Read VSR level from correct property.

Bug: 235424890
Test: VtsHalKeymasterV4_0TargetTest & VtsAidlKeyMintTargetTest
Ignore-AOSP-First: Cherry-pick of aosp/2128833
Change-Id: I39109c097d129124097a303c3f108d015cb367e3
Merged-In: I39109c097d129124097a303c3f108d015cb367e3
This commit is contained in:
Shawn Willden 2022-06-16 12:50:40 -06:00 committed by Justin Yun
parent 987a7e3f30
commit e5364d7617
2 changed files with 36 additions and 30 deletions

View file

@ -388,25 +388,28 @@ bool avb_verification_enabled() {
}
int get_vsr_api_level() {
int api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
if (api_level == -1) {
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
int vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vendor.api_level", -1);
if (vendor_api_level != -1) {
return vendor_api_level;
}
if (api_level == -1) {
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vndk.version", -1);
// Android S and older devices do not define ro.vendor.api_level
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
if (vendor_api_level == -1) {
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
}
// We really should have a VSR API level by now. But on cuttlefish, and perhaps other weird
// devices, we may not. So, we use the SDK first or current API level if needed. If this goes
// wrong, it should go wrong in the direction of being too strict rather than too lenient, which
// should provoke someone to examine why we don't have proper VSR API level properties.
if (api_level == -1) {
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
int product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
if (product_api_level == -1) {
product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
EXPECT_NE(product_api_level, -1) << "Could not find ro.build.version.sdk";
}
if (api_level == -1) {
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
// VSR API level is the minimum of vendor_api_level and product_api_level.
if (vendor_api_level == -1 || vendor_api_level > product_api_level) {
return product_api_level;
}
EXPECT_NE(api_level, -1) << "Could not find a VSR level, or equivalent.";
return api_level;
return vendor_api_level;
}
bool is_gsi() {

View file

@ -1461,25 +1461,28 @@ void verify_subject(const X509* cert, //
}
int get_vsr_api_level() {
int api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
if (api_level == -1) {
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
int vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vendor.api_level", -1);
if (vendor_api_level != -1) {
return vendor_api_level;
}
if (api_level == -1) {
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vndk.version", -1);
// Android S and older devices do not define ro.vendor.api_level
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
if (vendor_api_level == -1) {
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
}
// We really should have a VSR API level by now. But on cuttlefish, and perhaps other weird
// devices, we may not. So, we use the SDK first or current API level if needed. If this goes
// wrong, it should go wrong in the direction of being too strict rather than too lenient, which
// should provoke someone to examine why we don't have proper VSR API level properties.
if (api_level == -1) {
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
int product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
if (product_api_level == -1) {
product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
EXPECT_NE(product_api_level, -1) << "Could not find ro.build.version.sdk";
}
if (api_level == -1) {
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
// VSR API level is the minimum of vendor_api_level and product_api_level.
if (vendor_api_level == -1 || vendor_api_level > product_api_level) {
return product_api_level;
}
EXPECT_NE(api_level, -1) << "Could not find a VSR level, or equivalent.";
return api_level;
return vendor_api_level;
}
bool is_gsi_image() {