c4d91bceba
No current use cases for soong.config and user-editable local configuration options for Soong, so let's remove it to reduce the API surface. The MegaDevice configuration is used for building every module, for every cpu variant, for every architecture, but it apparently isn't used for a while now. Test: m nothing Test: TH Fixes: 174188200 Change-Id: I2550e70ff6f9c8b57e9a7cc517d6a119a032a27a
134 lines
4.4 KiB
Go
134 lines
4.4 KiB
Go
// Copyright 2017 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
//
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
package android
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"reflect"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func validateConfigAnnotations(configurable jsonConfigurable) (err error) {
|
|
reflectType := reflect.TypeOf(configurable)
|
|
reflectType = reflectType.Elem()
|
|
for i := 0; i < reflectType.NumField(); i++ {
|
|
field := reflectType.Field(i)
|
|
jsonTag := field.Tag.Get("json")
|
|
// Check for mistakes in the json tag
|
|
if jsonTag != "" && !strings.HasPrefix(jsonTag, ",") {
|
|
if !strings.Contains(jsonTag, ",") {
|
|
// Probably an accidental rename, most likely "omitempty" instead of ",omitempty"
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("Field %s.%s has tag %s which specifies to change its json field name to %q.\n"+
|
|
"Did you mean to use an annotation of %q?\n"+
|
|
"(Alternatively, to change the json name of the field, rename the field in source instead.)",
|
|
reflectType.Name(), field.Name, field.Tag, jsonTag, ","+jsonTag)
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Although this rename was probably intentional,
|
|
// a json annotation is still more confusing than renaming the source variable
|
|
requestedName := strings.Split(jsonTag, ",")[0]
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("Field %s.%s has tag %s which specifies to change its json field name to %q.\n"+
|
|
"To change the json name of the field, rename the field in source instead.",
|
|
reflectType.Name(), field.Name, field.Tag, requestedName)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type configType struct {
|
|
PopulateMe *bool `json:"omitempty"`
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (c *configType) SetDefaultConfig() {
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// tests that ValidateConfigAnnotation works
|
|
func TestValidateConfigAnnotations(t *testing.T) {
|
|
config := configType{}
|
|
err := validateConfigAnnotations(&config)
|
|
expectedError := `Field configType.PopulateMe has tag json:"omitempty" which specifies to change its json field name to "omitempty".
|
|
Did you mean to use an annotation of ",omitempty"?
|
|
(Alternatively, to change the json name of the field, rename the field in source instead.)`
|
|
if err.Error() != expectedError {
|
|
t.Errorf("Incorrect error; expected:\n"+
|
|
"%s\n"+
|
|
"got:\n"+
|
|
"%s",
|
|
expectedError, err.Error())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// run validateConfigAnnotations against each type that might have json annotations
|
|
func TestProductConfigAnnotations(t *testing.T) {
|
|
err := validateConfigAnnotations(&productVariables{})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf(err.Error())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestMissingVendorConfig(t *testing.T) {
|
|
c := &config{}
|
|
if c.VendorConfig("test").Bool("not_set") {
|
|
t.Errorf("Expected false")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func assertStringEquals(t *testing.T, expected, actual string) {
|
|
if actual != expected {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected %q found %q", expected, actual)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestConfiguredJarList(t *testing.T) {
|
|
list1 := CreateTestConfiguredJarList([]string{"apex1:jarA"})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("create", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA", list1.String())
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
list2 := list1.Append("apex2", "jarB")
|
|
t.Run("append", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex2:jarB", list2.String())
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("append does not modify", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA", list1.String())
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that two lists created by appending to the same list do not share storage.
|
|
list3 := list1.Append("apex3", "jarC")
|
|
t.Run("append does not share", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex2:jarB", list2.String())
|
|
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex3:jarC", list3.String())
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
list4 := list3.RemoveList(list1)
|
|
t.Run("remove", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assertStringEquals(t, "apex3:jarC", list4.String())
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
t.Run("remove does not modify", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex3:jarC", list3.String())
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that two lists created by removing from the same list do not share storage.
|
|
list5 := list3.RemoveList(CreateTestConfiguredJarList([]string{"apex3:jarC"}))
|
|
t.Run("remove", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assertStringEquals(t, "apex3:jarC", list4.String())
|
|
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA", list5.String())
|
|
})
|
|
}
|