Bug: http://b/197147102
Bug: http://b/214080353
With https://reviews.llvm.org/D77491, clang got stricter when issuing
diagnostics regarding builtin functions.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112024 adds a diagnose_as_builtin attribute
which lets it diagnose builtins even though their signature is slightly
different. This patch adds diagnose_as_builtin attribute as needed.
Versioner is built with an older clang so it doesn't recognize this
attribute. So this is added with a preprocessor check on clang
versions. We can remove the version check once versioner gets updated
shortly after the compiler update.
Test: mmma bionic/tests with clang-r445002
Change-Id: I3d0d63ecdbea0cffe97eb5110e2d9f2a7595a38e
We've added mallinfo and mallinfo2 to musl, enable the bionic tests
for it. Also modify the comparison test to explicitly cast the
mallinfo fields to size_t, as they are ints in musl.
Bug: 190084016
Test: bionic-unit-tests-glibc --gtest_filter=malloc.*
Change-Id: Ib2a1d6cf698de817c314a61fe29fda85edabb9ed
Fix references to symbols that don't exist in musl in the bionic
benchmarks, and disable the header tests for musl.
Bug: 190084016
Test: m USE_HOST_MUSL=true host-native
Change-Id: I6b1964afa4a7b6e6a4812e9f2605fcfc2fae9691
This change is to allocate `head_` and `tail_` outside of LinkedList
and only keep a readonly pointer there. By doing this, all updates
of the list touches memory other than the LinkedList itself, thus
preventing copy-on-write pages being allocated in child processes
when the list changes.
The other approach is to make the LinkedList a singly-linked list,
however, that approach would cause a full list traversal to add
one item to the list. And preliminary number shows there are ~60K
calls to `soinfo::add_secondary_namespace` during Android bootup
on a wembley device, where a singly-linked approach could be
hurting performance.
NOTE: the header is allocated and initialized upon first use instead
of being allocated in the constructor, the latter ends up in crash.
This is likely caused by static initialization order in the linker,
e.g. g_soinfo_list_allocator is a static object, and if this linked
list is embedded into some other static objects, there's no guarantee
the allocator will be available.
Bug: http://b/206889551
Test: bionic-unit-tests
Change-Id: Ic6f053881f85f9dc5d249bb7d7443d7a9a7f214f
Bug: http://b/214080353
The wrong alignment to aligned_alloc() is deliberate. Silence the
warning around the test.
Test: build with clang-r445002
Change-Id: I73bad7775423c908c2bbe1c550e8ce5aeede129d
The first time should_trace() returns true, bionic_trace_begin() calls
open() on trace_marker.
The problem is that open() can call bionic_trace_begin(). We've observed
this happening, for example when:
* fdtrack is enabled. dlopen("libfdtrack.so") can be used to enable
fdtrack on a process.
* ThreadA is busy unwinding inside fdtrack and is holding an fdtrack
internal mutex.
* ThreadB calls bionic_trace_begin() for the first time since the
property "debug.atrace.tags.enableflags" contains ATRACE_TAG_BIONIC.
* ThreadB calls open("/sys/kernel/tracing/trace_marker"). Since fdtrack
is enabled, ThreadB tries to do unwinding as well.
* ThreadB, inside fdtrack's unwinding tries to grab the same mutex that
ThreadA is holding.
* Mutex contention is reported using bionic_systrace, therefore
bionic_trace_begin() is called again on ThreadB.
* ThreadB tries to grab g_lock in bionin_systrace.cpp, but that's
already held by ThreadB itself, earlier on the stack. Therefore
ThreadB is stuck.
I managed to reproduce the above scenario by manually pausing ThreadA
inside unwinding with a debugger and letting ThreadB hitting
bionic_trace_begin() for the first time.
We could avoid using g_lock while calling open() (either by releasing
g_lock and reacquiring it later, or by using atomics), but
bionic_trace_begin() would try to call open() again. In my tests, open()
does not call bionic_trace_begin() a third time, because fdtrack has
reentrancy protection, but there might be another code path inside open
that calls bionic_trace_begin again (it could be racy or only happen in
certain configurations).
This commit fixes the problem by implementing reentrancy protection in
bionic_systrace.
