Previously, the .docs suffix was used for droidstubs internal modules
that generate the stubs source. The name was confusing so this change
replaces the suffix with .stubs.source to clarify the purpose of those
modules.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m droid
Change-Id: I9d7a2ab19e4a331b515408912ac8f7e8b0e1b35d
libhidlbase is now being built without intermediate static libraries.
This requires a different neverallow exception for the
'enforce_vintf_manifest' variable.
Bug: N/A
Test: N/A
Change-Id: I5b7f7fc8eb4ac37d658e60a491c39baa5ac137f8
When a module is not available for platform (i.e.
//apex_available:platform is missing in the apex_available property), m
<module_name> previously just didn't work because there is no platform
variant of the module.
This change fixes the behavior; regardless of whether the platform
variant is available or not, m <module_name> builds all the apex
variants of the module along with the platform variant if it exists.
Bug: 147728094
Test: m conscrypt
Change-Id: Iedd3fa6fc0ed779c5f7c5d65f23d86f799ac0cbe
Previously a java_sdk_library_import module did not replace the
corresponding java_sdk_library module, even when it was marked as
prefer=true. That is because the java_sdk_library_import had an empty
set of sources. However, the stubs modules that are created by the
java_sdk_library_import did override the stubs modules created by the
corresponding java_sdk_library module.
That created inconsistent behavior between the cases where only the
prebuilt is available and both source and prebuilt are available and
the prebuilt is preferred. e.g. assume a java_sdk_library/import module
called SDKLIB.
When both prebuilt and source modules are available for SDKLIB then
even if the prebuilt is preferred then any dependencies on the
SDKLIB module would use the source module.
This change fixes that inconsisteny by making the array of sources
non-empty.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m droid && TARGET_BUILD_APPS=Camera2 m
Change-Id: I25395e020393921735ada20c5492f27f1260f6c5
Prior to this change droidstubs modules that set sdk_version
did not get framework.aidl added to its aidl includes.
Bug: 149138391
Test: patch CL in bug && m system_aidl_test-droidstubs
Change-Id: I92ab344c8a4311e10c1e5c8ebf525fa2dc704075
(cherry picked from commit f278ca60e06da86c67f6a3865c290f8451657ce9)
When building java.lang classes it is necessary to compile them using
patch_module: "java.base". This change causes patch_module to be passed
through to the java_library created to compile the stubs to allow this
to be used to generate stubs for java.lang.
Test: m droid
Change-Id: I7c27953a5d782eeedd7f25e849ab444d28e28228
This library is empty, and its functionality has moved
into libbinder/libhwbinder.
Bug: 148692216
Test: N/A
Change-Id: I5874efda9ab43fc00cf90395a1aabde45cf49579
Internal sdk members are used by an sdk member but not exported by the
sdk. The exported sdk members are those listed explicitly in one of the
sdk member list properties, e.g. java_header_libs.
The prebuilts of an internal sdk member use a unique name so that they
do not clash with the source module. The use of the module internally
is an implementation detail that must not have any effect outside the
snapshot. Having the same name as the source module could cause it to
override the source module, hence why it needs a unique name.
Similarly, they are marked as private so as to prevent their accidental
use from outside the snapshot.
Bug: 142940300
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Id5364b410be0592f65666afb3e40e9d3f020251c
Adds an SdkMemberType implementation for java_system_modules. It
specifies that java_system_modules can be used with sdk as well as
module_exports, and also that the libs property should be included
as transitive members in the sdk.
It also adds support for treating appropriate tagged properties in
the snapshot prebuilts module as references to sdk members so that
they are correctly transformed when creating the versioned modules.
Bug: 142940300
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ic10b5a6d5b92b6018334fe876f06feaf79cc55e9
Allow an sdk member type to treat some of its dependencies as being
members of the sdk.
Needed for the java_system_modules type whose libs property are an
implementation detail of the system module and so should not be
explicitly listed in the sdk module but still have to be included in
the sdk snapshot.
