platform_build_soong/android/config_test.go
Paul Duffin 7d584e9360 Retry: Make ConfiguredJarList immutable
By making the Append and RemoveList methods return a new list instead
of modifying the existing list it makes the ConfiguredJarList usages
easier to reason about and safer to use, especially considering that
they are primarily used in global configuration.

Added some tests for Append/RemoveList to ensure that they work and
do not modify the original or result in newly created lists sharing
storage with the original which would lead to corruption.

Bug: 171756871
Bug: 171479578
Test: m nothing
      EMMA_INSTRUMENT=true EMMA_INSTRUMENT_FRAMEWORK=true m nothing
Change-Id: I541c4686ecdd45c6a0c8b1c93fedf0fcd5952e2b
2020-10-27 17:37:20 +00:00

139 lines
4.5 KiB
Go

// Copyright 2017 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package android
import (
"fmt"
"reflect"
"strings"
"testing"
)
func validateConfigAnnotations(configurable jsonConfigurable) (err error) {
reflectType := reflect.TypeOf(configurable)
reflectType = reflectType.Elem()
for i := 0; i < reflectType.NumField(); i++ {
field := reflectType.Field(i)
jsonTag := field.Tag.Get("json")
// Check for mistakes in the json tag
if jsonTag != "" && !strings.HasPrefix(jsonTag, ",") {
if !strings.Contains(jsonTag, ",") {
// Probably an accidental rename, most likely "omitempty" instead of ",omitempty"
return fmt.Errorf("Field %s.%s has tag %s which specifies to change its json field name to %q.\n"+
"Did you mean to use an annotation of %q?\n"+
"(Alternatively, to change the json name of the field, rename the field in source instead.)",
reflectType.Name(), field.Name, field.Tag, jsonTag, ","+jsonTag)
} else {
// Although this rename was probably intentional,
// a json annotation is still more confusing than renaming the source variable
requestedName := strings.Split(jsonTag, ",")[0]
return fmt.Errorf("Field %s.%s has tag %s which specifies to change its json field name to %q.\n"+
"To change the json name of the field, rename the field in source instead.",
reflectType.Name(), field.Name, field.Tag, requestedName)
}
}
}
return nil
}
type configType struct {
PopulateMe *bool `json:"omitempty"`
}
func (c *configType) SetDefaultConfig() {
}
// tests that ValidateConfigAnnotation works
func TestValidateConfigAnnotations(t *testing.T) {
config := configType{}
err := validateConfigAnnotations(&config)
expectedError := `Field configType.PopulateMe has tag json:"omitempty" which specifies to change its json field name to "omitempty".
Did you mean to use an annotation of ",omitempty"?
(Alternatively, to change the json name of the field, rename the field in source instead.)`
if err.Error() != expectedError {
t.Errorf("Incorrect error; expected:\n"+
"%s\n"+
"got:\n"+
"%s",
expectedError, err.Error())
}
}
// run validateConfigAnnotations against each type that might have json annotations
func TestProductConfigAnnotations(t *testing.T) {
err := validateConfigAnnotations(&productVariables{})
if err != nil {
t.Errorf(err.Error())
}
validateConfigAnnotations(&FileConfigurableOptions{})
if err != nil {
t.Errorf(err.Error())
}
}
func TestMissingVendorConfig(t *testing.T) {
c := &config{}
if c.VendorConfig("test").Bool("not_set") {
t.Errorf("Expected false")
}
}
func assertStringEquals(t *testing.T, expected, actual string) {
if actual != expected {
t.Errorf("expected %q found %q", expected, actual)
}
}
func TestConfiguredJarList(t *testing.T) {
list1 := CreateTestConfiguredJarList([]string{"apex1:jarA"})
t.Run("create", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA", list1.String())
})
list2 := list1.Append("apex2", "jarB")
t.Run("append", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex2:jarB", list2.String())
})
t.Run("append does not modify", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA", list1.String())
})
// Make sure that two lists created by appending to the same list do not share storage.
list3 := list1.Append("apex3", "jarC")
t.Run("append does not share", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex2:jarB", list2.String())
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex3:jarC", list3.String())
})
list4 := list3.RemoveList(list1)
t.Run("remove", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex3:jarC", list4.String())
})
t.Run("remove does not modify", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex3:jarC", list3.String())
})
// Make sure that two lists created by removing from the same list do not share storage.
list5 := list3.RemoveList(CreateTestConfiguredJarList([]string{"apex3:jarC"}))
t.Run("remove", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex3:jarC", list4.String())
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA", list5.String())
})
}