.removedApiFilePath = android.OptionalPathForModuleSrc(ctx, scopeProperties.Removed_api)
}
if ctx.Device() {
// If this is a variant created for a prebuilt_apex then use the dex implementation jar
// obtained from the associated deapexer module.
ai := ctx.Provider(android.ApexInfoProvider).(android.ApexInfo)
if ai.ForPrebuiltApex {
// Get the path of the dex implementation jar from the `deapexer` module.
di := android.FindDeapexerProviderForModule(ctx)
if di == nil {
return // An error has been reported by FindDeapexerProviderForModule.
}
if dexOutputPath := di.PrebuiltExportPath(apexRootRelativePathToJavaLib(module.BaseModuleName())); dexOutputPath != nil {
dexJarFile := makeDexJarPathFromPath(dexOutputPath)
module.dexJarFile = dexJarFile
installPath := android.PathForModuleInPartitionInstall(
ctx, "apex", ai.ApexVariationName, apexRootRelativePathToJavaLib(module.BaseModuleName()))
module.installFile = installPath
module.initHiddenAPI(ctx, dexJarFile, module.findScopePaths(apiScopePublic).stubsImplPath[0], nil)
// Dexpreopting.
module.dexpreopter.installPath = module.dexpreopter.getInstallPath(ctx, installPath)
module.dexpreopter.isSDKLibrary = true
module.dexpreopter.uncompressedDex = shouldUncompressDex(ctx, &module.dexpreopter)
module.dexpreopt(ctx, dexOutputPath)
} else {
// This should never happen as a variant for a prebuilt_apex is only created if the
// prebuilt_apex has been configured to export the java library dex file.
ctx.ModuleErrorf("internal error: no dex implementation jar available from prebuilt APEX %s", di.ApexModuleName())
}
}
}
}
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) sdkJars(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, sdkVersion android.SdkSpec, headerJars bool) android.Paths {
// For consistency with SdkLibrary make the implementation jar available to libraries that
// are within the same APEX.
implLibraryModule := module.implLibraryModule
if implLibraryModule != nil && withinSameApexesAs(ctx, module) {
if headerJars {
return implLibraryModule.HeaderJars()
} else {
return implLibraryModule.ImplementationJars()
}
}
return module.selectHeaderJarsForSdkVersion(ctx, sdkVersion)
}
// to satisfy SdkLibraryDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) SdkHeaderJars(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, sdkVersion android.SdkSpec) android.Paths {
// This module is just a wrapper for the prebuilt stubs.
return module.sdkJars(ctx, sdkVersion, true)
}
// to satisfy SdkLibraryDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) SdkImplementationJars(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, sdkVersion android.SdkSpec) android.Paths {
// This module is just a wrapper for the stubs.
return module.sdkJars(ctx, sdkVersion, false)
}
// to satisfy UsesLibraryDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) DexJarBuildPath() OptionalDexJarPath {
// The dex implementation jar extracted from the .apex file should be used in preference to the
// source.
if module.dexJarFile.IsSet() {
return module.dexJarFile
}
if module.implLibraryModule == nil {
return makeUnsetDexJarPath()
} else {
return module.implLibraryModule.DexJarBuildPath()
}
}
// to satisfy UsesLibraryDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) DexJarInstallPath() android.Path {
return module.installFile
}
// to satisfy UsesLibraryDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) ClassLoaderContexts() dexpreopt.ClassLoaderContextMap {
return nil
}
// to satisfy apex.javaDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) JacocoReportClassesFile() android.Path {
if module.implLibraryModule == nil {
return nil
} else {
return module.implLibraryModule.JacocoReportClassesFile()
}
}
// to satisfy apex.javaDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) LintDepSets() LintDepSets {
if module.implLibraryModule == nil {
return LintDepSets{}
} else {
return module.implLibraryModule.LintDepSets()
}
}
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) getStrictUpdatabilityLinting() bool {
if module.implLibraryModule == nil {
return false
} else {
return module.implLibraryModule.getStrictUpdatabilityLinting()
}
}
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) setStrictUpdatabilityLinting(strictLinting bool) {
if module.implLibraryModule != nil {
module.implLibraryModule.setStrictUpdatabilityLinting(strictLinting)
}
}
// to satisfy apex.javaDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) Stem() string {
return module.BaseModuleName()
}
var _ ApexDependency = (*SdkLibraryImport)(nil)
// to satisfy java.ApexDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) HeaderJars() android.Paths {
if module.implLibraryModule == nil {
return nil
} else {
return module.implLibraryModule.HeaderJars()
}
}
// to satisfy java.ApexDependency interface
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) ImplementationAndResourcesJars() android.Paths {
if module.implLibraryModule == nil {
return nil
} else {
return module.implLibraryModule.ImplementationAndResourcesJars()
}
}
// to satisfy java.DexpreopterInterface interface
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) IsInstallable() bool {
return true
}
var _ android.RequiredFilesFromPrebuiltApex = (*SdkLibraryImport)(nil)
func (module *SdkLibraryImport) RequiredFilesFromPrebuiltApex(ctx android.BaseModuleContext) []string {
name := module.BaseModuleName()
return requiredFilesFromPrebuiltApexForImport(name)
}
//
// java_sdk_library_xml
//
type sdkLibraryXml struct {
android.ModuleBase
android.DefaultableModuleBase
android.ApexModuleBase
properties sdkLibraryXmlProperties
outputFilePath android.OutputPath
installDirPath android.InstallPath
hideApexVariantFromMake bool
}
type sdkLibraryXmlProperties struct {
// canonical name of the lib
Lib_name *string
// Signals that this shared library is part of the bootclasspath starting
// on the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// This will make platforms at this level and above to ignore
// <uses-library> tags with this library name because the library is already
// available
On_bootclasspath_since *string
// Signals that this shared library was part of the bootclasspath before
// (but not including) the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// The system will automatically add a <uses-library> tag with this library to
// apps that target any SDK less than the version indicated in this attribute.
On_bootclasspath_before *string
// Indicates that PackageManager should ignore this shared library if the
// platform is below the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// This means that the device won't recognise this library as installed.
Min_device_sdk *string
// Indicates that PackageManager should ignore this shared library if the
// platform is above the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// This means that the device won't recognise this library as installed.
Max_device_sdk *string
}
// java_sdk_library_xml builds the permission xml file for a java_sdk_library.
// Not to be used directly by users. java_sdk_library internally uses this.
func sdkLibraryXmlFactory() android.Module {
module := &sdkLibraryXml{}
module.AddProperties(&module.properties)
android.InitApexModule(module)
android.InitAndroidArchModule(module, android.DeviceSupported, android.MultilibCommon)
return module
}
Reland: Deduplicate APEX variants that would build identically APEX variants that share the same SDK version and updatability almost always use identical command line arguments to build but with different intermediates directories. This causes unnecessary build time and disk space for duplicated work. Deduplicate APEX variants that would build identically. Create aliases from the per-APEX variations to the new shared variations so that the APEX modules can continue to depend on them via the APEX name as the variation. This has one significant change in behavior. Before this change, if an APEX had two libraries in its direct dependencies and one of those libraries depended on the other, and the second library had stubs, then the first library would depend on the implementation of the second library and not the stubs. After this change, if the first library is also present in a second APEX but the second library is not, then the common variant shared between the two APEXes would use the stubs, not the implementation. In a correctly configured set of build rules this change will be irrelevant, because if the compilation worked for the second APEX using stubs then it will work for the common variant using stubs. However, if an incorrect change to the build rules is made this could lead to confusing errors, as a previously-working common variant could suddenly stop building when a module is added to a new APEX without its dependencies that require implementation APIs to compile. This change reduces the number of modules in an AOSP arm64-userdebug build by 3% (52242 to 50586), reduces the number of variants of the libcutils module from 74 to 53, and reduces the number of variants of the massive libart[d] modules from 44 to 32. This relands I0529837476a253c32b3dfb98dcccf107427c742c with a fix to always mark permissions XML files of java_sdk_library modules as unique per apex since they contain the APEX filename, and a fix to UpdateUniqueApexVariationsForDeps to check ApexInfo.InApexes instead of DepIsInSameApex to check if two modules are in the same apex to account for a module that depends on another in a way that doesn't normally include the dependency in the APEX (e.g. a libs property), but the dependency is directly included in the APEX. Bug: 164216768 Test: go test ./build/soong/apex/... Change-Id: I2ae170601f764e5b88d0be2e0e6adc84e3a4d9cc
2020-08-11 21:17:01 +02:00
func (module *sdkLibraryXml) UniqueApexVariations() bool {
// sdkLibraryXml needs a unique variation per APEX because the generated XML file contains the path to the
// mounted APEX, which contains the name of the APEX.
return true
}
// from android.PrebuiltEtcModule
func (module *sdkLibraryXml) BaseDir() string {
return "etc"
}
// from android.PrebuiltEtcModule
func (module *sdkLibraryXml) SubDir() string {
return "permissions"
}
// from android.PrebuiltEtcModule
func (module *sdkLibraryXml) OutputFile() android.OutputPath {
return module.outputFilePath
}
// from android.ApexModule
func (module *sdkLibraryXml) AvailableFor(what string) bool {
return true
}
func (module *sdkLibraryXml) DepsMutator(ctx android.BottomUpMutatorContext) {
// do nothing
}
var _ android.ApexModule = (*sdkLibraryXml)(nil)
// Implements android.ApexModule
func (module *sdkLibraryXml) ShouldSupportSdkVersion(ctx android.BaseModuleContext,
sdkVersion android.ApiLevel) error {
// sdkLibraryXml doesn't need to be checked separately because java_sdk_library is checked
return nil
}
// File path to the runtime implementation library
func (module *sdkLibraryXml) implPath(ctx android.ModuleContext) string {
implName := proptools.String(module.properties.Lib_name)
if apexInfo := ctx.Provider(android.ApexInfoProvider).(android.ApexInfo); !apexInfo.IsForPlatform() {
// TODO(b/146468504): ApexVariationName() is only a soong module name, not apex name.
// In most cases, this works fine. But when apex_name is set or override_apex is used
// this can be wrong.
return fmt.Sprintf("/apex/%s/javalib/%s.jar", apexInfo.ApexVariationName, implName)
}
partition := "system"
if module.SocSpecific() {
partition = "vendor"
} else if module.DeviceSpecific() {
partition = "odm"
} else if module.ProductSpecific() {
partition = "product"
} else if module.SystemExtSpecific() {
partition = "system_ext"
}
return "/" + partition + "/framework/" + implName + ".jar"
}
func formattedOptionalSdkLevelAttribute(ctx android.ModuleContext, attrName string, value *string) string {
if value == nil {
return ""
}
apiLevel, err := android.ApiLevelFromUser(ctx, *value)
if err != nil {
ctx.PropertyErrorf(attrName, err.Error())
return ""
}
intStr := strconv.Itoa(apiLevel.FinalOrPreviewInt())
return formattedOptionalAttribute(attrName, &intStr)
}
// formats an attribute for the xml permissions file if the value is not null
// returns empty string otherwise
func formattedOptionalAttribute(attrName string, value *string) string {
if value == nil {
return ""
}
return fmt.Sprintf(` %s=\"%s\"\n`, attrName, *value)
}
func (module *sdkLibraryXml) permissionsContents(ctx android.ModuleContext) string {
libName := proptools.String(module.properties.Lib_name)
libNameAttr := formattedOptionalAttribute("name", &libName)
filePath := module.implPath(ctx)
filePathAttr := formattedOptionalAttribute("file", &filePath)
implicitFromAttr := formattedOptionalSdkLevelAttribute(ctx, "on_bootclasspath_since", module.properties.On_bootclasspath_since)
implicitUntilAttr := formattedOptionalSdkLevelAttribute(ctx, "on_bootclasspath_before", module.properties.On_bootclasspath_before)
minSdkAttr := formattedOptionalSdkLevelAttribute(ctx, "min_device_sdk", module.properties.Min_device_sdk)
maxSdkAttr := formattedOptionalSdkLevelAttribute(ctx, "max_device_sdk", module.properties.Max_device_sdk)
return strings.Join([]string{
`<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?>\n`,
`<!-- Copyright (C) 2018 The Android Open Source Project\n`,
`\n`,
` Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the \"License\");\n`,
` you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.\n`,
` You may obtain a copy of the License at\n`,
`\n`,
` http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0\n`,
`\n`,
` Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software\n`,
` distributed under the License is distributed on an \"AS IS\" BASIS,\n`,
` WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.\n`,
` See the License for the specific language governing permissions and\n`,
` limitations under the License.\n`,
`-->\n`,
`<permissions>\n`,
` <library\n`,
libNameAttr,
filePathAttr,
implicitFromAttr,
implicitUntilAttr,
minSdkAttr,
maxSdkAttr,
` />\n`,
`</permissions>\n`}, "")
}
func (module *sdkLibraryXml) GenerateAndroidBuildActions(ctx android.ModuleContext) {
module.hideApexVariantFromMake = !ctx.Provider(android.ApexInfoProvider).(android.ApexInfo).IsForPlatform()
libName := proptools.String(module.properties.Lib_name)
xmlContent := module.permissionsContents(ctx)
module.outputFilePath = android.PathForModuleOut(ctx, libName+".xml").OutputPath
rule := android.NewRuleBuilder(pctx, ctx)
rule.Command().
Text("/bin/bash -c \"echo -e '" + xmlContent + "'\" > ").
