The interface lib has been in VNDK-SP because
android.hardware.graphics.mapper@1.0 was using it. However, since the
dependency has gone [1], there is no need keep it in VNDK-SP. The
VNDK-SP set should be kept as small as possible because libs in VNDK-SP
are subject to double-loading.
Unmark the 'support_system_process' property to exclude the lib from
VNDK-SP.
This commit re-lands I8722c1ac15ddf56a627a12a0c649b4d734e5e5cd because
it was reverted during O-MR1 push to AOSP-master.
Bug: 69480083
Test: walleye boots to the UI
Change-Id: I0af8115dceb9711c6c451ffaeedda6c823ec2905
Merged-In: I8722c1ac15ddf56a627a12a0c649b4d734e5e5cd
(cherry picked from commit ec44d18dbe)
setSampleRate, setChannelMask, setFormat
may not be implemented by the HAL, although this is not documented in
the HAL API.
Currently the VTS test requires their implementation if the respective
getSupported{SampleRate,ChannelMask,Format} are supported.
Relax this requirement as the framework never calls those setters.
Note that the optionality of those functions will be documented
in the next HAL API version.
Test: vts-tradefed run commandAndExit vts --module VtsHalAudioV2_0Target -t CheckConfig.audioPolicyConfigurationValidation
Bug: 69811500
Change-Id: I3a390ae925cabd99e7f1ed4a627e71ad87b1b437
Signed-off-by: Kevin Rocard <krocard@google.com>
getSupportedSampleRate should return the native sampling rates,
(IE. the sampling rates that can be played without resampling)
but other sampling rates can be supported by the HAL.
The test was too strict as it was failing if HALs were supporting more
sample rates than there native (optimized) ones.
For example, a HAL might have its best performance (no resampling)
on 48kHz but still support 16kHz through resampling.
Note: getSupportedSampleRate might be renamed to getNativeSampleRate in
the next major HAL revision to avoid ambiguity.
Test: vts-tradefed run commandAndExit vts --module VtsHalAudioV2_0Target -t CheckConfig.audioPolicyConfigurationValidation
Bug: 69811500
Change-Id: I1ec1ce422bc5039637463c6641060508f4ee892b
Signed-off-by: Kevin Rocard <krocard@google.com>
This constraint was added due to an incorrect assumption
that device ports were identified by names whereas
they are by the (module,type,address) triplet.
Bug: 69442986
Test: xmllint validates an XML with two identically named devices in
different modules.
Test: vts-tradefed run commandAndExit vts --module VtsHalAudioV2_0Target -t CheckConfig.audioPolicyConfigurationValidation
Change-Id: I66d890d3c967bead4f2a287202c259009217996a
Signed-off-by: Kevin Rocard <krocard@google.com>
Device port are not identified by names but by their type and address
and the module they are in.
As a result, enforce this constraint in the XSD. Violating it results in
a policy parsing crash.
Bug: 69442986
Test: xmllint invalidates an XML with two devices of the same type
and address
Test: vts-tradefed run commandAndExit vts --module VtsHalAudioV2_0Target -t CheckConfig.audioPolicyConfigurationValidation
Change-Id: I84245f0fa80fef786a002c98073c166b6aaf2be4
Signed-off-by: Kevin Rocard <krocard@google.com>
Vendor are currently not allowed to extend the XML format.
As some enumeration are allowed to be extended, this mean that
the format must allow some extension mechanism.
This patch relaxes the definition of the module name field.
AOSP names are still allowed, but a vendor can add its own name
if prefixed with "vx_". Eg:
<module name="vx_google_vr" halVersion="3.0">
Test: xmllint --xinclude --noout --schema hardware/interfaces/audio/2.0/config/audio_policy_configuration.xsd audio_policy_configuration.xml
with audio_policy_configuration.xml containing a module named vx_google_vr
Test: vts-tradefed run commandAndExit vts --module VtsHalAudioV2_0Target -t CheckConfig.audioPolicyConfigurationValidation
on Pixel 2
Bug: 69442986
Signed-off-by: Kevin Rocard <krocard@google.com>
Change-Id: I4ead38535cce89bb8fe44cf23fa1146acd1271d6
Motivation:
1) Support running the test against each hal service instance for the
registered hal.
2) Support testability checker to determine whether we should run the
test on the taget device.
3) Help to determine the process we want to profile for coverage data
if running on coverage build.
Bug: 64203181
Test: make vts
vts-tradefed run vts -m VtsHalBootV1_0Target
vts-tradefed run vts -m VtsHalMemtrackV1_0Target
vts-tradefed run vts -m VtsHalPowerV1_0Target
vts-tradefed run vts -m VtsHalPowerV1_1Target
Change-Id: Ie0bbd9ef9d9fbe11de5aee70fad9028fa0ae897c
