platform_system_sepolicy/tests/sepolicy_tests.py

226 lines
8.6 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

# Copyright 2021 The Android Open Source Project
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
from optparse import OptionParser
from optparse import Option, OptionValueError
import os
import pkgutil
import policy
import re
import shutil
import sys
import tempfile
SHARED_LIB_EXTENSION = '.dylib' if sys.platform == 'darwin' else '.so'
#############################################################
# Tests
#############################################################
def TestDataTypeViolations(pol):
return pol.AssertPathTypesHaveAttr(["/data/"], [], "data_file_type")
def TestSystemTypeViolations(pol):
partitions = ["/system/", "/system_ext/", "/product/"]
exceptions = [
# devices before treble don't have a vendor partition
"/system/vendor/",
# overlay files are mounted over vendor
"/product/overlay/",
"/product/vendor_overlay/",
"/system/overlay/",
"/system/product/overlay/",
"/system/product/vendor_overlay/",
"/system/system_ext/overlay/",
"/system_ext/overlay/",
]
return pol.AssertPathTypesHaveAttr(partitions, exceptions, "system_file_type")
much more finegrained bpf selinux privs for networking mainline Goal is to gain a better handle on who has access to which maps and to allow (with bpfloader changes to create in one directory and move into the target directory) per-map selection of selinux context, while still having reasonable defaults for stuff pinned directly into the target location. BPFFS (ie. /sys/fs/bpf) labelling is as follows: subdirectory selinux context mainline usecase / usable by / fs_bpf no (*) core operating system (ie. platform) /net_private fs_bpf_net_private yes, T+ network_stack /net_shared fs_bpf_net_shared yes, T+ network_stack & system_server /netd_readonly fs_bpf_netd_readonly yes, T+ network_stack & system_server & r/o to netd /netd_shared fs_bpf_netd_shared yes, T+ network_stack & system_server & netd [**] /tethering fs_bpf_tethering yes, S+ network_stack /vendor fs_bpf_vendor no, T+ vendor * initial support for bpf was added back in P, but things worked differently back then with no bpfloader, and instead netd doing stuff by hand, bpfloader with pinning into /sys/fs/bpf was (I believe) added in Q (and was definitely there in R) ** additionally bpf programs are accesible to netutils_wrapper for use by iptables xt_bpf extensions 'mainline yes' currently means shipped by the com.android.tethering apex, but this is really another case of bad naming, as it's really the 'networking/connectivity/tethering' apex / mainline module. Long term the plan is to merge a few other networking mainline modules into it (and maybe give it a saner name...). The reason for splitting net_private vs tethering is that: S+ must support 4.9+ kernels and S era bpfloader v0.2+ T+ must support 4.14+ kernels and T beta3 era bpfloader v0.13+ The kernel affects the intelligence of the in-kernel bpf verifier and the available bpf helper functions. Older kernels have a tendency to reject programs that newer kernels allow. / && /vendor are not shipped via mainline, so only need to work with the bpfloader that's part of the core os. Bug: 218408035 Test: TreeHugger, manually on cuttlefish Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com> Change-Id: I674866ebe32aca4fc851818c1ffcbec12ac4f7d4 (cherry picked from commit 15715aea32b85c933778b97a46de6ccab42ca7fb)
2022-05-21 14:03:29 +02:00
def TestBpffsTypeViolations(pol):
return pol.AssertGenfsFilesystemTypesHaveAttr("bpf", "bpffs_type")
def TestProcTypeViolations(pol):
return pol.AssertGenfsFilesystemTypesHaveAttr("proc", "proc_type")
def TestSysfsTypeViolations(pol):
ret = pol.AssertGenfsFilesystemTypesHaveAttr("sysfs", "sysfs_type")
ret += pol.AssertPathTypesHaveAttr(["/sys/"], ["/sys/kernel/debug/",
"/sys/kernel/tracing"], "sysfs_type")
return ret
def TestDebugfsTypeViolations(pol):
ret = pol.AssertGenfsFilesystemTypesHaveAttr("debugfs", "debugfs_type")
ret += pol.AssertPathTypesHaveAttr(["/sys/kernel/debug/",
"/sys/kernel/tracing"], [], "debugfs_type")
return ret
def TestTracefsTypeViolations(pol):
ret = pol.AssertGenfsFilesystemTypesHaveAttr("tracefs", "tracefs_type")
ret += pol.AssertPathTypesHaveAttr(["/sys/kernel/tracing"], [], "tracefs_type")
ret += pol.AssertPathTypesDoNotHaveAttr(["/sys/kernel/debug"],
["/sys/kernel/debug/tracing"], "tracefs_type",
[])
return ret
def TestVendorTypeViolations(pol):
partitions = ["/vendor/", "/odm/"]
exceptions = [
"/vendor/etc/selinux/",
"/vendor/odm/etc/selinux/",
"/odm/etc/selinux/",
]
return pol.AssertPathTypesHaveAttr(partitions, exceptions, "vendor_file_type")
def TestCoreDataTypeViolations(pol):
return pol.AssertPathTypesHaveAttr(["/data/"], ["/data/vendor",
"/data/vendor_ce", "/data/vendor_de"], "core_data_file_type")
def TestPropertyTypeViolations(pol):
return pol.AssertPropertyOwnersAreExclusive()
def TestAppDataTypeViolations(pol):
# Types with the app_data_file_type should only be used for app data files
# (/data/data/package.name etc) via seapp_contexts, and never applied
# explicitly to other files.
partitions = [
"/data/",
"/vendor/",
"/odm/",
"/product/",
]
exceptions = [
# These are used for app data files for the corresponding user and
# assorted other files.
# TODO(b/172812577): Use different types for the different purposes
"shell_data_file",
"bluetooth_data_file",
"nfc_data_file",
"radio_data_file",
]
return pol.AssertPathTypesDoNotHaveAttr(partitions, [], "app_data_file_type",
exceptions)
def TestDmaHeapDevTypeViolations(pol):
return pol.AssertPathTypesHaveAttr(["/dev/dma_heap/"], [],
"dmabuf_heap_device_type")
###
# extend OptionParser to allow the same option flag to be used multiple times.
# This is used to allow multiple file_contexts files and tests to be
# specified.
#
class MultipleOption(Option):
ACTIONS = Option.ACTIONS + ("extend",)
STORE_ACTIONS = Option.STORE_ACTIONS + ("extend",)
TYPED_ACTIONS = Option.TYPED_ACTIONS + ("extend",)
ALWAYS_TYPED_ACTIONS = Option.ALWAYS_TYPED_ACTIONS + ("extend",)
def take_action(self, action, dest, opt, value, values, parser):
if action == "extend":
values.ensure_value(dest, []).append(value)
else:
Option.take_action(self, action, dest, opt, value, values, parser)
Tests = [
much more finegrained bpf selinux privs for networking mainline Goal is to gain a better handle on who has access to which maps and to allow (with bpfloader changes to create in one directory and move into the target directory) per-map selection of selinux context, while still having reasonable defaults for stuff pinned directly into the target location. BPFFS (ie. /sys/fs/bpf) labelling is as follows: subdirectory selinux context mainline usecase / usable by / fs_bpf no (*) core operating system (ie. platform) /net_private fs_bpf_net_private yes, T+ network_stack /net_shared fs_bpf_net_shared yes, T+ network_stack & system_server /netd_readonly fs_bpf_netd_readonly yes, T+ network_stack & system_server & r/o to netd /netd_shared fs_bpf_netd_shared yes, T+ network_stack & system_server & netd [**] /tethering fs_bpf_tethering yes, S+ network_stack /vendor fs_bpf_vendor no, T+ vendor * initial support for bpf was added back in P, but things worked differently back then with no bpfloader, and instead netd doing stuff by hand, bpfloader with pinning into /sys/fs/bpf was (I believe) added in Q (and was definitely there in R) ** additionally bpf programs are accesible to netutils_wrapper for use by iptables xt_bpf extensions 'mainline yes' currently means shipped by the com.android.tethering apex, but this is really another case of bad naming, as it's really the 'networking/connectivity/tethering' apex / mainline module. Long term the plan is to merge a few other networking mainline modules into it (and maybe give it a saner name...). The reason for splitting net_private vs tethering is that: S+ must support 4.9+ kernels and S era bpfloader v0.2+ T+ must support 4.14+ kernels and T beta3 era bpfloader v0.13+ The kernel affects the intelligence of the in-kernel bpf verifier and the available bpf helper functions. Older kernels have a tendency to reject programs that newer kernels allow. / && /vendor are not shipped via mainline, so only need to work with the bpfloader that's part of the core os. Bug: 218408035 Test: TreeHugger, manually on cuttlefish Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com> Change-Id: I674866ebe32aca4fc851818c1ffcbec12ac4f7d4 (cherry picked from commit 15715aea32b85c933778b97a46de6ccab42ca7fb)
2022-05-21 14:03:29 +02:00
"TestBpffsTypeViolations",
"TestDataTypeViolators",
"TestProcTypeViolations",
"TestSysfsTypeViolations",
"TestSystemTypeViolators",
"TestDebugfsTypeViolations",
"TestTracefsTypeViolations",
"TestVendorTypeViolations",
"TestCoreDataTypeViolations",
"TestPropertyTypeViolations",
"TestAppDataTypeViolations",
"TestDmaHeapDevTypeViolations",
]
def do_main(libpath):
"""
Args:
libpath: string, path to libsepolwrap.so
"""
usage = "sepolicy_tests -f vendor_file_contexts -f "
usage +="plat_file_contexts -p policy [--test test] [--help]"
parser = OptionParser(option_class=MultipleOption, usage=usage)
parser.add_option("-f", "--file_contexts", dest="file_contexts",
metavar="FILE", action="extend", type="string")
parser.add_option("-p", "--policy", dest="policy", metavar="FILE")
parser.add_option("-t", "--test", dest="test", action="extend",
help="Test options include "+str(Tests))
(options, args) = parser.parse_args()
if not options.policy:
sys.exit("Must specify monolithic policy file\n" + parser.usage)
if not os.path.exists(options.policy):
sys.exit("Error: policy file " + options.policy + " does not exist\n"
+ parser.usage)
if not options.file_contexts:
sys.exit("Error: Must specify file_contexts file(s)\n" + parser.usage)
for f in options.file_contexts:
if not os.path.exists(f):
sys.exit("Error: File_contexts file " + f + " does not exist\n" +
parser.usage)
pol = policy.Policy(options.policy, options.file_contexts, libpath)
results = ""
