libfdt: Improve comments in some of the assumptions
Add a little more detail in a few of these comments. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Suggested-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Message-Id: <20200302190255.51426-2-sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fc207c3234
commit
28fd7590aa
1 changed files with 12 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -91,7 +91,9 @@ enum {
|
|||
*
|
||||
* With this assumption enabled, normal device trees produced by libfdt
|
||||
* and the compiler should be handled safely. Malicious device trees and
|
||||
* complete garbage may cause libfdt to behave badly or crash.
|
||||
* complete garbage may cause libfdt to behave badly or crash. Truncated
|
||||
* device trees (e.g. those only partially loaded) can also cause
|
||||
* problems.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: Only checks that relate exclusively to the device tree itself
|
||||
* (not the parameters passed to libfdt) are disabled by this
|
||||
|
@ -130,8 +132,15 @@ enum {
|
|||
ASSUME_NO_ROLLBACK = 1 << 3,
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This assumes that the device tree components appear in the correct
|
||||
* order. As such it disables a check in fdt_open_into() and removes the
|
||||
* This assumes that the device tree components appear in a 'convenient'
|
||||
* order, i.e. the memory reservation block first, then the structure
|
||||
* block and finally the string block.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This order is not specified by the device-tree specification,
|
||||
* but is expected by libfdt. The device-tree compiler always created
|
||||
* device trees with this order.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This assumption disables a check in fdt_open_into() and removes the
|
||||
* ability to fix the problem there. This is safe if you know that the
|
||||
* device tree is correctly ordered. See fdt_blocks_misordered_().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue