When an apex sets "vendor: true", it becomes a vendor apex.
Vendor apexes use vendor variants for native modules and are
installed in /vendor/apex.
Bug: 159211312
Test: m
Change-Id: I2585dd990ba857a2ab3ec6ab24e09d4652e867f2
AndroidMkEntries handles bunch of common properties(e.g. LOCAL_INIT_RC,
LOCAL_VINTF_FRAGMENTS, etc).
However apex defines its own Custom() writer, so those properties should
be handled manually.
For example, when an apex defines "init_rc" properties, the value should
be passed to Make via LOCAL_INIT_RC.
Bug: 159211312
Test: m
Change-Id: I65e7a456486c9f5fe70c91b78ff181425035fcf2
apex_manifest.pb is added to payload.img by the build system and is
supposed to be read by apexd during activation.
So, it should be labeled as "system_file" so that apexd can read it
regardless of how file_contexts is defined.
Bug: 159767275
Test: add an apex with file_contexts with everything as vendor_file
apexd should activate the apex.
Change-Id: Ie34eb7ad905828976152d67a7dfabf0add0a5de4
Enforce min_sdk_version for every payload dependency of updatable
APEX/APKs.
android.CheckMinSdkVersion() calls ApexModule.ShouldSupportSdkVersion
for every transitive dependency from APEX/APK modules to see if it
meets the min_sdk_version requirements.
The common implementation for apex/android_app is provided in
android/apex.go.
Bug: 145796956
Bug: 152655956
Bug: 153333044
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I4a947dc94026df7cebd552b6e8ccdb4cc1f67170
Because override_apex can modify the contents of the base apex,
allowed_files (which describes the contents) should be overridable.
Bug: 159503079
Bug: 159392784
Bug: 158169437
Test: m (soong test added)
Merged-In: I12744b0465dc3cfc90a66643867e65b4092cd0f7
Change-Id: I12744b0465dc3cfc90a66643867e65b4092cd0f7
(cherry picked from commit faa5399b3f)
Because override_apex can modify the contents of the base apex,
allowed_files (which describes the contents) should be overridable.
Bug: 159503079
Bug: 159392784
Bug: 158169437
Test: m (soong test added)
Change-Id: I12744b0465dc3cfc90a66643867e65b4092cd0f7
Previously, when there is apex_set that is overriding another module,
the entry for the overridden module is removed from apexkeys.txt.
However, this is wrong because the existence of the apex_set module
doesn't necessary mean that the module is insatalled instead of the
overridden module. That is determined by PRODUCT_PACKAGES which Soong
has no knowledge of. Therefore, we don't delete the entry for the
overridden (actually possibly overridable) modules in the file.
Bug: 158729168
Test: m
Merged-In: I85d0c756f862323bae556bf657d66ec50038985f
(cherry picked from commit ac5e79f900)
Change-Id: I85d0c756f862323bae556bf657d66ec50038985f
Q+ and R+ mainline modules may only add code in a restricted set of Java
package prefixes, that may never be changed.
If a mainline module owns the Java package prefix "foo.bar", it may have
classes in "foo.bar", "foo.bar.baz", "foo.bar.baz.bat" etc.
Test: m
Bug: 156725734
Change-Id: I30bf510ed473309871469bf439d7c81575450931
Previously, when there is apex_set that is overriding another module,
the entry for the overridden module is removed from apexkeys.txt.
However, this is wrong because the existence of the apex_set module
doesn't necessary mean that the module is insatalled instead of the
overridden module. That is determined by PRODUCT_PACKAGES which Soong
has no knowledge of. Therefore, we don't delete the entry for the
overridden (actually possibly overridable) modules in the file.
Bug: 158729168
Test: m
Change-Id: I85d0c756f862323bae556bf657d66ec50038985f
apex_sets is a new module type that can be used to deliver pre-signed
APEXes, which previously could be done only via prebuilt_apex.
Soon gnow understands apex_sets module types and emits the signing info
of the modules to apexkeys.txt
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pic from AOSP
Bug: 158729168
Test: m
Merged-In: I9507375342ec053309660d94c931a79bf4f21218
(cherry picked from commit 8d6c51ebcc)
Change-Id: I9507375342ec053309660d94c931a79bf4f21218
If a java_sdk_library_import has a corresponding java_sdk_library then
make the java_sdk_library_import export both the xml and impl modules
created by the java_sdk_library.