# If an individual test is not specified, run all tests.
much more finegrained bpf selinux privs for networking mainline Goal is to gain a better handle on who has access to which maps and to allow (with bpfloader changes to create in one directory and move into the target directory) per-map selection of selinux context, while still having reasonable defaults for stuff pinned directly into the target location. BPFFS (ie. /sys/fs/bpf) labelling is as follows: subdirectory selinux context mainline usecase / usable by / fs_bpf no (*) core operating system (ie. platform) /net_private fs_bpf_net_private yes, T+ network_stack /net_shared fs_bpf_net_shared yes, T+ network_stack & system_server /netd_readonly fs_bpf_netd_readonly yes, T+ network_stack & system_server & r/o to netd /netd_shared fs_bpf_netd_shared yes, T+ network_stack & system_server & netd [**] /tethering fs_bpf_tethering yes, S+ network_stack /vendor fs_bpf_vendor no, T+ vendor * initial support for bpf was added back in P, but things worked differently back then with no bpfloader, and instead netd doing stuff by hand, bpfloader with pinning into /sys/fs/bpf was (I believe) added in Q (and was definitely there in R) ** additionally bpf programs are accesible to netutils_wrapper for use by iptables xt_bpf extensions 'mainline yes' currently means shipped by the com.android.tethering apex, but this is really another case of bad naming, as it's really the 'networking/connectivity/tethering' apex / mainline module. Long term the plan is to merge a few other networking mainline modules into it (and maybe give it a saner name...). The reason for splitting net_private vs tethering is that: S+ must support 4.9+ kernels and S era bpfloader v0.2+ T+ must support 4.14+ kernels and T beta3 era bpfloader v0.13+ The kernel affects the intelligence of the in-kernel bpf verifier and the available bpf helper functions. Older kernels have a tendency to reject programs that newer kernels allow. / && /vendor are not shipped via mainline, so only need to work with the bpfloader that's part of the core os. Bug: 218408035 Test: TreeHugger, manually on cuttlefish Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com> Change-Id: I674866ebe32aca4fc851818c1ffcbec12ac4f7d4 (cherry picked from commit 15715aea32b85c933778b97a46de6ccab42ca7fb)
2022-05-21 14:03:29 +02:00
if options.test is None or "TestBpffsTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestBpffsTypeViolations(pol)
if options.test is None or "TestDataTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestDataTypeViolations(pol)
if options.test is None or "TestProcTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestProcTypeViolations(pol)
if options.test is None or "TestSysfsTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestSysfsTypeViolations(pol)
if options.test is None or "TestSystemTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestSystemTypeViolations(pol)
if options.test is None or "TestDebugfsTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestDebugfsTypeViolations(pol)
if options.test is None or "TestTracefsTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestTracefsTypeViolations(pol)
if options.test is None or "TestVendorTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestVendorTypeViolations(pol)
if options.test is None or "TestCoreDataTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestCoreDataTypeViolations(pol)
if options.test is None or "TestPropertyTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestPropertyTypeViolations(pol)
if options.test is None or "TestAppDataTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestAppDataTypeViolations(pol)
if options.test is None or "TestDmaHeapDevTypeViolations" in options.test:
results += TestDmaHeapDevTypeViolations(pol)
if len(results) > 0:
sys.exit(results)
if __name__ == '__main__':
temp_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp()
try:
libname = "libsepolwrap" + SHARED_LIB_EXTENSION
libpath = os.path.join(temp_dir, libname)
with open(libpath, "wb") as f:
blob = pkgutil.get_data("sepolicy_tests", libname)
if not blob:
sys.exit("Error: libsepolwrap does not exist. Is this binary corrupted?\n")
f.write(blob)
do_main(libpath)
finally:
shutil.rmtree(temp_dir)