libsepol/cil: Limit the amount of reporting for bounds failures

Type bounds are checked when creating the CIL binary using libsepol
functions on the binary policy db. The bad rule is reported and, to
provide better error reporting, a search is made for matching rules
in the CIL policy. These matching rules as well as their parents are
written out with their locations to make it easier to find the rules
that violate the type bounds.

It is possible to craft CIL policies where there are many rules
that violate a bounds check each with many matching rules as well.
This can make the error messages very difficult to deal with. For
example, if there are 100 rules in the binary policy db that violate
a type bounds and each of these rules has 100 matches, then 10,000
matching rules along with their parents will be written out as part
of the error message.

Limit the error reporting to two rules for each type bounds violation
along with two matches for each of those rules.

This problem was found with the secilc-fuzzer.

Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org>
This commit is contained in:
James Carter 2021-09-28 13:55:21 -04:00 committed by Petr Lautrbach
parent b2891256cb
commit 4b2e2a248e

View file

@ -4825,6 +4825,7 @@ static int cil_check_type_bounds(const struct cil_db *db, policydb_t *pdb, void
avtab_ptr_t cur;
struct cil_avrule target;
struct cil_tree_node *n1 = NULL;
int count_bad = 0;
*violation = CIL_TRUE;
@ -4838,6 +4839,8 @@ static int cil_check_type_bounds(const struct cil_db *db, policydb_t *pdb, void
for (cur = bad; cur; cur = cur->next) {
struct cil_list_item *i2;
struct cil_list *matching;
int num_matching = 0;
int count_matching = 0;
rc = cil_avrule_from_sepol(pdb, cur, &target, type_value_to_cil, class_value_to_cil, perm_value_to_cil);
if (rc != SEPOL_OK) {
@ -4855,6 +4858,9 @@ static int cil_check_type_bounds(const struct cil_db *db, policydb_t *pdb, void
bounds_destroy_bad(bad);
goto exit;
}
cil_list_for_each(i2, matching) {
num_matching++;
}
cil_list_for_each(i2, matching) {
struct cil_tree_node *n2 = i2->data;
struct cil_avrule *r2 = n2->data;
@ -4865,9 +4871,19 @@ static int cil_check_type_bounds(const struct cil_db *db, policydb_t *pdb, void
__cil_print_parents(" ", n2);
__cil_print_rule(" ", "allow", r2);
}
count_matching++;
if (count_matching >= 2) {
cil_log(CIL_ERR, " Only first 2 of %d matching rules shown\n", num_matching);
break;
}
}
cil_list_destroy(&matching, CIL_FALSE);
cil_list_destroy(&target.perms.classperms, CIL_TRUE);
count_bad++;
if (count_bad >= 2) {
cil_log(CIL_ERR, " Only first 2 of %d bad rules shown\n", numbad);
break;
}
}
bounds_destroy_bad(bad);
}