Previously, when Q-targeting apexes are bundled-built, they are built
against the latest stubs.
It was because unwinder is linked dynamically in R and APIs are provided
by libc while Q apexes should run on Q where libc doesn't provide those
APIs. To make Q apexes run on Q device, libc++ should be linked with
static unwinder. But, because libc++ with static unwinder may cause problem
on HWASAN build, Q apexes were built against the latest stubs for bundled
build.
However, Q apexes should be built against Q stubs.
Now, only for HWASAN builds, Q apexes are built against the latest stubs
(and native modules are not linked with static unwinder).
Bug: 151912436
Test: TARGET_SANITIZE=hwaddress m
=> Q apexes(media, resolv, ..) are linked with the latest stubs
m
=> Q apexes are linked with Q stubs,
and Q apexes' libc++ is linked with static unwinder
Merged-In: If32f1b547e6d93e3955c7521eec8aef5851f908c
Change-Id: If32f1b547e6d93e3955c7521eec8aef5851f908c
(cherry picked from commit 7406660685)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cp from internal
Change-Id: If32f1b547e6d93e3955c7521eec8aef5851f908c
Delegate the responsibility for determining whether the
walkPayloadDeps() should visit a child dependency to its do function.
This is needed to allow the visitor in checkApexAvailability() to avoid
checking the apex_available setting after crossing the APEX boundary.
Bug: 152878661
Test: m droid
Change-Id: If46a2f74b6eca670befc3aeae430650e85542346
The partition tag helps merge_target_files.py determine
which apexkeys.txt to select from the framework partial
target files and which to select from the vendor partial
target files. The partition tag is the pysical partition
name, for example, a system_ext module on a device where
system_ext is at system/system_ext has a system
partition tag.
Bug: 138942268
Change-Id: Ia07887b34f1aa77dae94ef23610dfef83c1a5849
The apex available check can traverse quite a long path (5+ steps) to
get from the apex to a module that is missing the apex from its
apex_available property. Understanding where that dependency came from
can often require examining the dependency path which can be difficult.
This change adds the path to the error to simplify that process.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 152762638
Change-Id: Ic4eb169dc2026cd8339d49e23b25d6d1c3879750
Having multiple tests within one method makes debugging specific
failures more difficult so this change split the TestApexAvailable
test into multiple separate tests.
Test: m nothing
Bug: 152762638
Change-Id: I2b2408ef515fd79c078686ef29a6ee8fb0407e7e
Coverage build adds extra dependencies for the runtime libs. Marking
them and their transitive dependenciese with apex_available doesn't make
any value; it instead adds noise.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I08e51cec1de6ded624ef9d4c41c1e5b2e611ff38
The macro is required only for apex variants regardless of useVndk.
Before the enforcement of LLNDK sdk version, the macro was not passed to
vendor variants.
Bug: 151689896
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.media.swcodec m
libbase in swcodec apex is linked with liblog#29
(compiled with __ANDROID_SDK_VERSIO__=29)
Change-Id: I57fa4afe027eb39b98bd94d534be9ebe11713f19
This reverts commit 380fc3615c.
Reason for revert: breaking one of internal targets
Change-Id: Ica96c44078e5a7f674410828af3ba851317775dd
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: revert to fix build failure
The marked library(ies) were available to the adbd APEX via the
hand-written whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the
whitelist by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the
libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I6afbe905dda11056559521b937803dcd85b32fe5
The marked library(ies) were available to the APEXes via the hand-written
whitelist in build/soong/apex/apex.go. Trying to remove the whitelist
by adding apex_available property to the Android.bp of the libraries.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I91d1b1076733a949ca2a959ba640ce34d0233492
The NDK prebuilts are implicitly used when building with sdk_version set.
Make the module types be available to any apex so that we don't need to
manually add apex_available property to the module definitions manually.
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: I0870afa4c74b4a06ab1273dff84615778561ecc9
Revert submission 1254009-vdex-symlinks
Reason for revert: This causing some devices to fail to boot. See b/151836042 for details.
Reverted Changes:
Iced89071b:Expect vdex files in a target-independent director...
Ifbceb8457:Share vdex files in the ART apex between architect...
Change-Id: I5bd88f8e61d442eed921d840c90777a2750ddb16
Test: aosp_walleye-userdebug boots.
Test: Check symlinks to *.vdex files in the ART apex:
$ adb shell 'find /apex/com.android.art -name '*.vdex' | xargs ls -l'
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-apache-xml.vdex -> ../boot-apache-xml.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 25 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-bouncycastle.vdex -> ../boot-bouncycastle.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-core-icu4j.vdex -> ../boot-core-icu4j.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 24 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-core-libart.vdex -> ../boot-core-libart.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 19 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot-okhttp.vdex -> ../boot-okhttp.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 12 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm/boot.vdex -> ../boot.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-apache-xml.vdex -> ../boot-apache-xml.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 25 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-bouncycastle.vdex -> ../boot-bouncycastle.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 23 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-core-icu4j.vdex -> ../boot-core-icu4j.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 24 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-core-libart.vdex -> ../boot-core-libart.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 19 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot-okhttp.vdex -> ../boot-okhttp.vdex
lrw-r--r-- 1 system system 12 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/arm64/boot.vdex -> ../boot.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 1229 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-apache-xml.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 2043 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-bouncycastle.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 2883 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-core-icu4j.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 865 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-core-libart.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 395 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot-okhttp.vdex
-rw-r--r-- 1 system system 7125 1970-01-01 01:00 /apex/com.android.art/javalib/boot.vdex
Bug: 150934453
Change-Id: Ifbceb845749f4c218693f4118e8b35b59ff26de1
This change fixes a bug that license info for statically linked
libraries are absent in the merged notice for APEX. The problem was that
we were iterating over the apexFiles list that represents actual files
(not Soong modules) that are included in the APEX. The problem is now
fixed by iterarting the all the modules that directly or indirectly
contribute to the APEX using walkPayloadDeps() function.
Bug: 149455933
Test: m
Change-Id: I38655da62b590b669ab4649815b61a5a8e314154
Even though use_vendor:true is prohibited, there is media.swcodec apex
which is still use_vendor: true and also needs to support Android10.
(min_sdk_version: 29)
Because LLNDK stubs were provided only for the current VNDK version,
media.swcodec couldn't be built against min_sdk_version: 29.
This change introduces additional versions for LLNDK stubs which are
enforced when an apex with use_vendor: true sets min_sdk_version.
To make things easier, the versions of LLNDK stubs are borrowed from its
implementation libraries.
Bug: 147450930
Bug: 149591522
Test: TARGET_BUILD_APPS=com.android.media.swcodec m
(with min_sdk_version: 29 set)
check if liblog/libc/libm/libdl stubs are 29
check if 29 stubs don't have new symbols.
Change-Id: I79946cbb4da6617138a96d2b254349d3a298e77b
libselinux no longer is included in any APEX. Only the platform variant
of it (/system/lib/libselinux.so) exists and APEXes link to it.
Removing the lib name from the whitelist to make it clear that the
library is not available to any APEX.
Bug: 151053366
Bug: 150999716
Test: m
Change-Id: Id4fb933141ad32ff5217a58f1c7d689cc657e9ea
Makes sure that the module snapshots do not rely on the white list
of apex available settings so that when those lists are removed it is
not necessary to update any snapshots.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Iedcff7dfc2646a4da77258d16e06657dd2f411f9
Test apexes no longer check to see whether their contents are available
so the special handling is no longer necessary.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Iecae7dcbb87908d19c672f74d3c1ed8810d4485b
The whitelistedApexAvailable used to map references to
com.android.art.debug/release to com.android.art before looking it up
in the white list. This change removed that mapping and simply added
both to the white list.
Bug: 142935992
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
Merged-In: Ibad76fb73988688eb303e056197986ee9a6119ae
NativeBridgeRelativePath should be appended after /bin or /lib and
before subdir.
Bug: N/A
Test: m (add a soong test)
Change-Id: Id0c44c66b4900caa291e816cf3361fdec8ff9421
Checking apex_available was missing some corner cases.
For example, the deps of share deps of cc_library modules are missed
while those from cc_library_shared are correctly tracked.
This was due to..
* calling DepIsInSameApex in WalkDeps: both work fine separately, but
when they are used together, it fails to work. It's due to how WalkDeps
works. (We might fix this bug too risky since it is used very widely)
* incorrect receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator: receiver
is supposed to be parent, but child was used before. Interestingly lots
of deps are within the same group of module types(cc to cc, java to
java), it has worked. (note that receiver's DepIsInSameApex
implementation can be different).
This change fixes them by..
* walkPayloadDeps is now relying on ApexVariation, which is calculated
correctly by TopDown apex_deps mutator.
* use correct receiver for DepIsInSameApex in apex_deps mutator, which
requires for java.SdkLibrary to override the method and for
java.Library/Import to use passed dep instead of receiver to check its
membership of sdk.
Bug: 151071238
Test: build/boot
Change-Id: I0569ef4bb8e79635e4d97a89f421a8d8b7d26456
When the check for apex_available has failed, the build system now shows
the module that brought the unavailable module into the APEX.
Bug: 151051671
Test: m
Merged-In: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
(cherry picked from commit 7bd9444b0f)
Change-Id: Id1a3fda67fe56fdc2dc90ec800d10689415de4d6
sdk_version is passed for relevant variants.
If not specified or "current",
it maps to "10000" for platform variants, and
"min_sdk_version" of the apex for apex variants.
Bug: 150860940
Test: m (soong test)
manually check build.ninja
Change-Id: I5102ab0c5086b5ad29d16ac45af55d32062167b4
Native modules within APEX should be linked with proper stub version
according to its min_sdk_version.
For example, when min_sdk_version is set to "29", libfoo in the apex
would be linked to libbar of version 29 from platform, even if it has
a newer version like 30.
Bug: 145796956
Test: m nothing (soong tests)
Change-Id: I4a0b2002587bc24b7deeb5d59b6eeba5e1db5b1f
apex { name: "foo" }
override_apex { name: "override_foo", base:"foo" }
PRODUCT_MANIFEST_PACKAGE_NAME_OVERRIDES := foo:com.android.foo
Previously, the override was done only for the overridden package "foo",
but not for "override_foo". Fixing this issue by using ctx.ModuleName()
when finding the package name to use.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Bug: 150645663
Test: m
Merged-In: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
(cherry picked from commit a519c54dd3)
Change-Id: I2947e5c75369216a4bbce8749503236be86771c3
This is rarely used feature but cost alot for the local build and build
inra.
Bug: 150506627
Test: m
Change-Id: Iec3ada4a97c7b228f2818563fa0e81b407f2715a
When there is a runtime depedency (via runtime_libs property) to a
library providing stable C APIs, the dependency is considered as
crossing APEX boundary. Therefore, the requested lib doesn't need to be
made available to the APEX where the requesting lib is in.
Bug: 147813447
Test: m
Change-Id: I9cf8a5877850fb85b92c851e15fac921b8b7641b