Makes java_sdk_library_import consistent with java_sdk_library by
providing libraries within the same APEX access to the implementation
library instead of the stubs.
Bug: 158304459
Test: m nothing
Test what happens when building com.android.tethering with and without
a preferred "framework-tethering" java_sdk_library_import. Make sure that
it does not change the generated APEX.
Merged-In: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
Change-Id: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
(cherry picked from commit eedc5d55ce)
If a java_sdk_library_import has a corresponding java_sdk_library then
make the java_sdk_library_import export both the xml and impl modules
created by the java_sdk_library.
Makes java_sdk_library_import consistent with java_sdk_library by
providing libraries within the same APEX access to the implementation
library instead of the stubs.
Bug: 158304459
Test: m nothing
Test what happens when building com.android.tethering with and without
a preferred "framework-tethering" java_sdk_library_import. Make sure that
it does not change the generated APEX.
Change-Id: I2f4edea937ac377431a5696c92cbd467bded62ef
While libz has stubs for other mainline modules, it doesn't provide
stubs when it is used as a VNDK lib.
In general, VNDK libs are only for vendor modules. So, we skip them even
if they have stubs.
Bug: 155456180
Test: m com.android.vndk.current
provideNativeLibs of the APEX should be empty
Change-Id: I22401a2b1732a8560802c5be850181682e183a8e
apex_sets is a new module type that can be used to deliver pre-signed
APEXes, which previously could be done only via prebuilt_apex.
Soon gnow understands apex_sets module types and emits the signing info
of the modules to apexkeys.txt
Bug: 158729168
Test: m
Change-Id: I9507375342ec053309660d94c931a79bf4f21218
Ida6f7bb784efe74cc1fa0e8d370eaee803f08b0f made it possible to add
dex_import modules into apex, but that change had a bug. When creating
Android.mk for the dex_import module, the code executed an unchecked
type assertion to convert java.DexImport to java.Dependency, which
cannot be successful. This change fixes the bug by doing a checked type
assertion instead.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from AOSP
Bug: 157886942
Test: m (test added)
Merged-In: Id22c20d42effce539fab10b0d349bf340d467f02
(cherry picked from commit 9e83f0b531)
Change-Id: Id22c20d42effce539fab10b0d349bf340d467f02
Ida6f7bb784efe74cc1fa0e8d370eaee803f08b0f made it possible to add
dex_import modules into apex, but that change had a bug. When creating
Android.mk for the dex_import module, the code executed an unchecked
type assertion to convert java.DexImport to java.Dependency, which
cannot be successful. This change fixes the bug by doing a checked type
assertion instead.
Bug: 157886942
Test: m (test added)
Change-Id: Id22c20d42effce539fab10b0d349bf340d467f02
Give prebuilt_etc and sh_binary their own packages and split the
gigantic main Android.bp up to small, per-package ones.
(This is a cherry-pick change.)
Test: m nothing, TreeHugger
Bug: 156980228
Change-Id: I7b00cd344b9f16861f1ff39edf0029f016b853d0
Merged-In: I7b00cd344b9f16861f1ff39edf0029f016b853d0
Give prebuilt_etc and sh_binary their own packages and split the
gigantic main Android.bp up to small, per-package ones.
Test: m nothing, TreeHugger
Bug: 156980228
Change-Id: I7b00cd344b9f16861f1ff39edf0029f016b853d0
apex now respects stem of java_library modules.
As a follow-up we need to suppor the same for other types of modules.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 157638999
Test: m
Merged-In: Iaf5023020b5440f1ffd4f5414b5a7864655fc22a
(cherry picked from commit a62aa23990)
Change-Id: Iaf5023020b5440f1ffd4f5414b5a7864655fc22a
apex now respects stem of java_library modules.
As a follow-up we need to suppor the same for other types of modules.
Bug: 157638999
Test: m
Change-Id: Iaf5023020b5440f1ffd4f5414b5a7864655fc22a
Previously, if a data source was included in multiple APEX, it would
appear multiple times; however, this caused errors for overriding
commands for targets
Test: apex_test.go
Test: m nothing with change I54d92eca88fc04c949209d490e838d0a92ce8f87
Bug: 155820504
Change-Id: I98f04e0fd9fa3238f2bb0e5da3a86fc0797c38ba
For a given variant of a module that implements ApexModule interface,
the "updatable" property tests if this variant comes from an updatable
apex. For platform variants it is always false.
