Add description of Signed-off-by lines

dtc and libfdt have been using Signed-off-by lines (as used in the Linux
kernel) for some time, like a lot of open source projects.  However
Uwe Kleine-König pointed out we never really stated what they mean in our
context.

Add information on what the S-o-b line means in CONTRIBUTING.md - this is
essentially a quote of the same information from the kernel documentation,
with some tweaks to make sense in the new context.

Suggested-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
David Gibson 2022-07-28 17:44:45 +10:00
parent 90b9d9de42
commit c2ccf8a77d

View file

@ -23,3 +23,57 @@ all tests.
If you want to adjust a test file, be aware that `tree_tree1.dts` is compiled
and checked against a binary tree from assembler macros in `trees.S`. So
if you change that file you must change `tree.S` also.
## Developer's Certificate of Origin
Like many other projects, dtc and libfdt have adopted the "Developer's
Certificate of Origin" (Signed-off-by) process created by the Linux
kernel community to improve tracking of who did what. Here's how it
works (this is a very slight modification of the description from
`Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst` in the kernel tree):
The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the
patch, which certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have the right
to pass it on as an open-source patch. The rules are pretty simple:
if you can certify the below:
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.
then you just add a line saying::
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous
contributions.) This will be done for you automatically if you use
`git commit -s`. Reverts should also include "Signed-off-by". `git
revert -s` does that for you.
Any further SoBs (Signed-off-by:'s) following the author's SoB are
from people handling and transporting the patch, but were not involved
in its development. SoB chains should reflect the **real** route a
patch took as it was propagated to the maintainers, with the first SoB
entry signalling primary authorship of a single author.