am skip reason: Change-Id Id27009250090a65fbb45bb65fc39c1799bf1f861 with SHA-1 3c1803cab5 is in history
Change-Id: If880db4c67dea1de95d9cfcc49e39f91a4288f34
The size fields in the data descriptor can be either 4 bytes or 8 bytes.
This depends on if the size are read from the zip64 extended field in
the local file header. This cl adds support to parse these cases.
Also fix a misconception in that the uncompressed and compressed size
doesn't need to exist together in the zip64 fields of the central
directory. But they still need to co-exist in the fields of the local
file header.
Bug: 150900468
Test: unit tests pass, python tests pass
Change-Id: Ia54f9bf56c85ff456ead90a136f7fddc5be5220c
There is a chance that devices are failing to reboot in the lab due to
sync() taking explicitly long during reboot. Let's add the sync()'s
here to ensure they get accounted for in the flashing process.
A side benefit is it's likely safer to sync immediately after
flashing than to hope init does it during reboot.
Bug: 150863651
Test: flash local devices successfully
Change-Id: I4c4b0114f3cde8af4b8b2cb283ec21f869ef9f6f
This was sometimes causing build ids to be truncated, probably because
of memory corruption in std::string. A similar off-by-one was fixed in
ReadBuildID in aosp/939619.
Bug: 129873279
Change-Id: I401fe7f991dbd135f5b4836381b48ea3c6a2243f
Incremental doesn't support apex installation, but we were exiting
instead of returning -1 to fall back to regular installation.
Bug: http://b/151900478
Test: manual
Change-Id: Id27009250090a65fbb45bb65fc39c1799bf1f861
Merged-In: Id27009250090a65fbb45bb65fc39c1799bf1f861
This CL turns on the incremental installation for all
"adb install ..." commands where no explicit mode has been set.
To disable this, set the ADB_INSTALL_DEFAULT_INCREMENTAL
environment variable to 0/n/no/false. Unset to enable back
+ improve the install command argument parsing a bit: allow
--wait for all installation modes, --incr is enough for
an incremental install (and --no-incr to disable it)
Bug: 150183149
Test: adb install with different apks and command line switches
Change-Id: I1a237f34b70d920146746ab16104e28ef555a5fd
Merged-In: I1a237f34b70d920146746ab16104e28ef555a5fd
am skip reason: Change-Id I7118025cc20081a200000bf484a08c9ed0b0d3ec with SHA-1 14f4afd2f2 is in history
Change-Id: Ibedea64551ae3f2b7f24c16726524f185a45ea9d
The dependency path that determined libprocessgroup is in the
com.android.os.statsd APEX is:
com.android.os.statsd
shared lib -> libstatspull
static lib -> libutils
shared lib -> libprocessgroup
Bug: 152762638
Test: m droid
Change-Id: Idf5d93085f926cc4fbeba40cbe03684c49baab72
Incremental doesn't support apex installation, but we were exiting
instead of returning -1 to fall back to regular installation.
Bug: http://b/151900478
Test: manual
Change-Id: Id27009250090a65fbb45bb65fc39c1799bf1f861
Bug: 152630580
Bug: 152637928
Bug: 152662041
Bug: 152662652
Test: this test is skipped when run as non-root
Merged-In: I7118025cc20081a200000bf484a08c9ed0b0d3ec
Change-Id: I7118025cc20081a200000bf484a08c9ed0b0d3ec
(cherry picked from commit 14f4afd2f2)
This patch removed the old writeout policy tune which was never touched since
2009. In the meantime, most of Android devices are equipped with over 4GB DRAM
and very fast flash storages like UFS, which becomes more like desktop or
servers in 2009. So, it'd be worth to go back to use the default kernel configs.
Bug: 129751503
Change-Id: Idb58f5b01bbc4afd270cffba5b8912ea3565819f
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@google.com>
Temporarily delete adb_benchmark, since it seems difficult to make this
sensibly work with a single target that's used for both libadb and
libadbd benchmarking.
Bug: http://b/150317254
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Ibf81fdff4f2b7304b586ce9a7955b4bc2c11484e
This code path is effectively dead in adbd, and fastboot's dependency on
libadbd makes it hard to refactor adbd's dependencies.
Bug: http://b/150317254
Test: built and flashed aosp_walleye-eng
Change-Id: I5118136d32fdcbbd011559ed0a4a71e1dc7bf064
General recommendation is to avoid read-only properties, and instead control
"read-onlines" by only allowing init/vendor_init to set the property.
Since ro.init.userspace_reboot.is_supported was added in this release, and
nobody outside of the platform is querying it directly, it should be fine to
simply rename it.
Test: adb shell getprop init.userspace_reboot.is_supported
Test: atest CtsUserspaceRebootHostSideTestCases
Bug: 152803929
Change-Id: I7552d5ccc6e9b750a6081947eef8fcb027be13e1