Test: lunch aosp_walleye-userdebug && m nothing
Bug: 138994281
Merged-In: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
Change-Id: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit 7c140d828a)
Access to the implementation JARs is restricted to avoid code from
depending on implementation details that could change from one release
to the next which could cause compatibility issues. That is not a
problem when referenced from within the APEX that contains the
java_sdk_library.
As references from within the same APEX often need to access
implementation specific details of the java_sdk_library and doing that
from within the same APEX is safe this change all references to a
java_sdk_library made within the same APEX to use the implementation
jars instead of stub jars.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If239059690de61683c2ad2d8a0ce2e47286a3637
(cherry picked from commit 9b879594ed)
Access to the implementation JARs is restricted to avoid code from
depending on implementation details that could change from one release
to the next which could cause compatibility issues. That is not a
problem when referenced from within the APEX that contains the
java_sdk_library.
As references from within the same APEX often need to access
implementation specific details of the java_sdk_library and doing that
from within the same APEX is safe this change all references to a
java_sdk_library made within the same APEX to use the implementation
jars instead of stub jars.
Bug: 155164730
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If239059690de61683c2ad2d8a0ce2e47286a3637
apex_set takes an .apks file that contains a set of prebuilt apexes with
different configurations. It uses extract_apks to select and install the
best matching one for the current target.
Bug: 153456259
Test: apex_test.go
Test: com.android.media.apks
Change-Id: I1da8bbcf1611b7c580a0cb225856cbd7029cc0a7
Merged-In: I1da8bbcf1611b7c580a0cb225856cbd7029cc0a7
apex_set takes an .apks file that contains a set of prebuilt apexes with
different configurations. It uses extract_apks to select and install the
best matching one for the current target.
Bug: 153456259
Test: apex_test.go
Test: com.android.media.apks
Change-Id: I1da8bbcf1611b7c580a0cb225856cbd7029cc0a7
There're two ways to enable hwasan:
- global setting: TARGET_SANITIZE=hwaddress
- individual setting: sanitize: { hwaddress: true }
This change covers both cases by looking up if com.android.runtime is
hwaddress santized or not.
Bug: 156678661
Test: m (soong test added)
Change-Id: I67c382c3e76a06f4b27f221eebd153c698647227
A follow up change will add a mechanism for a module to register a hook
that is called after any defaults have been applied. That is intended
for use by modules like java_sdk_library that create child modules that
are dependent upon properties that could be supplied by defaults.
Creating those child modules after prebuilts mutators are run will
cause problems if those child modules clash with prebuilts modules.
Moving the prebuilts mutators after the defaults mutators will fix
that.
Tests are currently being run with the mutators in different orders so
this change also cleans that up so they are consistent with the actual
code that is being run.
Bug: 155295806
Test: m checkbuild
Merged-In: I825c6df09058fb3a45db196661959eb332aca2f3
Change-Id: I825c6df09058fb3a45db196661959eb332aca2f3
(cherry picked from commit c988c8e202)
A lib providing stable C APIs should be available only to the APEX
containing the library. It shouldn't be available to other APEXes,
especially via static linking.
This change also fixes a bug that llndkImplDep (the dependency from
llndk stub to its implementation library) was recognized as being in the
same APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Change-Id: Ifda7f4a367f68afcde93c86cda45a28cacd91f99
A follow up change will add a mechanism for a module to register a hook
that is called after any defaults have been applied. That is intended
for use by modules like java_sdk_library that create child modules that
are dependent upon properties that could be supplied by defaults.
Creating those child modules after prebuilts mutators are run will
cause problems if those child modules clash with prebuilts modules.
Moving the prebuilts mutators after the defaults mutators will fix
that.
Tests are currently being run with the mutators in different orders so
this change also cleans that up so they are consistent with the actual
code that is being run.
Bug: 155295806
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: I825c6df09058fb3a45db196661959eb332aca2f3
Compared to full list, flat list drops dependency edges and simply
lists all transitive dependencies for a top-level apex bundle.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m, manually build flatlist
Change-Id: Ibd521c96b7aeab90b95965c1b524e0a0152aaf5a
Merged-In: Ibd521c96b7aeab90b95965c1b524e0a0152aaf5a
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit a8bd113a69)
Move depsInfo into android for easier sharing with APK code.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m, diff'ing outputs for conscrypt module.
