New soong module type `TestModuleConfig`
This module type allows to write:
test_module_config {
name: "DerivedFrameworks1",
base: "FrameworksServicesTests",
include_filters: ["com.android.server.accessibility.FingerprintGestureDispatcherTest"],
}
This goal is to put the test options (include_fitler in this case) in
Android.bp rather than TEST_MAPPING to be able to name a set of options
and to allow the CI to more precise about which part of a TestModule
might be failing.
In general, it is recommended to split up tests rather than use this
approach, but that isn't always feasible.
More details on project here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MpA4BS6mTr-1D-K9MVmzdHkSufAvIkkM4gPEUglNodk/edit?tab=t.0
Migration plan here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x3w-BvKO3E-GbY8YOSBuzJC6-pkLkuhfjSyZ1hJQBYM/edit?tab=t.0
Some details of final output:
* All the [data] files from Derived are the same as base.
* The apk names is changed to be the Module name
* The test options are added to .config file
* test-file-name in the .config file (for base.apk) is changed to be
new apk.
* module-info.json is hand inspected between base and derived.
* I added a .manifest file so future tools know what base is, if they
need it.
We are working a mechanism to use a CAS so the zip of the testcases
won't explode. (however the trident disk image will get bigger)
% tree -ls out/target/product/shiba/testcases/DerivedFrameworks1 out/target/product/shiba/testcases/FrameworksServicesTests
[ 4096] out/target/product/shiba/testcases/DerivedFrameworks1
├── [ 4096] arm64
│ └── [ 72346281] DerivedFrameworks1.apk
├── [ 20887] BstatsTestApp.apk
├── [ 4096] data
│ └── [ 851] broken_shortcut.xml
├── [ 3157] DerivedFrameworks1.config
├── [ 12695] JobTestApp.apk
├── [ 8599] MediaButtonReceiverHolderTestHelperApp.apk
├── [ 16791] SimpleServiceTestApp1.apk
├── [ 16791] SimpleServiceTestApp2.apk
├── [ 16791] SimpleServiceTestApp3.apk
├── [ 1017540] SuspendTestApp.apk
└── [ 36] test_module_config.manifest
[ 4096] out/target/product/shiba/testcases/FrameworksServicesTests
├── [ 4096] arm64
│ └── [ 72346281] FrameworksServicesTests.apk
├── [ 20887] BstatsTestApp.apk
├── [ 4096] data
│ └── [ 851] broken_shortcut.xml
├── [ 2866] FrameworksServicesTests.config
├── [ 12695] JobTestApp.apk
├── [ 8599] MediaButtonReceiverHolderTestHelperApp.apk
├── [ 16791] SimpleServiceTestApp1.apk
├── [ 16791] SimpleServiceTestApp2.apk
├── [ 16791] SimpleServiceTestApp3.apk
└── [ 1017540] SuspendTestApp.apk
Fixes: 314148134
Test: atest DerivedFrameworks1 DerivedFrameworks2
Test: m blueprint_tests
Change-Id: Ib73a3404557e0bd583b065f0cf2fd55fba9ccdbe
Tests that run against mainline modules generally need to be built
twice: once for aosp (unsigned) and once for internal (signed).
The override_android_test rule is really useful for generating a
signed version of the unsigned test.
However, mainline tests need to use a MainlineTestModuleController
to only run tests on targets with the expected module. Since unsigned
and signed mainline modules have different package names, this means
the test config needs to be updated when overriding a test.
Add a new "mainline_package_name" argument so that android test rules
can update the targeted mainline package. Without this, the only way
to create a mainline package test is to instead use android_test, which
results in a lot of copy-pasta.
Test: added tests to soong
Test: manual, using a locally-modified RkpdAppUnitTest
Test: test_config_fixer_test.py
Change-Id: Idaffd63f225719a2bfda41018fda630b17db0080
If the install apk name is different than the module name, use
test_config_fixer to update the test-file-name value in the config.
Test: app_test.go
Fixes: 147375216
Change-Id: I2141eeebbb3552995400b45634712306673fd812
If package_name is set for an android_test module, package names in its
AndroidTest.xml config need to be updated too.
Test: test_config_fixer_test.py
Fixes: 145011263
Change-Id: I52f17ef1d1902364b9bcfec4f6e246bd655dbf09