Output(module.outputFilePath)
rule.Build("java_sdk_xml", "Permission XML")
module.installDirPath = android.PathForModuleInstall(ctx, "etc", module.SubDir())
}
func (module *sdkLibraryXml) AndroidMkEntries() []android.AndroidMkEntries {
if module.hideApexVariantFromMake {
return []android.AndroidMkEntries{android.AndroidMkEntries{
Disabled: true,
}}
}
return []android.AndroidMkEntries{android.AndroidMkEntries{
Class: "ETC",
OutputFile: android.OptionalPathForPath(module.outputFilePath),
ExtraEntries: []android.AndroidMkExtraEntriesFunc{
func(ctx android.AndroidMkExtraEntriesContext, entries *android.AndroidMkEntries) {
entries.SetString("LOCAL_MODULE_TAGS", "optional")
entries.SetString("LOCAL_MODULE_PATH", module.installDirPath.ToMakePath().String())
entries.SetString("LOCAL_INSTALLED_MODULE_STEM", module.outputFilePath.Base())
},
},
}}
}
type sdkLibrarySdkMemberType struct {
android.SdkMemberTypeBase
}
func (s *sdkLibrarySdkMemberType) AddDependencies(ctx android.SdkDependencyContext, dependencyTag blueprint.DependencyTag, names []string) {
ctx.AddVariationDependencies(nil, dependencyTag, names...)
}
func (s *sdkLibrarySdkMemberType) IsInstance(module android.Module) bool {
_, ok := module.(*SdkLibrary)
return ok
}
func (s *sdkLibrarySdkMemberType) AddPrebuiltModule(ctx android.SdkMemberContext, member android.SdkMember) android.BpModule {
return ctx.SnapshotBuilder().AddPrebuiltModule(member, "java_sdk_library_import")
}
func (s *sdkLibrarySdkMemberType) CreateVariantPropertiesStruct() android.SdkMemberProperties {
return &sdkLibrarySdkMemberProperties{}
}
var javaSdkLibrarySdkMemberType = &sdkLibrarySdkMemberType{
android.SdkMemberTypeBase{
PropertyName: "java_sdk_libs",
SupportsSdk: true,
},
}
type sdkLibrarySdkMemberProperties struct {
android.SdkMemberPropertiesBase
// Scope to per scope properties.
Scopes map[*apiScope]scopeProperties
// The Java stubs source files.
Stub_srcs []string
// The naming scheme.
Naming_scheme *string
// True if the java_sdk_library_import is for a shared library, false
// otherwise.
Shared_library *bool
// True if the stub imports should produce dex jars.
Compile_dex *bool
// The paths to the doctag files to add to the prebuilt.
Doctag_paths android.Paths
Permitted_packages []string
// Signals that this shared library is part of the bootclasspath starting
// on the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// This will make platforms at this level and above to ignore
// <uses-library> tags with this library name because the library is already
// available
On_bootclasspath_since *string
// Signals that this shared library was part of the bootclasspath before
// (but not including) the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// The system will automatically add a <uses-library> tag with this library to
// apps that target any SDK less than the version indicated in this attribute.
On_bootclasspath_before *string
// Indicates that PackageManager should ignore this shared library if the
// platform is below the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// This means that the device won't recognise this library as installed.
Min_device_sdk *string
// Indicates that PackageManager should ignore this shared library if the
// platform is above the version indicated in this attribute.
//
// This means that the device won't recognise this library as installed.
Max_device_sdk *string
}
type scopeProperties struct {
Jars android.Paths
StubsSrcJar android.Path
CurrentApiFile android.Path
RemovedApiFile android.Path
AnnotationsZip android.Path
SdkVersion string
}
func (s *sdkLibrarySdkMemberProperties) PopulateFromVariant(ctx android.SdkMemberContext, variant android.Module) {
sdk := variant.(*SdkLibrary)
s.Scopes = make(map[*apiScope]scopeProperties)
for _, apiScope := range allApiScopes {
paths := sdk.findScopePaths(apiScope)
if paths == nil {
continue
}
jars := paths.stubsImplPath
if len(jars) > 0 {
properties := scopeProperties{}
properties.Jars = jars
properties.SdkVersion = sdk.sdkVersionForStubsLibrary(ctx.SdkModuleContext(), apiScope)
properties.StubsSrcJar = paths.stubsSrcJar.Path()
if paths.currentApiFilePath.Valid() {
properties.CurrentApiFile = paths.currentApiFilePath.Path()
}
if paths.removedApiFilePath.Valid() {
properties.RemovedApiFile = paths.removedApiFilePath.Path()
}
// The annotations zip is only available for modules that set annotations_enabled: true.