Change-Id: If0ee967d37425540e69b4ce9304229d9f2cd86bd
Merged-In: If0ee967d37425540e69b4ce9304229d9f2cd86bd
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from aosp
(cherry picked from commit 872a144dca)
Compared to full list, flat list drops dependency edges and simply
lists all transitive dependencies for a top-level apex bundle.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m, manually build flatlist
Change-Id: Ibd521c96b7aeab90b95965c1b524e0a0152aaf5a
Move depsInfo into android for easier sharing with APK code.
Bug: 149622332
Test: m, diff'ing outputs for conscrypt module.
Change-Id: If0ee967d37425540e69b4ce9304229d9f2cd86bd
Shared lib dependencies of a test is included in the APEX regardless of
whether the test has test_per_srcs or not.
Bug: N/A
Test: m (apex_test.go amended)
Change-Id: I6b16843cc7467c42e250aba88d79d5580ba47324
The first component is the apex name, or a special name "platform"
if the boot jar is a platform jar rather than a part of some apex.
This is a prerequisite change for moving core-icu4j to a separate
com.android.i18n apex.
Old one-column format is still supported, but all unqualified
components of PRODUCT_BOOT_JARS get "platform:" prepended to them
after reading the product makefiles.
Test: aosp_walleye-userdebug boots
Bug: 138994281
Change-Id: Ic229159fdcdaf6182210a53b63850a389dd786fc
runtime_resource_overlay is put to an APEX via 'apps' property. It is
placed under ./overlay directory in it.
Bug: 154822536
Test: m
Change-Id: I8edf4a26c26368c52fb7b327b2ecc829f21ea148
This change adds 'test_for' property to cc_test_* types. The property is
used to mark a module as a test for one or more APEXes, in which case
the module has accecss to the private part of the listed APEXes. For
example, the module is linked with the actrual shared library in the
APEX instead of the stub of the shared library.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 129539670
Bug: 153046163
Test: m
Merged-In: I45ed0d7a15540b0d69b2a3b8d9c4cb202adff6f2
(cherry picked from commit 62304bbeec)
Change-Id: I45ed0d7a15540b0d69b2a3b8d9c4cb202adff6f2
A module is marked unavailable for platform when 1) it does not have
"//apex_available:platform" in its apex_available property, or 2)
it depends on another module that is unavailable for platform.
In that case, LOCAL_NOT_AVAILABLE_FOR_PLATFORM is set to true for the
module in the Make world. Later, that flag is used to ensure that there
is no module with the flag is installed to the device.
The reason why this isn't entirely done in Soong is because Soong
doesn't know if a module will be installed to the device or not. To
explain this, let's have an example.
cc_test { name: "mytest", static_libs: ["libfoo"]}
cc_library_static { name: "libfoo", static_libs: ["libbar"]}
cc_library { name: "libbar", apex_available: ["com.android.xxx"]}
Here, libbar is not available for platform, but is used by libfoo which
is available for platform (apex_available defaults to
"//apex_available:platform"). libfoo is again depended on by mytest
which again is available for platform. The use of libbar should be
allowed in the context of test; we don't want to make libbar available
to platform just for the dependency from test because it will allow
non-test uses of the library as well.
Soong by itself can't tell whether libfoo and libbar are used only in the
context of a test. There could be another module depending them, e.g.,
cc_library_shared { name: "mylib", static_libs: ["libfoo"] }
can exist and it might be installed to the device, in which case
we really should trigger an error.
Since Make has the knowledge of what's installed and what's not,
the check should be done there.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from AOSP
Bug: 153073816
Test: m
Test: remove "//apex_available:platform" from libmdnssd (it is currently
installed to /system/lib), and check that `m system_image` fails
Merged-In: Ia304cc5f41f173229e8a154e90cea4dce46dcebe
(cherry picked from commit 89e850ab84)
Change-Id: Ia304cc5f41f173229e8a154e90cea4dce46dcebe
Compiling native modules against the NDK disables platform features
like ASAN. For anything shipped on the system image there is no
reason to compile against the NDK. Add a new mutator to Soong that
creates a platform and an SDK variant for modules that set
sdk_version, and ignore sdk_version for the platform variant. The
SDK variant will be used for embedding in APKs that may be installed
on older platforms. Apexes use their own variants that enforce
backwards compatibility.
