libfdt: fix an incorrect integer promotion
UINT32_MAX is an integer of type unsigned int. UINT32_MAX + 1 overflows unless explicitly computed as unsigned long long. This led to some invalid addresses being treated as valid. Cast UINT32_MAX to uint64_t explicitly. Signed-off-by: Elvira Khabirova <e.khabirova@omp.ru>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1cc41b1c96
commit
c19a4bafa5
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int fdt_appendprop_addrrange(void *fdt, int parent, int nodeoffset,
|
|||
/* check validity of address */
|
||||
prop = data;
|
||||
if (addr_cells == 1) {
|
||||
if ((addr > UINT32_MAX) || ((UINT32_MAX + 1 - addr) < size))
|
||||
if ((addr > UINT32_MAX) || (((uint64_t) UINT32_MAX + 1 - addr) < size))
|
||||
return -FDT_ERR_BADVALUE;
|
||||
|
||||
fdt32_st(prop, (uint32_t)addr);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue