platform_build_soong/android/config_test.go
Paul Duffin 9c3ac96f1f Detect empty apex in ConfiguredJarList
Previously, ConfiguredJarList would accept an empty apex name,
e.g. ":jar" which makes no sense as every apex has to have a non-empty
name. This change makes an empty apex invalid.

In order to improve the test coverage of the TestConfiguredJarList test
this change also changes the implementation of
CreateTestConfiguredJarList([]string) to marshal the supplied strings
into a json list and then unmarshal into a ConfiguredJarList which more
closely matches how it is used at runtime.

Bug: 178361284
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I7dfec6b4cc1923aa99746e976da0393922ef0791
2021-02-04 10:07:41 +00:00

150 lines
5 KiB
Go

// Copyright 2017 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package android
import (
"fmt"
"reflect"
"strings"
"testing"
)
func validateConfigAnnotations(configurable jsonConfigurable) (err error) {
reflectType := reflect.TypeOf(configurable)
reflectType = reflectType.Elem()
for i := 0; i < reflectType.NumField(); i++ {
field := reflectType.Field(i)
jsonTag := field.Tag.Get("json")
// Check for mistakes in the json tag
if jsonTag != "" && !strings.HasPrefix(jsonTag, ",") {
if !strings.Contains(jsonTag, ",") {
// Probably an accidental rename, most likely "omitempty" instead of ",omitempty"
return fmt.Errorf("Field %s.%s has tag %s which specifies to change its json field name to %q.\n"+
"Did you mean to use an annotation of %q?\n"+
"(Alternatively, to change the json name of the field, rename the field in source instead.)",
reflectType.Name(), field.Name, field.Tag, jsonTag, ","+jsonTag)
} else {
// Although this rename was probably intentional,
// a json annotation is still more confusing than renaming the source variable
requestedName := strings.Split(jsonTag, ",")[0]
return fmt.Errorf("Field %s.%s has tag %s which specifies to change its json field name to %q.\n"+
"To change the json name of the field, rename the field in source instead.",
reflectType.Name(), field.Name, field.Tag, requestedName)
}
}
}
return nil
}
type configType struct {
PopulateMe *bool `json:"omitempty"`
}
func (c *configType) SetDefaultConfig() {
}
// tests that ValidateConfigAnnotation works
func TestValidateConfigAnnotations(t *testing.T) {
config := configType{}
err := validateConfigAnnotations(&config)
expectedError := `Field configType.PopulateMe has tag json:"omitempty" which specifies to change its json field name to "omitempty".
Did you mean to use an annotation of ",omitempty"?
(Alternatively, to change the json name of the field, rename the field in source instead.)`
if err.Error() != expectedError {
t.Errorf("Incorrect error; expected:\n"+
"%s\n"+
"got:\n"+
"%s",
expectedError, err.Error())
}
}
// run validateConfigAnnotations against each type that might have json annotations
func TestProductConfigAnnotations(t *testing.T) {
err := validateConfigAnnotations(&productVariables{})
if err != nil {
t.Errorf(err.Error())
}
}
func TestMissingVendorConfig(t *testing.T) {
c := &config{}
if c.VendorConfig("test").Bool("not_set") {
t.Errorf("Expected false")
}
}
func assertStringEquals(t *testing.T, expected, actual string) {
if actual != expected {
t.Errorf("expected %q found %q", expected, actual)
}
}
func TestConfiguredJarList(t *testing.T) {
list1 := CreateTestConfiguredJarList([]string{"apex1:jarA"})
t.Run("create", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA", list1.String())
})
t.Run("create invalid - missing apex", func(t *testing.T) {
defer func() {
err := recover().(error)
assertStringEquals(t, "malformed (apex, jar) pair: 'jarA', expected format: <apex>:<jar>", err.Error())
}()
CreateTestConfiguredJarList([]string{"jarA"})
})
t.Run("create invalid - empty apex", func(t *testing.T) {
defer func() {
err := recover().(error)
assertStringEquals(t, "invalid apex '' in <apex>:<jar> pair ':jarA', expected format: <apex>:<jar>", err.Error())
}()
CreateTestConfiguredJarList([]string{":jarA"})
})
list2 := list1.Append("apex2", "jarB")
t.Run("append", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex2:jarB", list2.String())
})
t.Run("append does not modify", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA", list1.String())
})
// Make sure that two lists created by appending to the same list do not share storage.
list3 := list1.Append("apex3", "jarC")
t.Run("append does not share", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex2:jarB", list2.String())
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex3:jarC", list3.String())
})
list4 := list3.RemoveList(list1)
t.Run("remove", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex3:jarC", list4.String())
})
t.Run("remove does not modify", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA,apex3:jarC", list3.String())
})
// Make sure that two lists created by removing from the same list do not share storage.
list5 := list3.RemoveList(CreateTestConfiguredJarList([]string{"apex3:jarC"}))
t.Run("remove", func(t *testing.T) {
assertStringEquals(t, "apex3:jarC", list4.String())
assertStringEquals(t, "apex1:jarA", list5.String())
})
}