diff --git a/cc/sanitize.go b/cc/sanitize.go
index 87cee9f02..42a112ed4 100644
--- a/cc/sanitize.go
+++ b/cc/sanitize.go
@@ -1428,9 +1428,12 @@ func sanitizerMutator(t SanitizerType) func(android.BottomUpMutatorContext) {
 				}
 			}
 		} else if sanitizeable, ok := mctx.Module().(Sanitizeable); ok && sanitizeable.IsSanitizerEnabled(mctx, t.name()) {
-			// APEX and Java fuzz modules fall here
+			// APEX fuzz modules fall here
 			sanitizeable.AddSanitizerDependencies(mctx, t.name())
 			mctx.CreateVariations(t.variationName())
+		} else if _, ok := mctx.Module().(JniSanitizeable); ok {
+			// Java fuzz modules fall here
+			mctx.CreateVariations(t.variationName())
 		} else if c, ok := mctx.Module().(*Module); ok {
 			//TODO: When Rust modules have vendor support, enable this path for PlatformSanitizeable
 
diff --git a/java/fuzz.go b/java/fuzz.go
index cf2c981d5..b306991da 100644
--- a/java/fuzz.go
+++ b/java/fuzz.go
@@ -54,11 +54,12 @@ type JavaFuzzLibrary struct {
 // cc.JniSanitizeable. It returns a bool for whether a cc dependency should be
 // sanitized for the given sanitizer or not.
 func (j *JavaFuzzLibrary) IsSanitizerEnabledForJni(ctx android.BaseModuleContext, sanitizerName string) bool {
-	for _, s := range j.jniProperties.Sanitizers {
-		if sanitizerName == s {
-			return true
-		}
-	}
+	// TODO: once b/231370928 is resolved, please uncomment the loop
+	// 	for _, s := range j.jniProperties.Sanitizers {
+	// 		if sanitizerName == s {
+	// 			return true
+	// 		}
+	// 	}
 	return false
 }