platform_system_sepolicy/public/cameraserver.te
Nick Kralevich 38c12828da Add documentation on neverallow rules
Better document the reasons behind the neverallow for tcp/udp sockets.

Test: policy compiles.
Change-Id: Iee386af3be6fc7495addc9300b5628d0fe61c8e9
2017-02-17 22:37:23 +00:00

42 lines
1.7 KiB
Text

# cameraserver - camera daemon
type cameraserver, domain;
type cameraserver_exec, exec_type, file_type;
binder_use(cameraserver)
binder_call(cameraserver, binderservicedomain)
binder_call(cameraserver, appdomain)
binder_service(cameraserver)
hal_client_domain(cameraserver, hal_camera)
allow cameraserver ion_device:chr_file rw_file_perms;
add_service(cameraserver, cameraserver_service)
allow cameraserver appops_service:service_manager find;
allow cameraserver audioserver_service:service_manager find;
allow cameraserver batterystats_service:service_manager find;
allow cameraserver cameraproxy_service:service_manager find;
allow cameraserver mediaserver_service:service_manager find;
allow cameraserver processinfo_service:service_manager find;
allow cameraserver scheduling_policy_service:service_manager find;
allow cameraserver surfaceflinger_service:service_manager find;
###
### neverallow rules
###
# cameraserver should never execute any executable without a
# domain transition
neverallow cameraserver { file_type fs_type }:file execute_no_trans;
# The goal of the mediaserver split is to place media processing code into
# restrictive sandboxes with limited responsibilities and thus limited
# permissions. Example: Audioserver is only responsible for controlling audio
# hardware and processing audio content. Cameraserver does the same for camera
# hardware/content. Etc.
#
# Media processing code is inherently risky and thus should have limited
# permissions and be isolated from the rest of the system and network.
# Lengthier explanation here:
# https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2016/05/hardening-media-stack.html
neverallow cameraserver domain:{ tcp_socket udp_socket rawip_socket } *;