Sample callstack from ThreadA deadlocked before the fix:
```
* frame #0: 0x0000007436db077c libc.so`syscall at syscall.S:41
frame #1: 0x0000007436db0ba0 libc.so`bionic_trace_begin(char const*) [inlined] __futex(ftx=0x000000743737a548, op=<unavailable>, value=2, timeout=0x0000000000000000, bitset=-1) at bionic_futex.h:45:16
frame #2: 0x0000007436db0b8c libc.so`bionic_trace_begin(char const*) [inlined] __futex_wait_ex(ftx=0x000000743737a548, value=2) at bionic_futex.h:66:10
frame #3: 0x0000007436db0b78 libc.so`bionic_trace_begin(char const*) [inlined] Lock::lock(this=0x000000743737a548) at bionic_lock.h:67:7
frame #4: 0x0000007436db0b74 libc.so`bionic_trace_begin(char const*) [inlined] should_trace() at bionic_systrace.cpp:38:10
frame #5: 0x0000007436db0b74 libc.so`bionic_trace_begin(message="Contending for pthread mutex") at bionic_systrace.cpp:59:8
frame #6: 0x0000007436e193e4 libc.so`NonPI::MutexLockWithTimeout(pthread_mutex_internal_t*, bool, timespec const*) [inlined] NonPI::NormalMutexLock(mutex=0x0000007296cae9f0, shared=0, use_realtime_clock=false, abs_timeout_or_null=0x0000000000000000) at pthread_mutex.cpp:592:17
frame #7: 0x0000007436e193c8 libc.so`NonPI::MutexLockWithTimeout(mutex=0x0000007296cae9f0, use_realtime_clock=false, abs_timeout_or_null=0x0000000000000000) at pthread_mutex.cpp:719:16
frame #8: 0x0000007436e1912c libc.so`::pthread_mutex_lock(mutex_interface=<unavailable>) at pthread_mutex.cpp:839:12 [artificial]
frame #9: 0x00000071a4e5b290 libfdtrack.so`std::__1::mutex::lock() [inlined] std::__1::__libcpp_mutex_lock(__m=<unavailable>) at __threading_support:256:10
frame #10: 0x00000071a4e5b28c libfdtrack.so`std::__1::mutex::lock(this=<unavailable>) at mutex.cpp:31:14
frame #11: 0x00000071a4e32634 libfdtrack.so`unwindstack::Elf::Step(unsigned long, unwindstack::Regs*, unwindstack::Memory*, bool*, bool*) [inlined] std::__1::lock_guard<std::__1::mutex>::lock_guard(__m=0x0000007296cae9f0) at __mutex_base:104:27
frame #12: 0x00000071a4e32618 libfdtrack.so`unwindstack::Elf::Step(this=0x0000007296cae9c0, rel_pc=66116, regs=0x0000007266ca0470, process_memory=0x0000007246caa130, finished=0x0000007ff910efb4, is_signal_frame=0x0000007ff910efb0) at Elf.cpp:206:31
frame #13: 0x00000071a4e2b3b0 libfdtrack.so`unwindstack::LocalUnwinder::Unwind(this=0x00000071a4ea1528, frame_info=<unavailable>, max_frames=34) at LocalUnwinder.cpp:102:22
frame #14: 0x00000071a4e2a3ec libfdtrack.so`fd_hook(event=<unavailable>) at fdtrack.cpp:119:18
frame #15: 0x0000007436dbf684 libc.so`::__open_2(pathname=<unavailable>, flags=<unavailable>) at open.cpp:72:10
frame #16: 0x0000007436db0a04 libc.so`bionic_trace_begin(char const*) [inlined] open(pathname=<unavailable>, flags=524289) at fcntl.h:63:12
frame #17: 0x0000007436db09f0 libc.so`bionic_trace_begin(char const*) [inlined] get_trace_marker_fd() at bionic_systrace.cpp:49:25
frame #18: 0x0000007436db09c0 libc.so`bionic_trace_begin(message="pthread_create") at bionic_systrace.cpp:63:25
```
Bug: 213642769
Change-Id: I10d331859045cb4a8609b007f5c6cf2577ff44df
Unfortunately we have discovered that some applications in the wild
are using PAC instructions incorrectly. To keep those applications
working on PAC enabled devices, disable PAC in application processes
for now.
Bug: 212660282
Change-Id: I3030c47be9d02a27505bd4775c1982a20755758c
Merged-In: I3030c47be9d02a27505bd4775c1982a20755758c
Update the path to the helper binary, and run the test on non-MTE
hardware with the expectation that the bug is not detected.
Test: bionic-unit-tests
Bug: none
Change-Id: I34eb4dc46d0bacd83824d307398f7891d4806686
Unfortunately we have discovered that some applications in the wild
are using PAC instructions incorrectly. To keep those applications
working on PAC enabled devices, disable PAC in application processes
for now.
Bug: 212660282
Change-Id: I3030c47be9d02a27505bd4775c1982a20755758c
