tequilaOS/platform_hardware_interfaces
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Merge "Minor clarificaton on USER_IDENTIFICATION_ASSOCIATION doc." into rvc-dev

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
TreeHugger Robot 2020-05-12 17:05:45 +00:00 committed by Android (Google) Code Review
commit 501169a9fb
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
automotive/vehicle/2.0/types.hal
View file

@ -2847,7 +2847,7 @@ enum VehicleProperty : int32_t {
* *
* Then to associate the user with the custom mechanism, a set request would be made: * Then to associate the user with the custom mechanism, a set request would be made:
* *
* int32[0]: 42 // request id * int32[0]: 43 // request id
* int32[1]: 10 (Android user id) * int32[1]: 10 (Android user id)
* int32[2]: 0 (Android user flags) * int32[2]: 0 (Android user flags)
* int32[3]: 1 (number of associations being set) * int32[3]: 1 (number of associations being set)
@ -2856,7 +2856,7 @@ enum VehicleProperty : int32_t {
* *
* If the request succeeded, the response would be simply: * If the request succeeded, the response would be simply:
* *
* int32[0]: 42 // request id * int32[0]: 43 // request id
* int32[1]: 1 (number of associations in the response) * int32[1]: 1 (number of associations in the response)
* int32[2]: 101 (1st type: UserIdentificationAssociationType::CUSTOM_1) * int32[2]: 101 (1st type: UserIdentificationAssociationType::CUSTOM_1)
* int32[3]: 1 (1st value: UserIdentificationAssociationValue::ASSOCIATED_CURRENT_USER) * int32[3]: 1 (1st value: UserIdentificationAssociationValue::ASSOCIATED_CURRENT_USER)
@ -2865,7 +2865,7 @@ enum VehicleProperty : int32_t {
* example above, the end state would be 2 associations (FOB and CUSTOM_1). If we wanted to * example above, the end state would be 2 associations (FOB and CUSTOM_1). If we wanted to
* associate the user with just CUSTOM_1 but not FOB, then the request should have been: * associate the user with just CUSTOM_1 but not FOB, then the request should have been:
* *
* int32[0]: 42 // request id * int32[0]: 43 // request id
* int32[1]: 10 (Android user id) * int32[1]: 10 (Android user id)
* int32[2]: 2 (number of types set) * int32[2]: 2 (number of types set)
* int32[3]: 1 (1st type: UserIdentificationAssociationType::KEY_FOB) * int32[3]: 1 (1st type: UserIdentificationAssociationType::KEY_FOB)