Bug: 142940300
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I90f37dae269ef64a6fe9debd0bbaf29a64dd74d8
When linking native libraries with rustc, be explicit about the
kind of native library being linked. This prevents confusion when
two kinds of one library (e.g. static/dynamic) are available in
the library search paths.
Bug: 147140513
Test: The correct prebuilt is selected when linking native prebuilts.
Change-Id: I37975bcd284e6c33ce3dd45fab8a3b5011b0803b
Framework and other dex files are used without image.
Test: taimen-userdebug boots when built with
DEXPREOPT_USE_ART_IMAGE=true
Test: Check logcat for checksum verification failures.
(Build ART with extra logging in OatFileAssistant.)
Test: Check that bootclasspath-checksums from some prebuilt
oat files (say input.odex) contain only one image
checksum followed by dex file checksums with
grep -az -A1 -E '^bootclasspath-checksums$' <oat-file> | \
xargs -0 echo | gawk '{print $2}'
Bug: 119800099
Change-Id: I65c2f247656e41f2c37df1ecb9e06af7dabab76e
The APEX dependency is more correctly tracked. Previously, the
dependency was tracked while we gather modules that will be installed to
an APEX. This actually was incorrect because we skipped many dependency
types that we don't need to follow to gather the modules list, such as
the headers dependency.
Now, the dependency is tracked directly when a module is mutated for an
APEX. In other words, if a module is mutated for an apex X, then the
module will appear in the X-deps-into.txt file.
This change also changes the format of the txt file. It now clearly
shows why a module is included in the APEX by showing the list of
modules that depend on the module.
Bug: 146323213
Test: m
Change-Id: I0a70cf9cce56e36565f9d55683fdaace8748a081
The function visits dependencies of an APEX that contribute to the
payload. checkApexAvailability is rewritten using the generic function.
There is no change in behavior.
Bug: N/A
Test: m
Change-Id: I1a8b4eb0a60a432f667a61b4f6f457c3b8f1cd3d
With I63f8a1de463011c6e0b97f5f6eee83103e22bc30, a flattened APEX is
installed to /system/apex/<apexBundleName> not /system/apex/<apexName>.
The change was to be in sync with the non-flattened APEXes that are
installed to /system/apex/<apexBundleName>.apex.
apexName is from the 'name' property while apexBundleName is from the
'apex_name' property. The two names are mostly the same, but can be
different, notably for the ART and the VNDK APEXes. e,g apexName =
com.android.art, apexBundleName = com.android.art.release.
However, there was a bug in the fix; we haven't updated the path for the
flattened APEXes in other places: filecontexts and symlinks. As a
result, the files for the APEXes where apexName is different from
apexBundleName were incorrectly labeled and caused a boot loop.
Fixing the bug.
Bug: 140136207
Bug: 149013536
Test: m
Test: OVERRIDE_TARGET_FLATTEN_APEX=true m; then inspect the built
system.img to verify that
/system/apex/com.android.vndk.current/lib/libcrypto.so is correctly
labeled as system_lib_file.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Merged-In: I4aaf674a5daeabab5ed6e7025c5389821ee9a013
(cherry picked from commit be95e6b245)
Change-Id: I4aaf674a5daeabab5ed6e7025c5389821ee9a013
aidl libs need to be differentiated because they explicitly set
different system/vendor stabilities.
Bug: 142230898
Test: make checkbuild
Change-Id: I1eb8b77a8e15f962eb6a352c87b1a43ca2160758
Merged-In: Ib09baa946faff8334f7c50568db5e6735dfbbfe2
Product variables structs are generated at runtime to contain only
the properties that apply to the current module. Defaults modules
always contained all product variable properties. Defaults modules
apply their properties to the target module using
proptools.PrependProperties, which prepends structs that have
matching types. Filtered property structs had a different type
and were dropped.
Even after adding filtering to the defaults product variable
properties, defaults modules may contain more property structs
than the target module they are applied to, so the product
variables struct for the defaults module could contain more
fields than the product variables struct for the target module.
Use proptools.PrependMatchingProperties when applying defaults
of product variables instead, which will apply matching properties
across types.
Test: defaults_test.go
Test: variable_test.go
Change-Id: I281bdefef92053457a3b7b65383493a4e7d999df
The zero value check was being done by using reflect.DeepEqual on a
field from the default product variables, but this results in
comparison against a random type when the product variables struct
for the module has been filtered down. Luckily this will always
fail false, which just removed and optimization but left the
behavior correct.
Use reflect.IsZero instead, which is both faster and correct.
Test: variable_test.go
Change-Id: Ieaaa590c2788ca39230e6695397e8ba8d1c6c103
Soong config variables come from Make where they might be capitalized,
but Blueprint didn't handle capitalized variables well. Add test
coverage for capitalized Soong config variables.
Bug: 148865218
Test: soong_config_module_test.go
Change-Id: I1e434e392d5ee660a221a0d3f959811c35e65865
Add a dependency on the Soong config module definition file in case
it wasn't called Android.bp.
Fixes: 148866376
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: Ib441881bcee52fd1dc3a8d1c5ae4f5f0b7efe3ce
If a library happens to contain the extension as a substring in its
name, libNameFromFilePath will return a truncated library name. Change
this calculation to remove the last instance of the extension substring
instead.
Bug: 147140513
Test: Modified rust tests pass.
Change-Id: I0ed91e5f571ed5c4040ee15956a1598846aee43a
This implements four modules (static/shared/header libraries, and
binaries) for vendor snapshot. These modules will override source
modules if BOARD_VNDK_VERSION != current.
Bug: 65377115
Test: 1) VNDK_SNAPSHOT_BUILD_ARTIFACTS=true m dist vndk vendor-snapshot
Test: 2) install snapshot under source tree
Test: 3) set BOARD_VNDK_VERSION and boot cuttlefish
Change-Id: I24ddb4c3aa6abeab60bbfd31bcbd8753e2592dc5
Vendor snapshot can be captured with "m dist vendor-snapshot". With
vendor snapshot and vndk snapshot, older version of /vendor and newer
version of /system will be able to be built together by setting
BOARD_VNDK_VERSION to past vendor's version.
Only vendor modules under AOSP are to be captured. In detail, modules
under following directories are ignored:
- device/
- vendor/
- hardware/, except for interfaces/, libhardware/, libhardware_legacy/,
and ril/
Test modules (cc_test, etc.) and sanitized modules are also ignored.
Bug: 65377115
Test: m dist vendor-snapshot
Change-Id: If7a2f6de7f36deee936930c0ccf7c47c4a0cebf6
Previously, a java_sdk_library called "SDKLIB" would create a
prebuilt_etc module called "SDKLIB.xml" which installs the generated
XML permission file to /etc/permissions/SDKLIB.xml. That module
depended on the java_sdk_library "SDKLIB" to generate the XML file
as one of its outputs by specifying srcs: [":SDKLIB{.xml}"].
If the java_sdk_library is replaced by a prebuilt then the SDKLIB.xml
module expects the prebuilt to provide the XML permissions file which
it doesn't because that is an implementation detail and so the build
breaks.
A couple of alternative approaches were looked at to fix this. One was
to have the logic that replaced the source module with the prebuilt to
inform the source module that it was being replaced so it could disable
its created module. That lead to a dependency cycle where
SDKLIB -> SDKLIB.xml -> SDKLIB{.xml}
Another solution was to mark dependency tags in such a way that the
prebuilt could automatically identify and disable the SDKLIB.xml
module. Similar to how the visibility code will ignore dependencies
that are tagged with ExcludeFromVisibilityEnforcementTag. That became
very convoluted.
Instead the java_sdk_library was changed so that it was not responsible
for creating the XML permissions file. Instead it created a genrule
called "gen-SDKLIB.xml" to create it and then "SDKLIB.xml" depended on
that. The java_sdk_library also depended on the genrule to make the XML
permissions file available for APEX and testing.
Some refactoring of the APEX code and tests was necessary because they
had knowledge of the internal implementation of java_sdk_library. The
refactoring insulates them a little better from those details.
Bug: 148080325
Test: m droid && TARGET_BUILD_APPS=Camera2 m
Change-Id: I597bccbb177b6b6320c3a3edeff467243230d384
