For post-Q modules, we can avoid building the hashtree also in the
unbundled build case, since the device will regenerate the hashtree
locally. This CL simplifies the logic so that the build rules apply
regardless of the build being bundled or unbundled -- after all, bundled
build are only really valid for development purposes.
Fix: 147600151
Test: unit test;
m com.android.conscrypt and manual inspection of apexer invocation
(option no_hashtree not present)
m com.android.neuralnetworks and manual inspection of apexer invocation
(option no_hashtree present)
Change-Id: Ib4cc6149d3beac5df7e23a65a3b7ee6b0d68e395
This reverts commit 7cb4d378e7.
Test: m
Test: ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true DIST_DIR=out/dist ./art/tools/dist_linux_bionic.sh -j80 com.android.art.host
(in the master-art-host branch)
Change-Id: I9beca73aafdf42f03bfa19cf1634b2641dac417b
This reverts commit 956305c61c.
Reason for revert: broke master-art-host branch
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: reverting a bad change
Change-Id: Id7faed4ee85328c7c65847a3543ea9e67a3d50b3
For each APEX, <apexname>-installed-files.txt is dist'ed to show the
list of files and their sizes that are included in the APEX.
Bug: 147605944
Test: m dist and examine the txt files
Change-Id: I565479523e51280fc88d5fbf8ea3f48ac0ae9fee
It will be used to build a shim apex with zeroed hashtree for use in CTS
tests.
Test: builds
Bug: 145670581
Change-Id: I6f84850fefb3b58a1c2e8328242920d64a61e733
Bug: 144477678
Test: verified that apex_build_info.pb is populated and included in the
final apex.
Change-Id: Iecbc2a68a82595eee32aaa26d11a7253daf89f69
We need to have a way to see the list of modules that directly or
indirectly contribute to an APEX. People find it difficult to determine
whether a module is included in which APEXes because APEX tracks
indirect dependencies as well as direct dependencies. Therefore, just
looking at Android.bp for the APEX itself doesn't give the answer.
This change adds a new make target <apex_name>-deps-info, which
generates out/soong/<apex_name>-deps-info.txt file that shows the
internal and external dependencies of the said APEX.
Here, internal means the dependencies are actually part of the
APEX, while external means the dependencies are still external to the
APEX.
Bug: 146323213
Test: m (apex_test amended)
Change-Id: I33d1ccf5d1ca335d71cd6ced0f5f66b8c3886d13
It's not yet supported by bundletool and blocks other testing (see
attached bug).
This is a partial revert of
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/build/soong/+/1183459/
Test: out/dist/mainline_modules_arm64/com.android.tzdata-base.zip
Test: checked content doesn't have apex_pubkey
Bug: 146460014
Change-Id: I268caa9f9736ba1913145a1ce1065f6f5179a6db
The rules for apex certificate:
1. <unspecified>: use <default app cerficicate>
2. name: use <default app cerficiate dir>/<name>(.x509.pem|.pk8)
3. :module: use specified by <module>
Certificates can be overridden by PRODUCT_CERTIFICATE_OVERRIDES.
Currently, 1) and 2) aren't overridden by PRODUCT_CERTIFICATE_OVERRIDES,
which should be.
Bug: n/a
Test: m (apex_test.go amended)
Change-Id: Icbdf4979613ef10127ecc02f3debd6a798460532
This change fixes a bug that LOCAL_PATH for modules included in an APEX
is set to the path of the APEX bundle, not to the path of the embedded
module. For example, LOCAL_PATH of libconscrypt included in
com.android.adbd was set to /system/core/adb instead of
/external/boringssl. This caused a problem that NOTICE file in
/external/boringssl is not tagged to libconscrypt, but the NOTICE file
for adbd is.
Fixing the problem by recording the module directories of the included
modules and emitting it in LOCAL_PATH.
Bug: 145347092
Test: Settings -> About Phone -> Legal Information -> Third-party
license. The license for /apex/com.android.adbd/lib64/libconscrypt.so is
OpenSSL.
Change-Id: I76f1830d5a10af63fa74dcc2a42730ffabb8c4ed
APEXes with "legacy_android10_support" will have apex_manifest.json for
compatibility as well as apex_manifest.pb.
Bug: 143951586
Test: m (soong tests)
Change-Id: I019252aee5a9423f4b180ba1026e6e99c9961437
The two were missing.
Bug: 145678884
Test: m out/dist/mainline_modules_arm64/com.android.tzdata-base.zip and
inspect the content
Change-Id: I7e244561f59e5adce56b6a64f363a413faa106f2
This change fixes the problem that when an apex module is overridden by
another override_apex, the <apex_name>-file_contexts are duplicated when
creating the system-level file-contexts.
Fixing this by not emitting the file_context info for the overridden
apex.
In doing so, OverridableModule interface was extended to have
GetOverriddenBy() method which can be used to test whether a module is
an overridden one or not.
Bug: 144338929
Test: m (apex_test amended)
Test: add "override_apex {name:"com.googlge.android.tzdata",
Change-Id: I5e9401c32899bb9987c90cba4185f571dc1a87f0
base:"com.android.tzdata"}" and the build is successful
This change is to make it easier to add new fields to the struct.
transitiveDep field is added to distinguish apexFiles coming from
transitive dependencies of the APEX. We will later use the info to
reduce the size of bundled APEXes by replacing the transitive deps with
symlinks to the corresponding files in the system partition outside of
the APEX.
Bug: 144533348
Test: m
Change-Id: I283859f2f2f1b5cfb3025569f168ba8569b22bb9
When an override_apex named Foo overrides an apex module named Bar, the
Make modules from Foo have Foo as their suffix. Previously the suffix
was Bar for both of the overriding and the overridden APEXes, causing
name conflicts in the Make side.
Bug: 144338929
Test: apex_test.go
Change-Id: I1396910ab294ba5f5e0585af6d37f1eab9460250
For platform APEXes, file_contexts should point a file under
/system/sepolicy.
Bug: 144732805
Test: m
Change-Id: Ib2d5db715bbebc80a6178d1c42e387b268cc4a0d
apex.go is too big. Separate the build rule and android.mk generation
logic into builder.go and androidmk.go, respectively. prebuilt_apex is
moved to prebuilt.go as well.
No refactoring has been made other than the splitting.
Test: m
Change-Id: I839ab0a1ba2b70ce82d98ac1fa8e3534808b5fd3
