2016-06-02 00:29:55 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2016 The Android Open Source Project
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
|
|
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
|
|
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
|
|
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
|
|
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
|
|
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
|
|
* limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <utils/StrongPointer.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <utils/RefBase.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <thread>
|
|
|
|
#include <atomic>
|
|
|
|
#include <sched.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <errno.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Enhanced version of StrongPointer_test, but using RefBase underneath.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using namespace android;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static constexpr int NITERS = 1000000;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static constexpr int INITIAL_STRONG_VALUE = 1 << 28; // Mirroring RefBase definition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Foo : public RefBase {
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
Foo(bool* deleted_check) : mDeleted(deleted_check) {
|
|
|
|
*mDeleted = false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~Foo() {
|
|
|
|
*mDeleted = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
bool* mDeleted;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
Revert "Revert "Fix wp and sp comparison bugs""
Fix wp and sp comparison bugs
Make clear() actually clear wp m_refs, so that nulls compare equal.
Make equality consistent with < and >, ensuring that a weak pointer
cannot be both equal to and greater than another.
Don't rely on the built-in < and > operators to correctly order
different objects. The standard does not guarantee that, and there is
a risk of compiler relying on that lack of guarantee.
Remove unnecessary comparison overloads, especially those
comparing a wp<> to an sp<>.
Change the remaining wp<> to sp<> comparisons to check for equivalence
of the mRefs pointer instead of the object address, thus eliminating
the dubious equal comparison result for a dead wp<> and an sp<> that
happen to point to the same object address.
Add comparison tests.
This reverts commit a2a2ad805775ea88f25388677aa37e0492a492c4.
The original code, and my original CL, both failed to initialize m_refs
in various wp<> constructors. This now became more important, since
comparisons now rely more on m_refs. However I believe it was always
a bug, since some comparisons always relied on m_refs.
Test: Treehugger, boot AOSP, atest RefBase
Bug: 126922090
This reverts commit a2a2ad805775ea88f25388677aa37e0492a492c4.
Reason for revert: Reapply after constructor fixes.
Change-Id: I2c8917416a2306e36d2b6bb7b397f653020e5688
2019-03-13 18:34:46 +01:00
|
|
|
// A version of Foo that ensures that all objects are allocated at the same
|
|
|
|
// address. No more than one can be allocated at a time. Thread-hostile.
|
|
|
|
class FooFixedAlloc : public RefBase {
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
static void* operator new(size_t size) {
|
|
|
|
if (mAllocCount != 0) {
|
|
|
|
abort();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mAllocCount = 1;
|
|
|
|
if (theMemory == nullptr) {
|
|
|
|
theMemory = malloc(size);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return theMemory;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void operator delete(void *p) {
|
|
|
|
if (mAllocCount != 1 || p != theMemory) {
|
|
|
|
abort();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mAllocCount = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FooFixedAlloc(bool* deleted_check) : mDeleted(deleted_check) {
|
|
|
|
*mDeleted = false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~FooFixedAlloc() {
|
|
|
|
*mDeleted = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
bool* mDeleted;
|
|
|
|
static int mAllocCount;
|
|
|
|
static void* theMemory;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int FooFixedAlloc::mAllocCount(0);
|
|
|
|
void* FooFixedAlloc::theMemory(nullptr);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-02 00:29:55 +02:00
|
|
|
TEST(RefBase, StrongMoves) {
|
|
|
|
bool isDeleted;
|
|
|
|
Foo* foo = new Foo(&isDeleted);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(INITIAL_STRONG_VALUE, foo->getStrongCount());
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(isDeleted) << "Already deleted...?";
|
|
|
|
sp<Foo> sp1(foo);
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo> wp1(sp1);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(1, foo->getStrongCount());
|
|
|
|
// Weak count includes both strong and weak references.
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(2, foo->getWeakRefs()->getWeakCount());
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
sp<Foo> sp2 = std::move(sp1);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(1, foo->getStrongCount())
|
|
|
|
<< "std::move failed, incremented refcnt";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(nullptr, sp1.get()) << "std::move failed, sp1 is still valid";
|
|
|
|
// The strong count isn't increasing, let's double check the old object
|
|
|
|
// is properly reset and doesn't early delete
|
|
|
|
sp1 = std::move(sp2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(isDeleted) << "deleted too early! still has a reference!";
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Now let's double check it deletes on time
|
|
|
|
sp<Foo> sp2 = std::move(sp1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(isDeleted) << "foo was leaked!";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1.promote().get() == nullptr);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST(RefBase, WeakCopies) {
|
|
|
|
bool isDeleted;
|
|
|
|
Foo* foo = new Foo(&isDeleted);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(0, foo->getWeakRefs()->getWeakCount());
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(isDeleted) << "Foo (weak) already deleted...?";
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo> wp1(foo);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(1, foo->getWeakRefs()->getWeakCount());
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo> wp2 = wp1;
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(2, foo->getWeakRefs()->getWeakCount());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(1, foo->getWeakRefs()->getWeakCount());
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(isDeleted) << "deleted too early! still has a reference!";
|
|
|
|
wp1 = nullptr;
|
2016-08-03 03:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(isDeleted) << "Deletion on wp destruction should no longer occur";
|
2016-06-02 00:29:55 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Revert "Revert "Fix wp and sp comparison bugs""
Fix wp and sp comparison bugs
Make clear() actually clear wp m_refs, so that nulls compare equal.
Make equality consistent with < and >, ensuring that a weak pointer
cannot be both equal to and greater than another.
Don't rely on the built-in < and > operators to correctly order
different objects. The standard does not guarantee that, and there is
a risk of compiler relying on that lack of guarantee.
Remove unnecessary comparison overloads, especially those
comparing a wp<> to an sp<>.
Change the remaining wp<> to sp<> comparisons to check for equivalence
of the mRefs pointer instead of the object address, thus eliminating
the dubious equal comparison result for a dead wp<> and an sp<> that
happen to point to the same object address.
Add comparison tests.
This reverts commit a2a2ad805775ea88f25388677aa37e0492a492c4.
The original code, and my original CL, both failed to initialize m_refs
in various wp<> constructors. This now became more important, since
comparisons now rely more on m_refs. However I believe it was always
a bug, since some comparisons always relied on m_refs.
Test: Treehugger, boot AOSP, atest RefBase
Bug: 126922090
This reverts commit a2a2ad805775ea88f25388677aa37e0492a492c4.
Reason for revert: Reapply after constructor fixes.
Change-Id: I2c8917416a2306e36d2b6bb7b397f653020e5688
2019-03-13 18:34:46 +01:00
|
|
|
TEST(RefBase, Comparisons) {
|
|
|
|
bool isDeleted, isDeleted2, isDeleted3;
|
|
|
|
Foo* foo = new Foo(&isDeleted);
|
|
|
|
Foo* foo2 = new Foo(&isDeleted2);
|
|
|
|
sp<Foo> sp1(foo);
|
|
|
|
sp<Foo> sp2(foo2);
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo> wp1(sp1);
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo> wp2(sp1);
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo> wp3(sp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 == wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 == sp1);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp3 == sp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 != sp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 <= wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 >= wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp1 != wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp1 > wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp1 < wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(sp1 == sp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(sp1 != sp2);
|
|
|
|
bool sp1_smaller = sp1 < sp2;
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo>wp_smaller = sp1_smaller ? wp1 : wp3;
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo>wp_larger = sp1_smaller ? wp3 : wp1;
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp_smaller < wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp_smaller != wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp_smaller <= wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp_smaller == wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp_smaller > wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp_smaller >= wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
sp2 = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(isDeleted2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(isDeleted);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp3 == sp2);
|
|
|
|
// Comparison results on weak pointers should not be affected.
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp_smaller < wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp_smaller != wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp_smaller <= wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp_smaller == wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp_smaller > wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp_smaller >= wp_larger);
|
|
|
|
wp2 = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp1 == wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 != wp2);
|
|
|
|
wp1.clear();
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 == wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp1 != wp2);
|
|
|
|
wp3.clear();
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 == wp3);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp1 != wp3);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(isDeleted);
|
|
|
|
sp1.clear();
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(isDeleted);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(sp1 == sp2);
|
|
|
|
// Try to check that null pointers are properly initialized.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Try once with non-null, to maximize chances of getting junk on the
|
|
|
|
// stack.
|
|
|
|
sp<Foo> sp3(new Foo(&isDeleted3));
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo> wp4(sp3);
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo> wp5;
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp4 == wp5);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp4 != wp5);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(sp3 == wp5);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp5 == sp3);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(sp3 != wp5);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp5 != sp3);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(sp3 == wp4);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
sp<Foo> sp3;
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo> wp4(sp3);
|
|
|
|
wp<Foo> wp5;
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp4 == wp5);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp4 != wp5);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(sp3 == wp5);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp5 == sp3);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(sp3 != wp5);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp5 != sp3);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(sp3 == wp4);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check whether comparison against dead wp works, even if the object referenced
|
|
|
|
// by the new wp happens to be at the same address.
|
|
|
|
TEST(RefBase, ReplacedComparison) {
|
|
|
|
bool isDeleted, isDeleted2;
|
|
|
|
FooFixedAlloc* foo = new FooFixedAlloc(&isDeleted);
|
|
|
|
sp<FooFixedAlloc> sp1(foo);
|
|
|
|
wp<FooFixedAlloc> wp1(sp1);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 == sp1);
|
|
|
|
sp1.clear(); // Deallocates the object.
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(isDeleted);
|
|
|
|
FooFixedAlloc* foo2 = new FooFixedAlloc(&isDeleted2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(isDeleted2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(foo, foo2); // Not technically a legal comparison, but ...
|
|
|
|
sp<FooFixedAlloc> sp2(foo2);
|
|
|
|
wp<FooFixedAlloc> wp2(sp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(sp2 == wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(sp2 != wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(sp2 != wp1);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(sp2 == wp1);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(sp2 == sp1); // sp1 is null.
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp1 == wp2); // wp1 refers to old object.
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 != wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 > wp2 || wp1 < wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 >= wp2 || wp1 <= wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp1 >= wp2 && wp1 <= wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp1 == nullptr);
|
|
|
|
wp1 = sp2;
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(wp1 == wp2);
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(wp1 != wp2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-06-02 00:29:55 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Set up a situation in which we race with visit2AndRremove() to delete
|
|
|
|
// 2 strong references. Bar destructor checks that there are no early
|
|
|
|
// deletions and prior updates are visible to destructor.
|
|
|
|
class Bar : public RefBase {
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
Bar(std::atomic<int>* delete_count) : mVisited1(false), mVisited2(false),
|
|
|
|
mDeleteCount(delete_count) {
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~Bar() {
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(mVisited1);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(mVisited2);
|
|
|
|
(*mDeleteCount)++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool mVisited1;
|
|
|
|
bool mVisited2;
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
std::atomic<int>* mDeleteCount;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static sp<Bar> buffer;
|
|
|
|
static std::atomic<bool> bufferFull(false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait until bufferFull has value val.
|
|
|
|
static inline void waitFor(bool val) {
|
|
|
|
while (bufferFull != val) {}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpu_set_t otherCpus;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-03 03:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
// Divide the cpus we're allowed to run on into myCpus and otherCpus.
|
|
|
|
// Set origCpus to the processors we were originally allowed to run on.
|
|
|
|
// Return false if origCpus doesn't include at least processors 0 and 1.
|
|
|
|
static bool setExclusiveCpus(cpu_set_t* origCpus /* out */,
|
|
|
|
cpu_set_t* myCpus /* out */, cpu_set_t* otherCpus) {
|
|
|
|
if (sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), origCpus) != 0) {
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!CPU_ISSET(0, origCpus) || !CPU_ISSET(1, origCpus)) {
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
CPU_ZERO(myCpus);
|
|
|
|
CPU_ZERO(otherCpus);
|
|
|
|
CPU_OR(myCpus, myCpus, origCpus);
|
|
|
|
CPU_OR(otherCpus, otherCpus, origCpus);
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
// I get the even cores, the other thread gets the odd ones.
|
|
|
|
if (i & 1) {
|
|
|
|
CPU_CLR(i, myCpus);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
CPU_CLR(i, otherCpus);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-02 00:29:55 +02:00
|
|
|
static void visit2AndRemove() {
|
|
|
|
if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &otherCpus) != 0) {
|
|
|
|
FAIL() << "setaffinity returned:" << errno;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < NITERS; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
waitFor(true);
|
|
|
|
buffer->mVisited2 = true;
|
|
|
|
buffer = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
bufferFull = false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST(RefBase, RacingDestructors) {
|
|
|
|
cpu_set_t origCpus;
|
|
|
|
cpu_set_t myCpus;
|
|
|
|
// Restrict us and the helper thread to disjoint cpu sets.
|
|
|
|
// This prevents us from getting scheduled against each other,
|
2016-08-03 03:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
// which would be atrociously slow.
|
|
|
|
if (setExclusiveCpus(&origCpus, &myCpus, &otherCpus)) {
|
2016-06-02 00:29:55 +02:00
|
|
|
std::thread t(visit2AndRemove);
|
|
|
|
std::atomic<int> deleteCount(0);
|
|
|
|
if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &myCpus) != 0) {
|
|
|
|
FAIL() << "setaffinity returned:" << errno;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < NITERS; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
waitFor(false);
|
|
|
|
Bar* bar = new Bar(&deleteCount);
|
|
|
|
sp<Bar> sp3(bar);
|
|
|
|
buffer = sp3;
|
|
|
|
bufferFull = true;
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(bar->getStrongCount() >= 1);
|
|
|
|
// Weak count includes strong count.
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(bar->getWeakRefs()->getWeakCount() >= 1);
|
|
|
|
sp3->mVisited1 = true;
|
|
|
|
sp3 = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
t.join();
|
|
|
|
if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &origCpus) != 0) {
|
|
|
|
FAIL();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(NITERS, deleteCount) << "Deletions missed!";
|
|
|
|
} // Otherwise this is slow and probably pointless on a uniprocessor.
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-08-03 03:39:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static wp<Bar> wpBuffer;
|
|
|
|
static std::atomic<bool> wpBufferFull(false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait until wpBufferFull has value val.
|
|
|
|
static inline void wpWaitFor(bool val) {
|
|
|
|
while (wpBufferFull != val) {}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void visit3AndRemove() {
|
|
|
|
if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &otherCpus) != 0) {
|
|
|
|
FAIL() << "setaffinity returned:" << errno;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < NITERS; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
wpWaitFor(true);
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
sp<Bar> sp1 = wpBuffer.promote();
|
|
|
|
// We implicitly check that sp1 != NULL
|
|
|
|
sp1->mVisited2 = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
wpBuffer = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
wpBufferFull = false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST(RefBase, RacingPromotions) {
|
|
|
|
cpu_set_t origCpus;
|
|
|
|
cpu_set_t myCpus;
|
|
|
|
// Restrict us and the helper thread to disjoint cpu sets.
|
|
|
|
// This prevents us from getting scheduled against each other,
|
|
|
|
// which would be atrociously slow.
|
|
|
|
if (setExclusiveCpus(&origCpus, &myCpus, &otherCpus)) {
|
|
|
|
std::thread t(visit3AndRemove);
|
|
|
|
std::atomic<int> deleteCount(0);
|
|
|
|
if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &myCpus) != 0) {
|
|
|
|
FAIL() << "setaffinity returned:" << errno;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < NITERS; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
Bar* bar = new Bar(&deleteCount);
|
|
|
|
wp<Bar> wp1(bar);
|
|
|
|
bar->mVisited1 = true;
|
|
|
|
if (i % (NITERS / 10) == 0) {
|
|
|
|
// Do this rarely, since it generates a log message.
|
|
|
|
wp1 = nullptr; // No longer destroys the object.
|
|
|
|
wp1 = bar;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
wpBuffer = wp1;
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(bar->getWeakRefs()->getWeakCount(), 2);
|
|
|
|
wpBufferFull = true;
|
|
|
|
// Promotion races with that in visit3AndRemove.
|
|
|
|
// This may or may not succeed, but it shouldn't interfere with
|
|
|
|
// the concurrent one.
|
|
|
|
sp<Bar> sp1 = wp1.promote();
|
|
|
|
wpWaitFor(false); // Waits for other thread to drop strong pointer.
|
|
|
|
sp1 = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
// No strong pointers here.
|
|
|
|
sp1 = wp1.promote();
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(sp1.get(), nullptr) << "Dead wp promotion succeeded!";
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
t.join();
|
|
|
|
if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &origCpus) != 0) {
|
|
|
|
FAIL();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(NITERS, deleteCount) << "Deletions missed!";
|
|
|
|
} // Otherwise this is slow and probably pointless on a uniprocessor.
|
|
|
|
}
|