Adds support for specifying separate members to an sdk/module_exports
for different os types, e.g. separate ones for android and host.
Adds 'android:"arch_variant"' tag to the dynamically generated fields
for the sdk member types.
Merges the exported members from all variants together.
Determines the device/host_supported flags of the member snapshots by
whether the OsClasses used by their variants rather than the sdk's
host/device supported properties as they may be different.
Bug: 150451422
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I41fbbcd8723aafd54826aad9b78eced9f66ef51c
Updates the member snapshot creation code to support multiple os types.
It basically sorts the variants by os type, then applies the code to
optimize the arch properties and then it optimizes the properties that
are common across architectures and extracts any properties that are
common across os types.
The java and cc member types needed to be modified to make the location
of the generated files within the snapshot os type dependent when there
is more than one os type. That was done by adding an OsPrefix() method
to the SdkMemberPropertiesBase which returns the os prefix to use when
there is > 1 os type and otherwise returns an empty string.
Added three tests, one for cc shared libraries, one for cc binary and
one for java header libraries.
Bug: 150451422
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I08f5fbdd7852b06c9a9a2f1cfdc364338a3d5bac
Adds a CommonOS variant for sdk that depends on the os specific
variants and is used to generate a single sdk for multiple OsTypes,
e.g. host linux and android.
At the minute the member types only support a single OsType but the
basic mechanism for managing the CommonOS variant and collating the
variants across all of them is there.
The only visible effect of this change is that the location of the
generated snapshot is changed, it is no longer os specific and instead
is in the same location irrespective of which os it is built for.
A lot of tests needed to be changed to specify "common_os" as the
variant type instead of the specific os type. As that is the same across
all tests it is hard coded in CheckSnapshot method.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 150451422
Change-Id: If36be39b06d6910453649f7c288c2d34f688b2f4
Internal sdk members are used by an sdk member but not exported by the
sdk. The exported sdk members are those listed explicitly in one of the
sdk member list properties, e.g. java_header_libs.
The prebuilts of an internal sdk member use a unique name so that they
do not clash with the source module. The use of the module internally
is an implementation detail that must not have any effect outside the
snapshot. Having the same name as the source module could cause it to
override the source module, hence why it needs a unique name.
Similarly, they are marked as private so as to prevent their accidental
use from outside the snapshot.
Bug: 142940300
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Id5364b410be0592f65666afb3e40e9d3f020251c
Adds an SdkMemberType implementation for java_system_modules. It
specifies that java_system_modules can be used with sdk as well as
module_exports, and also that the libs property should be included
as transitive members in the sdk.
It also adds support for treating appropriate tagged properties in
the snapshot prebuilts module as references to sdk members so that
they are correctly transformed when creating the versioned modules.
Bug: 142940300
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ic10b5a6d5b92b6018334fe876f06feaf79cc55e9
This change fixes a bug that apex_available is not enforced for static
dependencies. For example, a module with 'apex_available:
["//apex_available:platform"]' was able to be statically linked to any
APEX. This was happening because the check was done on the modules that
are actually installed to an APEX. Static dependencies of the modules
were not counted as they are not installed to the APEX as files.
Fixing this bug by doing the check by traversing the tree in the method
checkApexAvailability.
This change includes a few number of related changes:
1) DepIsInSameApex implementation for cc.Module was changed as well.
Previuosly, it returned false only when the dependency is actually a
stub variant of a lib. Now, it returns false when the dependency has one
or more stub variants. To understand why, we need to recall that when
there is a dependency to a lib having stubs, we actually create two
dependencies: to the non-stub variant and to the stub variant during the
DepsMutator phase. And later in the build action generation phase, we
choose one of them depending on the context. Also recall that an APEX
variant is created only when DepIsInSameApex returns true. Given these,
with the previous implementatin of DepIsInSameApex, we did create apex
variants of the non-stub variant of the dependency, while not creating
the apex variant for the stub variant. This is not right; we needlessly
created the apex variant. The extra apex variant has caused no harm so
far, but since the apex_available check became more correct, it actually
breaks the build. To fix the issue, we stop creating the APEX variant
both for non-stub and stub variants.
2) platform variant is created regardless of the apex_available value.
This is required for the case when a library X that provides stub is in
an APEX A and is configured to be available only for A. In that case,
libs in other APEX can't use the stub library since the stub library is
mutated only for apex A. By creating the platform variant for the stub
library, it can be used from outside as the default dependency variation
is set to the platform variant when creating the APEX variations.
3) The ApexAvailableWhitelist is added with the dependencies that were
revealed with this change.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 147671264
Test: m
Merged-In: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
(cherry picked from commit fa89944c79)
Change-Id: Iaedc05494085ff4e8af227a6392bdd0c338b8e6e
This means everything that goes into apexes need to be
explicitly labeled to be available for apex.
Whitelist the current offenders. This list should be
trimmed down.
Bug: 147364041
Test: m
Test: multiproduct_kati -only-soong
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Change-Id: I837299c6a15d46f8a5ba544b613776b1cc27d7b8
Merged-In: I837299c6a15d46f8a5ba544b613776b1cc27d7b8
(cherry picked from commit 93488cbb10d4882845abb732f8e53714f0982031)
Adds java_test_import module type for use by the sdk snapshot and
adds java_tests property to the sdk and sdk_snapshot module type.
This is needed for the conscrypt test sdk.
Bug: 143678475
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ied4c56c978dac2f92a9b3bc34b3235d7eeba2fd3
By default SdkMemberTypes are only supported on module_exports module
type. Support for sdk module type has to be explicitly specified.
The java_header_libs, native_shared_libs and stubs_sources are
supported on sdk. The latter is required to provide the stubs source
for an API specified in java_header_libs as they should be kept in
sync.
Bug: 146341462
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I19b9e60792780a797458d4a9e489506602b13144
Exports visibility and package mutator registration functions so they
can be used in sdk testing. Updates sdk test to support visibility and
package modules.
Adds EffectiveVisibility(...)[]string function to make the effective
visibility rules available to sdk snapshot creation.
Extracts compositeRule.Strings() []string from compositeRule.String()
method so that it can be used by above func.
Adds visibility property to sdk snapshot and prebuilt modules along
with a test to ensure it works properly.
Adds dir parameter to CheckSnapshot so that it can check the snapshot
generated for a non-root package. That is required in order to ensure
that visibility of :__subpackages__ on a source module in package
<pkg> is resolved to an effective visibility of
//<pkg>:__subpackages__ on its corresponding prebuilt.
Test: m conscrypt-module-sdk
Bug: 143678475
Change-Id: Icaacac5b9c04726d28e6fec93e49715ac45df7f4
Add a new java_header_libs property that exports header jars (as
java_libs currently does) and switch java_libs to export implementation
jars instead.
Refactors implementation of the existing library sdk member type so
both properties can be supported from common code as they differ only
on the jar being exported.
Bug: 143678475
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I04642122f72d083bbdfd3290624f957b71ee8875
Makes it easier for multiple people to work on different areas without
conflicts.
Bug: 143678475
Test: m conscrypt-module-sdk
Change-Id: I93140450c0b049946a9d0432225bccff82f5a873