if paths.annotationsZip.Valid() {
properties.AnnotationsZip = paths.annotationsZip.Path()
}
s.Scopes[apiScope] = properties
}
}
s.Naming_scheme = sdk.commonSdkLibraryProperties.Naming_scheme
s.Shared_library = proptools.BoolPtr(sdk.sharedLibrary())
s.Compile_dex = sdk.dexProperties.Compile_dex
s.Doctag_paths = sdk.doctagPaths
s.Permitted_packages = sdk.PermittedPackagesForUpdatableBootJars()
s.On_bootclasspath_since = sdk.commonSdkLibraryProperties.On_bootclasspath_since
s.On_bootclasspath_before = sdk.commonSdkLibraryProperties.On_bootclasspath_before
s.Min_device_sdk = sdk.commonSdkLibraryProperties.Min_device_sdk
s.Max_device_sdk = sdk.commonSdkLibraryProperties.Max_device_sdk
}
func (s *sdkLibrarySdkMemberProperties) AddToPropertySet(ctx android.SdkMemberContext, propertySet android.BpPropertySet) {
if s.Naming_scheme != nil {
propertySet.AddProperty("naming_scheme", proptools.String(s.Naming_scheme))
}
if s.Shared_library != nil {
propertySet.AddProperty("shared_library", *s.Shared_library)
}
if s.Compile_dex != nil {
propertySet.AddProperty("compile_dex", *s.Compile_dex)
}
if len(s.Permitted_packages) > 0 {
propertySet.AddProperty("permitted_packages", s.Permitted_packages)
}
for _, apiScope := range allApiScopes {
if properties, ok := s.Scopes[apiScope]; ok {
scopeSet := propertySet.AddPropertySet(apiScope.propertyName)
scopeDir := filepath.Join("sdk_library", s.OsPrefix(), apiScope.name)
var jars []string
for _, p := range properties.Jars {
dest := filepath.Join(scopeDir, ctx.Name()+"-stubs.jar")
ctx.SnapshotBuilder().CopyToSnapshot(p, dest)
jars = append(jars, dest)
}
scopeSet.AddProperty("jars", jars)
if ctx.SdkModuleContext().Config().IsEnvTrue("SOONG_SDK_SNAPSHOT_USE_SRCJAR") {
// Copy the stubs source jar into the snapshot zip as is.
srcJarSnapshotPath := filepath.Join(scopeDir, ctx.Name()+".srcjar")
ctx.SnapshotBuilder().CopyToSnapshot(properties.StubsSrcJar, srcJarSnapshotPath)
scopeSet.AddProperty("stub_srcs", []string{srcJarSnapshotPath})
} else {
// Merge the stubs source jar into the snapshot zip so that when it is unpacked
// the source files are also unpacked.
snapshotRelativeDir := filepath.Join(scopeDir, ctx.Name()+"_stub_sources")
ctx.SnapshotBuilder().UnzipToSnapshot(properties.StubsSrcJar, snapshotRelativeDir)
scopeSet.AddProperty("stub_srcs", []string{snapshotRelativeDir})
}
if properties.CurrentApiFile != nil {
currentApiSnapshotPath := filepath.Join(scopeDir, ctx.Name()+".txt")
ctx.SnapshotBuilder().CopyToSnapshot(properties.CurrentApiFile, currentApiSnapshotPath)
scopeSet.AddProperty("current_api", currentApiSnapshotPath)
}
if properties.RemovedApiFile != nil {
removedApiSnapshotPath := filepath.Join(scopeDir, ctx.Name()+"-removed.txt")
ctx.SnapshotBuilder().CopyToSnapshot(properties.RemovedApiFile, removedApiSnapshotPath)
scopeSet.AddProperty("removed_api", removedApiSnapshotPath)
}
if properties.AnnotationsZip != nil {
annotationsSnapshotPath := filepath.Join(scopeDir, ctx.Name()+"_annotations.zip")
ctx.SnapshotBuilder().CopyToSnapshot(properties.AnnotationsZip, annotationsSnapshotPath)
scopeSet.AddProperty("annotations", annotationsSnapshotPath)
}
if properties.SdkVersion != "" {
scopeSet.AddProperty("sdk_version", properties.SdkVersion)
}
}
}
if len(s.Doctag_paths) > 0 {
dests := []string{}
for _, p := range s.Doctag_paths {
dest := filepath.Join("doctags", p.Rel())
ctx.SnapshotBuilder().CopyToSnapshot(p, dest)
dests = append(dests, dest)
}
propertySet.AddProperty("doctag_files", dests)
}
}