Test: sdk_test.go
Test: TestJNIPackaging
Bug: 149591340
Change-Id: I7d72934aaee2e1326cc0ba5f29f51f14feec4521
Merged-In: I7d72934aaee2e1326cc0ba5f29f51f14feec4521
(cherry picked from commit 82e192c3ae)
Apps that expect to run on older platforms should use JNI libraries
that will also run on older platforms. Require that apps that set
sdk_version have jni_libs modules that also set sdk_version, or
set jni_uses_platform_apis: true to bypass the check.
Fixes: 149591057
Test: app_test.go
Change-Id: I76b9b45fb5773bc4dfc10520108f4f3578723909
Merged-In: I76b9b45fb5773bc4dfc10520108f4f3578723909
updatable APEXes should set min_sdk_version as well.
Bug: 152655956
Test: m
Merged-In: I8192086eb89fa958dd8ff1b731e43e24bf217ce2
Change-Id: I8192086eb89fa958dd8ff1b731e43e24bf217ce2
(cherry picked from commit 548640b55f)
This change adds 'test_for' property to cc_test_* types. The property is
used to mark a module as a test for one or more APEXes, in which case
the module has accecss to the private part of the listed APEXes. For
example, the module is linked with the actrual shared library in the
APEX instead of the stub of the shared library.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: already +2'ed by owner
Bug: 129539670
Bug: 153046163
Test: m
Change-Id: I45ed0d7a15540b0d69b2a3b8d9c4cb202adff6f2
apex_deps/apex/apex_flattened mutators don't have to run if module is
disabled.
For some branches which have no valid targets, apex modules are disabled
by the os mutator. e.g. aosp-build-tools
Some enforcement checks which run during those mutators may fail because
build-environment doesn't provide full context information.
For example, "Platform_version_all_codenames" config variable is not
set while apex.min_sdk_version uses one of those codenames.
Bug: 152655956
Test: m
Merged-In: I47e27d2d025ba4c36534708b113ce77c4cb2397b
Change-Id: I47e27d2d025ba4c36534708b113ce77c4cb2397b
(cherry picked from commit 49f6701e9a)
A module is marked unavailable for platform when 1) it does not have
"//apex_available:platform" in its apex_available property, or 2)
it depends on another module that is unavailable for platform.
In that case, LOCAL_NOT_AVAILABLE_FOR_PLATFORM is set to true for the
module in the Make world. Later, that flag is used to ensure that there
is no module with the flag is installed to the device.
The reason why this isn't entirely done in Soong is because Soong
doesn't know if a module will be installed to the device or not. To
explain this, let's have an example.
cc_test { name: "mytest", static_libs: ["libfoo"]}
cc_library_static { name: "libfoo", static_libs: ["libbar"]}
cc_library { name: "libbar", apex_available: ["com.android.xxx"]}
Here, libbar is not available for platform, but is used by libfoo which
is available for platform (apex_available defaults to
"//apex_available:platform"). libfoo is again depended on by mytest
which again is available for platform. The use of libbar should be
allowed in the context of test; we don't want to make libbar available
to platform just for the dependency from test because it will allow
non-test uses of the library as well.
Soong by itself can't tell whether libfoo and libbar are used only in the
context of a test. There could be another module depending them, e.g.,
cc_library_shared { name: "mylib", static_libs: ["libfoo"] }
can exist and it might be installed to the device, in which case
we really should trigger an error.
Since Make has the knowledge of what's installed and what's not,
the check should be done there.
Bug: 153073816
Test: m
Test: remove "//apex_available:platform" from libmdnssd (it is currently
installed to /system/lib), and check that `m system_image` fails
Change-Id: Ia304cc5f41f173229e8a154e90cea4dce46dcebe
For a given variant of a module that implements ApexModule interface,
the "updatable" property tests if this variant comes from an updatable
apex. For platform variants it is always false.
Test: lunch aosp_walleye-userdebug && m nothing
Bug: 138994281
Change-Id: I2d4c54fb397e29dc9b3203be7fb17be4536529f7
