0de2b45f63
Commit dc0ab516f11d8e2c413315e733e25a41ba468e4f changed the libsepol structures on which sepolicy-analyze relies so that it could be compiled as a C++ library. Reflect this change in sepolicy-analyze. Change-Id: I7da601767c3a4ebed7274e33304d8b589a9115fe |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
Android.mk | ||
dups.c | ||
dups.h | ||
neverallow.c | ||
neverallow.h | ||
perm.c | ||
perm.h | ||
README | ||
sepolicy-analyze.c | ||
typecmp.c | ||
typecmp.h | ||
utils.c | ||
utils.h |
sepolicy-analyze A component-ized tool for performing various kinds of analysis on a sepolicy file. The current kinds of analysis that are currently supported include: TYPE EQUIVALENCE (typecmp) sepolicy-analyze out/target/product/<board>/root/sepolicy typecmp -e Display all type pairs that are "equivalent", i.e. they are identical with respect to allow rules, including indirect allow rules via attributes and default-enabled conditional rules (i.e. default boolean values yield a true conditional expression). Equivalent types are candidates for being coalesced into a single type. However, there may be legitimate reasons for them to remain separate, for example: - the types may differ in a respect not included in the current analysis, such as default-disabled conditional rules, audit-related rules (auditallow or dontaudit), default type transitions, or constraints (e.g. mls), or - the current policy may be overly permissive with respect to one or the other of the types and thus the correct action may be to tighten access to one or the other rather than coalescing them together, or - the domains that would in fact have different accesses to the types may not yet be defined or may be unconfined in the policy you are analyzing. TYPE DIFFERENCE (typecmp) sepolicy-analyze out/target/product/<board>/root/sepolicy typecmp -d Display type pairs that differ and the first difference found between the two types. This may be used in looking for similar types that are not equivalent but may be candidates for coalescing. DUPLICATE ALLOW RULES (dups) sepolicy-analyze out/target/product/<board>/root/sepolicy dups Displays duplicate allow rules, i.e. pairs of allow rules that grant the same permissions where one allow rule is written directly in terms of individual types and the other is written in terms of attributes associated with those same types. The rule with individual types is a candidate for removal. The rule with individual types may be directly represented in the source policy or may be a result of expansion of a type negation (e.g. domain -foo -bar is expanded to individual allow rules by the policy compiler). Domains with unconfineddomain will typically have such duplicate rules as a natural side effect and can be ignored. PERMISSIVE DOMAINS (permissive) sepolicy-analyze out/target/product/<board>/root/sepolicy permissive Displays domains in the policy that are permissive, i.e. avc denials are logged but not enforced for these domains. While permissive domains can be helpful during development, they should not be present in a final -user build. NEVERALLOW CHECKING (neverallow) sepolicy-analyze out/target/product/<board>/root/sepolicy neverallow \ [-w] [-d] [-f neverallows.conf] | [-n "neverallow string"] Check whether the sepolicy file violates any of the neverallow rules from the neverallows.conf file or a given string, which contain neverallow statements in the same format as the SELinux policy.conf file, i.e. after m4 macro expansion of the rules from a .te file. You can use an entire policy.conf file as the neverallows.conf file and sepolicy-analyze will ignore everything except for the neverallows within it. You can also specify this as a command-line string argument, which could be useful for quickly checking an individual expanded rule or group of rules. If there are no violations, sepolicy-analyze will exit successfully with no output. Otherwise, sepolicy-analyze will report all violations and exit with a non-zero exit status. The -w or --warn option may be used to warn on any types, attributes, classes, or permissions from a neverallow rule that could not be resolved within the sepolicy file. This can be normal due to differences between the policy from which the neverallow rules were taken and the policy being checked. Such values are ignored for the purposes of neverallow checking. The -d or --debug option may be used to cause sepolicy-analyze to emit the neverallow rules as it parses them. This is principally a debugging facility for the parser but could also be used to extract neverallow rules from a full policy.conf file and output them in a more easily parsed format.