Merge "Update KM4 VTS tests to allow s/w implementation to pass." am: 1cba34ebd4
Change-Id: I83adafe6eef5abad38647a55f854a7985843ad10
This commit is contained in:
commit
097aaee88f
4 changed files with 58 additions and 39 deletions
|
@ -321,19 +321,20 @@ ErrorCode parse_root_of_trust(const uint8_t* asn1_key_desc, size_t asn1_key_desc
|
|||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << "Failed record parsing";
|
||||
return ErrorCode::UNKNOWN_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!record->tee_enforced) {
|
||||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << "Failed hardware characteristic parsing";
|
||||
|
||||
KM_ROOT_OF_TRUST* root_of_trust = nullptr;
|
||||
if (record->tee_enforced && record->tee_enforced->root_of_trust) {
|
||||
root_of_trust = record->tee_enforced->root_of_trust;
|
||||
} else if (record->software_enforced && record->software_enforced->root_of_trust) {
|
||||
root_of_trust = record->software_enforced->root_of_trust;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << " Failed root of trust parsing";
|
||||
return ErrorCode::INVALID_ARGUMENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!record->tee_enforced->root_of_trust) {
|
||||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << "Failed root of trust parsing";
|
||||
if (!root_of_trust->verified_boot_key) {
|
||||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << " Failed verified boot key parsing";
|
||||
return ErrorCode::INVALID_ARGUMENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!record->tee_enforced->root_of_trust->verified_boot_key) {
|
||||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << "Failed verified boot key parsing";
|
||||
return ErrorCode::INVALID_ARGUMENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
KM_ROOT_OF_TRUST* root_of_trust = record->tee_enforced->root_of_trust;
|
||||
|
||||
auto& vb_key = root_of_trust->verified_boot_key;
|
||||
verified_boot_key->resize(vb_key->length);
|
||||
|
@ -342,19 +343,19 @@ ErrorCode parse_root_of_trust(const uint8_t* asn1_key_desc, size_t asn1_key_desc
|
|||
*verified_boot_state = static_cast<keymaster_verified_boot_t>(
|
||||
ASN1_ENUMERATED_get(root_of_trust->verified_boot_state));
|
||||
if (!verified_boot_state) {
|
||||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << "Failed verified boot state parsing";
|
||||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << " Failed verified boot state parsing";
|
||||
return ErrorCode::INVALID_ARGUMENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
*device_locked = root_of_trust->device_locked;
|
||||
if (!device_locked) {
|
||||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << "Failed device locked parsing";
|
||||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << " Failed device locked parsing";
|
||||
return ErrorCode::INVALID_ARGUMENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
auto& vb_hash = root_of_trust->verified_boot_hash;
|
||||
if (!vb_hash) {
|
||||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << "Failed verified boot hash parsing";
|
||||
LOG(ERROR) << AT << " Failed verified boot hash parsing";
|
||||
return ErrorCode::INVALID_ARGUMENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
verified_boot_hash->resize(vb_hash->length);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ namespace test {
|
|||
using namespace std::literals::chrono_literals;
|
||||
|
||||
void KeymasterHidlTest::InitializeKeymaster() {
|
||||
std::string instance_name = GetParam();
|
||||
keymaster_ = IKeymasterDevice::getService(GetParam());
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(keymaster_, nullptr);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -127,7 +128,7 @@ ErrorCode KeymasterHidlTest::ImportWrappedKey(string wrapped_key, string wrappin
|
|||
string masking_key,
|
||||
const AuthorizationSet& unwrapping_params) {
|
||||
ErrorCode error;
|
||||
ImportKey(wrapping_key_desc, KeyFormat::PKCS8, wrapping_key);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, ImportKey(wrapping_key_desc, KeyFormat::PKCS8, wrapping_key));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(keymaster_
|
||||
->importWrappedKey(HidlBuf(wrapped_key), key_blob_, HidlBuf(masking_key),
|
||||
unwrapping_params.hidl_data(), 0 /* passwordSid */,
|
||||
|
@ -196,7 +197,9 @@ void KeymasterHidlTest::CheckGetCharacteristics(const HidlBuf& key_blob, const H
|
|||
HidlBuf empty_buf = {};
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK,
|
||||
GetCharacteristics(key_blob, client_id, app_data, key_characteristics));
|
||||
if (SecLevel() != SecurityLevel::SOFTWARE) {
|
||||
EXPECT_GT(key_characteristics->hardwareEnforced.size(), 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPECT_GT(key_characteristics->softwareEnforced.size(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(ErrorCode::INVALID_KEY_BLOB,
|
||||
|
@ -636,23 +639,25 @@ std::vector<uint32_t> KeymasterHidlTest::ValidKeySizes(Algorithm algorithm) {
|
|||
switch (algorithm) {
|
||||
case Algorithm::RSA:
|
||||
switch (SecLevel()) {
|
||||
case SecurityLevel::SOFTWARE:
|
||||
case SecurityLevel::TRUSTED_ENVIRONMENT:
|
||||
return {2048, 3072, 4096};
|
||||
case SecurityLevel::STRONGBOX:
|
||||
return {2048};
|
||||
default:
|
||||
CHECK(false) << "Invalid security level " << uint32_t(SecLevel());
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "Invalid security level " << uint32_t(SecLevel());
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case Algorithm::EC:
|
||||
switch (SecLevel()) {
|
||||
case SecurityLevel::SOFTWARE:
|
||||
case SecurityLevel::TRUSTED_ENVIRONMENT:
|
||||
return {224, 256, 384, 521};
|
||||
case SecurityLevel::STRONGBOX:
|
||||
return {256};
|
||||
default:
|
||||
CHECK(false) << "Invalid security level " << uint32_t(SecLevel());
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "Invalid security level " << uint32_t(SecLevel());
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -667,15 +672,15 @@ std::vector<uint32_t> KeymasterHidlTest::ValidKeySizes(Algorithm algorithm) {
|
|||
return retval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
default:
|
||||
CHECK(false) << "Invalid Algorithm: " << algorithm;
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "Invalid Algorithm: " << algorithm;
|
||||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
CHECK(false) << "Should be impossible to get here";
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "Should be impossible to get here";
|
||||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<uint32_t> KeymasterHidlTest::InvalidKeySizes(Algorithm algorithm) {
|
||||
if (SecLevel() == SecurityLevel::TRUSTED_ENVIRONMENT) return {};
|
||||
CHECK(SecLevel() == SecurityLevel::STRONGBOX);
|
||||
if (SecLevel() == SecurityLevel::STRONGBOX) {
|
||||
switch (algorithm) {
|
||||
case Algorithm::RSA:
|
||||
return {3072, 4096};
|
||||
|
@ -686,6 +691,8 @@ std::vector<uint32_t> KeymasterHidlTest::InvalidKeySizes(Algorithm algorithm) {
|
|||
default:
|
||||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<EcCurve> KeymasterHidlTest::ValidCurves() {
|
||||
|
@ -704,6 +711,7 @@ std::vector<EcCurve> KeymasterHidlTest::InvalidCurves() {
|
|||
|
||||
std::vector<Digest> KeymasterHidlTest::ValidDigests(bool withNone, bool withMD5) {
|
||||
switch (SecLevel()) {
|
||||
case SecurityLevel::SOFTWARE:
|
||||
case SecurityLevel::TRUSTED_ENVIRONMENT:
|
||||
if (withNone) {
|
||||
if (withMD5)
|
||||
|
@ -729,10 +737,10 @@ std::vector<Digest> KeymasterHidlTest::ValidDigests(bool withNone, bool withMD5)
|
|||
return {Digest::SHA_2_256};
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
CHECK(false) << "Invalid security level " << uint32_t(SecLevel());
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "Invalid security level " << uint32_t(SecLevel());
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
CHECK(false) << "Should be impossible to get here";
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "Should be impossible to get here";
|
||||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -204,6 +204,11 @@ class KeymasterHidlTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<std::string> {
|
|||
KeyCharacteristics key_characteristics_;
|
||||
OperationHandle op_handle_ = kOpHandleSentinel;
|
||||
|
||||
static std::vector<std::string> build_params() {
|
||||
auto params = android::hardware::getAllHalInstanceNames(IKeymasterDevice::descriptor);
|
||||
return params;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
sp<IKeymasterDevice> keymaster_;
|
||||
uint32_t os_version_;
|
||||
|
@ -216,8 +221,7 @@ class KeymasterHidlTest : public ::testing::TestWithParam<std::string> {
|
|||
|
||||
#define INSTANTIATE_KEYMASTER_HIDL_TEST(name) \
|
||||
INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(PerInstance, name, \
|
||||
testing::ValuesIn(android::hardware::getAllHalInstanceNames( \
|
||||
IKeymasterDevice::descriptor)), \
|
||||
testing::ValuesIn(KeymasterHidlTest::build_params()), \
|
||||
android::hardware::PrintInstanceNameToString)
|
||||
|
||||
} // namespace test
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -397,10 +397,16 @@ bool verify_attestation_record(const string& challenge, const string& app_id,
|
|||
// true. A provided boolean tag that can be pulled back out of the certificate indicates correct
|
||||
// encoding. No need to check if it's in both lists, since the AuthorizationSet compare below
|
||||
// will handle mismatches of tags.
|
||||
if (security_level == SecurityLevel::SOFTWARE) {
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(expected_sw_enforced.Contains(TAG_NO_AUTH_REQUIRED));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(expected_hw_enforced.Contains(TAG_NO_AUTH_REQUIRED));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Alternatively this checks the opposite - a false boolean tag (one that isn't provided in
|
||||
// the authorization list during key generation) isn't being attested to in the certificate.
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(expected_sw_enforced.Contains(TAG_TRUSTED_USER_PRESENCE_REQUIRED));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(att_sw_enforced.Contains(TAG_TRUSTED_USER_PRESENCE_REQUIRED));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(expected_hw_enforced.Contains(TAG_TRUSTED_USER_PRESENCE_REQUIRED));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(att_hw_enforced.Contains(TAG_TRUSTED_USER_PRESENCE_REQUIRED));
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -461,10 +467,10 @@ bool verify_attestation_record(const string& challenge, const string& app_id,
|
|||
verified_boot_key.size()));
|
||||
} else if (!strcmp(property_value, "red")) {
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(verified_boot_state, KM_VERIFIED_BOOT_FAILED);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(verified_boot_key.data(), empty_boot_key.data(),
|
||||
verified_boot_key.size()));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(false);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(verified_boot_state, KM_VERIFIED_BOOT_UNVERIFIED);
|
||||
EXPECT_NE(0, memcmp(verified_boot_key.data(), empty_boot_key.data(),
|
||||
verified_boot_key.size()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
att_sw_enforced.Sort();
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue