Read VSR level from correct property.
Bug: 235424890 Test: VtsHalKeymasterV4_0TargetTest & VtsAidlKeyMintTargetTest Ignore-AOSP-First: Cherry-pick of aosp/2128833 Change-Id: I39109c097d129124097a303c3f108d015cb367e3 Merged-In: I39109c097d129124097a303c3f108d015cb367e3
This commit is contained in:
parent
987a7e3f30
commit
e5364d7617
2 changed files with 36 additions and 30 deletions
|
@ -388,25 +388,28 @@ bool avb_verification_enabled() {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int get_vsr_api_level() {
|
||||
int api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
|
||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||
int vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vendor.api_level", -1);
|
||||
if (vendor_api_level != -1) {
|
||||
return vendor_api_level;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vndk.version", -1);
|
||||
|
||||
// Android S and older devices do not define ro.vendor.api_level
|
||||
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
|
||||
if (vendor_api_level == -1) {
|
||||
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// We really should have a VSR API level by now. But on cuttlefish, and perhaps other weird
|
||||
// devices, we may not. So, we use the SDK first or current API level if needed. If this goes
|
||||
// wrong, it should go wrong in the direction of being too strict rather than too lenient, which
|
||||
// should provoke someone to examine why we don't have proper VSR API level properties.
|
||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||
|
||||
int product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||
if (product_api_level == -1) {
|
||||
product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
|
||||
EXPECT_NE(product_api_level, -1) << "Could not find ro.build.version.sdk";
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
|
||||
|
||||
// VSR API level is the minimum of vendor_api_level and product_api_level.
|
||||
if (vendor_api_level == -1 || vendor_api_level > product_api_level) {
|
||||
return product_api_level;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPECT_NE(api_level, -1) << "Could not find a VSR level, or equivalent.";
|
||||
return api_level;
|
||||
return vendor_api_level;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool is_gsi() {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1461,25 +1461,28 @@ void verify_subject(const X509* cert, //
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int get_vsr_api_level() {
|
||||
int api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
|
||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||
int vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vendor.api_level", -1);
|
||||
if (vendor_api_level != -1) {
|
||||
return vendor_api_level;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vndk.version", -1);
|
||||
|
||||
// Android S and older devices do not define ro.vendor.api_level
|
||||
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
|
||||
if (vendor_api_level == -1) {
|
||||
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// We really should have a VSR API level by now. But on cuttlefish, and perhaps other weird
|
||||
// devices, we may not. So, we use the SDK first or current API level if needed. If this goes
|
||||
// wrong, it should go wrong in the direction of being too strict rather than too lenient, which
|
||||
// should provoke someone to examine why we don't have proper VSR API level properties.
|
||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||
|
||||
int product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||
if (product_api_level == -1) {
|
||||
product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
|
||||
EXPECT_NE(product_api_level, -1) << "Could not find ro.build.version.sdk";
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
|
||||
|
||||
// VSR API level is the minimum of vendor_api_level and product_api_level.
|
||||
if (vendor_api_level == -1 || vendor_api_level > product_api_level) {
|
||||
return product_api_level;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPECT_NE(api_level, -1) << "Could not find a VSR level, or equivalent.";
|
||||
return api_level;
|
||||
return vendor_api_level;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool is_gsi_image() {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue