tequilaOS/platform_system_bpf
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

bpfLoader: verify that reused maps are the right type & shape am: 12bb520707

Browse source 
Original change: https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/system/bpf/+/2127664

Change-Id: Ia3aba46329f94083a5f7660159526075264c89ae
Signed-off-by: Automerger Merge Worker <android-build-automerger-merge-worker@system.gserviceaccount.com>
This commit is contained in:
Maciej Żenczykowski 2022-06-18 09:48:55 +00:00 committed by Automerger Merge Worker
commit efd19a30fd
1 changed files with 77 additions and 25 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

102
libbpf_android/Loader.cpp
View file

@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
// This is BpfLoader v0.16
// This is BpfLoader v0.17
#define BPFLOADER_VERSION_MAJOR 0u
#define BPFLOADER_VERSION_MINOR 16u
#define BPFLOADER_VERSION_MINOR 17u
#define BPFLOADER_VERSION ((BPFLOADER_VERSION_MAJOR << 16) | BPFLOADER_VERSION_MINOR)
#include "bpf/BpfUtils.h"
@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static std::optional<unique_fd> getMapBtfInfo(const char* elfPath,
std::string btfTypeIdStr;
if (!android::base::ReadFdToString(pipeRead, &btfTypeIdStr)) return {};
if (btfFd.get() < 0) return {};
if (!btfFd.ok()) return {};
const auto mapTypeIdLines = android::base::Split(btfTypeIdStr, "\n");
for (const auto &line : mapTypeIdLines) {
@ -576,6 +576,52 @@ static std::optional<unique_fd> getMapBtfInfo(const char* elfPath,
return btfFd;
}
static bool mapMatchesExpectations(unique_fd& fd, string& mapName, struct bpf_map_def& mapDef,
enum bpf_map_type type) {
// bpfGetFd... family of functions require at minimum a 4.14 kernel,
// so on 4.9 kernels just pretend the map matches our expectations.
// This isn't really a problem as we only really support 4.14+ anyway...
// Additionally we'll get almost equivalent test coverage on newer devices/kernels.
// This is because the primary failure mode we're trying to detect here
// is either a source code misconfiguration (which is likely kernel independent)
// or a newly introduced kernel feature/bug (which is unlikely to get backported to 4.9).
if (!isAtLeastKernelVersion(4, 14, 0)) return true;
// These asserts should *never* trigger, if one of them somehow does,
// it probably means a bpf .o file has been changed/replaced at runtime
// and bpfloader was manually rerun (normally it should only run *once*
// early during the boot process).
// Another possibility is that something is misconfigured in the code:
// most likely a shared map is declared twice differently.
// But such a change should never be checked into the source tree...
int fd_type = bpfGetFdMapType(fd);
int fd_key_size = bpfGetFdKeySize(fd);
int fd_value_size = bpfGetFdValueSize(fd);
int fd_max_entries = bpfGetFdMaxEntries(fd);
int fd_map_flags = bpfGetFdMapFlags(fd);
// DEVMAPs are readonly from the bpf program side's point of view, as such
// the kernel in kernel/bpf/devmap.c dev_map_init_map() will set the flag
int desired_map_flags = (int)mapDef.map_flags;
if (type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP || type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH)
desired_map_flags |= BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG;
// If anything doesn't match, just close the fd - it's of no use anyway.
if (fd_type != type) fd.reset();
if (fd_key_size != (int)mapDef.key_size) fd.reset();
if (fd_value_size != (int)mapDef.value_size) fd.reset();
if (fd_max_entries != (int)mapDef.max_entries) fd.reset();
if (fd_map_flags != desired_map_flags) fd.reset();
if (fd.ok()) return true;
ALOGE("bpf map name %s mismatch: desired/found: "
"type:%d/%d key:%u/%d value:%u/%d entries:%u/%d flags:%u/%d",
mapName.c_str(), type, fd_type, mapDef.key_size, fd_key_size, mapDef.value_size,
fd_value_size, mapDef.max_entries, fd_max_entries, desired_map_flags, fd_map_flags);
return false;
}
static int createMaps(const char* elfPath, ifstream& elfFile, vector<unique_fd>& mapFds,
const char* prefix, size_t sizeOfBpfMapDef) {
int ret;
@ -651,6 +697,28 @@ static int createMaps(const char* elfPath, ifstream& elfFile, vector<unique_fd>&
continue;
}
enum bpf_map_type type = md[i].type;
if (type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP && !isAtLeastKernelVersion(4, 14, 0)) {
// On Linux Kernels older than 4.14 this map type doesn't exist, but it can kind
// of be approximated: ARRAY has the same userspace api, though it is not usable
// by the same ebpf programs. However, that's okay because the bpf_redirect_map()
// helper doesn't exist on 4.9 anyway (so the bpf program would fail to load,
// and thus needs to be tagged as 4.14+ either way), so there's nothing useful you
// could do with a DEVMAP anyway (that isn't already provided by an ARRAY)...
// Hence using an ARRAY instead of a DEVMAP simply makes life easier for userspace.
type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY;
}
if (type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH && !isAtLeastKernelVersion(5, 4, 0)) {
// On Linux Kernels older than 5.4 this map type doesn't exist, but it can kind
// of be approximated: HASH has the same userspace visible api.
// However it cannot be used by ebpf programs in the same way.
// Since bpf_redirect_map() only requires 4.14, a program using a DEVMAP_HASH map
// would fail to load (due to trying to redirect to a HASH instead of DEVMAP_HASH).
// One must thus tag any BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH + bpf_redirect_map() using
// programs as being 5.4+...
type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH;
}
// Format of pin location is /sys/fs/bpf/<prefix>map_<filename>_<mapname>
string mapPinLoc =
string(BPF_FS_PATH) + prefix + "map_" + fname + "_" + string(mapNames[i]);
@ -664,27 +732,6 @@ static int createMaps(const char* elfPath, ifstream& elfFile, vector<unique_fd>&
ALOGD("bpf_create_map reusing map %s, ret: %d", mapNames[i].c_str(), fd.get());
reuse = true;
} else {
enum bpf_map_type type = md[i].type;
if (type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP && !isAtLeastKernelVersion(4, 14, 0)) {
// On Linux Kernels older than 4.14 this map type doesn't exist, but it can kind
// of be approximated: ARRAY has the same userspace api, though it is not usable
// by the same ebpf programs. However, that's okay because the bpf_redirect_map()
// helper doesn't exist on 4.9 anyway (so the bpf program would fail to load,
// and thus needs to be tagged as 4.14+ either way), so there's nothing useful you
// could do with a DEVMAP anyway (that isn't already provided by an ARRAY)...
// Hence using an ARRAY instead of a DEVMAP simply makes life easier for userspace.
type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY;
}
if (type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH && !isAtLeastKernelVersion(5, 4, 0)) {
// On Linux Kernels older than 5.4 this map type doesn't exist, but it can kind
// of be approximated: HASH has the same userspace visible api.
// However it cannot be used by ebpf programs in the same way.
// Since bpf_redirect_map() only requires 4.14, a program using a DEVMAP_HASH map
// would fail to load (due to trying to redirect to a HASH instead of DEVMAP_HASH).
// One must thus tag any BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH + bpf_redirect_map() using
// programs as being 5.4+...
type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH;
}
struct bpf_create_map_attr attr = {
.name = mapNames[i].c_str(),
.map_type = type,
@ -703,7 +750,12 @@ static int createMaps(const char* elfPath, ifstream& elfFile, vector<unique_fd>&
ALOGD("bpf_create_map name %s, ret: %d", mapNames[i].c_str(), fd.get());
}
if (fd < 0) return -saved_errno;
if (!fd.ok()) return -saved_errno;
// When reusing a pinned map, we need to check the map type/sizes/etc match, but for
// safety (since reuse code path is rare) run these checks even if we just created it.
// We assume failure is due to pinned map mismatch, hence the 'NOT UNIQUE' return code.
if (!mapMatchesExpectations(fd, mapNames[i], md[i], type)) return -ENOTUNIQ;
if (!reuse) {
ret = bpf_obj_pin(fd, mapPinLoc.c_str());