At this point, we still don't understand the root cause of
bug 10290009, or if it's even a real bug. Rollback
29d0d40668 so we an get a device
in this state and figure out the root cause of this problem.
This reverts commit 29d0d40668.
Bug: 10290009
OTAs aren't properly labeling /system, which is causing SELinux
breakage. Temporarily put isolated_app.te and untrusted_app.te
into permissive.
Bug: 9878561
Change-Id: Icaf674ad6b3d59cbca3ae796c930c98ab67cae9c
This is needed to support "Verify App" functionality.
During side loading, the Verify App functionality reads the APK
to determine if it's safe to install.
Bug: 9863154
Change-Id: I33f6b0fd012f6cb194e253d5d92cf6189d6aa222
This is my first attempt at creating an enforcing SELinux domain for
apps, untrusted_apps, and isolated_apps. Much of these rules are based on the
contents of app.te as of commit 11153ef349
with extensive modifications, some of which are included below.
* Allow communication with netd/dnsproxyd, to allow netd to handle
dns requests
* Allow binder communications with the DNS server
* Allow binder communications with surfaceflinger
* Allow an app to bind to tcp/udp ports
* Allow all domains to read files from the root partition, assuming
the DAC allows access.
In addition, I added a bunch of "neverallow" rules, to assert that
certain capabilities are never added.
This change has a high probability of breaking someone, somewhere.
If it does, then I'm happy to fix the breakage, rollback this change,
or put untrusted_app into permissive mode.
Change-Id: I83f220135d20ab4f70fbd7be9401b5b1def1fe35
app.te covers a lot of different apps types (platform_app, media_app,
shared_app, release_app, isolated_app, and untrusted_app), all
of which are going to have slightly different security policies.
Separate the different domains from app.te. Over time, these
files are likely to grow substantially, and mixing different domain types
is a recipe for confusion and mistakes.
No functional change.
Change-Id: Ida4e77fadb510f5993eb2d32f2f7649227edff4f
