We were ending up with multiple copies of the proto runtime in the
recovery image, when we need zero.
Before:
784K recovery/root/system/lib64/libadbd_services.so
832K recovery/root/system/lib64/libadbd.so
After:
360K recovery/root/system/lib64/libadbd_services.so
344K recovery/root/system/lib64/libadbd.so
Bug: http://b/150317254
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I39fbb3959128994f0de2ae0ea47dbc0800c516fe
libselinux is currently being copied to APEXes. This is risky because
the library is not designed to be portable; part of it is tied to the
specific version of the Android that it was developed for.
This change fixes the problem by declaring that the library supports
a stub with the list of C APIs that are included in the stub. Then there
is only one copy of libselinux in /system/lib and other APEXes use the
copy by dynamically linking to it.
Also, adbd no longer statically links to it, because doing so brings
libselinux in it.
Bug: 151053366
Test: m com.android.adbd. It doesn't include libselinux in it.
Test: m com.android.adbd-deps-info. then inspect
out/soong/com.android.adbd-deps-info.txt. The dependency to libselinux
is shown as '(external)'.
Change-Id: If418cbe3abdeacb759d59052e6dca4c2067678dd
With some internal API changing from "const char*" to
"const std::string&", we can change a couple calling sites to
directly pass a std::string reference, instead of getting the
c_str() version of the string. This avoids us creating a
temporary std::string for the call.
Test: TreeHugger
Change-Id: I2fe0760ce8bf7d352010a341005356c0a801d351
liblog is a platform library that provides stable C API. There is no
need to include the library, especialy by statically linking to it, in
any APEX. It not only wastes the storage/ram, but also is incorrect
because the socket interface to logd which is implemented in liblog is
not guaranteed to be stable.
Fixing this issue by converting static_libs: ["liblog"] into
shared_libs: ["liblog"], in which case the dependency to the library
is satisfied via the stub variant of the library.
As a result, we could restrict the availablity of the library to
the platform and the runtime APEX.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: already approved when this was in internal
master (ag/10572699)
Bug: http://b/151051671
Bug: http://b/150827719
Test: m
Change-Id: I5aab863cb12b8767b6979255c247000a59355b0e
For currently unknown reasons, sideloading is broken with
libadbd_services as a cc_library_static.
Partial revert of commit a9b62d5452.
Bug: http://b/151056300
Test: xunchang@ tested manually
Change-Id: Iaffad9c476ba0adcffc5db512ba4a7ee0fb5cb22
* mdns.cpp:153:20: warning: an integer is interpreted as a character code
when assigning it to a string; if this is intended, cast the integer to
the appropriate character type; if you want a string representation, use
the appropriate conversion facility [bugprone-string-integer-assignment]
Test: WITH_TIDY=1 make
Change-Id: Id9a790ac31722c6ee8886703939977b913ce95fe
In particular, always include the file name in the log.
Bug: http://b/144462309
Test: adb kill-server && adb devices -l && cat /tmp/adb.*.log
Change-Id: I66b5e063b00381f9dfa9ace222cad3e415e4f43b
Add a "track-app" service in adbd. For every debuggable or
profileable-from-shell process, ART sends related info to
adbd and adbd surfaces the info through the "track-app"
service.
The output format of "track-app" is a line summarizing
the number of reported processes, followed by a protobuf
message in human readable form. For example,
Process count: 2
process {
pid: 3307
profileable: true
architecture: "arm64"
}
process {
pid: 3341
debuggable: true
profileable: true
architecture: "arm64"
}
Bug: 149050485
Test: manually unplugged/replugged, "adb track-app",
"adb track-jdwp"
Change-Id: Id1f1a920e1afc148c7e4d2add790baab796178e1
Previously, we were waiting for the other end to respond after every
file sent, which results in massive slowdown when there's any amount of
latency on the transport.
This improves performance on a cuttlefish instance with ~7ms RTT from:
system/: 2037 files pushed, 0 skipped. 2.8 MB/s (762803979 bytes in 262.964s)
to:
system/: 2037 files pushed, 0 skipped. 11.9 MB/s (762803979 bytes in 61.278s)
Bug: https://issuetracker.google.com/150827486
Test: ./test_device.py
Change-Id: I3a0c893faa5d455cc6ccbc86915a17e1b5abbfbe
Will re-enable once flaky failure is fixed.
Bug: 150529485
Bug: 150388912
Test: atest adb_pairing_connection_test doesn't run above test.
Change-Id: I63ac3fc2fd2d289b977dd3b9f6eccfb65866769c
Add some requested logging options that can be turned on at runtime
without having to restart adbd.
Bug: http://b/141959374
Test: manual
Change-Id: Ib97acc6d199e0b91238a6758e18b7cb75f8688d9
Also remove statically linking libc++, because these libraries are not
exported native shared libraries.
We are slightly over the 12MB limit for ramdisk recovery size, so let's
remove the adb pairing libraries, since they won't be used in recovery
mode.
These are only used in normal boot mode, and currently, only by adb
client. The pairing server is used by system server.
Bug: 150317254
Test: Check size of ramdisk-recovery.img in walleye, walleye-hwasam
build to be under 12MB. Also verify installed-files-recovery.txt no
longer contains libadb_pairing*.
Also put phone into recovery mode, check system/lib64 for no
libadb_pairing*.
Change-Id: Ida7c4fdc9dda2b09091b853feac8df8f125e4274
Merged-In: Ida7c4fdc9dda2b09091b853feac8df8f125e4274
(cherry picked from commit afc2cf0dec)
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick
If we get unlucky and something else (or ourselves, in another thread)
beats us to listening on our hardcoded ports, we can deadlock.
Bug: http://b//149829737
Test: ./test_adb.py
Change-Id: I8f14004a6b2e77366abad6e88786ea8941629020
Mark updatable APEXes as updatable: true so that they are opted-out from
optimizations that make sense only for non-updatable modules; such as
symlinking to the libs in the system partition.
Bug: 149805758
Test: m and check that there is no symlink from the APEX to the system
partition.
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: cherry-pick from internal
Merged-In: Ic3edc7e285e9eafbdaa20b18ccbc0b2231370779
(cherry picked from commit 7c2ae1f02c)
Change-Id: Ic3edc7e285e9eafbdaa20b18ccbc0b2231370779
This broke because two CLs touching the Android.bp file both
independently passed presubmit, but failed when combined.
Clean up a misindentation while we're at it.
Bug: http://b/150032367
Test: mma in system/core/adb
Change-Id: I091ef9dec806c767ffb21a5fd73b2bb37ab29ff9
Without this, the caller is likely to assume that their buffer is
fully usable, which clang's analyzer doesn't believe is the case.
Another option is to set `*size` to nonzero.
Caught by the static analyzer:
system/core/adb/client/incremental_server.cpp:111:31: warning: 1st
function call argument is an uninitialized value
[clang-analyzer-core.CallAndMessage]
Bug: None
Test: TreeHugger
Change-Id: Ib844aa4ab3ebb297ca8f6f4289bbe3212275275b
This command will be sent by adbd to notify the client that the
connection will be over TLS.
When client connects, it will send the CNXN packet, as usual. If the
server connection has TLS enabled, it will send the A_STLS packet
(regardless of whether auth is required). At this point, the client's
only valid response is to send a A_STLS packet. Once both sides have
exchanged the A_STLS packet, both will start the TLS handshake.
If auth is required, then the client will receive a CertificateRequest
with a list of known public keys (SHA256 hash) that it can use in its
certificate. Otherwise, the list will be empty and the client can assume
that either any key will work, or none will work.
If the handshake was successful, the server will send the CNXN packet
and the usual adb protocol is resumed over TLS. If the handshake failed,
both sides will disconnect, as there's no point to retry because the
server's known keys have already been communicated.
Bug: 111434128
Test: WIP; will add to adb_test.py/adb_device.py.
Enable wireless debugging in the Settings, then 'adb connect
<ip>:<port>'. Connection should succeed if key is in keystore. Used
wireshark to check for packet encryption.
Change-Id: I3d60647491c6c6b92297e4f628707a6457fa9420
Bug: 111434128, 119493510, 119494503
Test: Enable wireless debugging in Settings UI, click "pair with pairing code"
to generate pairing code.
On client, 'adb pair <ip_address>', enter pairing code at prompt and hit
enter. Pairing should complete.
'adb logcat'.
Change-Id: I86527bd3fc52e30a8e08ec5843dc3e100abf91fa
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: approved already
Dynamic linker will use generated linker configuration in general. As
ld.config.txt file in the APEX module will not be used, we can remove
this to avoid confusion.
Bug: 149887007
Test: m -j passed
Test: Boot succeeded from cuttlefish and walleye
Change-Id: Ic98aca819b5a4d0e0af4fe0ea25145a483aa7d53
We were previously statically linking libcutils into adbd for several
different reasons, which were addressed as follows:
socket functions: extracted to a statically linked libcutils_network
fs_config: wrapped with a shared library on /system
ATRACE: deleted the single use in adbd
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I821fa174cfcbfa8e29a4be10de4016b817adbaf8
